Custom Search
CASPER RESPONSE TO WHISTLEBLOWER COMMUNICATION
Surely you have noticed by now that WE do not get involved in 'other folks business' unless WE are mentioned by name or "Our Business" is the subject being discussed.
When asked about RAP for example WE made it clear we are not involved with them.
When asked about Fulford we made it clear that an occasional, courteous and professional exchange of info is the only relationship.
WE are not involved with Story or 'Poof' or any of the other messengers.
WE do what we do on behalf of Program Participants which might be summarized as 'the pursuit of truth' which we then report to our fellow participants/recipients.
We have been at this a very long time, before any of these other folks ever appeared on the scene, long before our updates began to appear on Fourwinds and later other Web-Sites where they were taken from 'cyber-space'. Before C.H., before 'O'.
We go way back and began to make Intel sought for personal reasons public in an attempt to stop a rash of suicides and stress related heart attacks being caused, in our view, by the huge volumes of lies and false info being fed as a steady diet to 'innocent victims'. Doing this work 'with a vengeance' was triggered by the suicide of this writers best friend, and All American football player.
WE are not affiliated with anyone else, not Cheney or Bush or any Intel Agency as some have implied. As explained many times WE remain anonymous in an attempt to protect self and family. The attempt may be feeble, our 'identity' may be known already, but WE persist in the attempt to remain anonymous with the assistance of the very few we trust to know who we are.
I write the above to again establish our Independence from ALL others and to remind readers who WE work for, ourselves and the legitimate program participants.
Again Whistleblower mentions Casper and 'Our Business' while defending his business, the OITC.
To the very best of my recollection WE have never discussed the OITC or offered an opinion of them although we have had several public 'back and forth's with Whistleblower when he offered his Intel or his opinions of 'our business'.
Generally speaking he has never agreed with us and we have never agreed with him. I have always viewed Whistleblowers statements and criticisms about us and 'our business' as his and the OITC's views, professionally delivered, publicly, and not a personal attack.
I do not recall ever 'attacking' him personally or the OITC either and I have no intention of doing so now.
I do believe however, that for the first time and for the sake of our program brethren the time has come to jump into this fray, the OITC vs Fulford, the OITC vs Casper and Program Participants, the OITC vs its various critics on various web-sites.
Whistleblower refers to Fulford and Casper as offering their unenlightened view of the big picture and says 'if we had any real sources we would know that his view of things is correct' (paraphrasing). He says WE and Fulford and others are influenced by those not at the top of the heap and as a result the Info/Intel we provide the people is actually destructive to their well being as well as being false. To which I respond--Baloney.
Whistleblower and OITC, in my opinion, have a view point of their own making. A view that says they have a rightful claim to control of the worlds wealth under the auspices of the U.N. and other 'authorities' as described by him. A Self Interested point of view I submit to you. I believe he and the OITC are affiliated with and 'invested in' the existing establishment and its attempts to preserve its corrupt self at all cost. Also, that implementation of the new metals backed banking system represents a defeat to the OITC as well as 'the establishment' which includes such as the Corporation, the Queen, the Fed Res, the City, the Vatican, the U.N., World Court, World Bank, IMF, etc etc... I believe Whistleblower very professionally represents a view which calls for the defeat of the new and places a self interested claim on most of the worlds assets including funds expected by program participants.
In these respects I view his claims as no different than those of Obama, or the Queen, or the Vatican, or many others each saying all funds belong to them and they must have the funds.
Why was the Tribunal formed and then replaced, never mind that both got bribed?
It was to by-pass the corrupt World Court and the Corrupt U.N. both of which had been attempting to access our accounts and/or trade the funds.
If the funds belong to the OITC what are they doing in our accounts necessitating the theft attempts?
As was said to the Queen and Obama I now say to Whistleblower, if the funds belong to you why don't you simply withdraw them?
What we are witnessing here, in my opinion, is one more entity attempting to claim and/or steal all funds in a series of attempts to stop the new, all perpetrated by the existing 'establishment' with each and every aspect thereof, including the OITC, claiming their view of the world is correct at the expense of all others.
There is no doubt in my mind, none, that Whistleblower knows things WE don't know. Have we not often said 'we don't know everything'?
The corollary is likely true also, 'we know things he does not know'. WE report most of what we know to you and we do not do so 'willy nilly'.
When the Intel we provide does not agree with Whistleblowers view of the world then as far as WE are concerned he is 'up the creek without a paddle'.
There are those who refer to the OITC as the 'Office of International Thieves and Con-Artists'. Not us ,you understand, and we are not quoting Fulford.
What they are or are not is of little concern to us except to the extent they wish to involve themselves in 'our business' then WE have an obligation, in our view, to respond publicly for the sake of those WE work for, Program Participants.
OUR POSITION Summarized is, therefore, that We know what we are talking about and that Whistleblower does not.
No sense beating around the bush.
Should WE for any reason turn out to be wrong we will eat an extra piece of humble pie, publicly, for Whistleblowers benefit.
And finally, as to 'sources', after 20 years of this 'Rocky Horror Picture Show' you may rest assured WE do not obtain our Intel from the milkman.
casper 8-18-10