FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

"Hello, Central!" What is God's Law? (Updated March 27, 2007)

Patrick H. Bellringer

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

m needed to contemplate when making a decision against the immoral actions of a fellow man. It remains in the Roman Catholic Bibles.

Tobias 4:16. See thou never do to another what thou wouldst hate to have done to thee by another.

When the English people were forced by poverty and royal coercion into becoming 'subjects' of the Crown, after the Pope [Benedict VIII] and King Edward I incorporated the Crown in the early 1300s AD, this becoming 'subjects' removed the people from the status of 'free will' to that of a form of 'slave' to the corporate Crown.

The negative Golden Rule, The Law, only serves adult free will humans, and thus, was replaced in England by Roman Municipal Law [magistrates, edicts, statutes, acts, laws, rules and regulations]. This 'so-called' common law, mitigated the obvious changeover from the law of a free sovereign people to that of a system based upon 'good order and discipline on a ship, or make-believe ship - an incorporation, by the use of the 'notwithstanding clause' found on any ship - the captain [or designated officer] may deviate from any rules when he deems it necessary for the good of the ship.

This is the 'so-called' common law which has come down to us over the last 700 years.

This may explain why the Book of Tobias [sometimes called the Book of Tobit] was not inserted by King James, the 'Divine Right of Kings' advocate, in his severely edited version of the Geneva Bible, the KJV version.

I believe that, rather than a dramatic shift back to the Anglo-Saxon system, which was quite workable in sparsely populated and mostly rural England, we could make use of a mandatory to use, Grand Jury system, made up of people who are intelligent enough to apply The Law - God's Law.

EW

(Response)

FROM: Patrick H. Bellringer

TO: EW

DATE: March 25, 2007

SUBJECT: Reply

Dear EW:

Thank you for your letter and comments about our recent posting on Fourwinds of the Book of Tobias. You are probably correct in your statement of the reason this book was rejected by the early church Fathers and by King James of England.

As you quoted, Tobias 4:16 says, "See thou never do to another what thou wouldst hate to have done to thee by another," is The Golden Rule. This is Law number sixteen of the Laws of God and Creation given to us by Esu Immanuel in Phoenix Journal number 27, p. 56 which says, "You must do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Also called 'The Golden Rule'".

The Golden Rule is Creator God's Law. Had that been kept as the foundation of our laws today, we would, indeed, have Heaven on Earth. We need to be reminded that inspite of man's laws, God's Law still holds for those, who would enter Heaven.

In Love and Light,

Patrick H. Bellringer

Reply

----- Original Message -----

From: EW

To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com

Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 9:03 PM

Subject: Re: "Hello, Central!" What is God's Law?

Patrick, Thanks for posting my response to Tobias 4:16

In my research, I found that the negative form of the Golden Rule is shown to mankind through the reasoning of the mind - instinctively, if you will. The 'mind circuits' discussed in the URANTIA Book, which are the 'programs' built up upon the basic operating system of the mind-electro/chemical computer, tell us about the circuit of 'courage-fear' which engenders 'self-preservation'. Number 7 is the circuit of 'wisdom' - 'putting tomorrow into today's contemplations'.

By these two 'mind circuits', we are able to logically deduce the 'negative Golden Rule', and thus the maxim of law: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."

On the other hand, the positive form of the Golden Rule is only logical to one who knows, understands and accepts 'eternal life'. And, we have no way of determining that is the case by are own reasoning - we must be told by acceptable revelation. Observing UFOs would not reveal to us that we have eternal life.

Thus, we had the positive Golden Rule taught in combination with the fact of eternal life 2,000 years ago by Jesua. Simply put, if one is going to be dealing with those whom you encounter in this lifetime throughout eternity, and know that they are truly family, then the positive Golden Rule makes total sense. If one does not know of, understand and accept 'eternal life', then the positive Golden Rule is totally illogical to that one.

EW

Reply

Original Message -----

From: CB

To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com

Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 5:10 PM

Subject: The Golden Rule

A few years ago I unraveled what I perceive to be the truth about the 'Golden Rule'. That is, 'Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.' Like a math problem I deduced that if one treated oneself horribly, one would 'do unto others' horribly as well. As I see it, the truth of the Golden Rule is that one must be good to oneself in a healthy, not selfish, manner in order to know how to 'do unto others' in the same healthy loving way; thereby expecting the same in return. What a beautiful world it will be when love conquers the wars that rage in the hearts of humans.

CB