- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

BREAKING: Canadian Senate passes bill that could cause pro-life activists to be jailed for 10 years

Anthony Murdoch

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0


Bill C-3 bars anyone trying to prevent a doctor or nurse 'in the performance of their duties' or 'intentionally obstruct or interfere with another person’s lawful access' to a hospital or clinic. It would be up to law enforcement to decide what constitutes interference.

OTTAWA, Ontario, (LifeSiteNews) – A bill that could ban all pro-life demonstrations outside facilities that provide abortion, with a penalty of up to 10 years in jail, has been approved by the Canadian Senate.

Bill C-3 passed third reading in Canada’s House of Commons yesterday with no recorded vote. Today senators approved the bill with no amendments.

Bill C-3 was introduced to the House of Commons by Minister of Labour Seamus O’Regan of the Liberal Party on November 26. 

The bill bars anyone trying to prevent a doctor or nurse “in the performance of their duties” or “intentionally obstruct or interfere with another person’s lawful access” to a hospital or clinic. It would be up to law enforcement to decide what constitutes interference.

According to Bill C-3: “Every person commits an offence who, without lawful authority, intentionally obstructs or interferes with another person’s lawful access to a place at which health services are provided by a health professional.”

Bill C-3 also states: “Every person commits an offence who engages in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear in… a person in order to impede them from obtaining health services from a health professional.”

Due to its omnibus nature, the bill also contains a portion which would allow for up to ten paid sick days for federal employees and give unpaid bereavement leave for parents who face a stillbirth or the death of a child. The extended bereavement was added as an amendment from a CPC MP before being sent to the senate.

The bill has been blasted by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) Campaigns Manager David Cooke as one that uses the Liberal party’s “old, corrupt tactic of presenting two entirely different proposals together – one popular and one controversial – in order to scuttle debate and secure passage of the more controversial matter.”

Cooke stressed that the question of what constitutes “interference” remains unclear. 

“Does it mean counselling an abortion-minded woman on the sidewalk outside a hospital? Could the sidewalk counsellor be charged with ‘interference’ if that woman cancels her appointment with the abortionist? Would the abortionist – who just lost his commission on the killing – not jump at the chance to press charges,” wrote Cooke.