RECOMMENDED PRIOR READING

Scientists have recognised some of the limitations of experimental procedures that are utilised for determining (and thus explaining) truth. This will become an ever-increasing problem. Some reassurance can be obtained from the fact that if we project into our more advanced future, or probabilities, we will see that the mind and consciousness alone are capable of understanding and acquiring all knowledge. In other words, a more evolved civilisation no longer utilises scientific methodology as we know it. However, such an achievement would have to be attained on a slow gradient. Nevertheless these partial abilities already exist and vary greatly amongst individuals. One of the principal components of this ability is intuition; a trait very much neglected and suppressed on this planet. When fully functional it is capable of ascertaining truth without structural context. It is also capable potentially of accessing cellular information that will be found to contain vast data storage, which includes man's true origins.

As stated, these abilities are present today to some degree but with huge variations. Unfortunately, statistically, the more education one receives (as per our educational system) the more dependent the mind becomes on knowing through the physical senses (with the drawback of the accompanying illusions), and having to obtain facts via the scientific method and applying only linear 3D logic. Academics become very upset when they see people claiming knowledge without scientific proof (upon which they have developed a dependence).

We desperately need to recognise that all forms of education on this planet, available through schooling and the media, are subtly developing minds which are over-structuralised (programmed) and context-dependent (fruitlessly using existing information in endeavouring to understand something new).

Today, in addition to knowledge through scientific method we need to accept, gradually, other ways of obtaining certainty of truth. Significant support to this certainty can be obtained from accumulation of information on a subject in question which contains consistency of data and in which some of the material is provable or of obvious truth. Thus, far-fetched items within this body of information are backed up by the consistent context to which they are related. We must also not forget the 'tests of truth' in physics which can lend validation to a particular theory.

The conclusion is that it is possible to know truth to a probable or high degree of certainty, with the advantage of not being totally dependent on scientific methodology, thus enabling ideas to be considered that may be thousands of years ahead of what science is capable of demonstrating at this time. One only has to put two and two together here to realise scientific methodology is being misused, resulting in setting massive limits to human progress (The Deception of Scientific Progress). We might remind the reader that modern science embraces not even the tip of the 'iceberg'; one would have to say, the skin of the tip. Current inadequate scientific instruments plus a lack in the finer spectrum of perception and thought, prevent a recognition of a huge range of energies, rendering them left undetected.

Most of the articles on this website each contribute only a part of a whole paradigm, and therefore sufficient reading is required for a thorough understanding or explanation.

Oct. 4, 2010

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/index.htm