This evolving article fleshes out Jim’s concerns in more detail and asks some interesting questions ~

Jim writes . . . After spending hours on the topic of the “Islamic uprising”, I have hit a wall of frustration. The conflicting B.S. coming out of the media with regard to this topic has made it impossible to get a solid stab at the monster. Here is what I know for sure at this time:

1. There is no great Islamic uprising occurring, especially over a movie which is now proven to not exist.
2. It appears from the photos of the Sydney protest that it was staged. I am going to be making a few calls today to get what people on the ground there are saying.
3. There is no Benghazi consulate. Instead, someone rented a very nice home on the outskirts of town and trashed it. This would be Mossad all the way. None of the stories match, so many different versions of this story are out there, even in the “official” press that it is obvious there is no root of truth to any of it. There are way to many obvious conflicts here to post and have people read through. In short,

A. The “embassy vehicle” is not an embassy vehicle. The Ambassador came from an embassy. The U.S. embassies, especially in hostile areas, and Libya would be one, always send diplomats around in armored cars with bullet proof glass. What is burned up in the photos is just an ordinary civilian car with normal glass. And if it is not the one the “diplomat” used to get there, where is his car?

B. I and others at this site managed to pull up articles related to the previous test run wag the dog regarding this “consulate”. One of these articles stated that the “consulate” opened in 2011, yet no where on the Department of State web site was this “consulate” listed.And the press is being careful to label it as “temporary” so they can maintain the excuse that it is not in any record. But 2011? If it was there since 2011 according to an Australian newspaper, well, it’s September 2012 now, exactly what do they call “temporary?”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2012/sep/13/us-consulate-attack-benghazi-interactive

C. None of the photos show a consulate. They show a fancy house. And not just any fancy house. According to the scale provided by the guardian, the house is approximately 10,000 square feet, and has an additional 3,000 square foot extension. So at this “consulate”, which as a “consulate” would need a maximum of 2,000 square feet to function, we have 13,000 square feet, and a total of 4 people who arrived in one car temporarily “staffing” it. Yeah. Right. Such an enormous size would spaciously employ at least 125 people in their own 100 square foot office. Where are the rest of them? If over 9 months is not enough to get people there to staff it, especially in a country where you would want it staffed, how much time is enough? Why would any “consulate” be so freaking huge? That alone is bullshit.

D. In one of the stories, we have mortars. In another, we have “it burned to the ground” (a flat impossibility, it was concrete). In another story, we have it got flamed. That definitely did happen, but what about the other two stories? Where are the holes in the concrete from it getting shelled?

E. And, why is there a washing machine thrown into the swimming pool? Why is there trash strewn everywhere? Where is the flag pole? Is 9 months not enough to put one in? Where is the consulate placard, that all consulates have? Would a mob take the time to trash the place thoroghly in such a way? Folks, there is not even a temporary flag holder on the front, a requirement for any embassy or consulate. There is no trashed office furniture, no smashed office equipment, and if the looters were there to steal, why is a fancy front load washer at the bottom of the pool? That alone proves the place did not get robbed, so where is the rest stuff it should have? It would not have burned in it’s entireity, the governement uses too much metal office equipment, and what about the metal shells the computers would have had?

F: And then we have the location. This “consulate”, which is supposed to perform ONE FUNCTION – handle paperwork so people can travel, had 13,000 square feet in a city of around 600,000 population and is located out in the middle of NOWHERE. From a functional standpoint, its placement is so stupid that by itself is a red flag. The appropriate arrangement for a consulate would be a 7/11 store sized rental unit on the third floor of an office building in the heart of the city.

On top of this, the various news agencies can’t even get the location of the consulate straight, proof of a bullshit story.

The Daily Mail says it’s here

And the Guardian says it’s here (you have to click the little arrow that says next to make their animation work.

Since the consulate is a fiction, both pictures will do because no one is going to be able to check up on the story anyway. Last I heard, the State Department is no longer answering questions with regard to the embassy, probably because people can’t figure out where it really is.

I’ll make a guess, with regard to the “consulate,” [as to] what happened.

There was an affluent white guy, who had sympathies for the Libyan people after America destroyed them and was going to help them. Sources state he was a Muslim. He had a nice pad built, and perhaps was a billionaire. Because America and Israel hate such types, they raided and burned his home and murdered him, and then paraded his body on camera in a filthy false flag. That’s what I really think happened. But don’t say I said it publicly because there is no way you will find this documented anywhere. That little story is a fiction, who cares. At least it is not a lie because I told you it was a guess.

But it’s more accurate than the “official story, because it at least explains why the car was a normal car, and why there was only 1 instead of 50. The lack of office equipment or anything else, for all I can perceive the place had just finished being built and had not had much furniture moved in yet. And the scamming media can’t get in on that and say it now, that the consulate had just been built because they already said it was a rented house and at least one of them said it had been occupied since 2011. They can’t agree on what neighborhood it was in.

As for the rest of the scam, the zionist media now has the Muslim world rebelling over a movie that never existed. So that lie has been bagged. This means that any “protests” are likely staged for the cameras, and any video of mass protests is probably stock footage.

This begs the question then, why?

Why would the zionist media be pumping a phony story about protests happening everywhere, instigating violence, and filling the television screens with flaming B.S., to scare the American people and the rest of the Western world, while whipping the Western world into a state of hate?

I can tell you why. It’s because there is a false flag terror event imminent, which will probably happen on the 16th (coordinated universal time). I am not into predicting dates, but they have to make music now that the song is playing, before people get bored with the tune. They have a window of opportunity to use, and it won’t be very wide. They already got busted for the cause of these uprisings being a nonexistent fake, and the clock is ticking on how long it will take for the masses to figure it out.

Many people have figured out the false flag terror game, so the Zionists need to create a plausible believable environment to frame the next false terror event in to make people believe Muslims may actually have done it despite so many people having knowledge of false flags.

People won’t realize that before all of this happened, that Israel had already mobilized their military in preparation for an attack on Iran. The Israeli soldiers have already visited the wailing wall three days ago to pay their last respects to God, and have already mobilized for a major conflict. Why? And why does it coincide with a massive media lie campaign to turn world opinion against Muslims?

Think about that. I just had to rant to get the framework laid out, and will work on linking all this stuff in later. But there will be a major horrific false flag soon if the word of this is not spread and attached to all these phony staged riots. I am not going to get into the permutations of what form that attack could take.

http://shiftfrequency.com/jim-stone-slogging-through-the-pit-of-lies/