Reuters Slideshow: Mideast Conflict

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

Boston was senior legal counsel to the Navy's original 1967 review of the attack. He said in the sworn statement that he stayed silent for years because he's a military man, and "when orders come ... I follow them."

He said he felt compelled to "share the truth" following the publication of a recent book, "The Liberty Incident," which concluded the attack was unintentional.

The USS Liberty was an electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was cruising international waters off the Egyptian coast on June 8, 1967. Israeli planes and torpedo boats opened fire on the Liberty at what became known as the outbreak of the Israeli-Egyptian Six-Day War.

In addition to the 34 Americans killed, more than 170 were wounded.

Israel has long maintained that the attack was a case of mistaken identity, an explanation that the Johnson administration did not formally challenge. Israel claimed its forces thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel and apologized to the United States.

After the attack, a Navy court of inquiry concluded there was insufficient information to make a judgment about why Israel attacked the ship, stopping short of assigning blame or determining whether it was an accident.

It was "one of the classic all-American cover-ups," said Ret. Adm. Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.

"Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own?" Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.

Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress to investigate.

Israeli Embassy spokesman Mark Regev disputed any notion that Israel knowingly went after American sailors.

"I can say unequivocally that the Liberty tragedy was a terrible accident, that the Israeli pilots involved believed they were attacking an enemy ship," Regev said. "This was in the middle of a war. This is something that we are not proud of."

Calls to the Navy seeking comment were not immediately returned.

In Boston's statement, he does not say why Johnson would have ordered a cover-up. Attempts were made to reach Boston at his home in Coronado, Calif., but he did not return calls seeking comment.

Moorer's panel suggested several possible reasons Israel might have wanted to attack a U.S. ship. Among them: Israel intended to sink the ship and blame Egypt because it might have brought the United States into the 1967 war.

___

On the Net:

USS Liberty Memorial Web site: http://www.ussliberty.org

this article and related links @:

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=world&cat=israel

Here's investigative journalist Peter Hounam's book, "Operation Cyanide":

http://www.visionpaperbacks.co.uk/bookDetails.php

What Iknow of the book I learned from the excellent BBC documentary, "Dead in the Water", about Israel's attempted sinking of the spyship USS Liberty just off the coast of Egypt during the '67 June War. What it tells of Operation Cyanide is Israel had massacred a mass of Egyptian troops in the Sinai. This was not really central thought it's not as if Israel sunk the Liberty to cover that crime. Operation Cyanide is about US foreknowledge and setting up the unarmed spyship, without escort as a duck to use for pretext for a nuclear strike on Cairo. The planes were only recalled--from the air, BTW, when the US realized it didn't have its pretext because they learned the sinking didn't work and the Liberty's crew got an SOS out.

They had dropped napalm on the ship's deck and shot it up from the air, but that was just to prevent the crew from getting any communication out. It was the Israeli torpedo that was supposed to sink the ship, but the torpedo that hit luckily struck a crossbeam square and blew up against the ship rather than inside the ship, rendering it "dead in the water" rather than sunk. This is also when, '67, the relationship between Israel and the US changed to its present state where Israel like umbilically and insatiably feeds off of the US as well as being insulated from condemnation for its crimes by US veto power in the UN. See the film. it's most important. and obviously, news is relevant until its heard and accepted:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/dead_in_the_water.shtml

Here's an article by one of the survivors:

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=399

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------