FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

RE: Personhood battle moves into courtroom

More Recent Stories

Help Us Grow

Like Us On Facebook and Follow Our Posts

Most Emailed

GP

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } o\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } w\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } .shape { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) }

From: GP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: Personhood battle moves into courtroom
 

Hello Patrick/Anne

No message in the reply. Also, there are no constitutional rights. The Constitution is a framework for laws to be written. The Constitution protects rights, it doesn’t give them.

GP

 

From: Bellringer [mailto:bellringer@fourwinds10.com]

Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 3:59 PM

To: GP

Subject: Re: Personhood battle moves into courtroom

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: GP

To: 'Bellringer'

 

Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:39 AM

Subject: Personhood battle moves into courtroom

 

This is where the right to life people got it wrong in Roe vs. Wade and where they continue to be mistaken. It may be asking too much from attorneys who were “educated” in the halls of federal control. They continue to argue that the fetus is a person under the 14th amendment. Why don’t they argue that the fetus is a state Citizen under Article IV § 2 of the Constitution and not a federal citizen. There are many more protections for a Private state Citizen then there are for those who fall under federal citizenship in the corporate territory of DC. In most situations, protections of our substantive God given unalienable rights are best sheltered with the state Constitutions, not the federal which tries to gain jurisdiction and trump the states.

Best regards,

GP

 

Related in this Category