CASPER: ' YOUR IGNORANCE IS SHOWING' (Updated Oct. 20, 2010)
Dear Casper (...and Wendy, et al),
Just OUTSTANDING!
I too was (mildly) surprised at Rayelan's comment regarding your work...not to mention, irritated.
Thank you . The ignoramuses are just a handful in number compared to the huge number who greatly admire, support, and thank you for your intelligent, honest, discerning, forthright, detailed, and courageous work these many years. You and yours are truly heroes...and you are loved, no doubt.
Sure, I get frustrated and, for that matter, even terrified at moments. But it is clear to me, it is obvious that my fear, my frustration is not because of your reports. It is, rather, because of my own personal choices in my own financial life...now 'financial-less'. And, especially, it is because of the bad guys...okay, okay, it is sometimes anger at the good guys too when I fear they are impotent. (I still do fear just that, by the way.) But I thank God for your reporting. It is the only sanity I see anywhere regarding reports upon the Projects. Journalistic work. I do not agree with every single point in your 'Opinion' pieces and I suspect you would not expect me/us to do so. But I do agree with many, sometimes most of your op ed points...and I most appreciate the shining of your light upon the various issues especially as to parallels with the Projects.
I am honestly dumbfounded, truly amazed, at the people who praise Poof and dish you--severely so, at that. I don't get it. My assumption is that they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the definition of the word, "positive." They love Poof because he is "positive" and are irritated because you are not in their view. However, it is YOU who are positive because you are personally forthright and vulnerable. It is YOU who are positive because you substantially contribute to our knowledge of the Project wars whether pleasant or unpleasant at any moment. It is YOU who are positive because you seek truth even at a price. It is YOU who are positive because you are willing to reconsider, you are willing to learn from the disappointments and any misunderstandings. It is YOU who are positive because you give us EXTRAORDINARY detail and insight from behind closed doors. From years of consumption, it is self-evident to me that you are, AT THE VERY LEAST, one hundred percent sincere and authentic.
Though I sincerely appreciate Poof's personal presence in the Projects as a fellow 'sufferer' and Beneficiary, I find his reporting of no value whatsoever. I wish him well. Truly. But I, for one, have virtually no use for his updates...though I do read them trying to squeeze any information or insight from anyone, anywhere, anytime. His writing posture of knowing the 'whole truth, nothing but the truth' (my words), and he 'has been telling us along, for many years that this is what would be happening' (my words), while conveniently ignoring the delays ad nausea m (except he told us this or that would happen all along right?)...no explanations whatsoever. Geez. Come on now. His reports are sophomoric at best. At worse, they simply are not forthright. Furthermore, when somebody offers little actual information to the reading audience, the LAST thing they should presume to do is to talk down to that same audience. I do not apologize nor blush for this criticism of Poof in that he certainly reads the riot act to so many as part of his updates--at least by innuendo and tone. I fully support him as a member of our community but, for me, not as a messenger upon the Projects. Each to his own I guess.
I so appreciate RumorMillNews and Rayelan for her own brave and behind the scenes reporting these many years. But that, in part, is why I too was surprised by her reaction to Casper's reports.
Thank you Casper.
Warm Regards, Thomas
#3 (Reply)
----- Original Message -----From: LSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:42 AMSubject: Re: 'YOUR IGNORANCE IS SHOWING'Dear Patrick, Anne, Casper and WE:I've suspected for some time that Casper might be a Star person,and I'm not referring to a movie star !!The Best of Blessing to all of you.L'YOUR IGNORANCE IS SHOWING'#4 (Reply)
Starborn go about their lives just doing their jobs, not wanting or asking for publicity. Because they can do their jobs much better if they are essentially out of the public eye. They become less of a target that way, and can get a lot more done. Starborn come in all shapes and sizes, and ages, so I'm told often. Many have 'died', and when that happens, more come to take their place. There are literally millions here now, on this planet. At last count well over 100 million. So yes, there is a 'presence' on this planet, as there always has been. Especially now!!!
T
#5 (Reply)
The following letter is for you, and to pass on to Casper if you would be so kind, and also please feel free to publish it as well if you wish.
GD
-----------
Re: CASPER: 'YOUR IGNORANCE IS SHOWING'
Dear Patrick, Anne, Casper, Wendy, and others,
I'd like to thank you all for your herculean and tenacious struggle against the Dark.
Fourwinds, and the Casper Reports are one of my primary daily news sources, and provide a very valuable moral boost in my own personal struggle. Also, since I consider it possible that the dark forces may yet manage to disable the internet, I archive many fourwinds articles and all the Casper reports (since Feb 2008, when I first came across them.)
So, having followed the Casper reports closely for over two years (I know, not long compared to Casper's own dedication), I feel I may offer a comment on the issue of belief or disbelief in Casper's reporting.
For generations, the Powers That Be have been working to diminish the capacity of ordinary people to listen, learn, reason and judge reality. They are dumbing us down, all the better to enable their own tyranical and destructive rule over the entire world. It is easiest to lead the blind, to fool the foolish, oppress the meek, rob the innocent, and slaughter the weak. In this effort the Elites exhibit much subtlety - even the phrase 'dumbing down' is itself dumbed down, for it says nothing of the ways in which intelligence can be and is sabotaged from within.
One of the most effective mental shackles, is the learned practice of 'belief'. The idea that given a choice between a number of conflicting versions of 'real events', one must 'believe' one to the exclusion of all others. Religion is one of the ways in which this 'belief/disbelief' dichotomy is insinuated into the thought patterns of the people. Can you name one religion that maintains that it's own version of spirituality and Creation is only one of many potentially valid naratives? Thus people are habituated to the practice of 'potential exclusion', while lacking any direct personally experienced evidence supporting or depreciating different versions.
The Casper Reports, and the heated arguments over their 'reality' (or not) provide a fine example of the damage done by this unfortunate mental hobble most people wear. How many people reading this have *any* direct personal experience that would either validate or repudiate the theme of the Casper Reports? Some may, and I envy them. I know I do not. In the years I've been reading them (and various other commentators such as Poof, Story, Brammerton, Fulford, etc), and my best efforts to find correlations in 'Main Stream Media' (lying garbage, but still useful for background and 'intent'), I've never found a single solid corroboration. Or disproof for that matter. Only hints of validation in the subtlety of 'what is not said', and the surges of apparent counter-propaganda.
Does this mean I 'disbelieve' Casper? Or that I believe him unquestioningly? No, I do not. I simply absorb the information, file it for reference, and maintain in my mind a model of 'the world acording to Casper'. This provides one of several models against which I try to correlate everything I read and hear. In equal handedness, each one of these models could for all I know, be either absolutely true or the product of a deliberate disinformaton effort on someone's behalf. Some of the 'models' I maintain are developing quite high 'probably a disinfo source' scores, for instance Tom Heneghan. But even there, it doesn't mean I exclude every detail originating from that source. It merely means I try to identify the nature and objectives of that particular disinfo source. In Heneghan's case, he's clearly in thrall to some faction associated with Al Gore and the Warmists. But otoh, some of the information he publishes is still very interesting. So he gets the routine archiving tr!
eament
from me too. Same with Story - clearly had some relationship with the British Crown, and so aspects of his reports were highly suspect. But others very valuable. Again, full archiving. I miss him, and hope that rumors of his survival are not premature.
It happens that I do consider the 'Casper model' to be very high in probability of being an accurate narative of real events. But I also keep in mind that I cannot *know* for sure. Since I have no direct involvement in the events he relates, to me his news is all characters on a screen, that I am unqualified to judge as true or untrue even if I do agree with almost everything in his opinion pieces. The best I can do is to honour his obviously great effort in preparing his reports, by reading and learning what I can from them.
Perhaps someday some solid verification will turn up, perhaps not. Meanwhile, I continue to learn. This is the key point - 'learning' does not mean that one accepts the learned information as absolute, unquestionable truth. Even in the Sciences, this is not so. One learns things in order to enhance one's ability to question everything. One does not learn in order to cease questioning, as is the case with 'belief'.
The deeper the questions one can understand, the better chance one has of asking the right questions, and finding ways to uncover answers. The best scientists are those who are able to encompass possibilities beyond 'accepted truth', and then find ways to test the validity of those potentials.
Another 'dumbed down' flaw in common thinking, is the habit of judging information by its 'distance from consensus.' In other words, to dismiss information because it wildly differs from the world view held by the average person. This seems to be the basis for many complaints against Casper - that the world he describes is so bizarrely at variance with the Main Stream Media worldview.
But this basis for judgement is entirely purile. I'd hope that everyone reading this understands that the MSM worldview is a deliberately concocted illusion, 99% false from top to bottom. Quoting William Casey, once Director of Central Intelligence: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Casey left unsaid the methods of imposing a mental straightjacket on the People. These are primarily:
- Belief. Disables the ability to contemplate alternatives.
- Distance. The further the imposed False Beliefs are from reality, the fewer the people with the mental agility to make the leap to reality when some aspect of it is revealed to them.
- Consensus. Uses the natural human tribal/herd instinct as a barrier to considering ideas that differ from views held by others around them.
Perceived 'distance from consensus' is a very powerful tool of mind control. It manifests as instinctive contempt for ideas conflicting with a 'widely accepted' viewpoint. Quoting Herbert Spencer (1820-1903): "There is a principle, which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
This too applies well to the criticisms of Casper's work. His version of reality is very, very different (far) from the MSM illusion. And so we find people responding with contempt and vilification. We should pity and help them, for they have had their capacity for rational investigation deliberately crippled by the Powers That Be.
So with all that said, I'd like to make some comments directed to the content of Casper's reports.
Firstly, the packs. The mysterious, much travelled, never arriving packs. It's a fascinating story, regardless of its rather tedious repetition and predictability. There are so many questions one could ask, such as:
* Who created them? (And I have a *very* open mind on this matter. I'll even accept Celestials.)
* What are the packs, exactly? What is inside them?
* Who repairs/replaces them when the bad guys damage or destroy them?
* Why can't whoever made/repairs/replaces the packs, just deliver them directly to the recipients?
(Again, I have a very open mind on this. For example, 'as proof humans can act to save themselves'?)
* Why do the packs ever have to be all in one place, and thus prone to hijacking by the bad guys?
* How does this 'triggering' thing work exactly? Delivering the trigger packs initiates the disclosures?
* How is anyone going to know that ALL the trigger packs actually got delivered, and to the right people?
* What's to stop the Dark side just killing all the Pack recipients? Not as if this would be beyond them.
As for the disclosures, exactly why can't this just proceed anyway, given the history of extreme obstruction?
I presume 'the suitcase' is a figure of speech, and really refers to a collection of documents, some of which would be verified copies of papers, others of which would be digital, such as videos and sound recordings. But ultimately, there's no reason why the entire 'suitcase' couldn't consist of digital files, right? Also, I'd hope there are multiple copies of the 'suitcase' in existence, since having only one copy in one place would be really, really stupid.
So it has to be asked, what the hell is the problem with releasing it? This is the age of the Internet, and information released to the net cannot be suppressed. When the CRU emails leaked, I and everyone else who cared had a copy of the 63 MB zip of all the leaked files within hours. I really don't have much patience with the continuing non-release of the 'suitcase'. For F's sake, someone just scan the docs, zip it all up into one file, and post it on multiple public file servers. End of problem.
What, there's some contract to not release it till the trigger packs are delivered? So who exactly is the counter party to this contract? Would that be the lying, cheating, stealing, murderous scum who presently mis-rule this vale of tears? The same scum who's heads are going to be on pikes after the 'suitcase' is released?
And whoever has the suitcase is honoring this contract with murderous scum who can't be trusted to keep their word for even two seconds? Who soon after the release are not going to be in any position to complain about 'premature release'? Sorry, this *really* strains my ability to maintain alternate views of 'reality'.
Then there are the recipients of the packs. I have read all I could find of who the 'Program' beneficiaries are, in general. I have a little understanding of the magnitude of the amounts in question, and how they can be considered 'real money' as opposed to the fiat paper the world is choking on today. I think I understand how these factors make the payments significant enough to overturn the existing order of world financial control.
What I don't understand, is why a changeover of the financial elites from one group to another is put forward as a certain cure to the woes of today's world. Sure, things may be better. But money and power corrupts. How are the new group of ultra-wealthy (the Program investors, the Farm Claimers, etc) supposed to be immune to the same human failings that led to the existing mess? I strongly suspect it won't take long for things to go off the rails in a way similar to present problems. If the new ultra-wealthy even have the skill and wisdom to fix current systemic social problems in the first place.
Anyway, enough questions. I have one suggestion, which I hope may be constructive. My apologies for being only able to offer this one small idea.
The packs, numbering in the hundreds (?), must be pretty bulky. They regularly get shuttled around, loaded and unloaded from trucks and aircraft. The apparently numerous people who report to Casper seem to often actually sight the packs. And so, one *must* ask, isn't it possible to take some photographs of the mysterious packs during all this to and fro-ing? When they are regularly 'retrieved' perhaps? How about next time they are sabotaged and have to be repaired by unknown persons, who are presumably on the Light side?
A couple of common phrases spring to mind: "A picture is worth a thousand words", and "pics or it didn't happen!"
If Casper or his sources are worried about being identified by camera data in the pictures, use an image processing tool such as Irfanview to strip the EXIF data from the image files. How to anonomise images is common knowledge, easily googled. I gather Casper is a fairly senior person, and so may not be comfortable with computer technology. But come on, I'm 55 and can do this sort of stuff easily. It's not hard.
Some photos of the events included in the Casper reports would make a huge difference to many people, I'm sure.
Best wishes,
TerraHertz
PS. A short story for you all, that may or may not be relevant. Can you guess how?
http://forum.darkervision.com/smf/index.php?topic=3161.0
Fermi's Urbex Paradox, by TerraHertz