FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

The Thirteenth Floor

Mark Clarke

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

Anne and Patrick,

I continue to send my gratitude and Love to you. I AM deeply grateful for your service to humanity and Creation. I have been inspired lately to writing. I submit to you an article about the Thirteenth Amendment for your consideration.

May the Golden Light of Love continue to shine bright for all LightWorkers!

Namaste

Mark

***************************************************

The Thirteenth Floor

There is a lie that is so persuasive that it affects our daily lives without a thought.

Otis Elevators estimates that 85% of the buildings with elevators did not have a floor named the 13th floor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_floor

In the gambling mecca of Las Vegas you will never find a thirteenth floor in a high rise hotel. Thirteen is generally considered unlucky for some. Why is this? The superstition is so popular it even has it's own name.

Triskaidekaphobia (from Greek tris=three, kai=and, theka=ten) is an irrational fear of the number 13; it is a superstition and related to a specific fear of Friday the 13th, called paraskevidekatriaphobia or friggatriskaidekaphobia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triskaidekaphobia

Think about it every time you take an elevator somewhere above the twelfth floor you are participating in a LIE!!! The fourteenth floor is NOT the Fourteenth floor! The twentyith floor is not, it is the nineteenth and so on. Just because it is labeled as such does not make it so! If you walk outside a high rise building and count the floors do you omit the thirteenth?

We as humans cannot remove the number 13 from mathematics or anything else for that matter. Yet we Lie about it everyday and accept that lie without question. Why?

There is another lie associated with the number 13 that effects us everyday.That is the lie about the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the united States of America. The founders of the Constitution realized the inherent danger (from experience) of Titles of Nobility and included an exclusion in the original Constitution.

Titles of Nobility Article I Section 9 Clause 8.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html

http://supreme.justia.com/constitution/article-1/57-titles-of-nobility.html

     This Constitution  clearly forbids  titles of nobility.  See Article I,  Section 10,  Clause 1.  It is My contention, based on diligent research,  that any  license is  construed  by  American courts to  be a  title of  nobility, which  is forbidden  by this provision.     However,  no  penalties  were  mentioned  by  this provision and it is for this reason, I believe, that no penalties currently attach  to the exercise of licenses issued by the state and federal  governments..   It was  the lack  of penalties  which motivated Congress  to cure  this oversight  with a  proposal  to amend the  Constitution with  penalties for  exercising titles of nobility.

  My research  has also  uncovered a constitutional amendment, ratified by  the Union  states in  the year 1819, which penalizes the  exercise   of  titles  of  nobility  with  a  forfeiture  of

citizenship and  with a disqualification from ever serving in any public office  in America  (see attached).  This Amendment is the main reason  why I  am not now a licensed bar member, and have no intention of  ever becoming  a licensed  bar member, because I do not want  to forfeit  My Arizona  state Citizenship,  and I would like to serve in public office some day.

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness

RE: U.S.A. v. Wallen, Case No. 95-484-WDB

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/browning/browning.htm

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html

Because the original Constitution did not include any penalties for holding  or accepting Titles of Nobility a solution was proposed as the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

Journal of the Senate; Thursday, April 26th, 1810 (Pages 503-504)

The Senate resumed the consideration of the motion made on the 18th of  January, for an amendment to the constitution of the United States,  respecting titles of nobility, together with the amendments proposed thereto.

http://www.amendment-13.org/leghistory.html

The solution is Loss of Citizenship:

 "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain  any title of nobility, or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept any present, pension, office, or emolument, of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a  citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of  trust or profit under them, or either of them:"

 

http://www.amendment-13.org/leghistory.html

On March 12, 1819 the State of Virginia, with the enactment and publication  of the laws of Virginia, became the 13th and FINAL state required to ratify the above article of amendment to the Constitution For The United States,  thus making it the Law Of The Land. With the enactment of Act No. 280, March  12, 1819, which was Voted, En Bloc, and publication of the Revised Code, the  State of Virginia notified the Department of State, the Congress, the Library  of Congress, and the President of their action by issuing to each a copy of  the Laws of Virginia.

http://www.amendment-13.org/

Why is this so important? You may begin to see the importance of this Constitutional Amendment when you realize that the British Title of Nobility 'Esquire' is given to every Attorney that passes the BAR exam in every state of the union. The Actual definition of BAR is British Accreditation Registry. This hidden and little known fact may be validated by the fact that even Wikipedia refuses to provide documentation or even discussion of the issue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/British_Accreditation_Registry

Esquire (abbreviated Esq.) is a term of British origin, originally used to denote social status.

Thus, practically speaking, the term "esquire" may be appended to the name of any man not possessing a higher title (such as that of knighthood or peerage)  or a clerical one. In the United States, however, "esquire" is most commonly  assumed by lawyers in a professional capacity and has come to be associated by many Americans solely with the legal profession.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquire

S: (n) Esquire, Esq (a title of respect for a member of the English gentry ranking just below a knight; placed after the name)

http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=esquire

International Bar Association

In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no "title of nobility" or "honor". There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen's  "counsel of choice" was not restricted to a lawyer; there were no state or  national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London, and closely associated with the international

banking system. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank "Esquire" -- a  "title of nobility".

 

"Esquire" was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit from the United States. Why? Because the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers was suspect. Bankers and lawyers with an "Esquire" behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose principle purposes were political, not economic, and regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for members of the KGB or the CIA.

Article 1, Sect. 9 of the Constitution sought to prohibit the International Bar Association (or any other agency that granted titles of nobility) from operating in America. But the Constitution neglected to specify a penalty, so the prohibition was ignored, and agents of the monarchy continued to infiltrate and influence the government (as in the Jay Treaty and the US Bank charter incidents). Therefore, a "title of nobility" amendment that specified

a penalty (loss of citizenship) was proposed in 1789, and again in 1810. The meaning of the amendment is seen in its intent to prohibit persons having titles of nobility and loyalties foreign governments and bankers from voting, holding public office, or using their skills to subvert the government.

http://www.civil-liberties.com/13/page_h.html

http://www.ibanet.org/Join_the_IBA/Why_join_the_IBA.aspx

Membership has it's privilege.

http://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=25834764-545a-44ba-9b82-6d326ae46997

The ABA Rule of Law Initiative is a public service project of the American  Bar Association dedicated to promoting rule of law around the world. The ABA Rule of Law Initiative believes that rule of law promotion is the most  effective long-term antidote to the pressing problems facing the world  community today, including poverty, economic stagnation, and conflict.

http://www.abanet.org/rol/

These organizations Police Themselves as they are the Enforcement, Judaical Political and Business aspects of modern society.

The ABA Rule of Law Initiative's anti-corruption work emphasizes the following areas:

    * National Anti-Corruption Strategies and Action Plans

    * Public Integrity – Conflict of Interest Rules and Internal Oversight

    * Freedom of Information Laws

    * Civil Society – Awareness, Civic Education, and Advocacy

    * Ethics Codes – Drafting and Enforcement

    * Corruption and Financial Crimes Investigation Training

    * Preventive and Enforcement Tools and Institutions

    * Multilateral Cooperation

http://www.abanet.org/rol/programs/anti-corruption.html

Are they failing or succeeding in the Rule of Law initiative?

The 'rule of law', in its most basic form, is the principle that no one is  above the law. Thomas Paine stated in his pamphlet Common Sense (1776)Marxist theory asserts the capitalist state is an instrument of oppression of  the proletariat at the hands of the bourgeoisie, which set the laws to suit  itself. Following this, some critical theorists analyze the "rule of law" as

a judicial fiction which aims at disguising the reality of violence and, in  Marxist terminology, "class struggle". This theory presumes that the  "bourgeoisie" holds the power to set the laws.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

You may think that this is one of those 'little details' that has no merit or meaning. Ask the Canadians about the 'little detail' of the Canadian Governor-General Michaëlle Jean suspending the Parliament for the Queen on December 5, 2008.

Governor General Michaelle Jean -- the representative of Queen Elizabeth,  Canada's head of state -- agreed to Harper's request to shut down Parliament  until Jan 26.

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE4B34BC20081204

http://www.gg.ca/menu_e.asp

If the missing 13th Amendment were restored, "special interests" and  "immunities" might be rendered unconstitutional. The prohibition against  "honors" (privileges) would compel the entire government to operate under the  same laws as the citizens of this nation. Without their current personal  immunities (honors), our judges and I.R.S. agents would be unable to abuse  common citizens without fear of legal liability. If this 13th Amendment were  restored, our entire government would have to conduct itself according to the  same standards of decency, respect, law, and liability as the rest of the  nation. If this Amendment and the term "honor" were applied today, our  government's ability to systematically coerce and abuse the public would be  all but eliminated.

http://www.civil-liberties.com/13/page_j.html

It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government  outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional  jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the constitution."  [Downes vs Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]

http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony4.html

When considering this information as a Conspiracy Theory and it cannot be true,then the next time you get in an elevator I urge you to get off on the Thirteenth floor. If you cannot then I remind you that you are participating in a conspiracy by agreeing that it is not there!

NESARA NOW!

Namaste

Mark