Custom Search

QUESTIONS FOR MR. WHISTLEBOWER FROM D.W.

From: DW

To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 6:00 PM

Subject: QUESTIONS FOR WHISTLEBLOWER

Dear Patrick:

Thank you, for submitting my e-mail questions to the WHISTLERBLOWER, and appreciate his consideration for answering. Please be advised that the entire exchange is authorized for posting. Have made a few additions, whereas, I explained further the subject matter of the book being worked on, and those changes have been highlited in red.

Best Regards,

*******************************

----- Original Message -----

From: Mr. Whistleblower

To: Bellringer

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 1:50 AM

Subject: Re: Fw: Questions for Whistleblower

Dear Mr Bellringer,

I am most respectful of your continuous forwarding of questions from various persons that read or post to fourwinds10. I hope we can reduce some of this traffic when the updated version of the Web Site comes on line as that contains a section for Q & A, to which people can communicate direct.

In the meantime, below is my response to Mr DW, which I have no objection to publication, but in view of Mr DW's inclusion of specific details I believe you should obtain his consent first before any such publication.

Kindest regards and God Bless

Mr. Whistleblower

Response starts here:-

Dear Mr. DW.

Reference to your questions forwarded to me by Mr Bellringer, please refer below to my answers which are directly below (in blue print) the relevant sections of your letter.

You may also be interested in another response to questions, sent today to Mr Bellringer, reference to questions by Mr JR. of which my answers also contain a Diagrammatic View of the Structuring of the Trusts / Foundations, etc.

My response starts here:-

Dear Whistleblower. . .

A couple of questions "IF" you care to answer and/or find the time available to answer? And will herein ask away in hopes that you'd give it some thought. . .

First, having to do with that person who I identified wi thin my treatise ("Last Tentacle of the Octopus") addressed to CASPER'S attention, which was posted on RMN & fourwinds, and appreciate the interesting reply of your critique. And while I'm at it... you also gave and had an equally interesting exchange with CM. The person who I called Lewis Ellingford, who apparently triggered the arbitrage that I theorized had brought about the response that brought down the pre-planned failure of the USSR (which you agreed with, naming the parties to the deal in your posted reply). In that, banks are not permitted to solicit, therefore, an individual or legal entity is required to either offer and/or accept contractual agreement that could encumber (if accepted) the bank responsibility to perform.

A). Your last sentence is generally correct, but it does depend upon the relevant laws of the actual Nations where the Bank and Individual are situated, as the laws appertaining to this may be different. Additionally, it also depends upon which National Law is dominant within any Contractual Agreement. From my experience, you will find that the Bank will be operating outside the laws of their own domicile, probably within an “Off Shore Domicile” and therefore subject to the laws of the “Off Shore Domicile”. That is the little “loophole” that some Banks use to escape liability.

The question that has gnawing at me for years. My knowing some background on LE, being that he was a mercenary with the Selous Scouts in Rhodesia, or Angola, and based on his past history had absolutely no knowledge of banking. He may have had (and probably did) have MI6 connections; and, he did make an introduction of a person who I believe was either CIA (or, asset) living in Zurich. This person who I'll call Ron Black, was very interested in making my acquaintance when he had learned from LE of my knowing a investment banker on Xxxxxxxstrasse Street, Zurich, who I'll call Heir G. Now Heir G., was a billionaire (20 years ago, now deceased), and my introduction came by way of his son who was a friend of mine in the USA (also, now deceased). Now, visiting with Heir G., in his offices in Zurich, I related to him that Ron Black had asked if I'd introduce him, assuming for the purposes of arranging collateral for a program. And Heir G., refused to give him an audience. (a bit of background, before returning to LE). Now, to my question... Knowing LE had caused to trigger something that began the banking tranche event. The tranche began on the inter-bank's computer system, and was triggered by input of codes. My question: How does a guy without any background in banking cause to transact what was at the time a major financial event??

A). That is the enigma about these situations (Not all of them I add), one that doesn’t appear to have any comprehension at all, but it happens all too often. I personally came across a very similar situation some time back with a CI operative that I will refer to as DC, out of Arizona. The person / people involved do not appear to fit with the circumstances whereby it alerts one’s suspicion as to whether this is a Fraud or whether it is just a Joker trying his hand. The former usually takes no:1 slot.

My opinion, and I stress that it is my opinion, is tha t these people know more than they want us to realize they know, but they keep quite and play stupid when in company but beneath the scenes they know exactly what to do, which is the situation that I came across with DC. The other alternative is that behind the scenes they have a Controller who inform them and guides them as to what to do reference the codes and probably provides the codes to such people as DC and several others.

I can not see another alternative, which I will also relate to another example regarding a CI operative in China under the initials RP. He attempted a transaction and actually had codes, or he thought he did (Probably the codes used in some other previous transaction). The computer system rejected the codes he punched in and the transaction failed.

And from where would he had acquired the codes to perform a task for which his background doesn't fit??

A). Codes are usually set by a special department within the Federal Reserve where it relates to accounts held within the Federal Reserve (Collateral Accounts as an example).

Where it relates to transactions between Commercial Banks, codes are usually set by the “Lead” Bank. However, having said that, if transactions are international in nature, which most of them are, then the Federal Reserve has to be involved in one form or another.

The tranche began and was executed from a mediocre bank in Geneva. My only conclusion was that he was a front (a patsy, so to speak) and provided his services to keep the real identity confidential of the person who employed him; and, there was likely a couple more layers before centering on the REAL entity behind the plan? (Have considered it may have been Ron Black, being my reason for mentioning above?)

A). Your assessment here fits nicely into my own opinion, quote “The other alternative is that behind the scenes they have a Controller who inform them and guides them as to what to do reference the codes and probably provides the codes to such people as DC and several others”.

The reason I am asking, as it may be possible due to your OITC involvement that you may have some knowledge of the arbitrage event to which I am referrin g?? And possibly may give consideration of sharing (all or partial) with me??

A). We certainly have knowledge, but unfortunately I can not share it as there are still some missing pieces which are being currently investigated. To release any information may jeopardize the investigation. What I can say is that these investigations are, and have been, very extensive and thorough, and handled carefully because there are some well known figures involved.

A couple more questions? Your no doubt aware of what was called "The Hitler Trust"? That has been renamed, I assume by the Executor to divert any future aspersions cast its way after the demise of the Third Reich. Question: What was the name of the Trust prior to Adolf's involvement, and what is it named today?? Who may have been the Trust's Executor during the Weimar Republic?? Possibly Hitler's Minister of Finance, Heir Hjalmar Schacht??

A). This is a question you have got me on. I really do not know the answer to this question and the only person who would undoubtedly have the answer to this is The International Treasury Controller. If I ask, he will more than likely tell me that this is on a “need to know basis, and I don’t need to know”.

The only other persons or parties that would be aware of this would be engaged in special departments of the Federal Reserve, US Treasury, BIS.Last Question: Have you ever heard of a depository titled "Sanctuary of the Shark"?? If so, what might you know, or care to share with me about it??

A). Again, I can really say I know little on this matter. I have vaguely come across this, not only with the name you have stated, but also under other names such as “Shark Sanctuary”, “Shark Depository”, “Sanctuary of Atlantis”, and “Coral Reef Sanctuary”. My recollection is that it refers to a deep underwater depository which is accessed via a deep shaft and lift, heavily guarded, situated on a relatively small island in the Caribbean, but I could be wrong as my knowledge is very limited on same. If it is the same, then it is a very substantial depository which spans an underwater area covering many islands that very few people know about. There is also another one, smaller, off the coast of Australia, which has now been replaced by a larger on shore one.

The only other depository it could relate to, that I am aware of, is the area off the coast of the Philippines (deep Sea) in which there are many wrecks. Most of which are depositories of the assets of the Collateral Accounts, and are heavily guarded and with continuous submarine surveillance. Many of these wrecks were ships sunk either by the Japanese on their flight from the Philippines at the end of WW II, or were merchant ships carrying assets to be secreted in the Philippines during WW II, which were sunk by the Japanese.

Again let me state that my ONLY interest is in learning the TRUTH, that am sure you'll agree is a very illusive intangible of many shades of gray.

A). The many shades of Grey I agree with entirely. This is mainly as a result of the “Top Secret” factor surrounding all of this in conjunction with the speculation, plausible stories, innuendos, misinformation, and similar that evolve over a period of time from persons or parties that may have been somehow involved, may be a descendant of someone involved, may have actually stolen some assets, may have been involved with stolen assets, may be a deliberate misinformation specialist, and so on. Even I spend, and have sp ent, considerable time and resources on bringing to a definitive conclusion, many shades of grey over the years that I have been involved, but I will say that there are many, yet undiscovered by the public, that are waiting to be resolved.

My interest is ONLY in furthering the information for what is hoped will become a book about the financial history of the world from the late 19th Century to the present day. My envisioned book would be an extension of the history of economics and finance that was not included, or made a part of David Landes book "The Wealth and Poverty of Nations", by exposing the conspiratorial and clandestine side of banking, and how nations central banks are used to increase the wealth and power of the power elite.

I wish you well on this, but please do not make the same mistakes as many other writers have regarding the Gold in various places in the Far East. The truth is what matters, and if you can not find the truth then do not include speculation, or, if you only find part of the truth, only publish what you find, eliminating any speculation that you may be tempted, or others may be tempted, to include.

It won’t be easy for you because of all the “Secrecy” surrounding this issue, and I hope I am still alive to read your book when it gets published.

Thank you, for your time and consideration in reading my e-mail, and look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

A). Anything I can do to assist you, please ask. However, please remember there are limitations as to exactly what can be revealed publicly.

Sincerely,

P.S. If, you believe any part of this should be published and/or your reply, please feel free to notify Patrick, as I don't have a problem with it, other, than the Ron Black, Heir G. his son (my friend) and the street address in Zurich, being part of any public viewing, even though Heir G., and his son (my friend) are both deceased today (of natural causes). My reservation to deleating anything has been waived, as Whistler didn't have any problem with answering my questions.

A). I will leave this decision up to you, as I have no objection to publication regarding my answers to your questions. However, with reference to your above comments you may wish to remove all of this particular detail first.

Kindest regards

Whistleblower.

Response Ends here:

----- Original Message -----

From: DW

To: bellringer@fourwinds10.com

Sent: Sunday, May 24 , 2009 2:48 PM

Subject: Questions for Whistleblower

Dear Whistleblower. . .

A couple of questions "IF" you care to answer and/or find the time available to answer? And will herein ask away in hopes that you'd give it some thought. . .

First, having to do with that person who I identified within my treatise ("Last Tentacle of the Octopus") that was posted on RMN & fourwinds, and appreciate the interesting reply of your critique. And while I'm at it... you also gave and had an equally interesting exchange with CM. The person who I called Lewis Ellingford, who apparently triggered the arbitrage that I theorized had brought about the response that brought down the pre-planned failure of the USSR (which you agreed with, naming the parties to the deal in your posted reply). In that, banks are not permitted to solicit, therefore, an individual or legal entity is required to either offer and/or accept contractual agreements that could encumber (if accepted) the banks responsibility to perform.

The question that has gnawing at me for years. My knowing some background on LE, being that he was a mercenary with the Selous Scouts in Rhodesia, or Angola, and based on his past history had absolutely no knowledge of banking. He may have had (and probably did) have MI6 connections; a nd, he did make an introduction of a person who I believe was a CIA asset living in Zurich. This person who I'll call Ron Black, was very interested in making my acquaintance when he had learned from LE of my knowing a investment banker on Stockerstrasse Street, Zurich, who I'll call Heir G. Now Heir G., was a billionaire, and my introduction came by way of his son who was a friend of mine in the USA. Now, visiting with Heir G., in his offices I related to him that Ron Black had asked if I'd introduce him, assuming for the purposes of arranging collateral for a program. And Heir G., refused to give him an audience. (A little background, before returning to LE). Now, to my question... Knowing LE had caused to triggered soething that began the banking tranche event. The tranche began on the inter-bank's computer system, and was triggered by input of codes. My question: How does a guy without any background in banking cause to transact what was at the time a major financial event?? And from where would he had acquired the codes to perform a task for which his background doesn't fit?? The tranche began and was executed from a mediocre bank in Geneva. My only conclusion was that he was a front (a patsy, so to speak) and provided his services to keep the real identity confidential of the person who employed him; and, there was likely a couple more layers before c entering on the REAL entity behind the plan?

The reason I am asking, as it may be possible due to your OITC involvement that you may have some knowledge of the arbitrage event to which I am referring?? And possibly may give consideration of sharing (all or partial) with me??

Last Question: Have you ever heard of a depository titled "Sanctuary of the Shark"?? If so, what might you know, or care to share with me about it??

Again let me state that my ONLY interest is in learning the TRUTH, that am sure you'll agree is a very illusive intangible of many shades of gray. My interest is ONLY in furthering the information for what is hoped will become a book about the financial history of the world from the late 19th Century to the present day.

Thank you, for your time and consideration in reading my e-mail, and look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

Sincerely,

Go Back

Four Winds 10 - News