- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search



Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0



3/23/91   HATONN



THE HATE CRIMES BILL: The U.S. Congress has passed and President Bush signed a "Hate Crimes Bill" which requires the Justice Department to collect and publish data on crimes motivated by prejudice against a race, religion, ethnic group, or sexual orientation.  Pushed through by the powerful gay/homosexual lobby, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, this law authorizes federal and state authorities to collect federal and state authorities to collect data on so-called hate crimes and to formulate laws or regulations to prosecute perpetrators of same.  "Hate crimes" is then defined as an assault, intimidation, or harassment against a minority or homosexual group--in other words, unkind words or even thoughts toward these groups can be construed as a "hate crime".

Your Senator Helms argued against such a "bill" for you cannot legislate morality or kindness nor lovingness.  Laws then, can become bindings which can be interpreted and reinterpreted, and finally hang an entire nation on the basis of a "thing" never included in the original "law" and negates in point the very "thing" originally set out to correct.

As Jesse Helms entered into the Congressional Record (Feb. 8, 1990):

"Let the Senate understand that this bill is the flagship of the homosexual, lesbian legislative agenda.  Apparently there is a great deal of political clout in the homosexual community.  With this legislation, the radical elements of the homosexual community have hoodwinked a lot of people into believing that this is not a homosexual right's bill....The bill actually attempts to shift our focus away from criminal behavior and toward motivation behind the behavior."

The point being, brothers, is that any CRIME against ANYONE is what should be focused herein for it matters not whether the recipient of a bullet or a beating is heterosexual or homosexual--it is the bullet or the beating which is the point.  You see, the law itself could be interpreted in one of your "Injustice" courts to be that if a "homosexual" beats a "heterosexual" then it is perfectly alright--legally and, somehow, morally.  It is somehow now criminal to cast opinion against say, a Black man but it is perfectly fine for the same Black man to castigate a White man.

As it was pointed out, a person will be guilty of a "hate crime" for simply speaking out publicly, or having negative thoughts against, say, a "Jew", a Black, a Mexican, a lesbian, a homosexual or sodomite, or their political movements.  Helms went on to say:

"We are now considering legislation based on statistics that include name calling at public rallies as crimes.  Are we going onto the school yards of this country and when two kids get angry with each other and call each other names--what are we going to do, cart them over to the reformatory or add them to the list of 'hate crimes' perpetrators?  This is ridiculous!"

Helms went on to point out the hypocrisy of liberals who defend flag burning and pornographic art as "free speech" but want to jail someone for exercising their "free speech" by verbally expressing their disapproval of a gay, a black, or some other so-called and self-appointed minority group or organization.  If this is a fact, then I would most surely pronounce that Dharma and those writing for the Space Command are a minority group and the ones who object to our literature should be hanged or at the least suffer incarceration in prison for the remainder of their natural lives.  Since we now establish unilaterally that Dharma is a "minority", then we request that William Cooper be fined and incarcerated and pay damage by cause of defamation and insulting "bashing" by referring to her as "a slimy puke" and threats (which certainly bashed her sensitivity) to "throw every fucking legal thing in the books at you!"  Why?  Because she writes Truth which disagrees with his presentations.  But is this not "bashing"?  Or, is it only those who speak out in behalf of Truth, freedom, the Constitution, and rights of citizens who are allowed to "be bashed"?  Is it not "minority" "bashing" to literally shoot rifles with nice live bullets--at Dharma?  She certainly seems to constitute a "minority" by definition.  Or would you consider that the laws of the land are actually quite sufficient for protections--IF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM ACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAWS THEREOF?  That allows Mr. Cooper to say anything he wishes about Dharma and it is none of her business and, at any circumstance known to citizens, to be shot at is illegal and unlawful as well.

Herein and along the same lines, supposing that a citizen looked at the facts presented in literature and announced a conclusion that, say, "The National Organization for Women is made up of leftists, lesbians, and men-haters"--that person (citizen) would literally be guilty of a "hate crime".

Mr. Helms concluded:

"There is no doubt in my mind where the passage of this legislation will lead us.  It will be the first time that sexual orientation--and that means homosexuality--will be marked out for protected status.  The radical homosexuals know this, and this legislation is simply one step in their radical revolution.  They make no bones about their ultimate goal in getting this Hate Crimes Act enacted.  Mr. David Wertheimer of the Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, commenting on the need for this legislation, said: 'Our final goal should be nothing less than the expansion of the Civil Rights Act to include lesbians and gay men.' "

Other supporters of this Hate Crimes Act are rather interesting: Anti Defamation League and World Zionist Organization, World "Jewish" League, American Bar Association (could in mean just tons and tons of new business?), National Council of Churches (oh pain and agony), National Education Association (who also teach the techniques of proper homosexual sex act to the school children), League of Women Voters, National Organization of Women, National Lawyers Guild, Presbyterian Church U.S.A., United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church, Unitarian Church, and all of the gay/lesbian organizations.

Now, homosexual inclusion in the Civil Rights Act means employers, churches, clubs, etc., will have to accept or employ gays in the same ratio as they claim to be in the population (just as with other minority groups, they claim some ten percent) whether they have AIDS or not.  Would you have ten percent of all employee pools infected with deadly smallpox?  Remember that "bashing" or not, AIDS is lethal and is now PROVEN to be spread through airborne transmission just like a nice little cold in the nose.  Well, it matters not that which you think about it; if it is included as intended--for discrimination against those groups, it would become a criminal offense.

However, the broader implications of this Hate Crimes Act are really ominous.  Free speech in your nation is already in grave, grave danger.  This legislation will be used against conservatives and Christians over the next few years as they speak out against groups who threaten the very way of life and freedoms of your nation, and will be used to sentence, jail, or otherwise destroy the opponents of any social deviation in the country--without recourse.  Subsequent legislation will undoubtedly criminalize such "hate crimes" so that, one day in the very near future, a conservative or simply one who "disagrees" could be jailed for speaking out against the Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, the State Department, or various leftist groups--all are minority groups and after all, "minorities are in need of your protection at all costs, including your very existence.

You may not have to worry about little bills and "acts" like the above, however, for the full intent is to remove your existing Constitution and replace it with the New Constitution under the One World Government and all will become moot as to freedoms, etc.

Let us take a bit of an example.  Let us say, you are "Mr. Doe" and you live a bit of a stressed out lifestyle and you simply do not wish to run the risk of acquiring AIDS virus.  Let us say you even like the homosexual concept--well, sir, it won't matter what you "prefer" or do not prefer--you will work beside the homosexual--who may well have AIDS.  Now, however, does this give equal rights to the homosexual who has AIDS?  No, it singles out for special privilege, the homosexual!

Well, you say, no-one MEANS "THAT" and "how could they enforce such a thing?"  Easy--they plan to remove all your weapons for protection of self.  They are now training your police with use of Soviet KGB and Mossad special forces to ENFORCE THESE LAWS AS THEY COME ABOUT--AND--TAKE AWAY YOUR DEFENSE WEAPONS.  YOU WILL HAVE NO RECOURSE BUT TO OBEY OR PERISH.


Let us hear from LENIN:

"One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the workers and the disarming of the bourgeois (the middle class)."

and, from Noah Webster, An Examination Into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 1787:

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.  The Supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." (SO FAR!  IT IS NOW TWO CENTURIES LATER!)

How about James Madison, The Federalist Papers:

"Americans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation."

And how about the words, in 1990, to a female student from Beijing, Red China, describing her parent's last words to her:

"Tell the American people never to lose their guns.  As long as they keep their guns in their hands, whatever happened here will NEVER HAPPEN THERE!"



Communists, socialists, bureaucrats, and criminals have no desire to be shot; they prefer to deal with an unarmed citizenry which is helpless to resist any and all whims of the Elite.  What is equally important is that both the communists and the criminal element have long proven that they can and will obtain firearms, no matter what the government restrictions to the contrary may be.  So the theory of taking arms away from criminals is laughable at best.

The communists have taken over nation after nation when the number of communists in that country numbered less then three percent of the population.  How could this happen?  Because they were the ones with the guns.  It happened in Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, China, the Balkins, and so many other countries, I shall not list them.  More recently, this happened in Cuba, Central America, and Africa. It is happening today in the Natal Province and black townships of South Africa--where the revolutionary "comrades" have the guns, made in the Soviet Union, and those of the non-Elite Christian and anti-communist blacks remain unarmed by edict of South Africa's white liberal government.  This is why word comes out of slashings and stabbings; they have no other weapons with which to defend themselves.  This same scenario is being played out in the Philippines, in the mountains of Peru, and in El Salvador where the communist revolutionaries have the guns and the people do not.  It is now happening in the United Europe as thousands of well-armed Spetsnaz commandos and KGB with Mossad forces are pouring into Western Europe at this very minute.

Most of you loving and sleeping Americans are still not capable of understanding that the communists abroad and at home, aided and abetted by liberals, Zionists, socialist politicians, and the controlled media, are working overtime to disarm the American people.  Through media disinformation, they have confused the people and the issues.  Many people still think that gun ownership has primarily to do with target shooting, squirrel hunting, match competition, going after game, or collecting.  These are recreational uses, and are relatively unimportant.

Since we have already had the computer eat a portion of this writing, Dharma, at it grows too lengthy in segment, let us close it here and we will take up with this same subject as we sit again to write.  Thank you.

Hatonn to stand-by, please.  Salu.


Source:  PHOENIX JOURNAL EXPRESS, March 1991, Volume 10, Number 8, Pages 14-16.

Transcribed into HTML format by R. Montana.