FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

RESPONSE TO: 'COLORADO BATMAN SHOOTING SHOWS OBVIOUS SIGNS OF BEING STAGED'

Rocky Montana / Mike Adams

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

July 20, 2012

Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor / July 20, 2012

 

[Comments added by Rocky Montana]

(NaturalNews) James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-14-peop...)

As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...)

According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as "shy."

The New York Times is now reporting:

Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus.  Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect.  "It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html?page...)

"He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games..."

There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated.  His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind.  That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three).

His behavior doesn't add up

His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events.  For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance.  This is not consistent with the idea of "killing everyone."

Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives.  If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance?  It doesn't add up.

"Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a local CBS news affiliate (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...).

"After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives in his residence,' Oates said.  When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said.  Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment.  He said police could be there some time."

None of this checks out.  If you're a killer bent on causing mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb waiting for them back at your apartment?

Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear.

Continuing from CBS:

"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.'  One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News.  Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment.  SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman."  This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done. 

 

[ When it comes to evil, usually nothing is as it appears.  Informed Americans must look beyond the obvious, beyond the pragaganda, beyond the hype, and be vigil and weary of the "official reports" flooding the main-stream media regarding this latest, possible, government-sponsored terrorist event.

Could it be that perhaps Holmes is just another patsy and someone else actually planted the arsenal of weapons and ammunition and booby-traps in the man's apartment for the police to find?  Could it be that another actually pulled the triggers of the guns in the theater and surrendered to police in the parking lot?  Consider this: No one in the theater actually saw Holmes' face.  No one in the parking lot, other than the arresting police officers (if they actually were police officers), saw Holmes' face. For all we know, this could have been a total FBI psyops operation, where the FBI had Holmes drugged, unconscious and detained in a lock-up somewhere close-by until he was later needed, then switched with the actual shooter (a trained assassin) to then show up at the police station for interigation and lock-up, thus making it appear as though Holmes was the shooter and mass-murderer.

But for what reason?  Question: What has been the agenda of the "occupying" U.S. federal government and the United Nations over the past 50 + years?  Answer: the disarmament of the American people and the nullifying of the U.S. Constitution as a precursor to invasion and total take-over of this nation by the One World Order forces under the UN International government, who, at the top, sits an elite group of satanic men who call themselves 'the Olympians', better known as the Committee of 300, and who gave birth to all the other Godless organizations throughout the world over the centuries, including the UN.  They have partially been sucessful at disarming the United States by infiltrating the three branches of government, infiltrating all government agencies and by instilling fear and confusion among the American people and lawmakers alike through staged incidents and events, one after another, until lawmakers are bribed, coerced, fooled and/or intimidated into passing all forms of anti-gun and anti-ammunition laws upon the American people.

The most timely reason for this is as stated in this article below:

"Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it."

The Arms Trade Treaty is the name of a controversial potential multilateral treaty that would regulate the international trade in conventional weapons.  United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty being held in New York July 2–27, 2012 in New York.  

Of The Arms Trade Treaty, Kevin Danielsen reports:        

    "While it is difficult to sift through the various UN treaties, the ‘small arms treaty’ is a part of a much larger initiative to curtail individual gun rights.  In essence, the ‘small arms treaty’, the ‘Law of the Sea’ treaty, and the ‘Arms Trade Treaty’ can be bundled into one giant effort to remove US sovereignty, giving the UN control over the liberties of US citizens, nullifying protections Americans have enjoyed since the birth of the US.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have already vowed to sign such a treaty.  In fact, both have largely been working behind closed doors, as they know full-well that Americans would surely show staunch resistance if their agenda committed to ‘open war’". 

And Katie Pavlich, the Editor of TownHall.com, reports:         

What does this mean for Americans?  All of these ‘treaties’ have a common thread, which boil down to 4 directives.

-Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

-Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

-Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the anti-gun media never seem to grasp).

-Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.”

Send this article or the original article to your elected members of Congress.  Let them know you are not intimidated by the government's false-flag, strong-arm tactics against the American people, and neither should they.  Tell them to take a stand against this obvious 'wolf in sheep's clothing' and vote against the UN small arms treaty.]

 

 

"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices.  It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion.  It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack.  Who might be behind all this?  The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen.  See four documented stories on these facts:

http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.html

As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off!  This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open.  Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:

NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help...)

THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed.  A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.  But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...

Mystery man Holmes has no background

On top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background.  "He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," said a peace officer in a NYT article.  "This guy is somewhat of an enigma.  Nobody knows anything about him."  (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html)

Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said.  He earned a bachelor's degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...

Question: How does an unemployed medical student afford $20,000 in weapons gear?

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises:  How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself.  The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total.  Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms.  The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess.  With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.

The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is, all by itself, a felony crime by the way.  And remember: "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices.  It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reported Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).

Question:  Where does an unemployed, introverted medical school student get the training to deploy sophisticated booby traps, tactical body armor, weapons systems and more?  Certainly not in graduate school!

All this leads to an obvious third party influence over all this. 

Someone else taught this guy these skills and funded the acquisition of the equipment. 

Note: Some readers have questioned the $20,000 figure estimated here, saying this gear could have been acquired for only $10,000 or so.  I doubt that, as all the extras that you need to effectively run these guns cost a lot of money: training courses, spare magazines, etc.  Just a decent AR-15 battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) can run $1,000 - $2,000.  Search "ACOG" if you don't believe me.  It is also reported that Holmes bought 6,000 rounds of ammo, which definitely isn't cheap either.  It's clear this guy was spending big bucks.  Whether it's $10k or $20k isn't really that much of a point.

Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it.

All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police and admitting everything.  The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote next week on a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across America. (http://lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem61.1.html)

Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty.  The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."

In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II.  I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was behind it all.  After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation and take total control over the population than to stage violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!"  Such calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never too long after that before government genocide really kicks in like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.

Governments routinely murder millions

Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false flag events to justify the disarmament):

50+ million dead:  Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)

12+ million dead:  Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs

8+ million dead:  Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)

6+ million dead:  Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)  [The figure is actually 20 million + dead and the vast majority were Christian Russians.]

5+ million dead:  Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)

2+ million dead:  Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)

1.7 million dead:  Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)

1.6 million dead:  Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)

1.5 million dead:  Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)

1 million dead:  Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)

900,000 dead:  Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)

800,000 dead:  Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)

[Whether it was 90.5 + million people or 104.5 + million people exterminated at the hands of state governments and tyrants, these acts of genocide should put things into perspective and show you who your REAL arch-enemy IS.]

See more at:

http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html

Death by government:

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.CHAP1.HTM

http://www.infowars.com/democide-government-killed-over-260-million-i...

A "monopoly of force" in government is far more dangerous than one crazed lone shooter

So yes, [possibly] James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a number of people each year in random acts of violence.  It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when they gain total power over the populace.

The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of force" over the entire population.  And that's exactly what the UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only "legitimate" power on the planet.

See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:

http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Revisiting-the-State-Monopoly-on-the...

As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies of force" against their own people:

• (Re-)establish state monopoly

- Ownership of WMDs

- Safety Inspectorates

• Prohibit business activity

- Justice and Execution

- Deadly Force?

• Regulate/limit activities

- Private defense/security services

- Control of financial transfers

- Export controls

- Transport and infrastructure safety

- Environmental impact

Interestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie theater shooter:

Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.

A global monopoly of force

This document is a goldmine of information about the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population.  Check out page 28, which reads:

The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.

Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force

At the global level no monopoly of violence exists.  The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces...

This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.

This story gets deep, doesn't it?  Watch for more analysis here at NaturalNews.com, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.

UPDATE: Follow-up story now posted that asks the question: Why did not one fight back?

That story is available now at NaturalNews.com:

http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/z036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.html

Rocky Montana

 

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/war/terrorism_war/news.php?q=1342886964