I confirmed this was true from CNN and other msm outlets (shrug, not a reliable source) but for this type of thing, they will air such stories because they have to. ANYWAY, the amphetamine was in the form of "Captagon" pills (which I have never heard of before) and evidently this is the military form of amphetamine that is used to keep soldiers alert in battle.

This bust, which happened at the Beirut airport proves that the Sauds are helping ISIS in any way possible. This "prince" traveled heavy, stuffing the pills in "24 bags and 8 suitcases". That may sound like enough luggage to do away with 2 tons, but consider this - a ton is 2,000 pounds, which means that the prince would have needed a total of 40 suitcases to get them down to 100 pounds each! He did not have that many. How heavy does a Saudi prince travel, anyway? Maybe at least 10 percent of what Michelle Obama will tote along on a family outing . . . . . . geez.

Anyway, CNN threw in the towel and reported the truth for once, yep, the Sauds really do support ISIS, even with drugs and perhaps now that ISIS will be napping more sans amphetamines, Russia will do an even better job.

And where did that Saudi prince get two tons of "Captagon" amphetamines to begin with? I did a little checking, and low and behold, it looks like Turkey is the most likely manufacturing source. So now we most likely have a love triangle, involving Turkey, Saudia Arabia, and ISIS. Cute! That fits.

And that reminds me of a point of salience I forgot to post yesterday

A Russian alternative media outlet posted a really long blurb about Russia and electronic warfare yesterday, and that Russia successfully disrupted American communications with ISIS so badly that now America has to do a ground mission because they can't talk to ISIS via radio anymore. And that is something to think about, it is significant, and it is also a little ominous, because America's military is 100 percent radio/computer based and if Russia can kill just that one leg of the U.S. military, the smart bombs will be totally blind, GPS won't work, and communications will be completely down.

Low and behold, only hours after this was posted, it is confirmed that the U.S. will indeed be doing "direct action on the ground" as a continuation of America's "advise and assist mission", where previously, America was doing all "advising" via electronic communications and "assisting" via air drops and air strikes. Now with Russia declaring a no fly zone, and Russia cutting off electronic communications, a ground mission to do the same thing is America's only option.

This stands then, in my opinion, as proof that Russia really can enforce a no fly zone against the United States, and that Russia can badly, if not completely, disrupt the electronic communications of the U.S. military.

This is totally key in warfare, and it proves that if America really does go to war with Russia, it might well be an even battle, if not more than even. In addition to the electronics and air, Russia has massive numbers of tanks and artillery, as well as a nuclear stockpile that could just glass it all if things turned for the worse. Messing with Russia is not a good idea, why would America need to?

If getting rid of ISIS really is why America is in Syria, I suggest backing off and not poking the bear which is doing that job anyway. In this case the only sensible option is not to play.

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethis5.html