's not stopped in time, the communitarian disease will destroy every healthy human in its destructive path. Every free and independent nation's survival depends on every citizen getting immunized or treated for exposure, ASAP. While there are few good paths to full recovery, one of the best unknown cures for the spreading infection of communitarian poison is a heavy dose of anti-dialectical exposure.

This virus slowly destroys each citizen's capacity to remember their human survival instincts and the reason people formed tribes, nations, alliances and unions in the first place. Sold to the public as the antidote to "full-blown-fear," it causes severe depression, anxiety, self-destructivness, and very short attention spans. Mass individual confusion is the result of the four primary symptoms.

Toxic communitarian victims focus primarily on self-gratification and personal pleasures; this keeps them from having to think (which now hurts) about their confusion. Like AIDS and cancer, communitarian symptoms cannot always be seen by the naked eye in the early stages. Infected people can easily appear completely healthy and "normal" on the outside. The virus distorts reality in such a way that abnormal human concessions to slavery and servitude are common. The communitarian infection attacks the intellect, the spirit, and the body, all at once. It appeals to the most gullible first. It begins invading its host by slowing numbing the thinking capacity of the victim.

Benign physical hosts carry the infections to the unaware pleasure-seekers; television, magazines, videos, movies, cartoons, newspapers, syringes, straws, pipes, and websites continually repeat (and repeat) mind-numbing, dialectical persuasion. After a while, the infection takes permanent hold over the mind, usually when users begin to believe (not think) that they can trust infected, sick communitarians to ensure their personal survival. Evolved signs of full-blown communitarianism are: confusing delusions of grandeur, self-worship, arrogance, cruelty, racism, supremicism, elitism, greed, and bragging. Publically advertising communitarians as more moral is also a late sign of infection.

The earliest unrecognized communitarian infections began in London when the British lost control over the American market. All aristocrats were stripped of their lands and titles after the war. All Imperial property holdings were claimed by the upstart colonials. The new virus was created to poison the concrete system that promised freedom to common born men. The "new" virus soon spread into all the "best" imperial universities in the world. Highly educated, infected social scientists designed the ways to spread the silent but deadly poison. Year after year, Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Berekley, Univeristy of Chicago, and universities around the world spread the virus to their students. Their schools spit out infected teachers, they, in their turn, spewed communitarian vomit over every student they went on to teach.

For over a century communitarian academic elites have been rewriting U.S. and World history. But U.S. history cannot honestly be reduced to ideological theories created by infected communitarian "thinkers." Our history can't be defined as a "struggle" between individualism and the "collective good." There was no such "struggle" when the United States became a nation. The American struggle was between common born men and Imperialist aristocrats. Ours was a war for economic independence from the British Empire.

The U.S. Constitution is the structure for a revolving government body answerable to the individuals whom they represent. It separates government powers between several branches at every level, with no one branch having more power than any another. The states are the seat of power. The national government was established to ensure the Rights of the state citizens. This "separation of power" formation was to keep public servants wary, alert, and watching each other for signs of despotic, maniacal, elitist, aristocratic criminal behaviors.

The First Ten Amendments were added to the structure by the state representatives sent to the Constitutional Convention, whose constituents back home did not trust the central government's potential for taking power away from state protected individuals. The Bill of Rights were ten simple laws specifically designed to protect individuals and their private property from the newly formed federal government. Period.

The Rights of the Individual, which are the very foundation for constitutional government in the United States, are being slowly eliminated under vague justice theories that protect the "community." Communitarian Law, Programs, and Policy Studies are taught in all American universities. We have already become a communitarian nation. While our public schools teach our children their new communitarian requirements for global citizenship, the majority of adult American citizens have no idea what this means.

Communitarianism is an ancient, repressive, social-political theory. It re-emerged in Israel in the 1940s under the guidance of the Marxist-Hassidic philosopher Martin Buber. The founder of the American Communitarian Network was an early student of Buber's in Jerusalem. Their logical formula for worldwide corporate-military leadership supports the (now standard) practice of replacing national law with international law. In less than fifty years, global communitarianism replaced every other justice theory in the world. Today, every country in the world is undergoing a "wrenching transformation" into a sub-state, under a sub-regional, "supra-national" organization.

Social theorists claim that human society is only being "helped" into naturally evolving into planned communitarian sub-regions. Political and Religious Experts (and Communitarian "gurus") tell us this is the highest evolutionary progression mankind will ever make. It's a giant leap forward, it takes a great deal of faith in mysticism and magic, and only a few special people are so evolved they understand it. The new system must therefore be led and staffed by a trained, superior race of more moral humanitarians (which would be them). Whatever. Whether the law evolves naturally after an armed invasion or just magically springs from the same chanelled "entity" across America, the results are ultimately the same. The end result is the total abolishment of all national and state constitutional law.

While I do appreciate the ACL being cited as a topic under Individualism at the Modern History Project, I'm confused. Maybe I took too big a sip of the anti-dialectical antidote, but I don't trust this term. What is "individualism, really? The US principles for individual liberty and freedom for all isn't a vague theory of selfish individuals taking precedence over the vague moral community. I'm afraid Individualism is, (in my slightly recovered, albeit still confused mind) merely another dialectical label used to confuse everybody.

Now I don't have a Ph.D., a Masters, or even a Bachelors degree, but I'm fairly certain the U.S. Constitution is not some vague, debatable, theory of "individualism" verus "collectivism." As far as I know, it's our national law, not our national dilemma. But even if it is a dialectical conflict, the conflict ended in 1789, and individuals won. The 1787 draft U.S. Constitution was heavily debated in the thirteen original state legislatures. Intense public debates raged between common born men in the states for two full years before it passed, but only after it included the Bill of Rights. U.S. laws, like "freedom of speech," right to bear arms," and "authority of law" were pressed on the Constitutionalists by the free men in the free former colonies. Common American people wrote the U.S. Bill of Rights.

The American legal system that was based in the U.S. Constitution is barely functional anymore. American judges trained in communitarian colleges and law schools always favor "community rights" over "individual rights." American attorneys trained in communitarian colleges and law schools act like they made a sworn, secret pact (with the ABA founders, in London) to never allow the actual communitarian terms that define the actual communitarian laws into an American individual's actual defense against a communitarian regulation.

So Americans like me continue to go into their American court system charged with communitarian "crimes" while still believing the court honors the Bill of Rights. Every new communitarian law that protects the "community" ( i.e. masses of faceless "victims," women, children, and humans) drastically eliminates laws that protect specific individuals who may also be real victims, women, children, and humans. It allows corporate-state theft of all individuals' property, including their animals, plants, water, air, land, and anything else they can think of stealing.

Everybody wants to know who's on top. I don't know who the leaders are in this vast communitarian conspiracy to overthrow legitimate governments. The top level is still a murky maze of layers upon layers that always lead back to London. (The ACL has never taken the global hierarchy past the ties between the Communitarian Network, the Rothschild's Bank of England, and the Bilderberg Group.) The "real" leaders may be hard to find and almost impossible to pin down, but believe us, once you get started, that won't matter so much anymore. Recognizing who's running the bottom tier opens up the local players (some of whom we personally know and have voted into office). Every local area, from forest to farm to town to city to county to state, is being transformed into a communitarian neighborhood, by local communitarians.

Just like the original American system, there is an entire political and legal structure for the emerging government. It's fully documented at every local, regional and international level. Yet, many "infected" people continue to insist Communitarian Plans and Laws are a "conspiracy theory." Doesn't it seem a little odd that while communitarian policies and laws have been implemented in the USA for several decades, every American attorney refuses to even whisper the real charges to their clients? Shhhhh. There is a major taboo against average Americans studying or discussing American Communitarian Law. Only the communitarians are allowed to understand exactly how (and why) their vague new laws have any authority of law, anywhere, or just exactly how these anti-constitutional laws came to be so blatantly applied in the United States.

The main purpose for a communitarian system is to protect the economic interests of a small group of corporate elites who aim to control the global market. Communitarians suggest "ideas" for eliminating American laws that have been identified as barriers to global expansionism and a new form of nicer slavery. (The entire Bill of Rights is an "identified barrier.") Communitarians, not the Arabs, are the people who most "hate our freedoms." Their emptied brains never challenge the core communitarian idea that freedom for individuals is passe.

Communitarianism ia a political system that seizes all property and people for the "good of the community." The theory is not part of the first two components of a dialectical conflict, it is the final solution to every conflict. It's neither capitalist nor communist. It's neither right nor left. It's always somewhere vaugely in the "middle," smugly posing an innovative solution to every two or more opposing ideologies. Communitarianism is the basis for every new science, law, theory, program, policy, war, and agenda that finds a purpose for balancing individual rights against the rights of the "global-to-local community."

American education teaches only the "official version" of communitarian theory, values, and Global Supremecy. Many corporations and colleges certify their brightest students in communitarian facilitator and management skills. It's as if it's so perfect and brilliant it creates no worthy opposition. In fact, the final communitarian solution to the Marxist dialectic is supposed to be so perfect it gives rise to no opposition. That's why the ACL Manifesto begins with a short note explaining why our ACL Hegel page "cannot exist."

While most of the American population remains buried in dialectical opposition to themselves, the communitarian agenda marches by largely unnoticed. Our website seems to attract the folks who are looking past the Looking Glass, they've quit following the rabbit down the hole. They can see past propaganda even if they start out like we did, by looking at the emerging agenda with eyes wide open, and wondering why the heck they never heard of any of this before. We are humbled by the number of people who have found some answers at the ACL.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Niki Raapana is the co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian League (ACL), an online research center for studying outside the box.

Niki is also the recent author of the non-fiction biography, 2020. Unlike the ACL website (which is a massive endeavor) 2020 introduces the global community government in 100-pages using laymen's terms for average readers. Price: $20.00, includes S&H. Send check or money order to: Nordica Friedrich-2020, P.O. Box 231941, Anchorage, Alaska, 99523 or order online using PayPal at the ACL: http://nord.twu.net/acl

***********************************************************************************************

Famine Film: "Harvest of Despair"

by Leonard Klady

IN THE FALL and spring of 1932 and 1933, the government of the Soviet Union created a man-made famine in Ukraine to quell what was perceived as the dangerous threat of regional nationalism. With alarming design, the authorities succeeded in their goal. The possibility of rebellion was eliminated at a most terrible cost of millions of lives.

Harvest of Despair recalls this black period of modern inhumanity. The exceedingly well-documented film details an act of genocide using both personal and historical ammunition. The result is an unquestionably sobering film which rightfully deserves wide distribution on television and in the educational system.

Produced by the Ukrainian Famine Research Committee (since renamed the Ukrainian Canadian Research and Documentation Center -- Webmaster InfoUkes) with assistance from the National Film Board and a variety of private and public funding sources, the movie screened at the Planetarium Auditorium of the Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature on October 26 and 27, 1984. It is a real eye-opener.

The startling aspect of this bit of history goes well beyond the act by the regime of Josef Stalin. The insidious nature of what transpired was orchestrated in such a fashion that those within and outside the borders of the Soviet Union were led to believe low crop yields and drought were the cause of what is estimated to be seven million deaths. However, subsequently available meteorological, trade and political data quite conclusively proved this not to be the case.

THE ROOTS OF THIS deliberate and vicious act are traced back to the years immediately following the 1917 Revolution. Emerging from the era of the Czars, Lenin opened the door to liberal trade and cultural activity in Ukraine.

As detailed in the film, it was a time of tremendous growth of all types in the region. With Lenin's death and the rise to power of Stalin, there was a change in Soviet government attitudes. Ukraine, with its independent attitudes in education, politics and culture, was viewed as a hot bed of dissent. No method was viewed as being too severe to bring the area back into the fold.

The historical documentation has been vividly assembled. One can see that tremendous research was a part of making Harvest of Despair. There can be no question that without the film and photographs uncovered from the 1932-33 famine, the film would lose much of its authority.

However, the production's greatest asset remains the eloquent and emotional testimony of survivors and first-hand witnesses to the horrors. Memories of those who saw relatives and friends slowly succumb to disease and malnutrition fill one with the most terrifying images. It is clear from the tone of these people's recollections that their lives were forever changed by the experience.

Harvest of Despair is a chilling reminder that so-called civilized modern societies continue to participate in or remain silent witness to the most gruesome atrocities. Let's hope in some small fashion this and other like documents can reverse the terrible tide.

FOR YURIJ LUHOVY, THE PRODUCER and editor of Harvest of Despair, the documentary provided him with a very special opportunity to stand up and be counted for something of a very personal nature.

The 34-year-old film-maker, a native of Montreal, admits most of his income has come from editing feature films of questionable quality. He has a reputation as a good "doctor" someone who's brought in to salvage a movie which is deemed unreleaseable by film exhibitors and distributors.

"This movie," he says, "represents one of those rare situations where you have to demonstrate some courage and conviction. It may seem very strange but even 50 years after the actual famine, survivors now living in Canada and the United States are still fearful of reprisals. I cannot honestly say whether relatives of mine who live in the Soviet Union will not suffer because of this film."

Despite positive response to world premiere screenings in Toronto last month, Luhovy remains anxious about the film's reception and its eventual distribution to television and educational systems.

Produced on a modest budget of less than $200,000, the producer-editor indicates that the film could simply not have been made without the tremendous commitment of many people. He personally viewed more than a million fe&t of historic stock footage to find roughly 20 minutes (720 feet) of appropriate material for the film.

HE ALSO INTERVIEWED more than a hundred living survivors of the famine who live in Montreal. In the vast majority of cases, these people refused to be filmed or would only consent on the understanding the material would not be seen until after their deaths. Luhovy says their fear of reprisals is unshakeable.

"Of course, all of us who participated in the film would hope it has some small effect on getting the famine official recognition by Soviet authorities,' Luhovy notes. "But most important is that people not forget what occurred. The film was not made out of anger, it was made to show the senselessness of the action. We must always remember this and ensure such incidents never happen again."

Harvest of Despair: The 1932-33 Famine in Ukraine. Director: Slavko Novytski, Producers Yuri Luhovy and S. Novytski.