
'HELLO, CENTRAL!' TITLES OF NOBILITY (Updated May 13, 2009)
Patrick H. Bellringer
Message:
Dear Bellringers:
What most of the public does not know about attorneys is that they pledge allegience to the BAR. What the BAR means is that it is the British Accredited Registery.
Which makes all attorneys British Citizens. And they have no authority over any of American Citizens. They are all frauds.
With love and light,
RB
(Response)
consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
#1. (Reply)
If you want to post this you can about the Original 13th Amendment and the \"BAR\"
ORIGINAL 13TH AMENDMENT
From: David M. Dodge, Fields Lane, Brewster, New York 10509 voice/fax
914-278-6452. An update on the amendment to the United States Constitution
that the attorneys \"disappeared\" (subverted off the Constitution) in order to
establish a claim of superiority - Titles of Nobility over the people - Amendment
XIII - updated: September 9, 1993.
If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or
retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent
of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or
emolument of any kind whatever, from any emporer, king, prince, or
foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United
States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit
under them, or either of them.
This was instituted and passed because of Article 1, Section 9 Clause 8, which
stated:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person
holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall without the Consent
of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any
kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State. (No punishment
stated for doing so).
AND
Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 stated:
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant
letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make
anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass
any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law or Law impairing the Obligation
of Contracts or grant any Title of Nobility. (Again no punishment for
doing so).
David Dodge while doing some research in the basement of a court house in Maine
came across a copy of an old Constitution that contained the Original 13th
Amendment as a ratified amendment to the Constitution. This launched his search
of all the states and territories of that period.
The following states and/or territories have published the Titles of Nobility
(TON) amendment in their official publications as a ratified amendment to the
Constituiton of the United States.
Colorado 1861, 1862, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868
Connecticut 1821, 1824, 1835, 1839
Dakota 1862, 1863, 1867
Florida 1823, 1825, 1838
Georgia 1819, 1822, 1837, 1846, 1855
Illinois 1823, 1825, 1827, 1833, 1839, dis 1845
Indiana 1824, 1831, 1838
Iowa 1839, 1842, 1843
Kansas 1855, 1861, 1862, 1868
Kentucky 1822
Louisiana 1825, 1838/1838 (two separate publications)
Maine 1825, 1831
Massechusetts 1823
Michigan 1827, 1833
Mississippi 1823, 1824, 1839
Missouri 1825, 1835, 1840, 1841, 1845*
Nebraska 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1860, 1862, 1873
North Carolina 1819, 1828
Northwest
Territories 1833
Ohio 1819, 1824, 1831, 1833, 1835, 1848
Pennsylvania 1818, 1824, 1831
Rhode Island 1822
Virginia 1819 (13th state to ratify this amendment)
Wyoming 1869, 1876
Totals: 24 states in 79 separate official government publications Pimsleur\'s a
checklist of legal publications does not list 24 of the above volumes in 9
different States and Territories.
*This volume was published twice in 1845. The 1st published the TON amendment,
the 2nd was published right after Congress set the requirements for Missouri\'s
admission as a state. The TON amendment was replaced with a notation that
this amendment was printed in error in 1835.
Additional publications:
The History of the World, Samuel Maunder, Harper, new York. 1850, vol. II.
p.462. Republished by Wm. Burtis, Baltimore, 1856. Vol. II. P. 462.
The Rights of an American Citizen, Benj. Oliver, Counselor at Law, Boston,
1832. p. 89.
Laws of the United States of America, vol.I, Bioren and Duane, Philadelphia &
Washington, 1815, vol. I, page 74 (See Note).
The American Politition, M. Sears, Boston, 1842, p. 27.
Constitution of the United States, C. A. Cummings, Lynn, Mass. not dated.
p.35.
Political Textbook Containing the Declaration of Independence. Edward
Currier, Blake, Holliston, Mass. 1841, p. 129.
Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States for the use of
Common Schools. John S. Hart, A.M. (Principal of Philadelphia High School
and Professor of Moral, Mental, and Political Science), Butler & Co. ,
Philadelphia, 1850, p. 100.
Potter\'s Justice, H. Potter, U.S. District Court Judge, Raleigh 1828. p. 404
(2nd Ed. - 1st Ed., 1816, does not have TON).
NOTE: The Laws of the United States was published by John Duane. Without
doubt, John was aware of Virginia\'s plan to ratify this amendment which targeted,
amongst other things, the emolument of banking and the agents of foriegn banking
and the agents of foreign banking interests, the attorneys. Currency manipulation
led failure to numerous banks and in turn to many personal bankruptcy including
that of Thomas jefferson. The allegiance of attorneys** has always been with the
money state, whether pharoah, caesar, monarch, or corporate monopoly.
The Court, in Horst v. Moses, 48, Ala. 129, 142 (1872) gave the following
description of a title of nobility.
To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whome
privileges are granted at the expense of the people. It is not necessarily
hereditary, and the objection to it arises more from the privileges supposed
to be forbidden separately in terms \"privilege\", \"honor\", and \"emoluments\",
as they are collectively in the term \"title of nobility\". The prohibition is not
affected by any consideration paid or rendered for the grant.
Bovier\'s Law Dictionary, 15th Edition, vol. I. (1885) lists the due process
amendments as V and XV (XV was renumbered to XIV) on p. 571.
The prohibition of titles of nobility estops the claim of eminent domain
through fictions of law. Eminent domain is the legal euphemism for
expropriation, an unreasonable search and seizure given sanction by the
targets of this amendment.
In the Congressinal Record, of march 17, 1993, p. 1303H is reported
Mr. TRAFICANT. Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11. Members of
Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest re-organization
of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are
setting forth hopefully a blue-print for our future. There are some who
say it is a coroner\'s report that will lead to our demise.
The attorneys admit that the collapse of every great civilization occured
after they were granted an ex officio monopoly in the courts. ** Se: Acts of
Virginia, Feb. 20, 1812.
END OF REPORT
After the War of 1812 there ws a fire in Wasington which included the section
of the library of Congress where all the records were kept about the Original
13th Amendment after which it was subverted off the Constitution. Is there any
question who was behind the destruction of these records? It was proven in the
Farm Claims suit and will be reinstituted when Nesara is announced as will the
non-ratification of the 16th Amendment, the Income Tax.
ADDENDUM:
The connection between attorneys and the TON amendment is that when
attorneys pass the BAR, they get the title of \"Esquire\". This is a title of nobility.
Let me sight another message:
This is very important for all the people out there who are lawyers.
You know this. You signed an agreement as foreign agents to the
Queen [of England]---the British Accredited Regency---BAR
Association. It is time for everyone to dis-bar themselves as they
a lawfully titled nobility to the Queen [of England] and not to the
U.S. that is under the Constitutional Law. These are acts of treason
that our government has commited. Serious charges along with
treason there is also perjury. Dis-bar yourself if you are part of that
\"esquire-ilk\", because you represent a thorn in the side of the
process where you are not a Constutionally lawful law-smith that
is upholding and defending the Constitution. No more foreign
agents. get out.