FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

STOPPING THE CONGRESS APPROVED TSA AND THE MOLESTING OF OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN !!

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

We are not customers of any Government Agency,

We are their Masters

 

When preparing to enter the TSA check point or any check point for that matter, all you need to remember is some basic information and these words:

 

"I am a Sovereign man/woman, I do not consent, I give you no

Authority over me or my children, I/we deny the benefits, if you impede

my/our natural right to travel or violate any of my/our rights, I'll sue you and

your department head, personally and in your capacity. My fee is $100 per minute if you contract with me by detaining me, am I free to be on my/our way"

 

Where does the power for these words come from?

Their Power comes from:

Common Law:The US Constitution:The US Code:

Are Airports Public Property?

What is Public Property:

1: public property n. property owned by the government or one of its agencies, divisions, or entities. Commonly a reference to parks, playgrounds, streets, sidewalks, schools, libraries and other property regularly used by the general public. (See:common propertyhttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/public+property

 

2: It refers to any property that is owned by government.The government owned property is offered for use of public at large like that of parks, libraries, lakes, pathways etc.http://www.legal-explanations.com/definitions/public-property.htm

common property

 

What is Consent?

1: VoluntaryAcquiescence to the proposal of another; the act or result of reaching an accord; a concurrence of minds; actual willingness that an act or an infringement of an interest shall occur.

Consent is an act of reason and deliberation. A person who possesses and exercises sufficient mental capacity to make an intelligent decision demonstrates consent by performing an act recommended by another. Consent assumes a physical power to act and a reflective, determined, and unencumbered exertion of these powers. It is an act unaffected byFraud, duress, or sometimes even mistake when these factors are not the reason for the consent. Consent is implied in every agreement. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/consent

 

2: consent Law Definition

v

To acquiesce, agree, approve, assent, to voluntarily comply or yield, to give permission to some act or purpose. See alsoacquiescence.                                                     http://law.yourdictionary.com/consent

 

http://www/gpoaccess.gove/uscode/about.html

United States Code: About

NOTE: Of the 50 titles, only 23 have been enacted into positive (statutory) law.

These titles are 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36,

37, 38, 39, 40, 44, 46, and 49. When a title of the Code was enacted into

positive law, the text of the title became legal evidence of the law. Titles that have

not been enacted into positive law are only prima facie evidence of the law. In

that case, the Statutes at Large still govern.

 

(this means that those titles outside of the 23 do not include statutory law, so most of the titles are not even Statutory Law)

 

Prima Facie definition: (Latin) A legal presumption which means on the face of it

or at first sight) http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/P/PrimaFacie.aspx

 

(Domestic Security is in Title 6. Here you'll find much regulation related to

“Homeland Security”. Title 6 is not one of the 23 enacted into statutory law. So

nothing in Title 6 is statutory law.)

 

Statutory law -Laws, or statutes, enacted by legislatures, such as the New Jersey State

Legislature or the United States Congress. www.judiciary.state.nj.us/njcourts-09.htm

 

Statutory law-- Law enacted by the legislative branch of government, as

distinguished from case law or common law. A statute is an act of the legislature

declaring, commanding or prohibiting something.

www.mnbar.org/mocktrial/2007-08/GLOSSARY%20OF%20LEGAL%20TERMS.doc

 

TITLE 5—  GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES                 (Which is Statutory Law)                                                                                               PART I--THE AGENCIES GENERALLY

§ 103. Government corporation

For the purpose of this title—

(1) ‘‘Government corporation’’ means a corporation owned or controlled by the Government of the United States;

 

§ 105. Executive agency

For the purpose of this title, ‘‘Executive agency’’means an Executive department, a Government corporation, and an independent establishment.

 

(Here we see that Executive Agencies, regardless of their titles are in fact Corporations)

 

§ 301. Departmental regulations

The head of an Executive department or military department may prescribe regulations for the government of his department,

 

(Here we see that the head of an Executive Agency can only make regulations for the

government of his agency)

 

PART III--EMPLOYEES

-CHAPTER 97--DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Sec. 9701. Establishment of human resources management system

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Secretary of Homeland Security may, in regulations prescribed jointly with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, establish, and from time to time adjust, a human resources management system for some or all of the organizational units of the Department of Homeland Security.

 

(Here under Statutory Law, the Department of Homeland Security has the power to do

human resource work, nothing to do with running security at the airports)

 

 

TITLE 6DOMESTIC SECURITY (which is not Statutory Law)

CHAPTER 4--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY

SUBCHAPTER I--TRANSPORTATION SECURITY PLANNING AND INFORMATION SHARING

 

§ 1101(c) ‘‘security guideline’’ means any security-related

guidance that the Secretary recommends, for implementation

on a voluntary basis, to enhance the security

of surface transportation;

 

(So here we can see that TSA's security-related guidance is in fact voluntary. Now here it refers to surface transportation, we are looking for the one which refers to air

transportation, if there is such a thing. Transportation refers to Commerce. Under the

Commerce Clause from the Constitution, the Feds have the authority to regulate

Commerce and if you say you are in the act of Commerce then they have Authority over

you)

 

TITLE 6—CHAPTER 1--HOMELAND SECURITY ORGANIZATION

§ 112. Secretary; functions

(a) Secretary

(1) In general

There is a Secretary of Homeland Security, appointed by the President, by and with the

advice and consent of the Senate.

 

(Here we see that The Secretary of Homeland Security is appointed by the President, not Congress, which means there is no Congressional power in the Secretary of Homeland Security over anyone outside of their agency, just like there is no power in the Secretary of White House Janitorial Services, if there is such a thing, the President is not a Dictator and therefore cannot dictate power over the free people)

 

TITLE 49TRANSPORTATION                                                          SUBTITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                                                                                                                                  § 102. Department of Transportation                                                                     (a) The Department of Transportation is an executive department of the United States Government at the seat of Government.                                                                      (b) The head of the Department is the Secretary of Transportation. The Secretary is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

 

(Now here we see that the Department or Transportation is in fact a corporation)

 

TITLE 49TRANSPORTATION                                                           SUBTITLE VII--AVIATION PROGRAMS                                                             § 40103. Sovereignty and use of airspace

(2) A citizen of the United States has a public

right of transit through the navigable airspace.

 

(Now here we see that transit through the air is in fact a right. We've not found "public

right" defined in the code, but it must be there somewhere. We did find this though:

Legal Dictionary Main Entry: public right Function: noun

: a right created by the legislature that may be exercised against the government -)

 

TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

PART VI--PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS

CHAPTER 176--FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE

SUBCHAPTER A--DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

§ 3002. Definitions

(14) ‘‘State’’ means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the

Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

 

(now here we see that “State” is something other than the 50 States)

 

TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE                                                    SUBTITLE I--GENERAL

§ 103. United States

In this title, ‘‘United States’’, when used in a geographic sense, means the States of

the United States and the District of Columbia.

 

(Now here "the States" is not any of the 50 States. States refers to something which

belongs to the United States, the corporation)

 

TITLE 5--GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES                                                                                                            PART I--THE AGENCIES GENERALLY

§ 103. Government corporation

For the purpose of this title—

(1) ‘‘Government corporation’’ means a corporation

owned or controlled by the Government

of the United States

 

TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

PART VI--PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS

CHAPTER 176--FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE

SUBCHAPTER A--DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

§ 3002. Definitions

15) ‘‘United States’’ means

(A) a Federal corporation;

 

(Now here you can see that the term "United States" is in fact a Corporation. This

Corporation was created to bypass the Constitution. This corporation only has

Authority in "any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States".)

 

TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I--CRIMES

CHAPTER 109--SEARCHES AND SEIZURES

Sec. 2236. Searches without warrant

Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States

or any department or agency thereof, engaged in the enforcement of any

law of the United States, searches any private dwelling used and

occupied as such dwelling without a warrant directing such search, or

maliciously and without reasonable cause searches any other building or

property without a search warrant, shall be fined under this title for a

first offense; and, for a subsequent offense, shall be fined under this

title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

           This section shall not apply to any person--

               (a) serving a warrant of arrest; or

               (b) arresting or attempting to arrest a person committing or

           attempting to commit an offense in his presence, or who has

           committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having

           committed a felony; or

               (c) making a search at the request or invitation or with the

           consent of the occupant of the premises.

 

(Now here we see that we have no recourse against the Agency Agent if we give our consent)

 

________________________________________________________________

----------------

When you travel, repeat the line to everyone between the ticket counter and your gate. Be ready to be intimidated, but stand your ground. We are passing on this info, after seeing what TSA is doing, we felt it was our duty to do it. No one has a right to see your ticket or ID. Only the Airline Representative can request your ticket period. The last time we invoked our rights this way was before the “pat downs”,( and this was after seeing other people doing it) we simply did not want to take off our shoes, belt etc, and walked right through TSA without even having our carry-on scanned. We thought that was humiliating enough, we cannot imaging anyone touching us or our children, or seeing us naked. They tried their typical intimidation, called the supervisor, but when we started taking names they got out of our way. They may not say you are free to go, they may just step aside or not block your path, this is their consent, so start walking. It is a mind game. TSA agents or  local policemen (who also works for a local corporation) cannot hold you or restrict your movement without violating the warning you gave them.

  Be sure to have at least a tape recorder in your hand or pocket and let them know they are being recorded for your safety, if you can video tape it all the better. If you have any questions, it is much easier through email. We are getting lots of folks interested in no longer giving their consent and many of the questions are similar that is why we included the above information. Feel free to send any questions to

donotconsent83@yahoo.com

 

So, the moral of the Story is, people are being molested, because they know only that

which is fed to them by Liberal and Conservative talking heads alike, as well as

Democrats and Republicans. Thank God we still have the Internet, but this is next, this

public highway will be cut soon if we do not stop the fast growing Fascist State. We will update you as our research grows. We will only be able to update those folks who are on our mailing list. Although Attorneys are not needed to keep the Government corporations off your back and out of your pants, it is a good idea to have a competent Attorney who can file the proper forms so you can win a Case against any “United States” corporate employee, but please remember, if the “Judge” (who works for the “United States”) can show that you even gave the hint of a “consent” he will rule in favor of the “United States”. Please remember that every Judge, works for the United States corporation and therefore his first interest is to protect the corporate interest not yours.

Let us put TSA out of Service, then we can take out other corporations.

Since TSA has no authority over over us , what other agencies are in the same boat?

 

donotconsent83@yahoo.com not attorneys just American Patriots

________________________________________________________________

-------------------

 

Addendum1:

By consenting to TSA or any other agency, every passenger, man or woman is

risking being accused as a terrorist or domestic terrorist without any evidence

what so ever, “just simply appear to be intended”.

TITLE 18CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I--CRIMES

CHAPTER 113B--TERRORISM

 

As used in this chapter--

           (1) the term ``international terrorism'' means activities that--

               (A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life

           that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States

           or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if

           committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any

           State;

               (B) appear to be intended--

                   (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

                   (ii) to influence the policy of a government by

               intimidation or coercion; or

                   (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass

               destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

 

               (C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of

           the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of

           the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they

           appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which

           their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;

 

           (2) the term ``national of the United States'' has the meaning

        given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and

        Nationality Act;

           (3) the term ``person'' means any individual or entity capable

        of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;

           (4) the term ``act of war'' means any act occurring in the

        course of--

               (A) declared war;

               (B) armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared,

           between two or more nations; or

               (C) armed conflict between military forces of any origin;

           and

 

(5) the term ‘‘domestic terrorism’’ means activities

that—

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life

that are a violation of the criminal laws of

the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government

by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government

by mass destruction, assassination,

or kidnapping; and

(C) occur primarily within the territorial

jurisdiction of the United States

 

(Now here part ( C )  is letting you know that it does not have to occur with in the “United States”, so how do they get “jurisdiction”? through your consent, we cannot stress this enough”)

“When you read this section, you can see that Congress, the Senate, the President and

the Courts are all guilty of every part of this definition, but they will only apply it to us,

but we can apply it to them through the use of the Grand Jury, so we must also educate

ourselves on the “Rights of a Grand Jury”. “Grand Jurors” answer to no one in the

Government, and Grand Jurors have sole Jurisdiction over all evidence and can speak

with anyone privately (specially the Accused) They are not tools of the Government”

 

TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY

§ 444. Definitions

(2) Act of terrorism

(A) The term ‘‘act of terrorism’’ means any

act that the Secretary determines meets the

requirements under subparagraph (B), as such

requirements are further defined and specified

by the Secretary.

 

(Now here we see that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines who is a terrorist)

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

------------------

If anyone starts intimidating you or asking questions, after you stated

"I am a Sovereign man/woman, I do not consent, I give you no

Authority over me or my children, I/we deny the benefits, if you impede

my/our natural right to travel or violate any of my/our rights, I'll sue you and

your department head, personally and in your capacity. My fee is $100 per minute if you contract with me by detaining me, am I free to be on my/our way"

 

You can follow it with this and really should when ever dealing with any corporate agent trying to establish authority over you:    

                                 

“Mr/Mrs--------------, I am warning you that anything you say and do to me or my family can and will be used against you in a Court of Law, a Common Law Court and as evidence for the Grand Jury”

 

And PLEASE, DO NOT ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS, YOUR HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT, THEY MUST ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS, BUT YOU DO NOT!

 

ANSWERING THEIR QUESTIONS COULD BE UNDERSTOOD BY THE CORPORATE JUDGE AS GRANTING THEM AUTHORITY, GIVING YOUR CONSENT!

 

Addendum2:

The Homeland Security Corporation is buying up our

Sheriff and Police Departments

 

TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY

SUBCHAPTER XV—HOMELAND SECURITY GRANTS

 

§ 603. Homeland security grant programs

(a) Grants authorized

The Secretary, through the Administrator,

may award grants under sections 604 and 605 of

this title to State, local, and tribal governments.

 

§ 604. Urban Area Security Initiative

(e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for

grants under this section—

(1) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(2) $950,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(3) $1,050,000,000 for fiscal year 2010;

(4) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year 2011;

(5) $1,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2012; and

(6) such sums as are necessary for fiscal year

2013, and each fiscal year thereafter.

 

§ 605. State Homeland Security Grant Program

(a) Establishment

There is established a State Homeland Security

Grant Program to assist State, local, and

tribal governments in preventing, preparing for,

protecting against, and responding to acts of

terrorism.

(b) Application

(1) In general

Each State may apply for a grant under this

section, and shall submit such information in

support of the application as the Administrator

may reasonably require.

 

§ 607. Terrorism prevention

(a) Law enforcement terrorism prevention program

(1) In general

The Administrator shall ensure that not less

than 25 percent of the total combined funds

appropriated for grants under sections 604 and

605 of this title is used for law enforcement

terrorism prevention activities.

 

(2) Law enforcement terrorism prevention activities

Law enforcement terrorism prevention activities

include—

(A) information sharing and analysis;

(B) target hardening;

(C) threat recognition;

(D) terrorist interdiction;

 

§ 609. Use of funds

(2) Personnel

(A) In general

Not more than 50 percent of the amount

awarded to a grant recipient under section

604 or 605 of this title in any fiscal year may

be used to pay for personnel, including overtime

and backfill costs, in support of the

permitted uses under subsection (a).

 

(Now if you ever wondered how your Police Department, in this bad economy, can afford driving new vehicles, with new high tech equipment, establish “Amber Alert Systems”, and constantly increase their personnel, well now you know. Most people in this Republic are unable to see that they are being ruled by an intricate network of Government and Private corporations. The time to deny consent is now, if we cannot put TSA out of business, then we will live within the most efficient Fascist State in history. )

 docs.google.com/document/pub