May 7, 2015

The Abbott government has announced that parents who do not vaccinate their children

will lose welfare payments. The idea, which will "save" $50 Million a year, is to scrap the

"conscientious objection" provision which presently allows anti-vaccination parents to get

child care assistance and Family Tax Benefit A, so that objecting families could lose up

to $2,100 per child. This means that parents having a religious, philosophical or medical

objection to vaccination will be forced to comply or lose benefits. It seems that this

measure arose from rising whooping cough deaths and disease outbreaks in "small

communities" where unvaccinated children live. Presumably these "small communities"

include outback-Aboriginal communities.

Thus, rather than engage in a voluntary vaccination programme in the affected areas,

the government will introduce measures that overrule the freedoms of people objecting

to vaccinations. There are reasons for such an objection. For example, on philosophical

grounds alone one may actually prefer to get childhood diseases to strengthen the immune

system, as used to be done. One may not trust what goes into vaccines, even if conventional

immunization theory is accepted.

The claim that unvaccinated children are a "threat" to vaccinate children is fallacious.

The vaccinated children, according to orthodoxy are already protected, so why worry

about them? Their health and liberty is not threatened. If the parents choose to not

vaccinate their children, that is their right.

Tony Abbott posted this 29 minutes ago, about the time I started my article, on April 12, 2015

on his Facebook page "No Jab, No Play. No Jab, No Pay". Like that tough talk "jab, jab, jab".

It continued: "from 1 January 2016, childcare and family payments will be denied to parents

who don't vaccinate their children". The flavour of this is but one further illustration of Abbott's

abandonment of the classical liberal tradition of freedom and liberty.

Back in The Social Crediter J C.H. Douglas spoke of "moral re-armament". The forces of the

elites seek to divide and rule. As illustrated by consulting the comments on Abbott’s Facebook

page, many of the supporters of his proposed policy falsely (I believe) believe that the safety

of their children is at risk. There is a need to unite and not to be ruled, Douglas said. This is a

principle that needs to be recognized in the battle ahead.

---

Hundreds of Children Brain Damaged by the Swine Flu Vaccine to

Receive $90 Million in Financial Compensation from UK Government

Brain-Damaged UK Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine to Get £90 Million Compensation

by Tom Porter 
March 2, 2014

Patients who suffered brain damage as a result of taking a swine flu vaccine are to receive multi-million-pound payouts from the UK government. The government is expected to receive a bill of approximately £60 million, with each of the 60 victims expected to receive about £1 million each. Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants, told the Sunday Times: "There has never been a case like this before. The victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication." Following the swine flu outbreak of 2009, about 60 million people, most of them children, received the vaccine.

It was subsequently revealed that the vaccine, Pandemrix, can cause narcolepsy and cataplexy

in about one in 16,000 people, and many more are expected to come forward with the symptoms.

Across Europe, more than 800 children are so far known to have been made ill by the vaccine.

Narcolepsy affects a person's sleeping cycle, leaving them unable to sleep for more than

90 minutes at a time, and causing them to fall unconscious during the day. The condition

damages mental function and memory, and can lead to hallucinations and mental illness.

Cataplexy causes a person to lose consciousness when they are experiencing heightened

emotion, including when they are laughing.

The Pandemrix vaccine was manufactured by pharmaceuticals giant Glaxo Smith Kline, which

refused to supply governments unless it was indemnified against any claim for damage caused.

The company will pay the bill, and claim the money back from the government.

"There's no doubt in my mind whatsoever that Pandemrix increased the occurrence of narcolepsy

onset in children in some countries - and probably in most countries," Emmanuelle Mignot, a

specialist in sleep disorder at Stanford University in the United States told Reuters. Mignot has been

paid by GSK to research the effects of the drug.......(Read more at www.alor.org) 

I could be seen as 'cruel' on Gardasil: Abbott The Australian Nov 09 2006 Mr Abbott was today asked (2006 ed) if he would have his three daughters vaccinated with the breakthrough drug, which has been controversially left off the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). "I won't be rushing out to get my daughters vaccinated, maybe that's because I'm a cruel, callow, callous, heartless bastard but, look, I won't be," Mr Abbott told Southern Cross Broadcasting today. "If there is a national immunisation program, I certainly will be making sure that they get vaccinated (with Gardasil) under the program. "The program is what the experts think clearly is absolutely necessary, and at the moment the experts don't think this is absolutely necessary."