Please allow me the right to respond to the latest update of Fulford’s article as referred to below, particularly the updated section from AM, which I believe to be Anton Miller:-

FULFORD: The “International Office of Treasury Control” is a fraudulent organization (Updated July 7, 2010)

---- Original Message -----

From: AM

To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com

Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:16 AM

Subject: Comment RE: Fulford/OITC Article

The very reason why I did not respond or reference to the “Melchizedek” comments is because this is very old gossip which has been discredited many times before. However, to reiterate, but in condensed form, many old and past comments on this subject matter, the OITC is not connected in any shape of form to the Melchizedek syndrome. It never has been nor will be, as the OITC is a legitimate organization legally Chartered under the United Nations, registered with all Law Enforcement Agencies throughout the World, Registered and Recorded within the House of the Senate of the USA, Registered and Recorded within the BIS, US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve, The Swiss Central Bank, The Swiss Federal Finance Commission, and so on.

That FACT being the actual case, the question is why should we ever become, or want to become, associated with Melchizedek at any time, now, in the past or in the future. It just isn’t logical at all.

More to the point, WHY? is it necessary for anyone, whether Anton Miller or not, to dig up old gossip and attempt to continually discredit the OITC.

My own opinions are that we have a lot of people very worried and their method of defense revolves around the attack and discredit method.

The very people that are worried, seriously worried I add, about the truth that I express and report within my articles are ones who are living with Alice in Wonderland. If that is the way in which they want to live, fine by me, but don’t even think you have us worried by these continuous attacks with old gossip, because we really are not worried in the least.

In respect of AM’s statement that, quote “Fulford would not make such claims without substantial data and reference sources to said claims”, depends entirely on how one looks at things and how one’s perception works.

We all have contacts but it is a question of whether we and our contacts are high enough in society to gain the relevant information. Furthermore, it is down to the fact as to whether we believe such claims. Obviously AM you do believe such claims, which is your prerogative, but to publicly express such beliefs with an deliberate intent to distort the minds of others is deception beyond belief. Just to mention, as Fulford did, MI6, CIA etc, means nothing as there are literally thousands of people working within and for these Agencies, all at different levels of security classification. Dropping names like this is the trait of persons who need to substantiate their comments in the eyes of the public when in reality their contacts are, as it seems, so low in the ranking that it means nothing at all.

It is no mystery AM that you and I have had our battles in the past, whereby at the first possible opportunity you do appear to reignite the battle for whatever reason, but this time using some age old discredited gossip. Shame on you AM.

I can further add, to dispel Fulford’s claim that these Bonds / certificates were to be used to assist the European Countries that are currently in a financial mess.

For your information, gained from copies of documents and official means, the breakdown of commission payments include 20% of all funds to one group of Brokers including facilitators, 5% to BNP Paribas, 65% to Yamaguchi and all others, 10% to the Humanitarian Project…….FACT……..So 90% was actually going to be paid to people not the projects ………It really doesn’t work that way at all, which just shows how naïve some people are on this matter.

As for the reference to David Salle. This is my superior and a very highly respected and reputable person. Why you have seen fit to make reference to this matter is unknown to me because you AM have received communications from me and are fully aware of my name, which is not as you now claim. You have gathered this information from Fulford and his associates because neither you or they can spell the name correctly

All in all, just another pathetic attempt to discredit the OITC and all those involved with the OITC, whereby such an article is not really worth consideration at all as it contains nothing but old gossip and mistruths.

Fulford’s articles also run very short on Fact and very high on supposition, innuendoes, speculation, and false claims that indicate he has more power and knowledge than what he really has.

WHISTLEBLOWER