California Prosecutor Says People Have a Right to Defend Themselves Against Unlawful Police Brutality
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right
to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by
force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense,
his assailant is killed, he is justified.” (Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80;
Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
Tuesday, 27 September, 2011
Anonymous said...
Every 5 year old Mexican girl has a weapon and will use it to defend herself against attacks.This is why the DALLAS cops let THOUSANDS of Mexicans march in downtown UNTOUCHED.
Wise up and do some planning for the next rukus and get some security for your peaceful citizens protest security against ANYBODY commiting assults!