The special 1905 Theory of Relativity and the 1916 General Theory of Relativity are wrong, according to Adelaide’s physicist Reg Cahill.

Stephen Hawking, in his 1988 book, A Brief History of Time, debunked Einstein’s theories by stating that these theories are no better than astrology. “Explaining that scientists have been unable to make an exact measurement of an object’s velocity and position at the same time,” he said “one can suppose that information is known to God but hidden from us”.

 

Given an overview how physics has been part of man’s quest to predict the future, he said, “Einstein had been confused about quantum theory and wrong about the existence of black holes, massive stars with gravity so strong that light does not escape”.

The problem for Professor Cahill is that his contemporaries line up with Einstein. “I’ve been treated with utter contempt and hostility. This is pretty shocking stuff but it’s what you expect.”

In 2002 Professor Cahill started to question what he thought were anomalies in Einstein’s theory that time and space are relative.

“They all agreed with one another and they were all indicating a speed difference in different directions,” he said. “When you find out the speed of light differs, the whole Einstein theory starts collapsing.”

“We know now the speed of light at approximately 300,000 km per second is relative to space itself. Before it was always relative to the observer.”

“The outer part of spiral galaxies go around ten times faster than Einstein’s theory permits, so people invent dark matter to account for extra gravitational pull.”

“They spent years and millions of dollars for it but it doesn’t exist.”

On 24 December 2005 Professor Derek Leinweber, associate professor of Physics at The University of Adelaide wrote for our local Adelaide Advertiser an article, ‘Tobe or not to be: The weird, ghostly world of Einstein’s mind, which was an interesting piece on the weird world of quantum mechanics. The article has a photograph of Einstein and gives the impression that quantum mechanics was Einstein’s creation. It was not – but was the creation of physicists, such as Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, called the Copenhagen interpretation. Einstein disagreed with Quantum physics and proposed an experiment to refute the quantum theory. Einstein was proven wrong. So much for the depth of his genius.

Even Einstein’s accepted work is tainted with plagiarism of great thinkers as detailed in a 1965 book by Christopher Jon Bjerknes, Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist.

As Robert Hart says in his article, ‘The Einstein Cult Continues’, he was an ideological ploy to show the superiority of Jewish intellect. That would only be so if Einstein wasn’t a cheat and if he got his physics right. But Cahill and Hawkins made it clear that Einstein was dead-wrong. He even got the physics wrong as well. So much for a genius.”

British journalist, Robert Matthews, published an article in BBC Focus, December 2005, where he attempts desperately to defend Einstein from his critics. “So that’s Einstein’s year over with for another century and if the great man has been watching it from the great lap in the sky, he’ll be breathing a sigh. For by and large, his reputation has survived pretty much intact. Sure, there was a bit of sniping about his love life and some guff about whether he deserves the greatest scientist of the last century, as if anyone else came close. But trendy revisionist historians failed to land any serious punches.”

It seems to me that Robert Matthew does not know what he is talking about because he has not done his homework and/or lives in a permanent state of denial, unable to see or not willing to accept that Einstein was not the brain but the scientific fraud of the century.

It is well known today that quantum physics as established by Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr is the way forward as Prof Paul Davies said in his discussion with Phillip Adams during the middle 1990s.

Albert Einstein was indeed the plagiarist of the century. He lifted the works of Woldemar Voigt, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, Jule Henri Poincaré, Ludwig Gustav Lange, George Francis Fitzgerald, Joseph Larmor, Paul Drude, Paul Langevein, Herman Minkowski, Max Plank, Max von Laue, Bucherer, and his wife Mileva Einstein-Marity, and many others.

The Einstein industry is trying to cover all this up and celebrate Einstein, the scientific fraud of the century, as the genius of the universe and the brain of the century. This so-called scientific community is with a few exceptions nothing else but a bunch of morally and intellectually bankrupt cowards and hypocrites. Their main interest is to protect their professional, social, financial and political interests in order to secure on-going financial support for their research.

As a private person Albert Einstein was ruthless, for example his treatment of his first wife, Mileva, was not a fitting tribute of a woman who sacrificed her career for love. Even worse was his treatment of his first child. His insistent denial of the existence of the child by removing all records of its birth followed a complete lack of enthusiasm regarding the birth in the first place.

Jürgen Neffe, in his book, Einstein: A Biography, states that “Steven Spielberg modelled E.T’s kindly and sorrowful eyes after those of Einstein”. In Einstein’s later years at the Institute for Advance Study at Princeton University, he became something close to a Jewish saint.

As a student he got a classmate pregnant, sent her away to have the baby – which he refused to see – and then apparently made the young woman to give up the child for adoption. He regarded both of his wives as essentially caretakers, their main obligations being to see to his domestic needs. In the case of his first wife he compelled her to forego a promising scientific career and treated her shabbily. He hardly ever saw their mentally ill younger son whom he dismissed as degenerate.

In marriage he shamefully failed twice. Einstein’s mother loathed his first wife, Mileva, considered her unsuitable for her son because she was plain, from a lower class, not Jewish, and too bright [Imagine that, left behind because she was too bright. Intelligent women are the ones that should be breeding - unintelligent females ought to cleaning up after the intelligent ones.] She is a book and you deserve a wife. He left her behind in Hungary with two children in bitter poverty and became the celebrated Jewish saint at Princeton University.

There is an industry behind the name Albert Einstein. It has given birth to a massive amount of publications and has been part of folklore as well. Apart from a few, the scientific community has been very silent. His second marriage to his cousin, Elsa, was a disaster of his own making. Elsa called Einstein in her later years a character swine. Marriage to his cousin!? It seems there was a bit of in-breeding going on in the Einstein clan.

After Einstein’s claim that he despised all forms of nationalism, he became an enthusiastic Zionist. He spoke up strongly for pacifism throughout the 1920s but once Adolf Hitler rose to power, he grew full of martial anti-Nazi ardor. This isn’t to say he was wrong in embracing his Jewish identity, but his ideological flip-flops are nonetheless disconcerting. Similarly, he initiated the development of the atomic bomb as a weapon against the hated Third Reich, yet deplored its use on Japan. He was largely indifferent and silent to the victims of Stalinist show trials and purges but strongly supported the Pugwash conferences for world peace. Einstein never really advanced much in his thought after winning the Nobel Prize in 1921 and despite being widely revered, gradually lost touch with the cutting edge of physics.

Interestingly, Einstein published “his” special theory in 1905 and his General Theory of 1915-16 without resources. When questioned about the lack of resources given in his work, Einstein said: “The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources”. [I'll bet everything I own that Einstein did in fact say that and that he meant it too].

The bottom line here is that Albert Einstein published “his” two theories under his name, but which were actually taken from his first wife’s works, who in turn took most it from Henri Antoon Lorentz and Jules Henri Poincaré.

Interestingly, we find similar character structures, plagiarism, denial of children, exploitation of co-workers, and mis-treatment of family members in another fraudster of the 19th century – Mordechai Levi, better known as Karl Marx.

The following sources were used in compiling this article:

1. ‘Einstein’s Relativity, Warped Minds, Bent Truth’, I and II, by Dr Bjorn Overbye, in http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ – August-September & October-November 2007.

2. ‘Albert Einstein: Plagiarist of the Century’, by Richard Moody, in http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ – December-January 2004 .

3. ‘Tesla vs Einstein: The Ether & the Birth of the New Physics’, by Marc J Seifer, in http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/ – March-April 2009.

4. ‘The last word: Who’s to blame for history’s misuse of science’, by Robert Matthews, in http://www.bbcfocusmagazine.com/ December 2005. ‘Does anyone really understand quantum theory?’ in http://www.bbcfocusmagazine.com/ July 2006. Note that in the former article Matthews rejects the revisionist historians’ argument against Einstein and states he was, indeed, the greatest scientist of the 20th century. In the latter article he adopts the revisionist view and states that Einstein was wrong.

5. ‘The Other Einstein’ by Michael Dirda, in The Australian Financial Review, 1 June 2007 - http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/ .

6. Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist, by Christopher Jon Bjerkness, XTX INC, USA, 2002 – ISBN 0-9719629-8-7.

7. ‘Much ado about nothing’, by Humphrey McQueen, in The Age Review, February 19 2005 – http://www.theage.com.au/ .

8. The World As I See It, by Albert Einstein, Thinkers Library No 79, Watts & Co, London, 1935, translated from the German: Mein Weltbild.

9. ‘The wife and times of Albert Einstein’, by Clare Kermond, in The Age Green Guide, April 15 2004 - http://www.theage.com.au/ .

10. ‘How Einstein’s dead wrong, relatively speaking’, by Verity Edwards, in The Australian, 7 November 2005 - http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/ .

newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2009/05/false-icons-of-west-case-of-albert.html