Nov. 16, 2015

Down this page a ways there is a picture of the scene at the bataclan, and that picture was obviously, from the dryness of the blood, taken at least two hours after the shooting. Two hours after the shooting, the place should be flooded with EMT's and police, yet the entire shooting scene is devoid of people. This would only happen if the authorities set it up and wanted their photos and took so long setting it all up that the blood trails are dry at the ends of them, and only red near the bodies because the bodies were bleeding out that last little bit. Also, from the different blood colors, people were obviously shot over a period of hours as they were brought in and murdered to set up this scene. This one is sewn up in a body bag, ARCHIVE AND POST!

BUSTED: A GLITCH IN THE MEXICAN MEDIA HAS GIVEN STRONG EVIDENCE THAT THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERED "VICTIMS" WHILE IN CUSTODY OF THE AUTHORITIES. WE DEFINITELY HAVE A LOT OF DEAD PEOPLE IN THESE "TERROR ATTACKS" AND IT LOOKS LIKE NONE DIED "IN THE NAME OF ISLAM".

BUSTED: A Mexican girl (Nohemi Gonzalez) who died was confirmed alive after the Bataclan shooting when her family called her boyfriend's phone after hearing about the shooting in the Mexican media. They tried contacting her repeatedly on her own phone and then tried her boyfriend's phone. He said he was with her and they were both fine and the shooting was over, and now, after the authorities took her into custody the family has received a report that she is dead and her family is wondering how she is dead when they received the report she was fine straight from her boyfriend a considerable time after the "terrorist" attacks. Busted busted busted, it is all but admitted that there were no terrorists, and that the French government did this job, and it is a filthy false flag.

The fact Nohemi Gonzalez was alive came across the television while I was going over the photos of the Bataclan. The dead body scene looked real, but was too low res to work with. Then this report came across the TV with the girl's family on television, saying it like it happened from their perspective. They confirmed she was not shot after they heard about the shootings in the press. They got ahold of her boyfriend after the Bataclan was empty (UPDATE, LONG after the Bataclan was empty, and I am talking probably hours) who was with her alive and totally unhurt away from the theater at an un named location. Now, after she was reported totally unhurt long after things cooled off she has been confirmed dead and a "victim" of the attacks and her family is wondering how, when they confirmed she was not hurt and all was well.

THEY BLEW IT BLEW IT BLEW IT, EVIDENCE STRONGLY SUGGESTS THERE WERE NO ARABS, AND THAT THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS AND GOT THEIR BODY COUNT BY MURDERING PEOPLE IN CUSTODY!

If the French government murdered victims and then planted them back in the scenes afterwards it would explain completely why no real shooting ever turned up on amateur cell phone video from the Bataclan, yet there was a significant body count. It seems obvious that they took this Mexican girl into custody, murdered her, brought her back to where they needed her for their story and dragged her to where they left her dead. This would also explain why blood is dragged all over the floor in the bataclan, because they dragged and dropped the bodies after killing them.

This might be the first time ever the perpetrators of a false flag got busted by their own media, I REPEAT: A MEXICAN VICTIM WAS CONFIRMED ALIVE AND UNHURT AFTER THE BATACLAN "SHOOTING", ONLY TO END UP DEAD FOR THE PHOTO SHOOT. THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS, NO IFS OR BUTS.

Now let's keep an eye on the distribution of deaths, to find out if the authorities ID'd people before killing them, to get deaths from as many countries as possible. If there are deaths from everywhere, that is exactly what they did - the French checked ID's to decide who they would kill based upon where they were from, to get as many countries as possible to stand behind a war on Islam after "Islam" killed one of their own . . . . .

 

I have to have a disclaimer here: This is based on what came across the television. I don't have all the details because there is not jack about this on the web. What is said here is exactly what the family said on TV - they are wondering how on earth she ended up dead after being told by her boyfriend she was completely unhurt. This stinks to high heaven, I wonder what the excuse will be if this report takes off and gets slammed into the public conscience

Anything to get their world war 3, ANYTHING. I am actually pissed off beyond belief, of all the gall! They needed a real body count so they murdered people who were PROVEN ALIVE after the "event!"

 

Ok, after working on this for a while, things are coming into view. Here is what likely happened: Agents, not "terrorists" got a small body count at the scene, and then spiced it with people they detained afterwards. That makes the most sense based on various reports, they did not kill all "in custody", they spiced it with people they needed dead for the most political gain by murdering people who were selected for their nationality via their ID's while in custody.

Among the dead, there is quite a list of countries so far.

We have: Michael Jozic, from Belgium Elif Dogam from Turkey OTHER COUNTRIES NAMED, TO CUT TO THE CHASE: France, Sweden, Tunisia, Mexico, United States, Chile, Algeria, Portugal, Italy, Morocco, Spain, England, Germany, and the list is not done yet.

The Mexican victim's family is questioning how on earth she is dead when she was alive after everything settled down, ALIVE LONG ENOUGH AFTER IT ALL FOR THE MEDIA TO HAVE REPORTED IT, AND FOR THEM TO TRY TO CALL AFTER HEARING ABOUT IT. THIS GIRL'S FAMILY WAS IN MEXICO, THIS NEWS DID NOT BREAK IN MEXICO IN FIVE MINUTES. IT TOOK A LOT LONGER THAN THAT, HOW ON EARTH DID THIS GIRL END UP DEAD WHEN SHE WAS FINE WHEN THIS HIT THE NEWS IN MEXICO, LONG ENOUGH FOR HER FAMILY TO RESPOND TO THE NEWS OF THE ATTACK AT THE BATACLAN AND CALL? This latest event might be what kills false flags, the French government is BUSTED WHOLESALE.

 

ONE photo of Bataclan released

HERE IT IS: DING DING DING

UPDATE: ALL PHOTO ANOMALIES BELOW ARE FULLY EXPLAINED BY THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERING THESE PEOPLE AND THEN SETTING UP THE GRISLY BLOODY SCENE. THIS IS PROVEN, THEY BLEW THIS ONE LIKE AN EXPLODING SEMI TIRE IN DEATH VALLEY.

They released a photo of the bataclan, with dead bodies, blood, the whole 9 yards. But there are serious problems with it.

1. No EMT response. If this setup was not wanted by the government, EMT's would be all over it, dragging even known dead bodies to the hospital to be PROVEN DEAD.

2. No police response. If this was a scene that was not set up by the government, police would be ALL OVER IT.

3. Five people standing on the balcony, 1 photographer, and one guy on the ground floor. NOT A SINGLE ONE out with the bodies.

 

4. Want proof the French government did this? LOOK HOW DRY THE BLOOD IS. The blood is THAT DRY yet no EMT's have ever been on this scene because there are zero footprints through any of it, which proves that not only are they not there now, they were never there in the hours prior while that blood was drying. And the only way "hours" could pass like that is if the authorities in charge staged this and murdered everyone in this picture. If terrorists did this, the authorities would have flooded this scene and EMT's would have been there clearing out bodies while people were still spurting blood. Who knows when this even happened, - with how long this took to get published, and that Mexican girl alive long after the shooting only to end up dead here, this could have been staged an entire day later.

HERE IS A HUGE ONE: CONFIRMED: 5. The original picture in the highest resolution was released as a PNG screen capture. That exact photo is to the left here, totally un modified. If you wanted to avoid all chances of anyone doing a real photo analysis to dig up evidence, a screen capture of a photo would stop all analysis perfectly because a screen capture has so little to work with, it consists only of the bits it takes to display an image, there are no sub bits in a screen capture that can be pulled forward and analyzed. A REAL EVIDENCE PHOTO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED AS A .PNG SCREEN CAPTURE.

6. The Bataclan theater has many options for floor and seating arrangements, but in all past photos from before this "shooting", they try to at least maintain the honor of the theater by not having an event done on bare concrete. Why is the concrete in this photo bare? OBVIOUSLY TO AVOID MESSING UP A PREMIUM FLOOR COVERING STAGING THIS SHOT.

7. THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE ONLY PHOTO, IN ITS HIGHEST RESOLUTION IS STILL SUPER LOW RESOLUTION, WHICH WILL PREVENT PEOPLE FROM PICKING IT APART. It was not bad enough for them to release a screen capture, but even for a screen capture this is garbage. It looks "clear" until you try to do anything with it, like look for bullet holes in the theater. The resolution of the photo is not adequate to reveal a single one, IF any exist at all and if these people were killed selectively by authorities on scene and elsewhere, there would probably be few, if any bullet holes in the theater.

 

UPDATE: VIDEO OF BEGINNING OF SHOOTING RELEASED BY MSM, AS I REQUESTED!

HERE IT IS

And a few questions:

1. Why is there no crowd reaction AT ALL?

2. If the drummer got shot and fell down, as some are saying, why was he interviewed later with no gunshot wounds?

3. YEP - HOW DID THE SHOOTERS MISS THE BAND, KILLING ONLY MEMBERS OF THE CREW?

ANSWERS:

1. There was no crowd reaction because the sound of the gunshots was dubbed in afterward. There were no gunshots at the concert, as proven by no crowd reaction, and NO, A SPEAKER CANNOT OUT PERFORM THE SOUND OF AN AK-47, NO MATTER HOW LOUD ONE IS, THEY JUST DO NOT GO THAT LOUD. So EVERYONE in the audience should have jumped out of their shoes if a real gun got fired. Let me explain this -

Many people have been out in the back country when people have been doing target practice. And the gunshots can be heard CLEARLY, miles away. Ok, if so, when have you heard any event and speakers like that, from miles away? I remember the stories of an Ozzie Osbourne concert that could be heard from miles away, but it took place in an open air stadium with 50,000 people and laws were written afterward saying a concert cannot be that loud, because many people got their hearing permanently damaged from that one event, that was legendary loud. This band was not in a large stadium and was not playing to 50,000 people, the gunshots should have been deafening and scared the crap out of everyone.

2. The drummer, who was on TV later with no injuries whatsoever "fell down" most likely because it was just part of the normal stage act. His sticks did not go flying and instead got placed in the front of the drum set where they belonged. If there was really something going on, the drum sticks would have flown. The guitarist that exited to the left of the screen did so in a way that would be part of a normal act, performers do not stand still because that gets boring, they have to do a show. My conclusion: They needed to produce a fake video of this concert getting shot up "WHEN THE SHOOTING HAPPENED" because people were asking for it. So they went over whatever video of the concert there was, waited for a part of the show where they could say, yeah, this part of the show looks like people might believe something happened, and then they dubbed the gunshot audio in. But all aspects were not there, the lack of crowd reaction in any form at all proves this is not video of a real shooting.

3. The shooters missed the band, and only killed members of the crew, BECAUSE THE BAND HAS TO DO MORE SHOWS IN THE FUTURE, AND NO FANS ANYWHERE KNOW ANYONE WHO IS PART OF THE CREW, those people can be vanished and no one will be the wiser. If a band member was actually shot, the show could not go on. Therefore that was not part of the script.

 

There is a chance the band was totally in on this from the beginning and acted on cue as well, and that all parts of the sound track other than the gunshots were real. But one thing is certain, there were no gunshots AT ALL, the lack of crowd reaction proves it.

The video blows the lid off EVERYTHING, because IT PROVES PEOPLE HAD THEIR CAMERAS OUT RECORDING THIS LIVE. THERE WAS NOT ONLY ONE PERSON SHOOTING VIDEO, AS I SAID, THERE SHOULD BE OVER 50 UNIQUE VIDEOS AVAILABLE AT A MINIMUM, AND REALISTICALLY THERE COULD BE OVER 100, WITH AT LEAST 10 RIGHT BY THE SHOOTERS. NO ONE WILL TURN THEIR VIDEO CAMERA OFF, WHICH TAKES A CONSCIOUS EFFORT, IF THEY ARE BEING SHOT AT. THERE SHOULD BE FULL LENGTH VIDEOS FROM DROPPED CELL PHONES THAT HAVE NOTHING BUT GUYS TALKING ARABIC AND SHOOTING FOR 15 MINUTES STRAIGHT, AND OTHER CELL VIDEOS WHERE THE PHONES DID NOT GET DROPPED BUT AT LEAST GOT PUT IN POCKETS, AND SOME WHERE PEOPLE KEPT THEIR COOL AND FILMED IT ALL. WHERE ARE THEY?

SORRY, A 20 SECOND CLIP WITH A NOT SHOT DRUMMER DOING AN ACT AND NO CROWD REACTION JUST DOES NOT CUT IT. IF THE DRUMMER COULD HEAR IT AND HIT THE FLOOR WHILE HE WAS BASHING DRUMS, THE CROWD, WHICH WAS NOT RIGHT BY DRUMS GETTING BASHED WOULD HAVE HEARD IT, THIS VIDEO IS BUSTED AND THE FACT IT WAS FRONTED BY THE MSM AS REAL PROVES THIS SHOOTING NEVER HAPPENED AND PROVED THAT POINT IN ONE TAKE.

NOW AN AMATEUR VIDEO OF THE STADIUM BLAST IS OUT THERE, CAVEAT: IT WAS TAKEN INSIDE THE STADIUM, WHILE THE "BLAST" HAPPENED OUTSIDE THE STADIUM, ANOTHER FAKE!

Ok, I can't resist, so I will put this in fine print. DO NOT SKIP THE NEXT "FAR MORE IMPORTANT" REPORT. But I just gotta say this: Try to follow my logic, please . . . . . Ok, so Russia kicks ISIS butt in Syria, and ISIS, in response attacks France. Now, even if one makes the point that Muslims are not very bright, trust me, they are not that stupid. Why would ISIS attack France, when their worry is Russia? URF. That was a half burp half vomit . . . . contained. Anyway I just do not see the logic here. And lots of people do not see the logic. Where is the logic? WHERE ARE THE CELL PHONE VIDEOS? Ok, I did not look for photos, but the description was that it was all "apocalyptic," so we ought to be able to see an apocalypse. From people's cell phones. Come on now, we can't trust the media after all those fake ISIS beheadings, I want to see cell phone video from a $29 verykool cell phone, or some other sub $50 piece of pre paid crap. Thousands of people saw this, and I know not everyone has an Iphone. Let's see it if this was real. Let's see the blurry shaky cell phone video. And even then, if it shows up, I will only believe something happened and that is the end of it, BECAUSE, AND THIS IS A BIG BECAUSE, A THOUGHT PROVOKING BECAUSE:

Israel kidnaps hundreds of children from Palestine. Children that would work GREAT in an ISIS video, if Israel really did want to stage something real. Why not? Why settle for CPR dolls when you are soulless anyway and might as well just use a couple hundred real children and really get the job done? Site intelligence group is Mossad. Anyone with a lick of sense knows all of ISIS is CIA/Mossad. So if ISIS really did do this terror attack in France, what is stopping the Jewish community, which has absolutely nothing against killing non Jews, from doing a real event in France? Why scream Allahu Akbar? Muslims would not do that during an attack, but GOSH does it work for the idiot feed. Just fill that trough up with rotten droppings and watch the idiots suck it down. Anyway, whatever this was I am sure it was fun for someone and seriously doubt that "someone" has any sort of dent or mark on the forehead.

UPDATE: There were over 1000 people at that concert, all of them with cell phones. At least 50 would have been shooting video when the attacks happened.

http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethisc7.html