ight away (saving you hours of labor!) We've already sent approximately 727,000 faxes, can you help us reach 800,000?

PELOSI TO PASS "HEALTH" CARE WITHOUT VOTE?  Boehner blasts illegal plan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is considering support for an illegal plan written by Congresswoman Louise Slaughter (D-NY), to pass the Senate "health" care bill without an actual vote in the House, according to Republican House Leader John Boehner (R-OH).   On his blog, Boehner exposed the Democrats new "Slaughter Solution" to bypass existing procedural voting rules, stating, "You see, Democratic leaders currently lack the votes needed to pass the Senate health care bill through the House.  Under Slaughter’s scheme, Democratic leaders will overcome this problem by simply 'deeming' the Senate bill passed in the House - without an actual vote by members of the House."

The National Journal's CongressDaily confirmed the plan: "Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version."

Tony Perkins of Family Research Council wonders how the bill could be passed without a vote on the actual bill, "The obvious question is: how could this be constitutional? The answer? It isn't! This afternoon, the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that the President must sign the monstrous Senate-passed health care overhaul bill--which includes over a dozen bribes to Democratic Senators and a massive expansion of government-funded abortion--before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package."  So forget reconciliation, which cannot legally reduce the massive abortion coverage, since 41 Republican Senators just pledged to enact the "Byrd Rule" against any non-fiscal policy verbiage passed by the House, such as the language to limit abortions desired by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI) and his 12 moderate Democrats. 

So if the Senate version passes the House, it's game over.  Massive abortion funds will be unleashed upon innocent unborn children for as little as $12 co-pays by welfare moms.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

Congressman Stupak met with Pelosi this week to negotiate a possible compromise on abortion-funding, and surprisingly expressed optimism that a deal could be reached to pass President Obama's "health" care bill.   Stupak's statements appeared to contradict his previous promises, that he and 12 Democrats would vote against the Senate bill, on which Obama demands a March 18 vote.

It would have to be a separate bill, you could sidebar it to the final bill," Stupak told MSNBC. "One bill doesn't pass without the other. They walk down the aisle together."   Then Stupak told The National Review, that he will not settle for an agreement to pass the Senate bill now and fix the bill's problems on abortion later: "If they say 'we’ll give you a letter saying we'll take care of this later,' that’s not acceptable because later never comes."

But Stupak's surprise meeting with Pelosi confirms the shocking Washington Post report by Marc A. Thiessen entitled "How Pelosi Will Game the Stupak 12," detailing how Pelosi is trying to fool the 12 moderates into passing the current version of the Senate bill with empty promises.  "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must win their votes to pass her bill," Thiessen reports. "The problem for Stupak and his allies is that [Pelosi's] guarantee [to add Stupak's anti-abortion language] is not enough to ensure their position prevails -- because Senate Republicans are gearing up to use something called the 'Byrd rule' to blow up any deal Pelosi cuts to pass health care in the House." So Pelosi cannot keep any promises she makes.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

The Senate 'Byrd rule' would sink Stupak's compromise, since it empowers any one Senator to voice an objection to any non-fiscal verbiage in a 'Reconciliation' side-by-side bill, such as Stupak's proposed amendment to reduce abortion coverage.  If the Senate Chairman recognizes any voice objection, then 60 pro-life Senate votes would be required to reinstate Stupak's language, when only 45 Senators supported similar language last fall. Pro-abortion Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has 55 solid votes to flush any side-bill passed by Stupak and Pelosi, causing the Washington Post to rightly conclude:

"The bottom line: Stupak and the blue dog Democrats in the House have no leverage if they go along with Pelosi in a reconciliation strategy. The only way they can ensure that the abortion language and other provisions they oppose are eliminated is to reject reconciliation entirely -- and demand that the House and Senate start over with clean legislation."  To this we say, "Amen," but will Stupak cave-in like Sen. Nelson did?  Let's encourage the Stupak 12 to "Hold Firm."

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

Meanwhile pro-abortion Congresswoman Diana DeGette (D-CO), the co-chairwoman of the abortion-rights-supporting caucus, predicted the abortion issue won't stop Obamacare. "I don't think Congressman Stupak has the votes to kill healthcare legislation over his language not being in there," DeGette told The Hill newspaper.  

She believes that even if Stupak's 12 moderates hold firm, the vote count is too close to call, because some of the extreme liberals who voted against Pelosi-care the first time (for lacking a clear 'public option') could switch and vote for the Senate version of Obamacare this time around.  If DeGette is right, then conservatives will need more than just 12 of the 37 undecided Democrats to defeat Obamacare now.

We're the only ones reporting the names of the 25 undecideds in red below and 12 pro-Stupak swing votes in blue below (37 total undecided Dems and 1 Republican, Cao) who voted WITH STUPAK to reduce abortion funding, but then also voted WITH PELOSI to pass socialism in H.R. 3692.  We need just a handful of these 37 to switch votes and stand firm against President Obama and Harry Reid's pro-abortion amendments. If they stand firm against abortion, we can stop the entire socialist "health" bill in its tracks.

THESE 37 CONGRESSMEN CAN STOP TAX-FUNDED ABORTIONSPlease make time today to call the 37 Congressmen listed below at 202-225-3121 or 202-224-3121 and tell each "you are not pro-life unless you oppose entirely President Obama and Harry Reid's pro-abortion amendments, and we are watching your vote."  Or if you don't have time to make 37 calls, you can save time by simply signing our fax-petiton, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 52 "Blue-Dog" Democrats...

WE NEED JUST A HANDFUL OF THESE 37 CONGRESSMEN TO SWITCH.  PLEASE CALL ALL 37 TODAY:   Baca, Berry, Bishop (GA), Cao, Cardoza, Carney, Cooper, Costa, Costello, Cuellar, Dahlkemper, Davis (IL), Donnelly (IN), Doyle, Driehaus, Ellsworth, Etheridge, Kanjorski, Kaptur, Kildee, Langevin, Lipinski, Lynch, Oberstar, Obey, Ortiz, Perriello, Pomeroy, Rahall, Reyes, Rodriguez,  Ryan (OH),  Salazar,  Snyder,  Space,   Spratt,  Stupak, Wilson (OH) ...Call 202-225-3121 (or 224-3121) asking for each, 37 times, and tell them to vote against Harry Reid's "health" amendment to H.R.3590.

Don't have time to make 37 phone calls? Simply SIGN OUR FAX-PETITION and we will fax your petition to all 52 "Blue-Dog" Democrats automatically. We save you time...

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

On Fox News last Thursday, Congressman Stupak warned the White House that at least 12 of the 37 Democrats (who had previously voted for Pelosi-care) may now switch and vote against the Senate version of Obama-care, because of its massive abortion funding increases.  This proves our fax campaign to 37 undecided Democrats is really making a difference, but the vote-count is still too close to call.   "My intent is not to hold up this legislation," Stupak said, "My intent is to keep current law. Eight different pieces of legislation currently say no public funding for abortion. That's all we’re saying...There's a principle and a belief that the American people agree with which says no public funding for abortion, and that's a principle and a belief I'll continue to fight for...In my eyes [President Obama] has to be a little more flexible, especially on this issue of no public funding for abortion."  Stupak demands President Obama be flexible, but does anyone really believe Obama is "flexible" enough to reverse his recent demands for increased abortion funding?
On CBS News, Stupak reminded the White House of President Obama's broken promise.   "I heard the President say, when he addressed the nation on September 9th, there would be no federal dollars for abortion.  We're going to [require him to] honor that pledge.  And as long as he has no federal dollars for abortion, we're in pretty good shape." But since the Senate version of the bill massively funds abortion, Stupak and a dozen friends may vote against it.  Yet how will the other 25 undecideds, and all 52 Blue-Dog Democrats vote?   If House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) can bribe or twist enough arms, we could still lose. Stupak and babies need help to defeat Obamacare.  Our petitions are changing history...

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILLPelosi said last Tuesday that the abortion dispute in the "health" care bill cannot be resolved in the companion bill Democrats plan to use to settle the main differences between the House and Senate.  In other words, she now admits her plan to ram the massive Harry Reid Senate amended version of H.R. 3590 (which already passed with 60 votes) through the House without any changes, then use "reconciliation" only in a later companion bill to amend minor budgetary items, leaving the vast Senate abortion funding untouched. Bypassing efforts by Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI) with her arm-twisting of moderate Democrats, Pelosi will first try to pass Reid's plan as-is, and only then try reconciliation for minor amendments to everything except its massive abortion funding.  

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) rebuked President Obama over abortion at the "health" care summit last Thursday, saying "for 30 years we've had a law that says there will be no taxpayer funding of abortion. This bill, that we have before us, for the first time in 30 years allows for the taxpayer funding of abortions." Obama's new version 2.0 actually increases abortion funding above and beyond the massive increase already in Harry Reid's Senate version of the bill.  Boehner also issued a written request to include Stupak in the discussions, but Obama refused to include Stupak, or even speak to him since September, as punishment for how Stupak led a House amendment last fall that would have significantly reduced Obama's abortion funding.  Obama bristled that he and Boehner/Stupak "profoundly disagree" about whether tax-dollars should fund abortion.
Now Obama thinks even more abortion funds are needed.  The National Right To Life Committee revealed Obama's hidden "reconciliation" abortion fund-increase in their analysis of the new White House proposal, which will become Pelosi's companion bill:  "None of President Obama's proposed changes diminish any of the sweeping pro-abortion problems in the Senate bill.  And he actually proposes to increase the funds that would be available to directly subsidize abortion procedures [with $11 Billion for Community Health Centers like Planned Parenthood] and to subsidize private health insurance that covers abortion (through the premium- subsidy tax credits program)."

Boehner, NRLC, and babies need help.  Our petitions are changing history...

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL 

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council also condemned Obama's new plan: "It also calls for $11 billion for community health centers with no restrictions on funding abortions, [can you say Planned Parenthood?] mandates so-called 'preventative' services for women including abortion, reauthorizes the Indian Health Act without abortion funding restrictions, and creates a national plan run by the Office of Personnel Management to contract with plans that include abortion."

But the good news was confirmed by Newsweek.com's analysis (repeating what I've been saying for three months), that a handful of the 37 moderate House Democrats led by Stupak can stop the entire Obamacare bill, because it funds massive increases abortion with our tax-dollars.  "What matters now is how large that 'unclear number of Democrats' is, how many representatives will oppose the Democrat's compromise bill because of softer abortion language," said Newsweek.com.  "If we're talking Stupak and one or two other members of Congress, then the Democrats are probably safe. But if the ranks of Stupak-followers reach into low double digits, Pelosi may have a serious threat on her hands. When we know more of the numbers, we'll better understand whether they will pose a threat to health-care reform moving forward."  

While Newsweek didn't know the head-count, we do. And YOU can influence them.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI) told the New York Times that he and 12 unnamed "blue-dog" Democrats will try to sink the entire bill, unless their partially pro-life demands are met. But we know their names, and we're not yet satisfied of their commitment to follow Stupak. We've identified 37 supposedly moderate democrats and 1 Republican who pretends he's a Democrat (names above) who voted WITH STUPAK to reduce abortion funding, but then also voted WITH PELOSI to pass socialism in H.R. 3692.  We need just a handful of these 37 to switch votes and stand firm against President Obama and Harry Reid's pro-abortion amendments. If they stand firm against abortion, we can stop the entire socialist "health" bill in its tracks. Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser told LifeNews.com the health care summit is a great time for Obama to retreat on his demand to fund abortions: "So in this new conciliatory mode, if he ignores the 80-percent consensus opposing abortion coverage in healthcare, the most intractable and divisive issue thus far, he reveals what many have suspected from the beginning - that abortion ideology is more precious to this president than his top domestic priority."  So let's help de-fund abortion, right now...SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL

Despite Scott Brown's (R-MA) victory as Senator-elect from Massachusetts, leading Democrats were quick to dismiss the voice of the people and promised to push ahead by funding abortion with our tax dollars.  Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who forced her pro-abortion funding scheme with Senator Ben-Nelson (D-NE) into H.R. 3590, defended her own victory over pro-life advocates, stating "it's only an ‘accounting procedure' that will do nothing to restrict [abortion] coverage."  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi likewise thumbed her nose at the voters' strong anti-Obamacare rebuke in Massachusetts.  "Let's remove all doubt," Pelosi told reporters in San Francisco the week of Brown's election. "We will have health care – one way or another.  Certainly the dynamic would change depending on what happen[ed] in Massachusetts, just the question about how we would proceed," Pelosi added. "But it doesn't mean we won't have a health care bill."   Make no mistake, pro-abortion forces still control Congress, the Senate, and the White House, and vow to aggressively ram their agenda against the voters will.

Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) caved in to pressure from the White House, and broke his pledge to "draw a line in the sand" against abortion funding, by instead reaching a compromise with pro-abortion Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) to fund some elective abortions with our tax-dollars.  According to the Washington Post, Nelson bargained for extra Medicaid money for Nebraskans, and an accounting-scheme that citizens choosing the abortion option in their subsidized "health" care plans must write separate checks for abortion co-pays.  Senator Boxer admits not getting the total abortion funding she wanted, but Boxer claimed victory over the more conservative Stupak-Pitts version of the house bill that would prohibit tax-funding for all abortions except life of the mother, or familial or forced impregnation. SELECT HERE TO SIGN PETITION, AND WE WILL FAX ALL 37 UNDECIDED DEMS, ALL 52 "BLUE-DOG" HOUSE DEMOCRATS, AND ALL 100 SENATORS, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ABORTION FUNDING FROM THE HEALTH CARE BILL