FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

H1N1 VACCINATION A TAINTED NIGHTMARE

The Unhived Mind

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

 

Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 3:58 AM

This article went viral and received over 300 million reads. It shut out Google for the first six thousand hits, got translated into every language, triggered policy changes in several nations and made it to publications from Pub Med to several major religions. This is the number one most read article this site ever released, and it remains true to this day though it has been superseded by a following report. I suggest you also read this article about bacteriophages which is the new direction they are taking destructive vaccines because the damage is more precise with this new method.

Tainted nightmare

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/squalene.html

Dr. Sarah Stone, Pharm-D

Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist

Russ Clarke, Editor

“The H1N1 vaccination program, when put into the same frame as the engineered virus to go with it, appears to be a clear effort to divide humanity into two groups; those who have lost their intellect, health and sexuality via a tainted vaccination, and those who have not and are therefore superior.”

I met the story about the swine flu with great skepticism; it played like a story line in a B movie – Students go abroad for spring break. Students get the virus. Students bring it home. Worldwide pandemic starts. The story line was unbelievable, and I knew from day one that there was either no virus at all, and that it was just a “wag the dog”, or that a manufactured outbreak was intentionally released and underway.

Unfortunately the latter was true, and now we have an entirely new bug on our hands. It has never been seen before, and virologists have been quoted saying “where the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know.” Extensive analysis of the virus has revealed genes from the original 1918 flu, the avian flu, and two new H3N2 viruses from Eurasia. All evidence points to the fact that the swine flu is indeed a genetically engineered virus.

This article is the result of a team effort intended to explore what the motive for releasing it may be, to warn you in advance of things to come.

The first attempt

In Feb 2009, Baxter, a major manufacturer of vaccines, sent the seasonal flu shot to 18 different countries with live unattenuated H5N1 bird flu. When the Czech company Biotest was assigned to test the vaccine on live animals for the Czech government, they realized something was wrong when the test animals died. The alarm went out to all others who had received it, fortunately before it was administered. Upon follow up examination of the vaccine the live virus was revealed, had no one caught Baxter’s tainted batch, we would now be in the midst of a pandemic with massive numbers of dead.

Baxter was not prosecuted or punished in any way for this, even though their operational BSL3 (bio safety level 3) protocol would have stopped such contamination from being possible. The safety protocol, combined with the potency and volume of the virus in the shots clearly shows that the contamination was intentional, and that indeed an attempt to kill millions was stopped simply because ONE country paid attention to what it was getting. The protocol made it technically impossible for the virus to make the leap from the research department to the vaccine manufacturing department, which could never have had H5N1 show up there due to any reason other than willful intent.

One would think that Baxter would have been put out of business for making such an “error” but the opposite is true, which begs many questions, such as how did the live bird flu end up in millions of doses of vaccine? Why were the ingredients of the vaccine formulated to allow the virus to survive fully potent en route? Why was Baxter not prosecuted or punished in any way? Instead of rightfully blackballing the company, the World Health Organization has rewarded Baxter with a contract to make a large portion of the “Swine flu” vaccinations set to be distributed world wide this fall. How on earth could that be?

The main focus

Let’s switch to another aspect of vaccines, the real focus of this article, which is the plan to destroy our intellect, our health and our sexuality via a mass world wide vaccination campaign. With the use of special additives called adjuvants, manufacturers are able to increase the number of possible doses that can be made on time for the fall flu season. But though there are many safe adjuvants which can be added, they are adding one – squalene, which has been shown to cause prolonged systemic immune response against the squalene itself, which results in reduced fertility, reduced intellect and reduced life span.

Squalene is an important molecule in the body. It is a precursor to many different oils and hormones, and is needed for proper brain function, fertility and also plays an important role in protecting cells from aging and mutation. Anything which affects your natural squalene can have a major negative impact on your health.

Because the squalene will be injected in the presence of a pathogen during the H1N1 vaccination, it will cause an immune response against not only the pathogen, but to the squalene itself. Squalene is a precursor molecule which is essential for the production of many hormones including all of the male and female sexual hormones. Squalene is also a precursor to many of the neurochemical receptors prevalent in the nervous system and when the immune system is programmed to attack squalene, it causes irreversible neuronal and neuromuscular damage which can range from a loss of intellect and autism to more serious disorders such as Lou Gehrig’s disease and systemic autoimmune diseases and possibly brain tumors.

In independent studies where squalene laced vaccines were injected into guinea pigs, the resultant autoimmune disorders killed 14 out of 15. A later test, to verify the results had the same outcome.

When first injected via the anthrax vaccine in Gulf War 1, it permanently disabled many of the soldiers who received it, due to the effects now known as the Gulf War Syndrome. 95 percent of the soldiers who recieved the anthrax vaccine have been found to have antibodies to squalene. Few of the soldiers who recieved the vaccine remained healthy and do not have the antibodies whether or not they were deployed. None of the soldiers who did not receive the vaccine have the antibodies, even those who fought in Iraq. Squalene antibody related deaths total 6.5 percent of the vaccinated group.

It takes approximately a year for the effects to fully manifest themselves because that much time passes before the nervous system and brain deplete the reserves of Squalene that are out of the reach of the immune system and only after the reserves are gone will cell injury begin. This takes the pressure off vaccine manufacturers who deny any wrongdoing for a response so delayed. And with Congress passing legislation granting immunity to any corporations who cause damage with their vaccines, the outlook is evermore dark.

After examining the components of the H1N1 flu vaccine we can only conclude that it is not intended to treat the flu at all, quite differently, it is intended to:

1. Reduce intelligence

2. Reduce life span

3. Reduce fertility

4. Cause numerous deaths

For if it was intended for any other purpose, Squalene and other adjuvants beyond the scope of this article would not be present. Furthermore, the scope of this article only covers squalene, and we believe that because there are so many ways to induce autoimmune responses equally devastating via other injectable formulations coupled with the obviously intentional shipment of a pandemic by Baxter that the credibility of vaccines is forever tainted and the trust in the greater medical community may have been irreparably broken. Baxter should be out of business, the fact that they are not is damning.

The trust is broken

Through a manufactured pandemic and damaging vaccine the world health organization along with major manufacturers in the pharmaceutical industry have demonstrated clear intent to damage all of mankind. For what purpose is difficult to determine, but it would be safe to assume that there will be those who have been told and know better than to take one of these tainted vaccines, and as a result they will be of superior intelligence and health when put in perspective with those who receive them. The H1N1 vaccination program, when put into the same frame as the obviously engineered virus to go with it, appears to be a clear effort to divide humanity into two groups, those who have lost their intellect, health and sexuality via a tainted vaccination, and those who have not and are therefore superior. It can now be reasoned that it is no longer safe to take ANY vaccination for any reason; please, do not let them get your children.

If you ever see a video of major figures getting theirs, keep in mind that not all shots will be created equal!

References

The most valuable reference for this article by far was Dr. Sarah Stone, Pharm-D. Thank you so much, you helped sort fact from fiction and made this article possible

Newsmax.com “Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu”

Mercola.com “Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed”

Chiroweb.com “Vaccines May Be Linked to Gulf War Syndrome”

The Unify Coalition “Experimental Vaccines / Adjuvants / Squalene:”

Health Freedom Alliance Read this to item 122, it returns to English half a page down!

Rense This is an excellent report on the Gulf War Syndrome and Autism, by Neurosergeon Dr Blaylock

September 1 2014

http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress3/h1n1-vaccination-a-tainted-nightmare/

·  theunhivedmind says:

September 5, 2014 at 8:15 am

Vaccines May Be Linked to Gulf War Syndrome

DOD to Review Possible Use of Illegal Additive

By Michael Devitt

http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=31730

Less than four months after its publication, the Department of Defense (DOD) has agreed to review a controversial study that appears to link Gulf War syndrome (GWS) with a banned substance used in experimental vaccines.

The study, conducted by scientists at Tulane University Medical School, found that an overwhelming majority of sick veterans who had served in the Gulf War, and had received at least one vaccination, tested positive for antibodies to a naturally occurring substance called squalene. None of the healthy veterans in the study tested positive for squalene antibodies.

DoD officials originally dismissed the study as flawed and asserted that none of the vaccines administered during the Gulf War contained squalene. In response to pressure from Congress, however, the department has asked the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB) to re-examine the study. The Institute of Medicine is also reviewing the research to see what role squalene may play in Gulf-related illnesses.1

Squalene Adjuvant: Friend or Foe?

A naturally occurring molecule, squalene is produced by the human liver and plays a role in the metabolism of cholesterol. It is most commonly found in vegetable oils, shark liver oil, cosmetics and various health supplements.

Under normal circumstances, squalene is released into the blood to help combat physical injuries. However, people don’t usually have enough squalene in their blood to prompt the production of detectable levels of antibodies.

Since the late 1980s, squalene has been studied by the DoD and the National Institutes of Health as a possible adjuvant in vaccines. Because adjuvants boost the immune system’s response to foreign antibodies, the subtance has sparked the interest of researchers. Drug manufacturers, for their part, have incorporated adjuvants into vaccines in the belief that the substance will render the vaccine more effective.

Adjuvants, however, can sometimes trigger unwanted immune responses. While large-scale studies have yet to be conducted in humans, animal studies have shown that squalene adjuvants may generate autoimmune versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis type-conditions that attack the body from within.2

Although they have been used in a number of vaccines worldwide, only one adjuvant – aluminum hydroxide – has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in vaccines in the United States. And although squalene-adjuvant vaccines have been used on laboratory animals and in experimental human tests, the FDA has not approved the general use of any vaccine containing squalene in the U.S.

“We Never Used Squalene in Vaccines”

Military officials have said all along that no Gulf War vaccines contained squalene. In August 1997, spokespersons for the DoD claimed that squalene “was not an adjuvant that was in any of the vaccines that were used by the Department of Defense,”3 and that “we never used squalene in vaccines” during the Gulf War. However, in a report4issued in March 1999, the General Accounting Office (GAD) – the investigative arm of Congress – stated:

We cannot say definitively whether or not Gulf War-era veterans were given vaccines with adjuvant formulations containing squalene for a number of reasons. Although DoD officials told us they did not administer such vaccines, they stated they did not have documentation on the process and results of decision-making related to the administration of vaccines at the time of the Gulf War. Also, some officials involved in the decisions were no longer employed with DoD at the time of our review, and we were either unable to locate them, or they declined to be interviewed.

A month after the GAO issued its 1999 report, the first hint that squalene might be linked to Gulf War syndrome appeared in an article in New Scientist magazine.5 Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University, tested more than 400 Gulf War veterans for antibodies to squalene and found that 95 percent of those with GWS had high levels of squalene antibodies.

Garry also tested a pair of volunteers who had received experimental herpes vaccines containing squalene in trials conducted by the National Institutes of Health. Both had high levels of squalene antibodies and also suffered from GWS-type symptoms.

In February, the peer-reviewed journal Experimental and Molecular Pathology6 published a study written by Garry’s team at Tulane University and Dr. Pamela Asa, an immunologist from Tennessee. Dr. Asa was one of the first health professionals to advance the theory that Gulf War syndrome might be an autoimmune disorder caused by experimental vaccinations.

The research included blinded and unblinded studies. In the blinded study, 56 Gulf War-era veterans and military personnel who were on active service in 1990-91 were tested for squalene. Of those 56, 38 had been deployed to the Persian Gulf and had GWS-type symptoms; 12 had been deployed but were healthy; and six had not been deployed but were nevertheless ill.

The researchers found that among the 38 ill veterans who had been deployed, 36 (94.7 percent) tested positive for squalene antibodies. None of the deployed healthy individuals, however, tested positive.

Furthermore, all six subjects who were ill, but had not been sent to the Gulf, also had squalene antibodies. While they did not serve in the war, they had received the same type and number of vaccinations given to Gulf War troops.

To see whether squalene antibodies might be a marker for other types of autoimmune diseases, the researchers also tested groups of patients with lupus and chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as a small sample from the general population. Only 15 percent of those with chronic fatigue tested positive for squalene; only 10 percent of those with lupus tested positive; and only five percent of the general population had squalene antibodies.

The Tulane study made no conclusion about whether Gulf War vaccines contained squalene, what may have produced the antibodies, or what role they play in Gulf War syndrome. Still, it is hoped that the research conducted by Garry and Asa will prompt others to investigate the role of vaccinations in Gulf War syndrome and the safety of vaccines that contain squalene.

“We don’t know what caused the immune system to produce anti-squalene antibodies in the Gulf War veterans, but this study shows that the antibodies are indeed there,” observed Dr. Russell Wilson, president of Autoimmune Technologies, which helped market the study. Dr. Wilson does not believe that the antibodies were the result of a reaction to squalene added to vaccines. “That possibility must still be formally ruled out,”7 he concluded.

Approximately 700,000 Americans served in the Gulf War between 1990-91. One hundred and forty-eight Americans were killed in action; 467 were wounded. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that as many as 100,000 veterans may be suffering from Gulf War syndrome or related symptoms, and that approximately 6,500 soldiers have died since the war’s conclusion, including more than 1,300 soldiers between the ages of 18-24.8

Hughes J. Scrutinizing squalene: government to review study linking gulf illness, antibodies. Associated Press, April 14, 2000.

What is squalene? Associated Press, April 14, 2000.

Rodriguez PM. The Gulf War mystery. Insight Magazine, September 8, 1997.

Gulf War Illnesses. Questions about the Presence of Squalene Antibodies in Veterans Can Be Resolved. United States General Accounting Office, March 1999.

Mackenzie D. Victims of vaccines. New Scientist April 10, 1999.

Asa PB, Cao Y, Garry R. Antibodies to squalene in Gulf War syndrome. Experimental and Molecular Pathology February 2000;68(1):55-64.

New antibodies discovered in Gulf War syndrome patients. AutoImmune Technologies (www.autoimmune.com ), January 31, 2000.

Turner A. Death ruling raises issue of Gulf War ills. Houston Chronicle April 15, 2000.

Log in to Reply

·  theunhivedmind says:

September 5, 2014 at 8:16 am

Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed

August 04, 2009 | 771,708 views

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/04/Squalene-The-Swine-Flu-Vaccines-Dirty-Little-Secret-Exposed.aspx

vaccine, swine fluBy Dr. Mercola

Squalene Update as of October 2009:

According to Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the NVIC, none of the H1N1 vaccines being distributed in the United States contain squalene or other oil in water adjuvants.

We successfully made enough fuss about the potential danger of fast tracking licensure of squalene adjuvants into US H1N1 vaccines under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that can be invoked during a declared public health emergency that the FDA has NOT licensed these adjuvants for the U.S.

There is squalene in H1N1 vaccines licensed in Europe but not yet in the U.S. That is not to say the vaccine manufacturers will not try to get the adjuvants inserted into vaccines in the future, but for now we have won on this point.

According to Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, your children should be the first target for mass swine flu vaccinations when school starts this fall.[i]

This is a ridiculous assumption for many reasons, not to mention extremely high risk.

In Australia, where the winter season has begun, Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon is reassuring parents the swine flu is no more dangerous than regular seasonal flu. “Most people, including children, will experience very mild symptoms and recover without any medical intervention,” she said.[ii]

Sydney-based immunization specialist Robert Booy predicts swine flu might be fatal to about twice as many children in the coming year as regular influenza. Booy estimates 10-12 children could die from the H1N1 virus, compared with the five or six regular flu deaths seen among children in an average year in Australia.[iii]

“Cure the Disease, Kill the Patient”

Less than 100 children in the U.S. die each year from seasonal flu viruses.[iv] If we use Australia’s math, a very rough estimate would be another 100 children could potentially die of swine flu in the United States in the coming year.

If children are the first target group in the U.S. per Sebelius, that means we’re about to inject around 75 million children with a fast tracked vaccine containing novel adjuvants, including dangerous squalene, to prevent perhaps 100 deaths.

I’m not overlooking the tragedy of the loss of even one child to an illness like the H1N1 flu virus. But there can be no argument that unnecessary mass injection of millions of children with a vaccine containing an adjuvant known to cause a host of debilitating autoimmune diseases is a reckless, dangerous plan.

Why are Vaccinations Dangerous?

The presumed intent of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause illness and disease. However, your body’s immune system is already designed to do this in response to organisms which invade your body naturally.

Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, pulmonary system or your digestive tract – not through an injection.

These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body.

Your IgA immune system is your body’s first line of defense. Its job is to fight off invading organisms at their entry points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body’s immune system.

When a virus is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant like squalene, your IgA immune system is bypassed and your body’s immune system kicks into high gear in response to the vaccination.

Injecting organisms into your body to provoke immunity is contrary to nature, and vaccination carries enormous potential to do serious damage to your health.

And as if Vaccines Weren’t Dangerous Enough on Their Own …

… imagine them turbocharged.

The main ingredient in a vaccine is either killed viruses or live ones that have been attenuated (weakened and made less harmful).

Flu vaccines can also contain a number of chemical toxins, including ethylene glycol (antifreeze), formaldehyde, phenol (carbolic acid) and even antibiotics like Neomycin and streptomycin.

In addition to the viruses and other additives, many vaccines also contain immune adjuvants like aluminum and squalene.

The purpose of an immune adjuvant added to a vaccine is to enhance (turbo charge) your immune response to the vaccination. Adjuvants cause your immune system to overreact to the introduction of the organism you’re being vaccinated against.

Adjuvants are supposed to get the job done faster (but certainly not more safely), which reduces the amount of vaccine required per dose, and the number of doses given per individual.

Less vaccine required per person means more individual doses available for mass vaccination campaigns. Coincidentally, this is exactly the goal of government and the pharmaceutical companies who stand to make millions from their vaccines.

Will There Be Immune Adjuvants in Swine Flu Vaccines?

The U.S. government has contracts with several drug companies to develop and produce swine flu vaccines. At least two of those companies, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, are using an adjuvant in their H1N1 vaccines.

The adjuvant? Squalene.

According to Meryl Nass, M.D., an authority on the anthrax vaccine,

“A novel feature of the two H1N1 vaccines being developed by companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline is the addition of squalene-containing adjuvants to boost immunogenicity and dramatically reduce the amount of viral antigen needed. This translates to much faster production of desired vaccine quantities.”[v]

Novartis’s proprietary squalene adjuvant for their H1N1 vaccine is MF59. Glaxo’s is ASO3. MF59 has yet to be approved by the FDA for use in any U.S. vaccine, despite its history of use in other countries.

Per Dr. Nass, there are only three vaccines in existence using an approved squalene adjuvant. None of the three are approved for use in the U.S.

What Squalene Does to Rats

Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time.[vi]

A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.[vii]

The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.

What Squalene Does to Humans

Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.

The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.

Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.[viii]

Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines which contained squalene.[ix] MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was an unapproved ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases suffered by countless Gulf War vets.[x]

The Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed – as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP).

However, the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected with the vaccine containing squalene.

A study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental Molecular Pathology included these stunning statistics:

” … the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene.

In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.”[xi]

According to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist for the government of Australia:

“… this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called “Gulf War Syndrome,” documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War.

The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”[xii]

Post Vaccination Follow-Up Might as Well Be Non-Existent

There is virtually no science to support the safety of vaccine injections on your long-term health or the health of your children. Follow-up studies last on average about two weeks, and look only for glaring injuries and illnesses.

Autoimmune disorders like those seen in Gulf War Syndrome frequently take years to diagnose due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Complaints like headaches, fatigue and chronic aches and pains are symptoms of many different illnesses and diseases.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for vaccine purveyors and proponents to look seriously at the long-term health consequences of their vaccination campaigns.

What You Can Do Right Now

Visit the National Vaccination Information Center (NVIC) site and join in the fight against mandatory swine flu vaccinations.

Educate yourself about influenza strains, vaccination risks, and the public health laws in your state that may require you or your children to undergo either mandatory vaccination or quarantine.

Take care of your health to reduce or eliminate your risk of contracting the flu. The key is to keep your immune system strong by following these guidelines:

Eliminate sugar and processed foods from your diet. Sugar consumption has an immediate, debilitating effect on your immune system.

Take a high quality source of animal-based omega 3 fats like Krill Oil.

Exercise. Your immune system needs good circulation in order to perform at its best for you.

Optimize your vitamin D levels. Vitamin D deficiency is the likely cause of seasonal flu viruses. Getting an optimal level of vitamin D will help you fight infections of all kinds.

Get plenty of good quality sleep.

Deal with stress effectively. If you feel overwhelmed by stress, your body will not have the reserves it needs to fight infection.

Wash your hands. But not with an antibacterial soap. Use a pure, chemical-free soap.

References

[i] USAToday.com, Swine flu shots may go to kids first, Sebelius says, June 16, 2009

[ii] ABC.net.au, Health minister reassures parents over swine flu, July 2, 2009

[iii] Google News, AFP, Australia urges calm after child flu death, July 2, 2009,

[iv] Meryl Nass, M.D., July 4, 2009

[v] Meryl Nass, M.D., July 3, 2009

[vi] Rense.com, Vaccines, Autism, and Gulf War Syndrome, August 15, 2005

[vii] The American Journal of Pathology, The Endogenous Adjuvant Squalene Can Induce a Chronic T-Cell-Mediated Arthritis in Rats, 2000

[viii] Vaccination Liberation, Adjuvant Index Page

[ix] Autoimmune Technologies, News Release: SQUALENE FOUND IN ANTHRAX VACCINE,

[x] Autoimmune Technologies, Gulf War Syndrome: ANTI-SQUALENE ANTIBODIES LINK GULF WAR SYNDROME TO ANTHRAX VACCINE

[xi] ScienceDirect.com, Experimental and Molecular Pathology, Volume 68, Issue 1, February 2000, Pages 55-64

[xii] Adverse Effects of Adjuvants in Vaccines, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., 2000

Log in to Reply

·  theunhivedmind says:

September 5, 2014 at 8:17 am

http://www.cssa-inc.org/_unify/experimental_vaccines.htm

Experimental Vaccines / Adjutants / Squalene:

-During the GW Era, experimental vaccine(s) with equally experimental adjuvant(s) were administered. At least one of the vaccines given contained a highly experimental synthesized polymer adjuvant known as squalene. It has been reported, the same adjuvant was used in, at least, several lots / batches of the anthrax vaccine recently being given. And the most recent malaria vaccine being administered is reported to contain squalene as an adjuvant.

-Natural squalenes, as found in food sources, ingested and digested are changed to sterols in our bodies and are not normally problematic, nor do they produce anti-bodies to squalene. Digestion somehow creates the molecular changes / conversions, modifying the squalene into useful sterols.

-Laboratory synththetic polymer (processed) squalene, for vaccine adjuvants, differs somewhat in composition and greatly in body reactivity.

-Adjuvant activity is enhanced by the addition of other adjuvants, (e.g.. MDD, MTPE, Etc.) and, to some extent, by the processing itself.

-Body reactivity and antibody production comes primarily as a result of route of administration other than oral ingestion / digestion. To administer IV, IM, SQ is not natural and does not convert and assimilate squalene into sterols. It appears this un-natural administration establishes the ability to produce immune antibody reactivity to squalene.

-The molecular weight of squalene is 410.71 Large molecule and is C30H50 Identified as Hexamethyltetracosane. The polymer squalene is double bonded and generally unstable.

-Squalene, as an adjuvant, is capable of initiating antibody production to itself and initiating autoimmune disease, both neurological and rheumatological, by itself. The addition of the derivatives (MDD, MTPE, Etc) of mycobacterial cell walls enhances these effects.

-In oral ingestion/digestion route, the mucosal epithelium of the intestines modifies the squalene as it is absorbed from food materials into sterols and other molecular structures to which the body does not generate immune reactions.

-Injected squalene is not seen as normal by the immune system, hence, it does initiate immune reactivity to itself. The body synthesizes squalene in the Golgi apparartus of hepatocytes and is further processed into chylomicrons covered by lipoproteins containing triglycerides and cholesterol esters, considered to be poorly immunogenic molecules. Antibodies to cholesterol have been generated only by the addition of lipid A as an adjuvant or by the injection of silicone or silicone oil intraperitoneally (indicating its ability to act as an adjuvant and initiate autoimmunity). PB/DU/Chemicals-Insecticides, etc.

-I think it important to mention here, that not all got the same vaccines/adjuvants. It is also important to note that not all were deployed, but large numbers of non-deployed are ill with GWS illnesses.

-Equally important, for those who were deployed, not all were exposed to all of the same environmental contaminants, e.g.; DU, chemicals & insecticides, oil well fires, etc.

-Use of PB tabs is of significant concern. Probably more deployed, ingested PB tabs than were exposed to all of the environmental contaminants.

-DU exposure is also of very serious consideration, especially where quantities entered and continue to reside in the body.

-There are many possible equations for those who deployed, but only one common denominator, for the largest numbers, of both deployed and non- deployed. That was the use of experimental vaccines/adjuvants. It is interesting to note, the DOD continues to vehemently deny use of same, even in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.

I hope this is of some help. Best wishes to you and your loved ones.

Sincerely,

Rick Shuster

Viet Nam Era Vet

Father of 3 GW Era Vets

Log in to Reply

·  theunhivedmind says:

September 5, 2014 at 8:18 am

Vaccines, Autism and

Gulf War Syndrome

From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.

Bettym19@mindspring.com

8-15-5

http://www.rense.com/general67/vacc.htm

This is an excellent report by Dr. Blaylock.

Dr. Blaylock is the author of: ‘Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills’, ‘Health & Nutrition Secrets To Save Your Life’ and ‘Cancer Strategies’ all of which are shown on his site at

http://www.russellblaylockmd.com

An excitotoxin is a product that literally stimulates the neurons of the brain *to death causing permanent brain damage.* The two we think the most of are the aspartic acid in aspartame and MSG.

In Health & Nutrition Secrets, page 125, Dr. Blaylock says: “So, in the case of diet drinks in aluminum cans, the very toxic brain aluminum fluoride compound co-exists with multiple toxins found in aspartame, thus creating the most powerful government-approved toxic soup imaginable. With the strong association between aluminum, excitotoxins, aluminum fluoride complexes and Alzheimer’s disease, it would be completely irresponsible to encourage people to consume this toxic mixture. Yet, this is done literally billions of times every year in advertising.”

In the Gulf, these diet drinks sat on pallets as long as 8 weeks at a time, piled high, in 120 degree temperatures.

In the protest of the National Soft Drink Association at http://www.dorway.com, you will read that aspartame breaks down at 86 degrees. And it breaks down into a witches’ brew of toxins including formaldehyde and diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent that triggered brain tumors in original studies.

Aspartame destroys the immune system and central nervous system. It not only interacts with drugs because of damage to the mitochondria or life of the cell according to Dr. James Bowen, but as a chemical hypersensitization agent it interacts with vaccines and other toxins. In a lecture on http://www.dorway.com, Dr. Blaylock also says the reactions to aspartame are not allergic but *toxic*…

just like consuming arsenic and cyanide. Aspartame is an adjuvant and forms antigenic tissue, triggering immunologic attack. This is how it triggers lupus. The immune system turns against the victim’s tissues.

In this article Dr. Blaylock brings out that it is accepted by most authorities that vaccines should not be given to individuals with impaired immunity for fear of triggering immune attacks on the central nervous system, such as encephalitis, nerve injuries (peripheral neuropathy, multiple sclerosis and allergic encephalomyelitis.

So, it’s really a given with such a toxic soup the troops were exposed to, we truly are looking at diet drink catastrophe. This article makes it easy to understand Gulf War illness. A new study connects brain cancer in Gulf War vets to sarin, but researchers may not have known the aspartame laced pop they were drinking breaks down to a brain tumor agent. A USA Today article of July 26 states sarin has never been shown to cause cancer.

With all this information in mind, here is Dr. Blaylock’s excellent article:

By Russell L. Blaylock

MD Neurosurgeon

Most have at least heard about the controversy surrounding possible harmful effects of some of the vaccines. What is less well known is that even greater dangers exist than are being conveyed to the general public. Much of this information is buried in highly technical scientific journals beyond the reach and understanding of the average person.

Of special concern is the relationship between vaccine policy, autism and the Gulf War Syndrome.

I shall use the Gulf War Syndrome as an example of a vaccine policy gone berserk, while including discussions of other dangers as well.

Most scientific observers have attributed the dramatic fall in infectious disease to the appearance of widespread vaccination, despite recent evidence that some of that credit is unjustified. For example, we know that improved public health measures and nutrition played a major role in the sudden decline in most of the infectious diseases plaguing mankind. Likewise, there is growing evidence that vaccinations are not providing the protection that they are touted to provide. For example, all cases of polio occurring after the introduction of the polio vaccine shave been traced to the vaccine itself. Similar findings have been shown for diphtheria.

Convinced that the victory over the major childhood infectious diseases was secondary to vaccine programs, public health officials began to add more diseases to the list, including haemophilus influenza type b, hepatitis B, measles, mumps and now even chickenpox. Present vaccination programs are exposing children to as many as 22 inoculations before attending school. More are being proposed. Driving much of this are the profits being made by vaccine manufacturers and a revolving door between medical university professors with financial interest in these companies and public health officials with the same interest.

Unfortunately, the science supporting the safety of unlimited vaccination of small children and adults does not exist. Most follow-up studies of vaccinated children last no more than two weeks after the vaccine is given, and many of the effects of vaccination on brain development are delayed much longer. In addition, most of these studies look only for blatantly obvious injuries and not subtle changes that can lead to serious future impairment.

There are a growing number of scientific studies that are demonstrating serious dangers in our present vaccine policy, including altered brain development, seizures and a loss of brain cell connections called synapses. These studies all point to over-vaccination as a real and present danger to our children, and in certain instances, to adults. Unfortunately, most pediatricians and family practitioners are completely unaware of these dangers. Most depend on their specialty societies, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice for answers concerning safety issues. Rarely do these physicians research these important topics themselves. For too often, those serving on vaccine boards within these specialty societies have a vested interest in the financial success of the companies involved, either as investments in stock or direct payments by the companies.

Much controversy and confusing data surrounds the cause of the Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), and despite numerous studies, little solid information as to the cause of the syndrome has appeared. Throughout the entire period since the first Gulf war the Pentagon has been reluctant to admit to a connection between this devastating syndrome (that has left tends of thousands of soldiers and their families chronically ill and many of these children deformed) and military policies on vaccination. Our soldiers were given approximately 17 vaccinations over a short period, despite manufacturer’s warnings that many of the vaccines, were to be spaced over a year period. Several hypotheses have been proposed as to the cause of this syndrome, including neurotoxic and immunotoxic effects of pesticides, aspartame degradation products, chemical warfare agents released, toxins from spent uranium shells, combat stress and vaccines.

HOW SCIENTISTS THINK

It is characteristic of modern science to always look for one central cause of a problem rather than explore additive effects or even synergic toxicity of many agents.

Yet the science of toxin synergy is growing and finding some surprising effects caused by combing two or more weak toxins. For example, it is known that when two weakly toxic pesticides are used alone, neither cause Parkinson’s syndrome in experimental animals, but when combined, they can cause full-blown Parkinsonism very rapidly. The same is true with fluoride. We know that both fluoride and aluminum individually are brain toxins, but when combined, as we see in fluoridated water, the mix constitutes an extremely powerful brain toxin, destroying numerous neurons in the part of the brain associated with memory and emotional functions.

It is rare that the government agencies test potentially toxic chemicals or even food additives together; instead, they are tested alone. As in the examples above, we are seeing more instances of combinations of chemicals causing devastating injury yet when used alone are either mildly toxic or even non-toxic. Few laymen realize that vaccines contain many chemical additives in addition to the infectious organism being targeted. These include aluminum, mercury, hydrolyzed proteins, monosodium glutamate, oils and many complex molecules known as immune adjuvants. Several of these (aluminum, mercury, hydrolyzed protein and MSG) are known to be directly toxic to the brain.

TOO MANY VACCINES OVER A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME

A considerable amount of research indicates that the Gulf War Syndrome, as well as autism, is triggered by combing too many vaccines over too short a period. This is compounded by numerous other toxic events, especially in the Gulf War veteran. This includes exposure to pesticides, aspartame breakdown products, combat stress, high intake of food-based excitotoxins, possible exposure to released nerve agents, as well as exposure to contaminated vaccines. For example, recent studies by Dr. Garth Nicolson, head of The Institute of Molecular Medicine, have disclosed a high incidence of contamination of the anthrax vaccine with mycoplasma organisms. In addition, he has shown a strong correlation between ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and this mycoplasmal infection. Recently, Pentagon officials reluctantly admitted to a 200% increased incidence of ALS in Gulf War veterans.

Many of the toxic exposures named in connection with the GWS have a common effect on the immune system. In most instances, we see impaired cellular immunity (NK cells, T-lymphocytes, etc.) It is accepted by most authorities that vaccines should not be given to individuals with impaired immunity for fear of triggering immune attacks on the central nervous system, such a encephalitis, nerve injuries (peripheral neuropathy), multiple sclerosis, and allergic encephalomyelitis. All of these are considered autoimmune disorders, during which the immune system attacks specific components of the brain and spinal cord by mistake. Recent studies have disclosed a completely new mechanism of injury, referred to as bystander injury.

BYSTANDER INJURY: A GRENADE IN A SHOPPING MALL

In the case of bystander injury, rather than the immune system directly attacking specific parts of the nervous system (molecular mimicry), that is mistaking a part of the nerve cell or neuron for a viral or mycoplasmal invader, the immune system is merely doing its job but in the process killing a lot of innocent bystanders, that is surround normal brain cells. It’s sort of like throwing a grenade in a shopping mall that not only kills the enemy, but also kills anyone close by. This occurs because immune cells kill invaders by flooding them with a storm of free radicals. Free radicals are highly reactive particles that destroy everything they encounter, friend or foe. It is the immune cells that generate these free radicals in large numbers. Normally, an immune attack on viruses and other organisms occurs rapidly and is quickly terminated. This is why strong immunity is essential-it minimizes bystander injury. A weakened immune system initiates a smoldering attack that is prolonged; leaving surrounding normal cells and tissue soaked in destructive free radicals, but does not kill the invader.

These destructive free radicals initially accumulate locally, that is, at the site of the invasion of the organisms whereas, with prolonged immune activation, these free radicals can diffuse far out into the surrounding tissues and with time, can flood the entire body. For instance, in the case of a chronic illness, such as lupus, we see high levels of free radicals throughout the body. This is the cause of the widespread symptoms of the disease. The same is true for diabetes, chronic heart failure and rheumatoid arthritis.

Vaccinations, if too numerous and spaced too close together act like a chronic illness, flooding the entire body with free radicals. Even so, the highest concentration of these radicals is in the vicinity of the immune cells.

Bystander injury can also occur with autoimmune disorders, since the immune attack is so widespread, persistent and intense.

THE PROBLEM WITH VACCINES

When producing vaccines, scientists combine the intended organism, either killed or live, with chemicals that stimulate an immune reaction. These chemicals are called adjuvants. Squalene, one of the common culprits found in GWS veterans, is an immune adjuvant. Usually they add many such adjuvants together. When these adjuvants are injected into the tissues they remain for a long time, continuously stimulating the immune system. If your immune system is normal and healthy, complications are less frequent.

Yet, should you have a defective immune system, or even part of the immune system is defective, your risk of complications goes up considerably. This is because the immune system is made of many components that must act in a specific concerted manner to kill the invader while minimizing the damage to surrounding normal tissues.

One of the more common reasons for immune dysfunction is nutritional deficiency, even for single nutrients. For example, we know that vitamin E (natural E), selenium, zinc, vitamins C and flavonoids (from fruits and vegetables) are critical for normal immune function. These are common deficiencies, especially after middle age. Likewise, some people may have only a deficiency in selenium, which would also impair a cellular immunity. It is now known that even individual nutritional deficiencies can have devastating effects on the immune system. Likewise, certain nutrients in excess can significantly interfere with immune function as well, such as omega-6 fats, MSG, aspartame and sugar. Of particular concern are the omega-6 oils, which are metabolized in the body to produce a powerful immune suppressing substance (PGE2). Corn, safflower, sunflower, peanut and soybean oils are all omega-6 oils. The MREs (meals ready to eat) contain numerous immune suppressing nutrients.

When nutrition-based immune malfunction is combined with the immune toxicity of pesticides, herbicides, chemical warfare agents and stress even greater immune dysfunction occurs.

Numerous experimental studies have shown that when you over stimulate the immune system with immune adjuvants, as would occur when giving numerous vaccines, close together, enormous numbers of free radicals are generated, and because the immune activation takes place over such a long period of time, these free radicals begin to damage normal cells surrounding the sites of attack as well as throughout the body. In other words, it’s like producing a chronic illness in a person.

The type of adjuvant also matters significantly. Oil based adjuvants, such as squalene and squalane are known to produce intense, unrelenting immune reactions that can last a lifetime. Recent studies have shown that all of the Gulf War veterans tested have had antibodies to squaelene, even those not serving in Iraq. The source of this squalene adjuvant has been determined to be from a secret, investigational vaccine for anthrax. One of the code names for this adjuvant is MF59.

Aluminum (as alum), also used as an adjuvant not only produces prolonged immune activation, but also travels along nerve tracks into the spinal cord and brain steam. Aluminum is known to produce significant destruction of brain cell connections and development of the same pathological features as Alzheimer’s disease. When combined to fluoride, as occurs in vaccines as well as fluoridated drinking water, aluminum-fluoride complex causes a significant loss of brain cells in the hippocampus of the brain, the site of recent memory generation.

THE BRAIN’S SPECIAL IMMUNE SYSTEM

In the case of multiple vaccinations over a short period, something even worse happens – the adjuvants activate the nervous system’s special immune cells called the microglia. Microglia cells are dispersed throughout the nervous system. Normally, they lay dormant, that is, asleep. When activated they can migrate throughout the brain, secreting very powerful toxins, free radical and immune related chemicals (cytokines).

These cells are very easy to activate. We know from many experiments that stimulating the body’s immune system, as with vaccination, also activates the brain’s immune system.

Under normal circumstances these microglia are activated for only short periods and then quickly shut their self off. With over-vaccination, these cells can remain active for very long periods creating considerable bystander damage. This is because they secrete toxic products that diffuse throughout the nervous system killing neurons, destroying synaptic connections and damaging the coverings of nerve fibers. There is growing evidence that prolonged microglial activation is the mechanisms of damage in numerous neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, autism and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

It is interesting to note that Dr. Garth Nicolson, as well as others, have had significant success in treating the GWS with the prolonged use of antibiotics. A growing number of recent studies have shown that the very antibiotics being used shut down the microglial cells. It may be that the greater part of the beneficial effects of these antibiotics may be stopping the bystander damage by shutting off this type of cell, rather than by actually killing microorganisms. With residual or persistent infections, both effects are needed.

According to recent studies, it may not even be necessary that live organisms be present to cause this bystander damage. First, we know that prolonged immune stimulation by use of immune adjuvants alone can produce severe bystander damage in the nervous system. Likewise, even the persistence of viral components, that is viral debris, can trigger prolonged immune reactions leading to bystander damage. We see this in association with the dementia of HIV infection. One of the great puzzles of AIDS was how it could result in dementia when the brain’s neurons were not infected. We now know that a protein particle is shed within the microglia and that this triggers chronic activation of the microglia cell.

One class of toxins released by these microglial cells includes excitotoxins. These powerful chemicals can excite brain cells to death and are thought to play a role in all forms of neurodegenerative diseases, brain trauma, strokes and meningitis. Common forms of excitotoxins include glutamate (as in monosodium glutamate-MSG), aspartate (as used in aspartame) and quinolinic acid (a metabolic product of serotonin breakdown).

When chronically activated, microglial cells pour out these excitotoxins in large amounts, destroying neurons, synapses and dendrites, that is, the connections between brain cells.

When these same excitotoxins are consumed in foods and drinks, even more damage is done. There is ample evidence that these food-based excitotoxins easily enter the brain. Most processed foods contain one or more excitotoxins, many in disguised forms.

We know that several things can activate microglia, including pesticides, MSG, viruses, mycoplasma, bacteria, stress, aluminum, mercury and immune adjuvants. These are all things the Gulf War veterans were exposed to both in theater as well as out. One of the enigmas has been the high incidence of similar symptoms experienced by family members of Gulf War veterans. Viral and mycoplasmal contaminants of these vaccines could spread to family members and initiate similar microglial activation. This is especially so with highly mutated viruses, which would be expected in the Gulf War veteran as discussed below.

Another possibility is that the immune dysfunction produced by the adjuvants would allow secondary infections to develop, such as mycoplasma and various viral pathogens.

HUMAN GENERATORS OF DEADLY VIRUSES

Several recent studies, which have not been shared with the public, have disclosed a rather frightening process. It has been found that when viruses are exposed to high free radical concentrations, even within a person, the viruses mutate, becoming much more virulent (deadly). Giving vaccines with live-attenuated viruses opens up a completely new danger that is not being discussed. To make a live virus, say for measles virus vaccines, scientists pass the virus through several cultures to reduce the disease causing ability of the virus, that is, its virulence. Scientists refer to this weakened virus as an attenuated virus. What we are not told is that often this virus remains in the body for a lifetime. In fact, a recent study found that live measles viruses were found in 20% of the brains of autopsied adults and in 45% of other organs. In other words, the virus has been hiding in their bodies for a lifetime.

Interestingly, these viruses were found to be highly mutated. The bottom line is that by giving live viruses, either intentionally or as a contaminant of vaccines, you expose that person to a very high risk of viral persistence, especially if they have an impaired immune system. Furthermore, that virus can mutate, becoming much more likely to produce a serious disease, even one not normally associated with that particular virus, such as colitis, encephalitis or a chronic degenerative brain disorder. The danger is not only to the person initially vaccinated, but to also those who come in contact with him or her. That is, they are acting as generators of deadly mutated viruses. It should be noted that the measles virus itself suppresses the immune system. Other viruses are known to have a similar effect.

Chronic illness is characterized by the presence of large numbers of free radicals throughout the body, as we have seen. These free radicals not only damage cells, but also cause any virus living in that person’s body to mutate. Likewise, as we have seen, these new mutated viruses are much more likely to cause serious disease. In essence, people with chronic illnesses, because they generate a lot of free radicals, act as living viral mutation incubators. Poor nutrition greatly magnifies this process as well because such people generate significantly more free radicals. That was the great surprise of this study.

The recent panic over the A/Fujian strain of influenza is a case in point. People, especially mothers of small children, are rushing to have their loved ones vaccinated with the flu vaccines. Yet, doing so exposes them to serious dangers. For example, those receiving the killed older flu vaccine are receiving a significant dose of mercury (50ug).

This dose is even more toxic to small children because of their smaller body size.

Mercury has been shown to greatly magnify bystander injury in the brain. In the case of small children and babies, the immune reaction caused directly by the mercury is added to that of the other childhood vaccines, further aggravating bystander damage in their brain. Because the child’s brain continues to develop and grow so rapidly up until the age of two years, the danger of bystander damage is much greater than in adults.

Due to the shortage of conventional vaccines, a nasal form of the vaccine has been offered. Those at greatest risk from the nasal vaccine are people with immune deficiencies – diabetics, those with autoimmune diseases, the elderly and the very young. This means they are more likely to suffer from viral persistence and resulting prolonged bystander injury as well as the generation of mutated viruses. The influenza virus has been suspect in triggering atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) and in neurological degeneration such as Parkinson’s disease. Likewise, people with chronic illnesses, as we have seen, generate large numbers of free radicals all the time, increasing the likelihood that the virus will mutate to a more virulent strain. These are the high-risk groups the Public Health physicians and medical societies are encouraging to take the vaccines.

Second, many of these vaccines, including the anthrax and flu vaccines, contain thimerosal. Thimerosal is a preservative that is composed of 50% mercury. Mercury is a very unique poison, in that it incapacitates numerous enzymes in the cell including those used to neutralize free radicals. In addition, mercury, among all the metals tested, was the only one shown to block the removal of excess glutamate from the nervous system. This removal system is critical to nervous system health. By paralyzing the glutamate removal system, mercury triggers chronic excitotoxicity – that is chronic destruction of the nervous system.

In addition, mercury tends to accumulate in the microglial cell, causing it to become chronically active. This in turn results in the excretion of the two powerful excitotoxins from the microglial cell I mentioned before, called quinolinic acid and glutamate. It is the secretion of these two excitotoxins that causes the dementia associated with the HIV virus. In fact, the HIV virus coat proteins increase quinolinic acid concentrations in the spinal fluid of demented AIDS patients some 300 fold. Other persistent viruses, viral proteins and immune adjuvants have been shown to do the same thing, even in children.

Another recent study, conducted by the US Department of Agriculture, found that exposing mice to mercury prior to infection with the coxsackievirus B3, a virus that destroys the heart muscle, greatly increased the mortality, number of pathological injuries seen in the heart muscle and the number of viruses in the heart’s muscle (viral titer) as compared to animals exposed to the virus alone.

Cosackievirus B3 induced cardiomyopathy and heart failure is the number one disease leading to heart transplants in this country. This study was important in that it demonstrated that exposure to mercury greatly increased the lethality of this virus and promoted the replication of the virus. Other studies have confirmed this finding using different viruses.

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?

In essence, people should be cautious when considering vaccination for themselves and their families. Many parents are choosing to home school their children so that they can avoid the vaccination program. Families that choose to home school will not only benefit by avoiding the vaccines for their children, they will also be better able to build their children’s natural immunity by providing a good nutritional program comprised of whole foods and some supplements. As we have seen, vaccine complications increase dramatically when given close together, especially as combined vaccines such as the DPaT and MMR and the other 17 vaccines given to military personnel. The anthrax vaccine alone is given as a six-dose primary series followed by a yearly booster. It has never been shown to be effective, which is especially so against weaponized anthrax. Because rapid deployment of such a large number of soldiers was required, Pentagon officials compressed the vaccine schedule over a little more than a week. This is extremely hazardous, leading to a tremendous increase in complications. If individuals do choose to engage in this risky activity, they should separate vaccinations by 6 months in children and perhaps longer in adults in order to give the immune system time to settle down. For the reasons I have discussed already above, it’s my belief that most, if not all, vaccines need to be abandoned, since they have not been shown to be effective and there are reasonable and infinitely safer alternatives.

In addition it is vital to maintain nutritional health. Numerous studies have shown that nutritional depletion, even of one or two nutrients, dramatically increases vaccine complications. This is especially so for Vitamin A (as mixed carotenoids), vitamin E and vitamin D3. I would recommend a daily multivitamin/ mineral supplement without iron. In addition, I would recommend 1000 mg. of ascorbate (as magnesium ascorbate) three times a day between meals, vitamin E either as d-alpha-tocopheryl succinate or mixed tocopherols (natural vitamin E) 400 IU a day and DHA oil capsules-100 mg. three times a day. Dosages for children would have to be adjusted for weight and age.

Vitamin D3 is particularly important since it is known to regulate immune reactions and calm down those reactions that are overactive. New studies have shown that adults should be taking 1000 to 1500 IU of vitamin D3 instead of the previous 400 IU recommended by the government.

A number of experiments have shown that vitamin D3 can significantly reduce the neurological damage caused by multiple sclerosis-like experimental reactions (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis).

So, what are the alternatives to vaccinations? It is now accepted that immune function declines with age and that this is purely secondary to nutritional deficiency. This decline in immunity explains the 36,000 deaths often attributed to the flu each year among the elderly. Most of these deaths could be prevented simply by adding the nutrients known to repair and maximize immune function, which I have listed above. Additional immune activation can be achieved by the use of non-specific immune stimulation as with beta-1,3/1,6-glucan, a highly purified extract of yeast cell walls. To minimize bystander damage one takes this immune stimulant only during periods of high risk, such as flying on an airplane, and at the first sign of infection. Supplementation is terminated three days after the symptoms subside. This is infinitely safer than vaccination and, in my experience, more effective.

A recent study done at the Chemical and Biological Defense Section in Alberta, Canada demonstrated the remarkable effects of beta-1,3/1,6-glucan against anthrax infection. Using mice infected with anthrax, they found that prior immune stimulation using beta-1,3/1,6-glucan reduced mortality from 50% to 0%. In addition, it lowered anthrax bacterial counts in the lungs 4 to 8 fold and doubled the number of bacteria-free animals. In fact, they found the beta-glucan helped considerably even if given after the infection was established, increasing survival from 30% to 90%.

There are many ways to stimulate immunity safely using nutritional methods. In addition, non-specific nutritional immune restoration using beta-1,3/1,6-glucan can be used in high-risk individuals that are excluded from vaccination, such as those with serious heart diseases and neurological diseases. In addition, beta-1,3/1,6-glucan has been shown to protect the bone marrow from radiation damage and to lower cholesterol.

It is important to avoid omega-6 oils, such as corn, safflower,

sunflower, peanut, soybean and Canola oils. The omega-6 oils are powerful immune suppressants. Avoid all forms of sugar, which also suppresses immunity. Drink distilled water or water filtered by reverse osmosis and avoid sweetened drinks, even fruit drinks. Avoid all forms of fluoride, since it damages antioxidant enzymes, increases free radical production, damages DNA repair enzymes, suppresses immunity, produces skeletal and dental fluorosis, hypothyroidism and produces extensive brain cell injury.

Since most foods are contaminated with numerous excitotoxin additives, you should prepare your foods fresh. Your diet should contain at least three servings of fresh fruits and vegetables daily. Vegetables with the deepest color are preferred, but some white vegetables, such as cauliflower are also important.

Recommended Reading:

1. Blaylock, R. L. Interaction of cytokines, excitotoxins and reactive nitrogen and oxygen species in autism spectrum disorders. JANA 2003: 6: 21-35.

2. Blaylock, R. L. The Central Role of Excitotoxicity in autism spectrum disorders. JANA 6: 11-19, 2003

3. Blaylock, R. L. The central role of chronic microglial activation and excitotoxicity in the Gulf War Syndrome and autism. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 9: 46-51, 2004

Dr. Russell Blaylock is editor of The Blaylock Wellness Report, published by NewsMax.com

Board-certified neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock was a Clinical Asst Professor of Neurosurgery at the Medical University of Mississippi. He practiced Neurosurgey for 24 years and practiced nutritional medicine. Dr. Blaylock’s first book, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, demonstrated the link between food additives and degenerative diseases. He also has contributed to medical textbooks and written and illustrated booklets on multiple sclerosis and bioterrorism . Dr. Blaylock serves on the editorial staff of the Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association and the editorial board of the Medical Sentinel, the official journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. He is also author of Health & Nutrition Secrets to Save Your Life and Cancer Strategies.

Dr. Blaylock’s article on autism can be found on http://www.dorway.com plus other articles. There are also some on http://www.wnho.net And we have an Aspartame Information List on this site.

Dr. Blaylock can also be seen in the aspartame documentary, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, http://www.docworkers.com

Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 http://www.wnho.net and http://www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center, http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame

Log in to Reply

·  theunhivedmind says:

September 5, 2014 at 8:20 am

The strange story of the Influenza A

http://www.tendencias21.net/La-extrana-historia-de-la-Gripe-A_a3681.html

Prudence and calm are the best attitudes, as well as a better understanding of reality

The new flu all you have is a novelty strain and mortality is much lower than the regular seasonal flu. For WHO to declare a pandemic could he had to change the definition of this term. And USA It was declared a “state of national health emergency” in the country when there had been only 20 people infected with the new flu and none of them had died. The worst was that the Austrian subsidiary of American pharmaceutical Baxter distributed contaminated vaccines in January that if they had not been discovered, would have killed thousands of people in Eastern Europe. The pandemic declaration would become official real drama. Soon will come the new flu vaccines and some countries consider it mandatory. Pharmaceutical are demanding impunity in case of damage to the health of the population resulting from the use of the vaccine. Facing the new flu need to stay calm and prevent compulsory and get anyone who could be harmed can claim to pharmaceutical. By Teresa Forcades i Vila (*)

inShare

[Pin It]

CAMPANAS POR LA GRIPE A from ALISH on Vimeo.

BELLS FOR A FLU from alish on Vimeo .

1 SCIENTIFIC DATA

– The first two known cases of swine flu (influenza A / H1N1 strain S-OIV) were diagnosed in California (USA) on April 17, 2009 (1).

– The new flu is not new because it is of type A, nor because it is the H1N1 subtype: the influenza epidemic of 1918 was the type A / H1N1 viruses since 1977 and A / H1N1 form of flu season each year (2); the only thing that is new is the strain S-OIV (3) (4).

– 33% of people over 60 seem to have immunity to the new flu virus (5).

– From inception to September 15, 2009, have died from this flu 137 people in Europe and worldwide 3.559 (6); must take into account that every year in Europe between 40,000 and 220,000 people die from influenza (7).

– As they have stated publicly recognized health professionals – including Dr. Bernard Debré (member of the National Ethics Committee of France) and Dr. Juan José Rodríguez Sendín (president of the association of medical colleges of the State Spanish ) – the data obtained from the flu season in the southern hemisphere countries have passed, show that the rate of mortality and complications of the new flu is lower than the flu each year (8)

Irregularities 2 THINGS TO EXPLAIN

– In late January 2009, the Austrian subsidiary of American pharmaceutical Baxter distributed to 16 laboratories in Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovenia, 72 Kg of material to prepare thousands of vaccines against seasonal influenza,. vaccine had to be administered to the population of these countries during the months of February-March; before any of these vaccines would be administered, a lab technician BioTest Company of the Czech Republic decided on their own to prove vaccine in ferrets, which are the animals which since 1918 are used to study influenza vaccines; all vaccinated ferrets died; was then investigated what it was exactly the material sent by the Baxter house and found it contained live bird flu virus (influenza A / H5N1) combined with live influenza virus each year (virus A / H3N2); if this contamination had not been discovered in time, the pandemic that no real base are announcing global and national health authorities (WHO), now would be a frightening reality; this combination of live virus can be particularly deadly because it combines a virus that has a 60% mortality but is not very contagious (the avian flu) with one that has a very low mortality but with a great ability to spread (a virus of the flu each year) (9).

-.’s April 29, 2009, when it was just 12 days they had detected the first two cases of swine flu, Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO Director General, said the danger level of pandemic alert was in Phase 5 and ordered that all the governments of the member states of the WHO set forward plans and maximum health alert; . a month later, on June 11, 2009, Dr. Chan said that in the world we had a pandemic (phase 6) caused by the virus A / H1N1 S-OIV (10); How could declare something when, according to the scientific data presented above, the new flu is actually milder than the seasonal flu, and also is not a new virus and there is already part of the population that has immunity ?; it could declare that in May, the WHO had changed the definition of pandemic; before May 2009 to declare a pandemic was necessary to die because of an infectious agent a significant proportion of the population; this requirement – which alone gives meaning to the clinical notion of pandemic and policy measures associated with it – was eliminated from the definition in May 2009 (11), after the April 26 USA had been declared a “state of national health emergency” when across the country there had been only 20 people infected with the new flu and none of them had died (12).

3 POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF “PANDEMIC”

– In the context of a pandemic is possible to declare the vaccine mandatory for certain groups of people or even for all citizens (13)

– What can happen to a person who chooses not to be vaccinated? While it has not decreed that the vaccine is mandatory, not anything can happen; however, if it should be decreed compulsory, the state has an obligation to enforce the law imposing a fine or imprisonment (in the state of Massachusetts proposed penalty for this case could reach $ 1,000 per day that passes without you vaccinate ) (14).

– Against this, some people may think, if forced, for me and that’s beef, total, the vaccine is more or less like every year, there is no big deal …

– You need to know that there are three new features that make the new flu vaccine is different for each year: the first novelty is that most laboratories are designing the vaccine so that a single injection is not two sufficient and necessary; WHO also recommended not to stop giving the seasonal flu vaccine; who follow the WHO recommendations is exposed to be injected three times; this is news trebles theoretically possible side effects, but no one really knows what effects can cause, as never before done anything like this. The second novelty is that some of the laboratories makers have decided to add to the aids vaccine more powerful than those used so far in the annual vaccine; Adjuvants are substances added to the vaccine to boost the immune system; The new flu vaccine that is manufacturing Glaxo-Smith-Kline, for example, contains an adjuvant called AS03 (a combination of squalene and polysorbate tenfold the immune response, the problem with this is that no one can guarantee that this artificial stimulation of the immune system does not cause serious after a while (like ascending paralysis of Guillain-Barre syndrome) (15) auto immune diseases, and the third novelty which distinguishes the new vaccine flu vaccine each year is that the pharmaceutical companies that are manufactured by requiring states to sign agreements providing impunity for vaccines that have more side effects than expected (ie is expected to paralysis of Guillain-Barre syndrome affects about 10 of a million people to get vaccinated), USA have signed an agreement that releases both the politicians and the pharmaceutical of any responsibility for the possible side effects of the vaccine (16).

A REFLECTION

If shipment of contaminated material that made the Baxter home in January had not been accidentally discovered, he would have actually produced the very serious pandemic with the potential to cause the death of millions of people who are announcing some. It is inexplicable lack of political media i what happened in February in the Czech laboratory resonance. Even more inexplicable is the degree of irresponsibility demonstrated by the WHO, by governments and agencies for control and prevention of diseases in declaring a pandemic and promote maximum health alert level without real basis. It’s irresponsible and inexplicable to inconceivable extremes the billion euro investment by the public purse designed to produce millions of doses of vaccine against a non-existent pandemic, while there is not enough money to help millions of people (over 5 million in the USA) that because of the crisis have lost their jobs and their homes.

While these facts are clarified, the risk that contaminated vaccines can be distributed this winter and the risk of legal coercion to get taken to force vaccination, are real risks that in no case be underestimated.

If so benign flu continue as before, makes no sense exposed to a risk of contaminated or suffer paralysis of Guillain-Barré vaccine.

If flu worsens unexpectedly, as advertised for months without any scientific basis a surprising number of senior officials – including the director general of the WHO – and suddenly begin to die from the flu many more people than usual, still have less sense be pressured to get vaccinated because a surprise and may only mean two things: 1 the virus now circulating flu has mutated; 2. that is circulating another (or others) virus. In both cases the vaccine now being prepared and would be useless, considering what happened in January with the Baxter house, could be even be a pathway for disease transmission.

A PROPOSAL

My proposal is clear:

– In addition to stay calm, take sensible precautions to avoid infection and not be vaccinated, which are already offering many people with common sense in our country

– I appeal urgently to enable legal and citizen participation mechanisms needed to ensure outright so that no one can force our country to be vaccinated against their will, and the freedom to choose not be vaccinated denied the right to demand accountability and the right to be compensated financially (they or their relatives) if the vaccine will cause serious illness or death.

(*) Teresa Forcades i Vila (Barcelona 1966) holds a PhD in Public Health and Internal mediciona. He received his doctorate in medicine from the University of Barcelona. Then studied theology at Harvard and took orders in the monastery of Sant Benet. She is the author of three books: “Els grans crims companyies farmacèutiques of them”, “The Trinitat avui” and “Feminist theology in history.”

This document was originally published on 16 September at the Blog of the author with the title A REFLECTION AND A PROPOSAL ABOUT THE NEW FLU .

Footnotes

(1) Zimmer SM, Burke DS. Historical Perspective: Emergence of Influenza A (H1N1) viruses . NEJM, July 16, 2009 p. 279

(2) The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens, Zimmer, Burke, op. cit., p. 282

(3) Zimmer, Bunker, op. cit., p. 279

(4) Doshi, Peter. Calibrated response to emerging infections . BMJ 2009, 339: b3471

(5) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Serum cross-reactive antibody response to a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus after vaccination with seasonal influenza vaccine . MMWR 2009; 58: 521-4

(6) Official data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

(7) Official data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

(8) See Le Journal du Dimanche (25 juliol ’09): Debré: ‘Cette grippe n’est pas dangereuse ; cf. The Reason (4 September ’09). Rodriguez Sendín: Cordura against alarmism in the prevention of influenza .

(9) See Virus mix-up by lab Could have resulted in pandemic . The Times of India, science section, March 6, 2009.

(10) Statement by WHO Director-General to the press , June 11, 2009.

(11) Cohen E. When a pandemic is not a pandemic . CNN, May 4 ’09.

(12) Peter Doshi: Calibrated response to emerging infections . BMJ 2009, 339: b3471

(13) Falkiner, Keith. Get the flu jab or be rushed jailed . Irish Star Sunday, 13 September ’09.

(14) Senate Bill n. 2028: An act relative to pandemic and disaster preparation and response in the commonwealth . August 4th ’09. Cf Moore, RT. Critics rage as state prepares for flu pandemic . 11 September ’09. WBUR Boston.

(15) See H1N1 Vaccination: méfiance des infirmières

(16) Stobbe, Mark. Legal immunity set for swine flu vaccine makers . Associated Press, 17 July ’09.