'Hello, Central!' Do Any Readers Know the Truth Behind a Negatvie Rh Factor? (Updated July 31, 2008)
Patrick H. Bellringer
CT
(Response)
RH-Negative Blood and the Reptilian Connection
Compiled by Dee Finney
The following is presented for research purposes
The files were not edited in any way
|
UFO'S ANCIENT ASTRONAUT MAGAZINE October, 1976 Page 46 B L O O D O F T H E G O D S Are you an Rh Negative blood type? If so you could be a decendent of the ancient astronauts themselves!
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease. She has 0 negative blood. She has written a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus. One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur? Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ (135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge to ask "why?" Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why have, we always felt we were "different" from other people. And so many other things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combinations of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less. Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past. All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child. Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 157%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other European language. Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old." From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of Israel, male children of God, not children of man - Ex. 34:23." Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation." It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?
Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God. These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?) This message has been written for thousands of years. There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye. Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this tradition come from? People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why? How important could this have been to primitive cave men? Struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy? They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance. So why should they preserve their genealogy? Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to preserve their heritage, until a future date when they would return and it would be understood? Until a time, like now, when their descendent would be able to understand the message they were leaving.
Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand. Are we that future generation? Was there a message left for us to understand? Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand? What we don't know will still affect us. You will not see unless you look. Only through knowledge will we find truth.
I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence. Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.
For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing. Could the true "missing link" actually be man himself? The unknown link between earth and the stars - hybrid man. Man may be the missing link between primate and extraterrestrial. It seems inconceivable to me that those working on the evolution theory have overlooked this possibility. How can they state, that these people are lacking a factor contained in all other earthly primates, including the naked ape, and not ask why? What other characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon to other people? Is there a real difference other than just a different blood?
A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars," Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2. He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor. I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion. If mankind is a hybrid descendant of the ancient' astronauts, surely there would be some, appearing periodically, who would be genetically very similar to them. Would this not include their psychic powers? Could the great sleeping prophet, Edgar Cayce, have been one of these? Could Jesus Christ also have been one of these? A true descendant of the ancient astronauts. If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also have their powers and possibly their knowledge. I cannot say whether he was born with this knowledge or whether he established psychic communication with our cosmic family, but it is plain that he had powers far beyond those of mortal man. Could he have been an example of what the ancient astronauts were like? Jesus stated that the Father and him were one. Could he have actually meant that literally? He may have been an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father. He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention. Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary's sterilized egg? Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?
The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth, may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid. It is not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle of our heritage. Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing. Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5000 year old mummies. Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts? Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their blood and tissue factors? Could there be a message in the genetic factors of the mummies themselves?
There is an interesting fact found in the book "X-Raying the Pharaohs" by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners). Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled Prince Moutenihet was actually a female hamadryas baboon. An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying. Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her? Why else would it have been buried with her? A genetic throwback?
My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers also have Rh negative blood. Most psyphic and faith healers also have this blood. Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the ancient astronaut theory and other phenomena also have Rh negative blood.
Erich von Daniken has Rh negative blood and a thirst for the truth. Brad Steiger also has Rh negative blood. His new book "Gods of Aquarius" considers this possibility. Robert Antone Wilson, author of "Illuminus", also has this blood. There are many others too numerous to list here.
Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields? Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for? It has been said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.
There are about 5000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start our search.
A comparative analysis is now being done and we need your help. If you are reading this, you must be one of the lost children of Israel. Anyone else would not have read this far. copyright 1976, all rights reserved) |
|
Janet Swerdlow writes to a reader: |
I read the article about the Rh Negative blood and I, too, have 0 negative blood. All star people seem to have it. I donated plasma for quite a few years to make the Rhogam shot that is given to a pregnant woman who has 0 negative blood and is married to a man with any other blood type.
Here\'s an article I found online and I think it tells it all.
Rh-Negative Blood factor related to the REPTOIDS ?
BLOOD TYPES : http://ufoexperienc
John Carpenter of MUFON was director of abduction investigations was fired
for his controversial Reptile/blood type opinions....
....... it is interesting to note three possibilities exist to explain the
O-neg blood type (known as the universal donor type).
These are:
1) re-emergence of a dormant gene;
2) Exobiology & Inter-dimensional;
3) chance mutation, happening within the last 20-35k years.
1. First it is important to realize, sentient life on our planet can be
traced back over 2-million years. Many advanced civilizations have risen and
fallen. We have no direct way of knowing what were the conditions giving
rise to these civilizations, nor their physiology. A good primer is
"Forbidden Archaeology" by Richard Cremo. Given this longevity, it is
conceivable that extinct races could pass on certain of their genetic
traits.
For example, let's consider there were two sentient branches of the human
race in existence at the time: Cro-Magnons from which gave us modern humans,
and Neanderthals, of tall stature who became extinct. If you follow this
line of succession, it is highly likely that sometime after Cro-Magnons
became dominant, there was some degree of cohabitation with Neanderthals.
Rh-Neg may have been found within this extinct race, or may even have
predominated - allowing it to cross over into Cro-Magnons decedents.
2. Exobiology is the search for life elsewhere in the universe. There is a
very high probability that sentient life on this planet has interacted with
visitors from elsewhere in this universe, or perhaps more likely,
Interdimensional.
Whether through laboratory research (cloning or invitro fertilization)
offspring were produced having traits (RH O-Neg) received from their off
world, or out-of-phase visitors. I once communicated with an enigmatic
individual who suggested O-neg would be the ideal blood type for space
travellers. Of utmost importance would be the treating of wounds, minor
operations, and other conditions involving blood loss. During long space
voyages, perhaps with no possibility of ever returning to their homeward, it
would be convenient if all members of a crew were of the same blood-group,
or failing that, a large proportion where O-neg. These would most likely be
specially engineered crew members . . . living blood storage banks,
so-to-speak.
3. There is always the possibility that this is a true mutation, arising -
given its relatively low distribution - within the past 20k - 35k years. My
studies have not extended into how precisely this would occur. Personally, I
consider all variations of RH-neg as derived from an original O-Neg donor,
which factor has recently and selectively mutated through the human race to
give the low incidence within other blood groups, but maintaining the alien
(non-monkey) factors.
************
As a matter of interest, all O-negs are highly monitored and studied.
Blood Type / Abductee - Connection?
http://www.abovetop
I've come across many references to
O negative blood in ,
abduction cases,
abduction studies,
reptilian conspiricies,
grey conspiricies,
Illuminati conspiricies,
New world order , ect.
************
FACTS:
Rh-Negatives are RARE. But, strangely...
blood is considered to be a "Universal Donor". It means his or her blood can
be given to anyone, regardless of blood type, without causing a transfusion
reaction.The Rh-Negatives Factor is considered a "Mutation" of "Unknown
Origin", which happened in Europe, about 25,000-35,000 years ago. Then this
group spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland,
etc.O negatives have pure blood, no antigens , no rhesus monkey gene.many
articles said these O- people have these traits.
TRAITS:There are certain similairites that occur to those having rh negative
blood - according to some who have it there are common patterns found, which
include the following:
1. predominance of green or hazel eyes that change color
2. Black or reddish hair
3. low pulse rate
4. low blood pressure
5. keen sight or hearing
6. ESP
7. extra rib or vertabrae [or a cauda (a tail)].
8. UFO connections
9. love of space and science
10. a sense of not belonging to the human race
11. piercing eyes
12. para-normal occurrences
13. physic dreams
14. truth seekers
15. desire for higher wisdom
16. empathetic illnesses
17. deep compassion for fate of mankind
18. a sense of a 'mission' in life
19. physic abilities
20. unexplained scars on body
21. capability to disrupt electrical appliances
22. alien contacts
What my purpose for this post is to find any connections to abductees and
their bloodtype as well as to either debunk or help prove some of these
claims.
************
DISCUSSION OF BLOOD GROUPS AND THE HUMAN SPECIES
http://www.anomalog
If the RH negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link
(seemingly outside of the theorized evolutionary process) - from where did
it originate? Geneticists generally claim the RH-negative factor is a
mutation of unknown origin which apparently happened only a few thousand
years ago.
These ?negative? blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is
now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and
Australia. Basque peoples contain the largest concentration of known 'O'
negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined
themselves to one area, whereas the Celtic people have branched out among
all of the new world.
Blood Types Conspiracy & RH Factor spooky stuff...
Here are a few tidbits about this blood thing. In ALL blood groups
there exists a common microbe that in essence is THE LIFE FORCE ITSELF.
During experiments that our team conducted we heated the blood to 700
degrees F and also put it in Liquid Nitrogen. This microbe which is visible
only with a highly modified dark field microscope that was custom built for
us was STILL ALIVE. We have also tested this on ?mummy dust?. This microbe
is STILL alive after 5000 years plus when the mummy dust is placed in a ph
perfect solution the same as the "live blood", it returns back to ?life?.
Those having the hardest time being the "O" Rh- blood groups with alien
(to Earth) heritage. I cannot reveal at this time just how this is done but
I can say this, we are at a crossroad as far as our ability to affect our
OUTER world by changing the INNER world of the blood. Every disease is
nothing more than a reflection of the INNER terrain of the blood. As the
blood is intimately integrated with the life force, this explains the
feeling that we have when working with people that have the same blood type.
When you measure the heart harmonics of people with "O" RH-neg blood,
they are usually lower if they are smokers and heavy red meat eaters. The
ones who eat fish and vegetables are in the normal range. This is a very
new science and there are but a handful of people who are involved in this
research.
Here is something for all of you to think about:
There is a race of people in a remote region of China that are only 3 - 4
feet tall and speak a language spoken only within that remote area. When
they try to move from this region to lower geological elevations, THEY DIE.
Their skin colour is ashy white. Their eyes are very small almost like
slits.
THE pH REGULATORY SYSTEM OF THE BODY
The pH balance of the human bloodstream is recognized by all medical
physiology texts as one of the most important biochemical balances in all of
human body chemistry.
pH is the acronym for "Potential Hydrogen". In definition, it is the degree
of concentration of hydrogen ions in a substance or solution. It is
measured on a logarithmic scale from 0 to 14. Higher numbers means a
substance is more alkaline in nature and there is a greater potential for
absorbing more hydrogen ions. Lower numbers indicate more acidity with less
potential for absorbing hydrogen ions.
Our body pH is very important because pH controls the speed of our body?s
biochemical reactions. It does this by controlling the speed of enzyme
activity as well as the speed that electricity moves through our body.
The higher (more alkaline) the pH of a substance or solution, the more
electrical resistance that substance or solution holds.
Therefore, electricity travels slower with higher pH.
All biochemical reactions and electrical (life) energy is under pH control.
If we say something has an acid pH, we are saying it is hot and fast. As an
example, look at the battery of your car. It?s an acid battery. On cold
days you want it to be hot and ready, and you want your car to start fast.
Alkaline pH on the other hand, biochemically speaking, is slow and cool.
Compare it to an alkaline battery in a flashlight. You want that battery to
be cool, and to burn out slowly.
Here is an example of how pH can control. Look around you at society in
general. Do you see people getting exhausted, burned out, and quick to
anger? Do you see a rise in violence? In part it could be due to the fact
that people today lean to an acid pH. As a society we are running hot and
fast. How did we get there? We guzzle coffee for breakfast.
There are about 5000 known blood factors, and all of these must contribute
to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start
our search.
Suggested reading:
Max Flindt - Mankind, Child of the Stars, Fawcett Books 1 & 2
Brad Steiger, Gods of Aquarius.
http://www.anomalog
************
Conspiracy of Social Consciousness
-
BLOOD GROUPS -
THE MYSTERY OF O-NEGATIVE -
-
http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/be/index-2.html
In the Fall of 1990, two medical researchers, Drs.William Lyman and
Steven Kaali, working at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New
York City made an important discovery. They found that they could
inactivate the HIV virus by applying a low voltage direct current electrical
potential with an extremely small current flow to AIDS infected blood in a
test tube. Initially, they discovered this in the lab by inserting two platinum
current to the electrodes and found that a current flow in the range of 50-100 microamperes (uA) produced the most effective results. Practically all of
the HIV viral particles were adversely affected while normal blood cells
remained unharmed. The viral particles were not directly destroyed by the
electric current, but rather the outer protein coating of the virus was affected
in such a way as to prevent the virus from producing reverse transcriptase,
a necessary enzyme needed by the virus to invade human cells. Reverse
engineer the DNA reproduction machinery. After using the host cell to
reproduce itself into thousands of new virii, the swollen host cell (now called
syncytia or giant cell) will burst and spew the contents into the bloodstream
or lymph system. This is how the virus spreads, but lacking reverse transcriptase,
the HIV virus can't invade the host cell and it becomes vulnerable to destruction
by the body's immune system. (The details of this experiment can be read from
Kaali's patent application.)
-
====================================================== O negative blood group is replaced by O positive by donnor liver, immune system no longer rejects transplant. The question needing
answer in response to the following article is, "Are there other
O negative recipients? This may be a dramatic demonstration of the transforming power of O negative blood.
- Australian 'miracle' girl changes blood group. Immune system Reuters Published Friday, January 25, 2008. Canberra..An Australian teenage girl has become the world's first known transplant patient to change blood groups and take on the immunie system of her organ donor, doctors said on Friday, calling her a "one in six billion miracle. Demi Lee Brennan now 15, received a donor liver when she was nine yeasrs old and her own liver failed. It's like my second change at life, "Ms. Brennan told local media,recounting how her body achieved what doctors said was the holy grail of transplant surgery. "It's kind of hard to believe."
Ms. Brennan's body changed blood group from O negative to
O positive when she became ill while on drugs to avoid rejection
of the organ by her body's immune system
. Full story here: http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=26358-
BLOOD GROUPS AND THE HUMAN SPECIES While you won't find many of the following sentiments reflected within the "scientific" community, it is interesting to note three possibilities exist to explain the Rh negative blood type (known as the universal donor type). These are: 1) re-emergence of a primary gene; 2) Exobiology manipulation; 3) chance mutation within the last 20-35k years.1. First, it is important to understand sentient life on our planet can be traced back over 2-million years. Many advanced civilizations have risen and fallen. We have no direct way of knowing what were the conditions effecting the rise and decline of these civilizations, nor their physiology. A good primer is "Forbidden Archaeology" by Richard Cremo. Given this longevity, it is conceivable that extinct races could pass on certain of their genetic traits.
For example, let's consider there were two sentient branches of the human race in existence at the time: Cro-Magnons from which gave us modern humans, and Neanderthals, of tall stature who became extinct. If you follow this line of succession, It is highly likely that sometime after Cro-Magnons became dominant, there was some degree of cohabitation with Neanderthals. Rh negative may have been found within this extinct race, or may even have predominated - allowing it to cross over into Cro-Magnons decedents.
2. Exobiology is the search for life elsewhere in the universe. There is a very high probability that sentient life on this planet has interacted with visitors from elsewhere in this universe, or perhaps more likely, Interdimensional. Whether through laboratory research (cloning or invitro fertilization), offspring were produced having traits (RH O- neg.) received from their off world, or out-of-phase visitors.
O-neg would be the ideal blood type for space travelers. During extended voyages, the tending and treatment of wounds, Minor operations, and other conditions involving blood loss would present significant problems. During long space voyages, without possibility of returning to their homeward, it would be convenient if all members - or a significant proportion - of a crew were O-neg. These are most likely be specially engineered crew members . . . living blood storage banks, so-to-speak.
3. The possibility exists this is a true mutation, arising - given its relatively low distribution - within the past 20k - 35k years. My studies have not extended into how precisely this would occur.
Personally, I consider all variations of Rh negative as derived from an original O- neg. donor, which factor has recently and selectively mutated through the human race to give the low incidence within other blood groups, but maintaining the alien (non monkey) factors.
As a matter of interest, all O-negs are highly monitored and studied. -
-
- DO TYPE O RH NEGATVIE HUMANS OFFER HOPE TO A DYING WORLD?
INTERESTING FACTS REGARDING BLOOOD TYPE AND CANCER RISK
-
Type A Blood:
Type B Blood:
Type O Blood:
Age 00-39 08% Risk
Age 00-39 00% Risk
Age 00-39 04% Risk
Age 00-39 00% Risk
Age 40-49 18% Risk
Age 40-49 16% Risk
Age 40-49 05% Risk
Age 40-49 01% Risk
Age 50-59 29% Risk
Age 50-59 21% Risk
Age 50-59 08% Risk
Age 50-59 03% Risk
Age 60-69 43% Risk
Age 60-69 40% Risk
Age 60-69 14% Risk
Age 60-69 04% Risk
Age 70-79 52% Risk
Age 70-79 48% Risk
Age 70-79 22% Risk
Age 70-79 09% Risk
Age 80-89 26% Risk
Age 80-89 19% Risk
Age 90-99 28% Risk
Age 90-99 20% Risk
| T | Type O Blood: Age 00 – 39: 00% Risk Age 40 – 49: 01% Risk Age 50 – 59: 03% Risk Age 60 – 69: 04% Risk Age 70 – 79: 09% Risk Age 80 – 89: 19% Risk Age 90 – 99: 20% Risk |
-
Consider: Cloning has been practiced much longer than most might agree. The recent flurry of activity can be more appropriately labeled: societal conditioning. The genii is about to be released, as it becomes general knowledge that human cloning has been practiced for generations. In fact, prior to the current historical epoch - beginning about 200,000-years-ago - there was direct intervention against the peoples of Earth for that very reason, which is demonstrated by the Rh plus factor in humans. Genetic experimentation (largely directed by EBEs) was so successful, that most of Earth's remaining original inhabitants were eventually wiped out. Remnants of those original peoples still exist, but no longer on this world. They are regular visitors. To understand the basis of this argument it requires you to but aside your current understanding of linear time, expanding your personal point-of-reference to include an integrated serial view of dimensional reality.
BLOOD GROUPS - General Overview
Nearly 85% of all human beings have RH positive blood. Which merely indicates that their red blood cells contain a substance called the RHesus (rhesus) blood factor. Simply put, their positive blood contains a protein that can be linked to the Rhesus monkey. It is acknowledged that blood factors are transmitted with more exactitude than any other human or animal characteristic. It is not generally known from where the negative RH factor derived, although tantalizing evidence exists that it is incidental to human evolution, and that it is some manner of survival mechanism. A factor that expresses when mankind nears epochal change. The current onset began approximately 35,000 years ago near the end of the last ice age.The highest concentration of RH negative blood occurs in the Basque people of Northern Spain and Southern France, and in the Eastern/Oriental Jews. Only 15% of the entire world's population is known to have the RH negative blood factor. While it is known that RH negative blood - (type 'O') is the purest blood known to mankind, it is not known from where the negative factor originates, as it is generally theorized by evolutionists that there is an unbroken bloodline from early human prototypes (pre humans) to present day human beings.
As previously mentioned, 'Rh negative' blood indicates no protein connections exist to the Rhesus monkey, whereas 'RH positive' blood does carry protein linked to the Rhesus monkey - hence the 'RH' designation, i.e.. rhesus. All other earthly primates have this RH factor. Thus if all humans evolved from that line, all would have the RH factor. Obviously, that is not the case. Therefore, there must have been some manner of intervention giving rise to Rh negative blood groups.
Blood type 'O' is the most common of the blood groups. When we separate the 'O' types into 'negative' and 'positive' we find that 'O' negative (the universal donor blood) constitutes less than 7% of the world’s population. Science at this very time is attempting to create a synthetic RH negative 'O' blood, but without success. For while the protein in positive blood can be cloned, that of negative blood cannot - which is quite interesting, and may be indicative of an alien origin, or more probable, from early genetic experimentation during previous advanced human civilization(s). There was apparent need for a stable blood factor that would not mutate, nor could it be cloned.
If the RH negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link (apparently outside of the theorized evolutionary process) - from where did it originate? Geneticists generally claim the Rh negative factor is a mutation of unknown origin which apparently happened only a few thousand years ago. These ?negative? blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and Australia. Basque peoples contain the largest concentration of known 'O' negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined themselves to one area, whereas contemporary Celtic, who also carried the Rh negative factor, peoples branched out among all of the new world.
Interesting facts:
A RH negative pregnant mother's body will reject her positive blooded baby in the womb. Her body fights the RHesus factor as a foreign element. Alternatively, and most interestingly, a positive mother's body does not reject the negative baby she is carrying.
Most do not know that as Rh Oneg individuals, they are tracked throughout their whole lives by world-wide governmental agencies interested in understanding the genesis of this group, and for other more
complex societal purposes. (follow this line of thought in the new material to be posted as a continuation of Journey to the Absolute Elsewhere)