Subject: Poison In The Well

From: "The Office of Poofness" <2goforth@humanus.ca>

Date: Sun, January 13, 2019 7:55 pm

DID YOU KNOW?

Good Evening,

Please read twice for clarity.....

As the GCR/RV/Redemption/NESARA/GASARA unfolds, the narratives and accumulated information channels we choose to acknowledge as gospel that determine our perceptions are vast and varied. What is the truth, what is reality, and how are we to discern between speculated, contrived or exaggerated Intel? By focusing on the bigger picture and the overall grand plan we can view the maturing of these events through the ongoing developments of mechanisms required to facilitate this to fruition.

I was recently advised to understand that information changes on a regular basis and what was a reality last week, last month, and years gone by can completely change or evolve and grow past their initial introductions. Referring to the mechanisms required to facilitate this event.

One of, if not the most important, of these mechanisms is the movement of funds through the financial systems of the nation and the world in a secure and efficient manner. Understand that it is not an issue of moving money but an issue of moving information.

Because of the implementation of various internationally accepted Laws and Acts (i.e.: Money Laundering Act, Terrorist Act, Patriot Act) banks are required to source funds. The sourcing of funds requires the collection of information that adhere to the established compliance regulations installed by these Laws. How this personal information is passed between financial institutions in a secure manner, so as not to be corrupted, is the real issue.

In 1973 the “Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication” or S.W.I.F.T was created in Brussels and was supported by 239 banks in fifteen countries. It establish common standards for financial transactions and a shared data processing system with a worldwide communications network. Fundamental operating procedures, rules for liability, etc., were established in 1975 and the first message was sent in 1977.

SWIFT provided a centralized store-and-forward mechanism, with some transaction management. For bank A to send a message to bank B with a copy or authorization with institution C, it formats the message according to established standards and securely sends it to SWIFT. SWIFT guarantees it a secure and reliable delivery to B after the appropriate action by C. SWIFT guarantees are based primarily on high redundancy of hardware, software, and people.

During 2007 and 2008, the entire SWIFT Network migrated its infrastructure to a new protocol called SWIFTNet Phase 2. The main difference between Phase 2 and the former arrangement is that Phase 2 requires banks connecting to the network to use a Relationship Management Application (RMA) instead of the former Bilateral Key Exchange (BKE) system. A Bilateral Key allowed secure communication across the SWIFT Network. The text of a SWIFT: Message Types and the authentication key were used to generate a Message Authentication Code or MAC.

RMA operates by managing which message types are permitted to be exchanged between users of a SWIFT service: the receiver specifies which message types are permitted, and sends this permission data to the sender, the sender checks the message type against the permission data before sending a message to the receiver.

SWIFT has 9 Categories of messages; within each category can be 100 or more message types. Ex: SWIFT code MT103-(Single Customer Credit Transfer), MT 104-(Direct Debit and Request for Debit Transfer Message), MT303- (Forex/Currency Option Allocation Instruction). And so on. There are literally hundreds of message types. The message type determines what information is required by a client for the transaction to process or be accepted. If the wrong message type is placed in the wiring instructions the transaction will fail. One word can separate which “message type” should be used.

In November 2018, SWIFT recorded an average of 32.0 million FIN messages per day.! The chance for error is huge. The specifics of these “message types” read like the tax code. Very few bank employees actually understand or are efficient with the codes.

When SWIFT went to their “Phase 2 SWIFTNet “and a RMA they exposed themselves to even greater security issues. In 2016 an $81 million theft from the Bangladesh central bank via its account at the New York Federal Reserve Bank was traced to hacker penetration of SWIFT's Alliance Access software. Soon after the reports of the theft from the Bangladesh central bank, a second related attack was reported to have occurred on a commercial bank in Vietnam. Both attacks involved malware written to both and issued unauthorized SWIFT messages and to conceal that the messages had been sent.

In May 2016, Banco del Austro (BDA) in Ecuador lost $12 million in fund transfer requests that had been placed by thieves. In this case, the thieves sent SWIFT messages that resembled recently canceled transfer requests from BDA, with slightly altered amounts it is not detailed how the thieves gained access to send the SWIFT messages. There are dozens of investigations by the ISACA (Information Systems Audit and Control Association, is a nonprofit, independent association that advocates for professionals involved in information security, assurance, risk management and governance.) and others that are not being made public that have been variously reported to been "compromised" through the SWIFT network and to have lost money.

A series of articles published on 23 June 2006 in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times revealed a program, named the “Terrorist Finance Tracking Program”, which the US Treasury Department, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and other United States governmental agencies initiated after the 11 September attacks to gain access to the SWIFT transaction database. This access to the SWIFT data bases effectively gives the U.S. the power to spy on personal financial information on a global scale. This redefines invasion of privacy and only solidifies the opinion of the U.S. as the “Global Bully”.

On 26 February 2012 the Danish newspaper Berlingske reported that US authorities have sufficient control over SWIFT to seize money being transferred between two European Union (EU) countries (Denmark and Germany), since they succeeded in seizing around US $26,000 that was being transferred from a Danish businessman to a German bank. The transaction was automatically routed through the US (possibly because of the USD currency used in the transaction), which is how the United States was able to seize the funds. The money was a payment for a batch of Cuban cigars previously imported to Germany by a German supplier. As justification for the seizure, the U.S. Treasury stated that the Danish businessman had violated the United States embargo against Cuba. Germany has no embargoes on Cuba nor does Denmark! How is it the U.S. has the right to seize funds from another countries’ citizen based on a U.S. foreign policy? On information supplied by SWIFT!

The SWIFT system is corrupt and corruptible and can be used to sway and pressure foreign policy initiatives. Threats by the U.S. and the EU to oust Russia from the use of SWIFT in 2014 resulted in Russia developing its’ own backup delivery system SPFS ('System for Transfer of Financial Messages'). Compared to SWIFT, the system faces a number of challenges, especially higher transaction costs. The system only works within Russia, though there are plans to integrate the network with the China-based Cross-Border Inter-Bank Payments System (CIPS). The Russian government has also been expanding SPFS. As of March 2018, over 400 institutions (mostly banks) are part of the network.

An associate in Australia who supports orphans in multiple countries, has for years been transferring funds via SWIFT. Last week (The week of Jan 1sr 2019) on the bottom of his transaction receipt instead of saying SWIFT it said C.I.P.S. Instead of taking 5 days to clear, it cleared the same day. I have had conversation with business individuals who are moving billions, In Asia literally in minutes with C.I.P.S.

H.S.B.C. (The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation) is the 7th largest bank in the world and the largest bank in Europe) in a news release March 27, 2018 announced they are one of first major financial institutions to join China’s C.I.P.S.

Going back to my opening statements re: how information changes and evolves. When I first looked into the C.I.P.S., it was used primarily by China to move funds to countries they did business with. It is slowly and quietly, not replacing but integrating with SWIFT. The main difference is CIPS is an interbank clearing system with final settlement onshore while SWIFT transports financial messages but does not hold accounts for its members and does not perform any form of clearing or settlement.

In reality, CIPS uses SWIFT messaging as well as SWIFT standards – specifically ISO20022 XML (ISO is International Organization for Standardization, this regulation (20022 XML) is applicable to companies who send payment instructions to the bank and receive information on the payments as files). which supports Chinese and other extended character sets and is another mechanism indicator for the larger picture of the GCR/RV.

Implementation of the QFS (Quantum Financial System) effectively eliminates the capacity to alter, corrupt, misdirect or manipulate the financial message delivery which is vital to complete a fund transfer.

The CIPS and QFS are all happening now, not “Going to Happen”. These are All components and mechanisms of a larger agenda.

On a side note. Be aware that when ANY funds are received by a Pay Master or Attorney they have a fiduciary responsibility to account for delivery of those funds to a recipient. Receipt of funds to an attorney is just the first step. Acquiring the proper paperwork from a recipient, before funds can be sent, will take time to accumulate and structure.

For further information on the SWIFT system including the list of category message types and message type codes sent a request to reply2dj@mail.com subject line “SWIFT”

For a copy of the H.S.B.C news release send a request subject line “HSBC”

For updated info on the C.I.P.S send a request subject line Update “CIPS”

If you want all three, put all three request in one subject line please.

DJ

ZAP SAYS

HI ALL,

AFTER A RECORD RETURN OF KING (CHINOOK) SALMON IN ALASKA IN 2015, ON JANUARY 8 AT THE 11TH HOUR (LITERALLY), THE KING SALMON SEASON IN ALASKA IS IN EMERGENCY CLOSURE. THE ARTICLE ON YOUTUBE IS CONFLICTING BECAUSE OF THE DATES SHOWN. ONE SAYS JANUARY 8, 2019 AND THE OTHER REFERENCES THE PREVIOUS YEAR WHEN IT HAPPENED. I DO NOT KNOW WHICH IS TRUE YET AS I WRITE THIS.

IT WAS SENT TO ME BY ONE OF OUR INTERNAL TEAM SO IT MAY BE CURRENT AND 2019.

WHY?

BECAUSE OF FUKUSHIMA.

DR. KEVIN D. BLANCH PH.D. EXPLAINS IT A BIT IN THE VIDEO BUT THE REALITY IS THAT THE PACIFIC IS DEAD. NOBODY STOOD UP TO SAVE IT PAST SOME LIP SERVICE. NO CONCERTED MOVEMENT TO SAVE THE OCEAN AND ITS WILDLIFE. NOTHING. BUT MANY PROTESTS AROUND THE WORLD SUPPORTING THE NEXT GOLDEN STORY OF THE HOUR TO DO WITH THE NON STARTER TRADE WAR, OR THE WALL, OR LAST WEEK’S TERRIBLE FASHION.

( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yfpcf4OVh6Y&feature=youtu.be )

A WHILE AGO I TOLD PEOPLE TO EAT YOUR FILL OF SUSHI AND FORGET ABOUT MERCURY BECAUSE SOON YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY FISH TO EAT. NOW THAT THE SALMON IS OFF LIMITS BECAUSE OF RADIATION, WHAT ELSE HAS HAPPENED TO THE OTHER SPECIES OF FISH AND OTHER EDIBLE MARINE LIFE. OH JOY. SO MUCH FOR THAT PROTEIN SOURCE. I WILL MISS IT.

WHO IS TO BLAME? JAPAN FOR ONE. THEY WILL NOT ALLOW THE TECHNOLOGY INTO THEIR COUNTRY THAT CAN SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. WHY? ALL ABOUT MONEY I GUESS.

`

NEXT IS OTHER GOVERNMENTS THAT HAVE SHOWN A COMPLETE LACK OF RESOLVE IN THIS ISSUE. THEY ARE COMPLACENT OR COMPLICIT. THE END EFFECT IS THE SAME THOUGH.

SO WORLD, FORGET FISH. THEY ARE A THING OF THE PAST AND IF YOU DARE TO EAT SOME, BUY A GEIGER COUNTER. IF YOU CAN FIND ONE FOR SALE. I LOOKED AND THE SCARCITY OF THESE INSTRUMENTS IS REMARKABLE. I WONDER WHY.

ANYWAYS, THAT’S YOUR CHEERY NEWS FOR TODAY FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT DO NOT LIKE FISH. I WILL BE CRYING FOR A WHILE.

YES THE TECHNOLOGY TO TAKE CARE OF THE RADIATION PROBLEM IS AVAILABLE FROM A NUMBER OF SOURCES RANGING FROM RADIATION EATING MICROBES TO FREQUENCY MACHINES THAT NEUTRALIZE RADIATION. THERE ARE AT LEAST A DOZEN WAYS THAT IT CAN BE DONE FROM WHAT I SEE.

THE WHOLE IDEA OF NUCLEAR POWER IS INTRINSICALLY FLAWED BUT YET, GOVERNMENTS KEEP PUSHING IT AS A SAFE WAY OF GENERATING ELECTRICITY. IT AIN’T.

ONE EARTHQUAKE OR BOMB LATER, YOU ARE TOAST. WHAT A JOYFUL LANDSCAPE TO CONSIDER. AH WELL.

THERE MAY BE SOME DEMONSTRATIONS WITH PEOPLE MARCHING FOR A FEW HOURS, BUT I BET IT WILL NOT BE COVERED AND WILL DIE AN INSTANT MEDIA DEATH. WHO WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT DOOM AND GLOOM NO MATTER THE REALITY? VERY SAD.

THE BEST WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO IS TO SET UP FISH FARMS ON LAND I GUESS, AND THE SPECIES WILL BE LIMITED BUT IT WILL BE FISH. THAT’S ALL THAT CAN BE DONE NOW.

LOBSTER, OYSTERS, CRAYFISH, SHRIMP, SEA CUCUMBER, AND THE WHOLE LIST IS NOW OFF LIMITS. GREAT.

LIKE I SAID, WE WILL DO WHAT WE CAN BUT THE SELECTION WILL BE LIMITED AND BECOME VERY EXPENSIVE. A LOT OF THIS WORLD EATS FISH.

IN THE MEANTIME, THE IDIOCY CONTINUES AS SOME IN GOVERNMENT WANT TO DECLASSIFY THE HIGH LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE AT HANFORD TO A LOWER CLASSIFICATION TO SAVE CLEANUP COSTS. WHAT?? WOW.

GO SEE https://komonews.com/news/local/state-opposes-federal-plan-to-reclassify-hanford-nuclear-waste

OTHER COUNTRIES ARE FOLLOWING A SIMILAR PATTERN OF “WHO CARES”. THIS IS DANGEROUS AND CRIMINAL IN MY OPINION. UNFORTUNATELY, WE ARE NOT GEARED FOR POLITICAL ACTIVISM, JUST PROJECTS THAT MAKE SENSE SO I HOPE SOMEBODY OUT THERE WILL DO WHAT’S NECESSARY TO BRING FORWARD SOLUTIONS TO THIS GLOBAL POISON.

I AM DISSED BY THIS NEWS AS YOU CAN TELL BUT I DO NOT WANT TO BELABOUR THE POINT. IT IS ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT A VERY STRONG INDUSTRY JUST CLOSED ITS DOORS.

MANY OF US FORESAW THIS HAPPENING AND WE ALL TRIED TO WARN. TOO BAD NOTHING CAME OF IT.

I WISH EVERYBODY A BLESSED SUNDAY AND MAY YOU PONDER THIS INFORMATION FOR A GOOD WHILE. MAYBE SOME SOLUTION WILL POP INTO LIGHT THAT COULD BE USEFUL.

THANKS TO EVERYBODY FOR STICKING WITH US SO LONG.

GOD BLESS.

LOVE AND LIGHT

IN OUR SERVICE

ZAP

“GOD IS; I AM; WE ARE”

“BE GOOD, BE LEGAL, TELL TRUTH”

JANUARY 13, 2019

COPYRIGHT ZAP 2013-2019

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video Fukushima BREAKING NEWS; ALASKA Emergency CLOSES ENTIRE 2019 KING SALMON SEASON ;; THE 3 11th HOUR

Fukushima BREAKING NEWS; ALASKA Emergency CLOSES ENTIRE 2019 KING SALMON SEASON ;; THE 3 11th HOUR