Scalar Strike On Columbia Ends WW3?
Psychological warfare tactics were to the fore in continuing pre-conflict skirmishing over the planned US-UK invasion of the Middle-East. This time the blow was devastating, as the Columbia ran into an electromagnetic wall, in the sky over Texas.
On Saturday 1st February, 2003 a scalar Tesla Howitzer weapon --aimed at downing the US space shuttle Columbia was phenomenally successful and will leave red faces in the Pentagon.
Despite the media spin of an unfortunate accident, the nature of the crash of Columbia was evident from eyewitness accounts. The telltale sonic boom from the deployment of the weapon was so strong: "It was like a car hitting the house or an explosion. It shook that much," John Ferolito, 60, of Carrolton, north of Dallas, told the Associated Press.
Media reports put the noise down to the effects of the shuttle breakup, but this is clearly spurious. The shuttle was gliding at 203,000 feet. That works out to almost 40 miles. Aircraft-generated sonic booms 40 miles up in super-thin air do not shake homes at ground level. Nor do small debris parts. Just try generating air pressure changes at ground level when 40 miles up -no matter how fast you are going.
Just after a previous shuttle launch in November, 1985 a sonic boom occurred over the launch site, after the shuttle had departed. The same effects took place on least two previous shuttle launches. Scalar expert T. E. Bearden put these down to testing of the weapons.
The scalar boom effect is caused in way similar to a thunderstorm. In that case the lightning cleaves apart large masses of air which boom. The scalar weapon can generate a massive version of the same effect. This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers. It remotely produces local space-time distortion effects by connecting through the complex plane around which all space-time is wrapped.
MILITARY STRATEGIC CATASTROPHE
Quite how top military brass managed to hang out an irresistibly attractive lure for targeting, remains to be answered. If gross incompetence was the reason, then perhaps their war might better be delayed until the US-UK Axis has some competent military strategic leadership in place.
Let's just recap: First, the shuttle was launched in the middle of a tense period of nuclear weapon sabre-rattling between the US and China -with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) acting as the Chinese proxy and battleground. Second, the propaganda highlight of the mission was the onboard presence of an Israeli researcher. Third, the shuttle was scheduled to land in the middle of Chinese New Year celebrations. Fourth, it was scheduled to glide in over US president Bush's home state of Texas on final approach.
Given that taking the shuttle out with scalar weapons (known to be in the possession of a number of opponents of the Anglo-American cabal) was always going to be a straightforward matter, the question is: who the **** allowed this shuttle mission to go ahead at this time??
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DPRK Warns It Will Take Measures in Face of US Threat
From http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200302/01/eng20030201_111026.shtml
Today, February 1st, 2003 the China People's Daily online edition reported the DPRK's ambassador to Russia, Pak Ui-chun, warning in Moscow on Friday that the DPRK would take "adequate measures to counter a possible United States preemptive attack."
Adequate measures indeed. When the People's Daily reports the words of the DPRK ambassador there is a certain significance to such a report --under the headline "DPRK Warns It Will Take Measures in Face of US Threat."
As we recently reported, last week the US was hit with a scalar manipulation of weather, when a large high pressure area diverted cold air down from Canada, but the US Administration did not seem to get the message.
And so they left the space shuttle Columbia hung out on a limb for INEVITABLE targeting. This failure was overseen by military planners possessed with what can only be described as mind-boggling levels of incompetence.
If this is the leadership the US is relying upon to win a war in the Middle-East then expect George Bush to join the antiwar protesters tomorrow. Have these top brass ever heard of PsyOps? Presumably they have, as they run a huge PsyOps effort themselves.
So why offer such an unbelievably enticing PsyOp target such as Columbia in the context of all the above? The impact on the US population could not be greater -entirely negating the 'positive' military psychological and diplomatic advantages of this cabal having staged the 9/11 attacks in the first place. Even judged by the deeply flawed logic of global imperialist ambitions, what's the point of sacrificing 3,500 people to ensure the survival of the 'free world,' if you are going to squander that blood-earned 'advantage' like this?
It's the equivalent of going to war by unzipping your fly, and inviting your opponent to kick you in the **lls?! Pardon the rough terms in this tract. Sometimes words of three or less, and five or more, letters are insufficient to adequately express angered, bewildered outrage.
After the outrage we still have to figure why, and what next. Here's the why: This failure is the clear result of arrogance married to incompetence. Prudent planning would have anticipated the potential disaster, but prudence is a strange bedfellow to the arrogance born of expectations of hegemony as a birthright.
Yes, on the domestic scene the story is already being spun frantically along the lines of: "tiles came loose(insufficient cause)," and "valiant astronauts," to minimize the damage to national psychology. But nevertheless there will be significant effects and nagging doubts in the minds of the domestic population.
What next: The unwashed masses in the USA may well swallow whatever McSpin the networks churn out for domestic consumption, but it is internationally that the real damage will be done. International allies and waverers will know the truth of the matter and are unlikely to to be unaffected. Time for a VERY big rethink in the Cabal.
Excuse me Mr. Bush. War on Terror? Run that slogan by me again please. I thought for a moment you said War in Error.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------