FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

'HELLO, CENTRAL!' TITLES OF NOBILITY (Updated May 13, 2009)

Patrick H. Bellringer

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

From: RB
To: <bellringer@fourwinds10.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:41 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10

 

 Message:

 Dear Bellringers:

 What most of the public does not know about attorneys is that they pledge allegience to the BAR.  What the BAR means is that it is the British Accredited Registery.

 Which makes all attorneys British Citizens. And they have no authority over any of American Citizens.  They are all frauds.

 With love and light,

 RB

(Response)

FROM:  Patrick H. Bellringer
     TO:  RB
DATE:  May 12, 2009
SUBJECT:  Reply
 
Dear RB:
 
    You are quite correct.  Under the original 13th Amendment anyone holding a Title of Nobility has allegiance to a foreign power and can not be a citizen of the Republic of the u.S. of A.  Therefore, those person having a prefix after their name, such as esquire are attorneys and members of the "BAR", a foreign corporation, or Dr., are members of The American Medical Association a foreign corporation, or a suffix of Reverend before their name are all foreign agents and lawfully cannot hold public office in our Republic, as they are not lawful citizens.
 
    We have many foreign agents running our government, our medical profession, our courts, our churches and generally controlling our society.  It is time for great change!
 
                            In Love and Light,
                            Patrick H. Bellringer
                            bellringer@fourwinds10.com
                            www.fourwinds10.com
 
The original thirteenth Amendment states:  "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the

consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

#1.  (Reply)

----- Original Message -----
From: DTH
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:57 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10
 
Message:

If you want to post this you can about the Original 13th Amendment and the \"BAR\"

                        ORIGINAL 13TH AMENDMENT

From: David M. Dodge, Fields Lane, Brewster, New York 10509 voice/fax

914-278-6452. An update on the amendment to the United States Constitution

that the attorneys \"disappeared\" (subverted off the Constitution) in order to

establish a claim of superiority - Titles of Nobility over the people - Amendment

XIII - updated: September 9, 1993.

If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or

retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent

of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or

emolument of any kind whatever, from any emporer, king, prince, or

foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United

States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit

under them, or either of them.

This was instituted and passed because of Article 1, Section 9 Clause 8, which

stated:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person

holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall without the Consent

of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any

kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State. (No punishment

stated for doing so).

                                                             AND

Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 stated:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant

letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make

anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass

any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law or Law impairing the Obligation

of Contracts or grant any Title of Nobility. (Again no punishment for

doing so).

David Dodge while doing some research in the basement of a court house in Maine

came across a copy of an old Constitution that contained the Original 13th

Amendment as a ratified amendment to the Constitution. This launched his search

of all the states and territories of that period.

The following states and/or territories have published the Titles of Nobility

(TON) amendment in their official publications as a ratified amendment to the

Constituiton of the United States.

Colorado 1861, 1862, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868

Connecticut 1821, 1824, 1835, 1839

Dakota 1862, 1863, 1867

Florida 1823, 1825, 1838

Georgia 1819, 1822, 1837, 1846, 1855

Illinois 1823, 1825, 1827, 1833, 1839, dis 1845

Indiana 1824, 1831, 1838

Iowa 1839, 1842, 1843

Kansas 1855, 1861, 1862, 1868

Kentucky 1822

Louisiana 1825, 1838/1838 (two separate publications)

Maine 1825, 1831

Massechusetts 1823

Michigan 1827, 1833

Mississippi 1823, 1824, 1839

Missouri 1825, 1835, 1840, 1841, 1845*

Nebraska 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1860, 1862, 1873

North Carolina 1819, 1828

Northwest

Territories 1833

Ohio 1819, 1824, 1831, 1833, 1835, 1848

Pennsylvania 1818, 1824, 1831

Rhode Island 1822

Virginia 1819 (13th state to ratify this amendment)

Wyoming 1869, 1876

Totals: 24 states in 79 separate official government publications Pimsleur\'s a

checklist of legal publications does not list 24 of the above volumes in 9

different States and Territories.

*This volume was published twice in 1845. The 1st published the TON amendment,

the 2nd was published right after Congress set the requirements for Missouri\'s

admission as a state. The TON amendment was replaced with a notation that

this amendment was printed in error in 1835.

Additional publications:

The History of the World, Samuel Maunder, Harper, new York. 1850, vol. II.

p.462. Republished by Wm. Burtis, Baltimore, 1856. Vol. II. P. 462.

The Rights of an American Citizen, Benj. Oliver, Counselor at Law, Boston,

1832. p. 89.

Laws of the United States of America, vol.I, Bioren and Duane, Philadelphia &

Washington, 1815, vol. I, page 74 (See Note).

The American Politition, M. Sears, Boston, 1842, p. 27.

Constitution of the United States, C. A. Cummings, Lynn, Mass. not dated.

p.35.

Political Textbook Containing the Declaration of Independence. Edward

Currier, Blake, Holliston, Mass. 1841, p. 129.

Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States for the use of

Common Schools. John S. Hart, A.M. (Principal of Philadelphia High School

and Professor of Moral, Mental, and Political Science), Butler & Co. ,

Philadelphia, 1850, p. 100.

Potter\'s Justice, H. Potter, U.S. District Court Judge, Raleigh 1828. p. 404

(2nd Ed. - 1st Ed., 1816, does not have TON).

NOTE: The Laws of the United States was published by John Duane. Without

doubt, John was aware of Virginia\'s plan to ratify this amendment which targeted,

amongst other things, the emolument of banking and the agents of foriegn banking

and the agents of foreign banking interests, the attorneys. Currency manipulation

led failure to numerous banks and in turn to many personal bankruptcy including

that of Thomas jefferson. The allegiance of attorneys** has always been with the

money state, whether pharoah, caesar, monarch, or corporate monopoly.

The Court, in Horst v. Moses, 48, Ala. 129, 142 (1872) gave the following

description of a title of nobility.

To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whome

privileges are granted at the expense of the people. It is not necessarily

hereditary, and the objection to it arises more from the privileges supposed

to be forbidden separately in terms  \"privilege\", \"honor\", and \"emoluments\",

as they are collectively in the term \"title of nobility\". The prohibition is not

affected by any consideration paid or rendered for the grant.

Bovier\'s Law Dictionary, 15th Edition, vol. I. (1885) lists the due process

amendments as V and XV (XV was renumbered to XIV) on p. 571.

The prohibition of titles of nobility estops the claim of eminent domain

through fictions of law. Eminent domain is the legal euphemism for

expropriation, an unreasonable search and seizure given sanction by the

targets of this amendment.

In the Congressinal Record, of march 17, 1993, p. 1303H is reported

Mr. TRAFICANT. Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11. Members of

Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest re-organization

of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are

setting forth hopefully a blue-print for our future. There are some who

say it is a coroner\'s report that will lead to our demise.

The attorneys admit that the collapse of every great civilization occured

after they were granted an ex officio monopoly in the courts. ** Se: Acts of

Virginia, Feb. 20, 1812.

END OF REPORT

After the War of 1812 there ws a fire in Wasington which included the section

of the library of Congress where all the records were kept about the Original

13th Amendment after which it was subverted off the Constitution. Is there any

question who was behind the destruction of these records? It was proven in the

Farm Claims suit and will be reinstituted when Nesara is announced as will the

non-ratification of the 16th Amendment, the Income Tax.

ADDENDUM:

The connection between attorneys and the TON amendment is that when

attorneys pass the BAR, they get the title of \"Esquire\". This is a title of nobility.

Let me sight another message:

This is very important for all the people out there who are lawyers.

You know this. You signed an agreement as foreign agents to the

Queen [of England]---the British Accredited Regency---BAR

Association. It is time for everyone to dis-bar themselves as they

a lawfully titled nobility to the Queen [of England] and not to the

U.S. that is under the Constitutional Law. These are acts of treason

that our government has commited. Serious charges along with

treason there is also perjury. Dis-bar yourself if you are part of that

\"esquire-ilk\", because you represent a thorn in the side of the

process where you are not a Constutionally lawful law-smith that

is upholding and defending the Constitution. No more foreign

agents. get out.