US Judge Rules to Protect Wolves
The deal struck earlier this month between the US Fish and Wildlife Service and 10 conservation groups would have lifted federal protections from an estimated 1 200 wolves in Idaho and Montana, allowing those states to restore licensed hunting of the animals.
But a US district judge in Missoula, Montana, Donald Molloy, refused to approve the latest de-listing plan, which 10 conservation groups had hammered out with the Obama administration.
Another four conservation groups opposed the settlement, saying in legal filings that supporters of the proposed settlement were improperly being driven by a wish to lessen the public conflict over wolves, rather than by science.
Powerful ranching interests in Montana and Idaho opposed reintroduction of wolves to the region some 15 years ago and have continued to resist federal protection of the animals as a threat to livestock and sportsmen complain that wolves are killing too many big-game animals, such as elk.
A similar plan for removing Endangered Species Act safeguards for wolves in Montana and Idaho, and turning management of the animals over to state game officials, was implemented by the federal government in 2009.
But 14 conservation groups challenged that move in court, and Molloy sided with the environmentalists in August of 2010, ordering federal protections of the wolves restored.
Molloy ruled then that the government had erred in lifting federal protections for wolves in Idaho and Montana while leaving them intact for wolves in neighbouring Wyoming.
He agreed with conservationists that the wolves in all three states were part of a single population that could not be treated separately under the Endangered Species Act.
www.news24.com/printArticle.aspx
April 10, 2011