- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

MIT Destroys the Case for Social Distancing

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0


A new study from researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has demonstrated the total ineffectiveness of social distancing at stopping the spread of COVID-19.


The researchers determined that distancing at six feet provides no more protection than distancing at 60 feet. Sadly, this news will likely cause COVID fear cultists to demand mandatory social distancing at 60 feet.

“We argue there really isn’t much of a benefit to the 6-foot rule, especially when people are wearing masks,” Bazant said in an interview.

“It really has no physical basis because the air a person is breathing while wearing a mask tends to rise and comes down elsewhere in the room so you’re more exposed to the average background than you are to a person at a distance,” he continued.

“What our analysis continues to show is that many spaces that have been shut down in fact don’t need to be. Often times the space is large enough, the ventilation is good enough, the amount of time people spend together is such that those spaces can be safely operated even at full capacity and the scientific support for reduced capacity in those spaces is really not very good,” Bazant added. “I think if you run the numbers, even right now for many types of spaces you’d find that there is not a need for occupancy restrictions.”

Big League Politics has reported on how the experts, such as Big Pharma-backed goons with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO), have failed the public throughout the pandemic:

“A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study that has been largely ignored by the fake news media indicates that wearing face masks may not do all that much to prevent individuals from contracting COVID-19. Read more…