![Google](http://www.google.com/images/poweredby_transparent/poweredby_FFFFFF.gif)
Adolf Hitler And Joseph Stalin - A Comparison
Bill the Hermit
Adolf Hitler has always been hated by the western media. Joseph Stalin, however, was once their favorite. Only in recent decades has he acquired some of the opprobrium once reserved for Adolf Hitler - and only half-heartedly. What is the explanation?
Essentially, Stalin was the front man for the Jews - while Adolf Hitler was the enemy of the Jews. "Uncle Joe" Stalin was whitewashed for the same reason Stalin was condemned. Stalin's crimes were committed on behalf of the Jews; Hitler's crimes were committed against the Jews. When Hitler marched into Czechoslovakia and Poland, the west erupted in rage. When Stalin marched into Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Poland, the west looked the other way. It was the same after the war when Stalin took over Eastern Europe. Before the war, the same western media which screamed over Kristallnacht, viewed Stalin's purge trials as a legitimate response to an internal threat.
The western media shrugged with indifference toward seven to ten million dead in the Ukrainian man-made 'famine', while giving a public platform to every Jew wailing over his father imprisoned in Dachau. Stalin's gulags contained millions of victims in the 1930's; Hitler's camp system pre-war did not contain more than 20-30,000 total inmates - and, of that number, only 10%-15% were Jews. The remainder were political opponents of Hitler, such as members of the Catholic Center Party or the Social Democrats. Hitler was generally improving working conditions in Germany.; Stalin was sending Russia back to the stone age. Yet Hitler was the Devil of the western media; Stalin was their angel.
Why did Hitler get crucified while Stalin got the bouquet of red roses? The answer is that Stalin killed on behalf of the Jews; Hitler killed while fighting against the Jews. Stalin was the Czar of Red Russia - but his commissars were two-thirds Jewish. Stalin got the free pass for his crimes the same way that the state of Israel gets the free pass for its crimes. If an Arab suicide bomber kills a dozen Jews, the media wail for weeks. If the Israeli's bulldoze families to death in the rubble of their homes, that is not newsworthy. Stalin enjoyed a sainted reputation until he turned against the Jews in the final years of his life. So long as he was appointing one Jew after another to high Soviet positions and blinking at the crimes, he was applauded. Stalin is now more useful as a whipping boy than as the favorite of the media he once was. He can take the blame for the crimes of the Jewish commissars who have disappeared down the memory hole of history. He can even be used to paint the Jews as victims of communism, rather than the originators of communism, because he liquidated a few of them late in life.
Joseph Stalin now enjoys a bad reputation. But he is never as bad as Adolf Hitler and 'The Holocaust'. Thirty million dead Russians cannot compare with a mythical 'six million' dead Jews. Stalin was a much greater mass murderer than Adolf Hitler - but Hitler (supposedly) murdered the people who really count. And that is why we have one standard for the man who stood up to the Jews - and a different standard for the man who killed for the Jews so successfully for so many decades.
___________________________________________________________________________
WINSTON CHURCHILL in July 1940
"When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion [of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be obtained?" [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].
ADOLF HITLER in May 1940
Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940 at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:
"He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but 'where there is planing, there are shavings flying'. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the Continent. The return of Germany's colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.." (p 200).
According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia" (p140).www.rense.com/general81/stalin.htm