MRS. HANNOND WRITES 'THE OREGONIAN' ABOUT U.S. SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE WHO ARRIVED TO RESTORE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER >> Four Winds 10

Occupiers of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge lead members of the media on a tour of some federal buildings. The protestors believe some government officials have acted in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and a self-styled "judge" arrived in Burns on Tuesday to convene an unofficial grand jury to look into those claims. (Thomas Boyd / The Oregonian)

Thanks to a party directly involved in the events unfolding in Oregon, Mrs. Hammond, we now have more details available regarding last week’s story titled, Judge and 2 US Marshals in Route to Restore Constitutional Rule of Law. The information comes directly from Mrs. Hammond, in an article she wrote for her local newspaper, “The Oregonian.”

We already know that in the first few days of the Bundy militia standoff, a secret meeting took place between Sheriff Dave Ward and Ammon Bundy in hopes of determining a way to end the standoff between the parties immediately. You can watch the video of their meeting for yourself in a post titled, Oregon Militia Confirms They Are Not Leaving; Ready to Die For Freedom. During that meeting, when the sheriff put out a rather dismissive attitude, Ammon Bundy inquired if Sheriff Ward had any intention of addressing Bundy’s "redress of grievance" to Harney County and Oregon leaders that Bundy posted last month. In the document, Bundy claims state and local officials, including Sheriff Dave Ward, are guilty for failing to protect their citizens from illegal actions taken by federal agencies.

From the video below, it makes perfectly clear why this story is not getting the attention it deserves from the mainstream media. “Law enforcement” at every level is using corrupt and unconstitutional tactics to intimidate and cajole the local citizens into going along with them, and it’s very clear that "law enforcement" does not want their behavior on display for the American people. Their solution has been to impose almost a complete media blackout, so that when the standoff is over, regardless of the outcome, it is "law enforcement" who will feed the media whatever narrative they see fit. They already know from previous tragedies, that the media will go along with just about anything they are told without asking questions, no matter how nonsensical the explanation is, or how much it flies in the face of common sense.

To support the claim that "law enforcement" is covering this up, I suggest taking a look at the post titled, The FBI is Attempting to Shut Down Alternative Media Regarding the Oregon Standoff. In that post you can listen to a call recorded by a fellow citizen journalist that proves the FBI is willing to employ Chicago style thug tactics in an effort to go "around the law," much like Obama goes "around Congress." For further proof, in the video below, you can watch Sheriff Ward demonstrate for the second time that the United States Constitution is of little importance to him. The video begins with Sheriff Ward more or less saying that he doesn’t want to deal with the situation anymore, and the “hourglass” is running. Then, when Pete Santilli brings up adhering to the United States Constitution, Santilli is told to shut up, told it’s bullsh** that he has a First Amendment right to speak, and then Santilli was escorted out of the gymnasium by several law enforcement officials.

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

Americans would be wise to remember, that John F. Kennedy once said:

“There is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation, if our traditions don’t survive with it, and there is very grave danger, that an announced need for increased security will be ceased upon by those anxious to expand it’s meaning to include official censorship and concealment.”

Right now Kennedy’s words seem prophetic. According to Mrs. Hammond, Bruce Doucette is the name of the U.S. Superior Court Judge (pictured to the right), who has arrived to allegedly restore Constitutional order. There is no evidence however, that in our corrupt legal system, that a legal determination by a self-styled judge associated with the sovereign citizen movement would have any effect, other than to excite people already allied with that fringe view. Mrs. Hammond’s letter says:

"Doucette would easily reach the same conclusion since the leader of the movement under which he was declared a judge insists that the BLM is a private corporation, not a government agency, and the federal government ceased operating under the Constitution in the 1860s."

Of course what she is referring to is an act passed by the Forty-First Congress on February 21, 1871, and it is known as the “Act of 1871.” The act essentially destroyed our republic, and replaced it with the Corporation of the United States. Something not taught in history books, is that the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

“The Constitution for the united states of America.”

The Act of 1871, altered that, and the newer version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.” It is the “corporate constitution,” and what might seem to layman like no more than semantics, is a far far bigger deal. For a better understanding, see the video below put out by Anonymous:

The Act of 1871

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

FACEBOOK | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

Continuing with an explanation for the Corporation of the United States, Lisa Guliani writes:

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the “Acts of the Forty-First Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.” This is also known as the “Act of 1871.” What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let’s look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated “front” for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

“The Constitution for the united states of America”.

The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

Mrs. Hammond goes on to write:

"In late November, Anna Maria Riezinger, an Alaska woman who claims to be Judge Anna von Rietz under the same inaccurate reading of the Constitution that Doucette uses, ruled that the members of Congress, the president and the U.S. treasury secretary all committed crimes and directed U.S. marshals and FBI agents to arrest them.

Last week, Riezinger issued a statement about the Harney occupation. In it, she wrote that "The Hammond’s and the Bundy Family are Priority Creditors of all the (government agencies) which are now or which have operated in this country in the past. …They and their countrymen are owed the patent to all land within the geographically defined boundaries of their respective states, free and clear of liens, encumbrances, or other presumptions."

Incidentally, a government whistleblower who goes by the name Drake in the video below, says that it is by using the Corporation of the United States against those in power, that We the People can take our country back. He goes on to explain it all in much further detail in a post titled, Greatest Military Coup Ever Could Now Be Underway on U.S. Soil.

Whistleblower- Plan To Take Down NWO

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

We’ve been taught by the very same corrupt government perpetrating crimes against We the People, that all this talk about a “UNITED STATES CORPORATION” is nonsense, but upon even the slightest bit of research, you’ll see that it’s true. Below, check out another video on The Act of 1871. Then, below that is the letter from Mrs. Hammond.

The Corporation of the United States of America

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

CHECK OUT THE NEW GOOGLE+ PAGE!

In “The Oregonian,” Mrs. Hammond writes:

A self-proclaimed "U.S. Superior Court judge" who has been involved in past property rights protests in other states arrived Tuesday in Burns with plans to convene an extra-legal "citizens grand jury" that he said will review evidence that public officials may have committed crimes.

Bruce Doucette, a 54-year-old owner of a computer design and repair shop in suburban Denver, told The Oregonian/OregonLive, that he made the trip at the request of Harney County residents. He said he met with the armed occupiers of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge to hear their evidence, which he called "significant," that government officials have committed crimes.

But he declined to say which officials or which crimes they discussed and said a privately appointed "grand jury" of Harney County residents, not he as a self-appointed judge, would decide whether to charge anyone with a crime.

"The grand jury will convene in private and make its decisions in private," Doucette said. "The role of a superior court judge is not very glorified. All we do is write up" what the local citizens decide, he said.

Doucette's entry into the fray and claim to special Constitutional powers is the latest in a 11-day drama that has drawn a series of attention-seeking, Constitution-citing characters who say they can help Harney County residents solve their problems with federal restrictions on use of public lands.

Ammon Bundy and other organizers of the occupation have said in blog posts and other statements that they believe that lawyers in the U.S. attorney's office, federal court judges and leaders of the Bureau of Land Management, among others, have broken laws and violated the Constitution in their treatment of ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond.

The Hammond's, who have owned ranch land adjacent to the refuge since the 1960s, were denied access to federal rangelands, to water on federally owned land and have been jailed for five years each for setting fires they say were necessary to protect their property.

In Bundy's view, setting those restrictions on use of federal resources and using the courts to punish the Hammond's for burning 139 acres of federal rangeland represented unconstitutional overreach by federal officials. And the failure of state and local officials, including Sheriff Dave Ward, are also guilty, for failing to protect their citizens from those federal actions.

Doucette would easily reach the same conclusion since the leader of the movement under which he was declared a judge insists that the BLM is a private corporation, not a government agency, and the federal government ceased operating under the Constitution in the 1860s.