Dear Patrick and Anne:

I just finished reading Jim Marrs latest book, "The Raise of the Fourth Reich" and I started  a new one by Tony Bushby, titled "Papal Billions" . I'd like to include some paragraphs of Chapter # 2, in order to get your opinion which I value very much, on this subject.

"Up  until the Council of Nicaea, Roma aristocracy primarily worshiped two Greek gods. Apollo and Zeus, but the great bulk of common people idolized either Julius Caesar or Mithra. Caesar was deified by the Roman Senate after his death (d. 15th March, 44 BC) and subsequently venerated as the Divine Julius The word 'saviour ' was affixed to his name, its literal meaning 'one who sows the seed', i. e. a phallic god. Caesar was hailed as ' God made manifest and universal Saviour of human life' and his succesor, Augustus was called the ' ancestral God and Saviour of the whole human race' (Man and his Gods, Homer Smith, Little, Brown and Co., Boston, 1952). Emperor Nero (37-68), whose original name was L. Domitius Ahenobarbus, was immortalized on his coins as the 'Saviour of mankind (ibid). Because the Divine Julius was Roman Saviour and 'Father of the Empire', he was considered 'god among the Roman rabble for more than 300 years. He was the deity in some Western presbyter's texts, but was not recognized in Eastern or Oriental writtings.

Constantine's intention at Nicaea was to 'create an entirely new god for the Empire' (Confession of a Vatican Archivist) that would unite all religious factions under one deity, and presbyters were asked to debate and decide who their new would be. Delegates argued among themselves, expressing personal motives for inclusion of particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own special divinity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for discussion; ' As yet the new God had not been selected by the council, and so they balloted, in order to determine the matter; for one year and five months the balloting lasted' (God's Book of Eskra, xlviii, 26-53 Prof. S. L. MacGuire's trans, Salisbury, 1921).

At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover thet the presbyters had not agreed on a new  deity but had balloted down to a short list of five prospects, namely, Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus. Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea, and he ultimatelydecided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the mighty Druid god, Hesus (crucified in Britain and latter restored to life), be joined with the Eastern saviour-god Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus a caricature, or the personification of an ideal, Hesus Krishna, would be the name of the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was a majority show of hands that both divinities became one God... 161 votes to 157. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roma Apotheoses Decree to legally deify tw deities as on, and did so by democratic consent. A new god was proclaimed and 'officially ratified by Constantine' (Acta Concili Niceni, Colon, 1618) That purely political act of deification effectively, and legally, placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composition. That abstraction lent earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion, and when the letter 'J' was introduced into alphabets anround the Ninth Century, the linguistic relic of the name became Jesus Christ."

He goes on to elaborate on how the New and the Old Testaments were forgeries and a creation of the new church for their benefit. As you can gather, this would be mind bogling to many people (not me), that's why I need to know your expert and wise opinion.

I know that you are very busy, but I don't mind whether I receive the answer from eithe of you, or if you decide to post it on Hello Central, it's fine with me, just omit my full name, you can use AC.

In Love and Light,

AC

(Response)