- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search



Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0






4/8/91  HATONN




There are numerous current anti-gun legislation initiatives, so many in fact that we shall only look at a few. They run the scale of registration and criminal check (the criminals already have plenty of guns and simply "make" more for they know how--YOU DON'T) to total illegality of some varieties, that the Elite use.

One piece of legislative brilliance, for example, has been introduced which would ban, nationally, the sale of all new semi-automatic rifles and pistols capable of holding a ten-shot magazine, which is almost ALL of them, and shotguns and .22 rifles with tubular magazines holding more than six rounds.  Every person who presently owns one of these "assault weapons" would have to register it with the BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) within thirty days (i.e., fingerprints and the same kind of information now needed to get a "machine gun" license, including permission of the local police).  All magazines holding ten rounds or more and fitting a semi-automatic rifle, pistol, or shotgun become illegal to possess.  So, you won't find any clips holding more than 7 rounds--but attach one to the other so you can have as many attachable clips as you can lift off the ground--good, clear thinking.

Another bill specifically names AR-15's, Ruger Mini-14's, and eight others, but says the Attorney General and Treasury Secretary can ban all others.  A person who fails to register his .22 rifle (or other semi-automatic) or turn in his ten-round magazines is subject to a five-year jail sentence as a criminal felon. This bill calls for confiscation within thirty days after enactment into law with no compensation.

In California, bills have passed both legislative houses (on April 17, 1989) making it a felony to posses, sell, or manufacture an "assault weapon" or semi-automatic rifle or pistol.  Failure to register these firearms in California will carry prison terms of up to eight years. Is this Constitutional, you might inquire?  Of course not--but it is now LEGAL.

"Well", you might say, "we have to get the guns off the streets!"  Do you?  Will this disarming of you-the-people get the guns away from the criminals?  How many guns do you think have been registered?  The ONLY ones coming forth are you nice citizens--no criminally-oriented persons have come forth at all, regardless of that which they tell you.  The reason the public is honest, they say, is because "...the American people are so basically 'good'!"  I don't believe I would call the definition of the people as "good", although I do have some other adjectives I could apply but I fear would offend.

Similar legislation is under way in Florida, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Illinois, Wisconsin, and about a dozen other states, as well as local legislation in Cleveland, New Orleans, Los Angeles, New York City, Denver, etc. (Gosh, I thought Los Angeles was a part of California!)  One bill introduced in the Colorado legislature even calls for the police and highway patrol to set up roadblocks to stop cars and check them for firearms.  ARE YOU TRULY FREE--AMERICA?

Still other legislation in the U.S. Congress calls for the following gun-control measures (which will apply to gun stores, at gun shows, and in all private gun transactions):

1.  The legislation gives the Secretary of the Treasury (strange "authority" since "Treasury Dept., I assumed, dealt with money, taxes, etc.) power to outlaw the possession, sale, or gift of any semi-automatic rifle HE deems not to be suitable for sports (and this office is not even an elected official).  Well, it will be good for God's other creatures who walk, fly and crawl--but it bodes pretty sad for you two-legged, "thought-gifted" people.  You can tell they write the rules most carefully and intelligently--would not "possession" include "sale or gift" at some time or other?
The NEW Constitution is written in language which also gives open-ended enforcement rights to the government and NO rights to you at all--if it deviates one iota from that which they "decide" is illegal--WITHOUT RECOURSE!
The above bill will ban specific semi-automatic firearms and within a short period of time all other semi-automatics will be included.  The most dangerous aspect of the bill is that it gives a government bureaucrat the authority as to which guns he can arbitrarily ban.
2.  This legislation allows the Secretary of the Treasury to decide what reason is good enough to own a firearmHE could unilaterally, at any time, be free to rule that only hunting (or no hunting as the case might be) is a suitable reason, and as a practical matter, the BATF has already so ruled.
NOTE: There is a quiet move on among environmentalists and liberal government bureaucrats to ban most public lands (national forests, wilderness, BLM property) from hunting.  That would be rather nice for God's creatures in protection from the 'mighty hunters' of your species.  So, if gun ownership is restricted to hunting and hunting is banned in most areas, then the gun controllers will argue that guns are no longer needed.
Does Hatonn suggest that guns are wonderful?  No, but I guarantee you that as soon as you no longer have them--YOU WILL HAVE NO FREEDOM REMAINING!
Listen to what the administration tells you about national arms and "defense weapons and stockpiles-- "...if we get behind in military capability and nuclear/missile/weapons buildup and reserves, we have no means of strength from which to keep secure!"  IF YOU ONES DON'T BEGIN TO LISTEN TO AND WATCH FOR THAT WHICH "THEY" DO FOR SELVES AND ACT IN LIKE MANNER FOR SELF FOR PROTECTION, YOU CANNOT SURVIVE AS A NATION. THE INTENT IS TO HAVE ONE BIG GLOBAL NATION (CALLED "WORLD") AND YOU WILL NOT BE THE RULERS OF THAT WORLD.
3.  This legislation requires that before a rifle can be transferred by sale or gift, the recipient must undergo a comprehensive background check (which will take a month or more) which includes a portrait (mug shot), fingerprints, and an interview with the local police--and therefore a nice long file on record with at least five branches of law enforcement and government--instantly (they have no waiting period for entering you into their surveillance system).
The local police chief has to sign off on the approval, and if he is a nice "liberal" (as is the case in most of America's large cities today where the police chiefs are appointed by liberal mayors, he will probably refuse to approve the transfer. In most of the larger cities in the United States it is already virtually impossible to get a gun permit from the police.  Oh yes, they have thought of just about everything.
4.  This legislation outlaws possession, sale, or gift of magazines with a capacity of more than seven rounds of ammunition--oh, by the way, a LOT of ammunition is also banned.
5.  This legislation will criminalize the possession of firearm springs, pins, screws, etc., because the bill's wording says any part or combination of parts used in a restricted firearm is restricted as well.  Then it will go on from there, as with drugs--if "parts" are found on your premises no matter how long past, the entire property will be up for confiscation! Ridiculous?  Not on your belly-button!  This is exactly what they plan and how they plan to get rid of all opposition--by raiding (and/or planting evidence) in or around private property which then allows incarceration and/or confiscation of all property!  Scared?  Shocked?  I certainly do hope so!
6.  This legislation bans the manufacture of any firearm capable of receiving a bayonet without alteration of the gun. Since a bayonet fits over virtually all gun barrels, virtually all guns are covered by this provision.  So, back to arrows (well, not exactly for it is fully planned to ban cross-bows)--so, how about back to stone spears on birch branches to defend your Hogan and life from the criminals who have the machine guns and splatter bullets, lasers, and atomic bombs?

Failure to register firearms or adhere to all new gun transference procedures will render the gun owner a felon and render it illegal for him to ever again own a firearm.

The bottom line is that rifles, shotguns, and pistols will be covered by the above legislation.  There are 200 million privately owned firearms in the U.S. today, owned by about 70 million Americans (or about half of American households).  There are 20 million handgun owners in the U.S.  The lion's share of these owners are very emotional and possessive about their firearms and see them as a way to protect their families.  They will not take kindly to the government confiscating $25 billion to $50 billion worth of their firearms.  Bloodshed and even a revolution would undoubtedly follow prior to killing enough citizens to bring it under control.

The political "left" has decided to declare war on 70 million American families.  This war is not against assault weapons, but against honest, law-abiding citizens----you--YOU!  To take the guns out of the hands of American citizens at a time when criminal rage in America is exploding is insane, unconstitutional, and, in itself, criminal.  Your judges and courts are still coddling and releasing dangerous felons (e.g. the Stockton murderer had been in jail and released by liberal judges seven times).  Ah, but you have to have room to incarcerate the ones who do not pay the prescribed amount of taxes.  The U.S. cities like New York and Washington, which have stringent gun control bans, have the highest crime rates (including murder) in America AND the highest incidence of the use of handguns in the perpetration of crimes against unarmed victims. (THE CRIMINAL CAN ALWAYS GET A GUN!)

Switzerland, on the other hand, insists that every male of military age must keep a powerful, fully automatic assault rifle in his home--every home must be armed--by law--and some even keep mortars.  There is one beautiful little town in the U.S. where it is mandatory for all citizens to own a gun!  You won't hear much "good" about that on CNN--and certainly not two days in a row.  THEY DON'T HAVE ANY CRIME! FURTHERMORE THEY LIKE IT THAT WAY!  Switzerland has one of the most law abiding citizenry, the lowest crime rate, and least violence of any country in the free world.  They also have a magnificent underground shelter system for the population as a whole. It has remained free for over a thousand years.  Compare it to New York and Washington where handguns are completely banned.  In fact, in Washington, black Chief of Police Maurice Turner recently said that the District of Columbia gun-ban law had completely failed, and he has called for an armed citizens Police Auxiliary to help restore order.

Hard statistics have proven that armed citizens are far less likely to be crime victims than unarmed.  Citizens acting in self-defense kill about three times more assailants and robbers than do police.  But don't guns kill people?  Yes they do, but in 1985, 45,901 Americans died from falls; 4,938 died from drugs or medication (legal); 1,663 died by choking to death while eating, and 1,649 died from gunshot wounds.  Undoubtedly all of these deaths were tragic, but should you now eliminate autos, all "high" places, all fire, all water, all drugs/medication, and all food--as well as all guns?

I am not sure how this next bit of wisdom slipped through and into the Wall Street Journal but it is worthy of reprinting.  They summed up the potential disaster if the anti-gunners from Bush to Kennedy, from Bill Bennett to Jane Fonda (since she married Ted Turner, owner of CNN, how much unbiased information do you think you will get from CNN on the matter?), from Metzenbaum to Dan Rather get their way:

"What will happen if severe restrictions on semi-automatic rifles pass Congress or the state legislatures today? Millions of citizens who still believe in the Constitution will not forfeit or register their firearms; squads of federal and state agents will snoop; massive no-knock warrants will be issued; and both citizens and police will die in raids.  While previously law abiding citizens (now felons) and police battle each other, the drug lords will continue their nefarious trafficking.  Adding firearms prohibition to drug prohibition means war on the innocent (and perhaps a police state), and by diverting police resources, will give armed pushers even more free reign."

Thus perhaps the most dangerous of all the socialist attacks on America in the 1990s is the onslaught to register and confiscate America's firearms.  America cannot be subjected to communism or a socialist dictatorship until Americans are first disarmed. Poland has strict gun control; so does Cambodia, the Soviet Union, and Red China.  Over 100 million people were brutally slaughtered in those countries, but first they were disarmed.  The danger to people when they can't own guns is far greater than any danger gun ownership can ever create.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote in his Nobel Prize winning book, GULAG ARCHIPELAGO, after eleven years in communist (Khazar socialist) concentration camps:

"...At what exact point, then should one resist the communists?...How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: what would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

"Or if during periods of mass arrests people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand...The Organs (police) would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers...and notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt."

Please don't think the increasing violence in the police departments is accidentally increasing.  As the restraints and unconstitutional acts against citizens increase, only those willing to use violence against neighbors--brothers and family will become policemen--you are even training your military to kill, kill and destroy hundreds of thousands and then turn about and celebrate as heroes from the hunt.  Further, a lot of attention was given to "peaceful" working in coalition with Soviet officers from their forces.  Don't be stupid, America; you are training your police forces in direct management by KGB/Mossad agents!  These are the most brutal terrorists on the globe.

Further, please remember what I have said many, many times--the military forces of the U.N. are required, by charter, to be headed by a Soviet!  THEY ARE GETTING READY TO CLAMP DOWN LIKE THE PRESSING MACHINES USED AGAINST THE WITCHES OF THE DARK AGES!  HOW LONG DO YOU THINK IT WILL TAKE THE NATIONS TO DIE?  YOU ARE IN THE FINAL DEATH THROES NOW--HOW MUCH LONGER WILL IT TAKE?


The key words in the Bill of Rights protection against government harassment of individuals are "freedom from unreasonable search and seizure".  The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated."

At this point, many of you are saying, "Well, damn it, I don't have anything to hide--I don't drink and drive, I don't use drugs and I don't carry a gun--so let them stop me!  Ah so, it reminds me of one of your own stories:

"Two men were sitting in a living room, visiting in front of a very large window.

"Outside the police came and started shooting through the window--(oops, wrong house).

"First man shouts to his friend to 'get down' as Second man gets up and goes to the window to look out.



In June of 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court (that same group of nine persons who ruled that flag burning is legal) ruled six to three that police check-points to apprehend drunks are legal.  Police roadblocks to stop cars and interrogate drivers, give sobriety tests, and search the car if the police choose to do so seem far more in line with the East bloc police state tactics than the good old Free America.

Roadblocks, auto searches, and the running of sobriety checks on all drivers (ninety-nine percent of whom are not drinking) has a current parallel in the government's monitoring all of your bank accounts (of course they do), your deposits and withdrawals, to find that nasty old occasional big deal money-launderer or drug dealer--so they say!  It is done to keep TOTAL SURVEILLANCE ON ALL OF YOU.  In all instances, honest, law-abiding citizens are assumed guilty until they can prove themselves innocent--and they are now removing all manners to prove innocence.  Just suppose, for a minute, that you have five thousand dollars cash on your person and you are stopped.  If you cannot PROVE innocence of reason for carrying such a sum of cash, you may well be incarcerated and, at the least, the cash WILL BE CONFISCATED--YES, RIGHT IN THE GOOD OLD U.S.A.

Then what happens next? A few years hence, after you have all gotten used to roadblocks, sobriety interrogations, and searches (just as you have learned and demand airport searches for granted), what if Big Brother decides he wants to search your cars and your homes for possible "illegal" firearms, or for cash, or "for some yet to be declared illegal suspicious activity, like group meetings", or "wants to check your papers", as they do freely at East bloc checkpoints.  The Constitution says there first has to be reasonable cause before you are pulled over and searched.  A soviet-style police state will give you no such protection and neither will your present Supreme Court.  DOESN'T THIS TELL YOU THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS ALREADY CAST ASIDE BY THE CONTROLLERS OF YOUR DESTINY?


I owe this example to another speaker--I am not sure WHO, however, so I just give blanket "thanks".

Big Brother and his agents are harassing more and more U.S. citizens, businesses, and churches, etc., using gestapo-type tactics of intimidation, interrogation, formerly illegal search and seizure techniques, and imprisonment.  A case in point is Franklin Sanders, a Christian, a coin dealer, a newsletter writer (ouch) (he writes The Money Changer), and a patriot who has long warned his clients, readers, and friends about the growing abuse of government power, especially by the IRS.

In January, Sander's home was raided at dawn by ten IRS revenue agents and seven SWAT team members carrying automatic weapons, who proceeded to hold him and his pregnant wife and seven children captive for eight hours while the agents waited for a search warrant.  The interview which follows between Sanders and former Congressman Ron Paul is terrifying--it might come right out of Orwell's 1984 or East Germany, Russia, or Red China.  But it happened right in America in 1990, and you can begin to plan on it happening to you if you don't get up and stand with your brothers risking everything to regain and maintain FREEDOM:

Q:  Why were you abused?A: In 1985, I was the first person to publish an interview with an IRS whistle-blower showing that the IRS intended to have a computer dossier on everybody in the country. The dossier would include everything you did with your money.  About two weeks later, the IRS's Criminal Investigation Division (CID) told me I was the subject of a criminal investigation.  I wrote a letter to the agent, who claimed he was a Christian, and rebuked him on scriptural grounds.  That is one of the overt acts I am charged with.  They say it was a threatening letter.  Well, if one Christian can't tell another when he is violating Scripture, then put me in jail.

Q:  What else are you charged with?

A:  They said I am operating a secret banking business. In 1984 my partner and I started a gold and silver 'bank', a warehouse exchange system.  I have written about the dangers of our shaky banking system for ten years.  I sent thousands of announcements to people and went up and down the country making speeches promoting the bank.  That's hardly secret.  Also, the indictment cites as overt acts the fact that customers of mine closed their regular bank accounts. The government must now consider it a crime to close you bank account.

Q:  The IRS has also harassed your wife?

A:  Yes, in May 1986, while I was out of town, a Vietnam vet, a man I barely knew, sent a threatening letter to the agent. The IRS-CID followed my wife around with two carloads of armed men.  She had three children with her and was two months pregnant at the time, and I wasn't in town to protect her.  When I got back, they hauled me into court.  They arranged with the Tennessee Revenue Department to raid my office.  They sent two armed men and held me hostage for four hours.  They went through my files and took records.

Q:  And they have harassed members of your church?

A:  I'm a member of the Presbyterian Church of America.  In April 1989, they subpoenaed nine members of my congregation to appear before a grand jury and asked them all sorts of crazy questions, such as: Do you have a paramilitary group ready to overthrow the U.S. government?  Did anybody in your church teach or preach that you should not file tax returns?  Did anybody preach that you can avoid filing tax returns?  Well, my pastor has never preached about taxes, except to once say property tax is ungodly.

Q:  But so what if he did?

A:  Exactly.  The IRS wanted the church to turn over all its records.  The church has a two thousand-year-old history of not doing that.  The General Assembly of the PCA stuck by us even though they indicted eleven members of the church, four of them women.

[Hatonn: I can promise you that MOST of the current churches would not stand ten minutes behind you.]

Q:  What was the January assault?

A:  They arrested us in the middle of the night on January 9, and to do so sent seven SWAT team members and ten revenue agents.  They were wearing black ninja suits and carried automatic weapons. My seven children were in the house. These men were cowboys.  They only had a search warrant for me and my wife, and yet they kept the children captive. They stole my computer and all my records. They have my bond set at $100,000.

Q:  How are you holding up?

A:  The biggest problem is financial. As you know, justice in the United States is for the rich.  Lawyers want $25,000 to $100,000 to begin to defend my case.  But it is either that or get a Soviet-style court-appointed attorney who is paid a pittance by the government.  And even if I'm exonerated, I won't get any reimbursement.

NOTE: Thousands of U.S. citizens are similarly being harassed, persecuted, and jailed today by various agencies of the U.S. government in what is rapidly becoming the United Socialist States of America.  New government regulations and old ones which carried civil penalties are BEING CRIMINALIZED, with stiffer prison terms handed out than for murder, rape, burglary, and drug dealing.  It is being done to intimidate the masses into compliance.  Violators of new gun registration laws will become the next group to come under attack.

We must have a rest break but I am going to have to speak of a subject which might seem distant to that which we have covered so far in this Journal--the relationship and Communizing/Socializing of South Africa and the involvement of America.  The dragon has too many heads to ignore even one of the tiny, tiny ones--worse, for every head, he has a thousand arms--further, he simply "slips" his tail when stepped upon and grows two new ones immediately.  My God, in the Heavens, I wish I could offer you lambs a Rapture for I see such discouragement.  Let us not wallow in the discouragement; let us come together and stand strong.  This dragon cannot stand and survive in the presence of God or Truth.  So be it.

Hatonn to stand-by.  Thank you for your attention.


Source:  PHOENIX JOURNAL EXPRESS, March 1991, Volume 11, Number 6 Pages 1-5.

Transcribed into HTML format by R. Montana.



Founding Fathers Declared


9/2/91 #2  HATONN


Patrick Henry: "The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."

James Madison: "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed--unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." Ah humm!

Samuel Adams: "The Constitution shall never be prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."

Alexander Hamilton: "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."


James Madison: "The right of the people to keep (to have and to hold, openly or concealed) and bear (carry, transport and use) firearms (weapons of self-defense, including the handgun which predated the rifle and has existed for self-defense since the 1500's) shall not be abridged).  A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained in arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country..."

George Mason: "I ask sir, what is the militia?  It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."


Elbridge Gerry: "I ask what is the purpose of the militia?  To offset the need of large standing armies, the bane of liberty."

Thomas Jefferson: "The constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; and they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property and freedom of the press."

Abraham Lincoln: "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our Fathers made it inviolate.  The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution.  BUT TO OVERTHROW THE MEN WHO PERVERT THE CONSTITUTION."




Source:  THE PHOENIX EXPRESS, September 1991, Volume 16, Number 3, Pages 4-5.





2nd Amendment

As passed by the Congress and preserved in the National Archives, with the rest of the original hand-written copy of the Bill of Rights prepared by scribe William Lambert.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, then-Secretary of State:

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
From our United States Constitution


Source: PHOENIX JOURNAL EXPRESS, April, 1991, Volume 11, Number 6 Pages 1-5.