- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

The Most Important Property Rights Case In 50 Years

By Henry Lamb

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

od, and that there is no force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist."

In New London, Connecticut, the idea of "sacred" private property has been turned on its head. The city gave its power of eminent domain to the NLDC, a private corporation, to take the homes of Susette Kelo, and several other residents of the Fort Trumbull community, in order to resell the property to developers who would ultimately pay more taxes than the current residents.

The power of eminent domain, the taking of private property by government, is authorized - and limited - by the U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution clearly limits government's authority to take private property "...for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards and other needful buildings...." The Constitutional authority for taking private property is limited to property to be used by the government.

The practice of government taking private property for economic development expanded rapidly after the 1981 Michigan Supreme Court decision that allowed the city of Detroit to take private property from 1500 citizens in a 465-acre tract, so a General Motors assembly plant could be built on the site.

Cities everywhere began to create "economic development authorities" to exercise the power of eminent domain to remove private property owners from land that the city could resell to developers who would produce higher property tax revenues for the city.

The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the infamous "Poletown" decision in July, 2004. Since this reversal, cities have been very nervous, even though the decision affected only Michigan cities. Now that the Kelo vs. New London case has reached the U.S. Supreme Court, cities are pulling out all the stops to try to convince the Court that their use of eminent domain for economic benefit fits within Constitutional authority.

The American Planning Association, the National Congress for Community Economic Development, the National League of Cities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Conference of State Legislators, the National Association of Counties, and many other similar organizations filed amicus briefs on behalf of the city. Susette Kelo's case was argued by the Institute for Justice. Supporting briefs were filed by dozens of organizations and individuals, including the American Farm Bureau, the Home Builders Association, the National Association of Realtors, Property Rights Foundation of America, Richard Epstein & the Cato Institute, and many others.

This is the most important eminent domain case to reach the Supreme Court in 50 years.

If Susette Kelo wins, the practice of eminent domain takings for economic development will come to a screeching halt. Hundreds of cases now pending will be dropped. Cities will lose one of their most important tools in shaping community development and increasing tax revenues.

If the Supreme Court decides that "economic development" does not fit the definition of legitimate government use suggested in the Constitution, the question arises: does "environmental protection" fit the Constitutional definition? The power of eminent domain has been used to force hundreds of people from their homes in South Florida, to protect the Everglades.

Jesse Hardy is awaiting a court hearing now that will determine whether the state can take his 160-acre homestead in a massive effort to restore the Everglades to its pre-development condition.

If New London wins, no person anywhere in the United States can be secure in the ownership of private property. Just as the government has broadened its power of eminent domain to cover economic development and environmental protection, it will use this power to achieve whatever goal it chooses.

Private property will no longer be sacred - officially. John Adams, and his philosophy, will be erased from the principles on which the United States was founded. The consequences of this decision will shape the 21st century in America.

A free market cannot exist when government becomes the major, determining player. Freedom cannot exist when the government assumes the power to take whatever property it wants from the individual who owns it. As John Adams says, "Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist."

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


Henry Lamb is the founding Chairman of Sovereignty International (1996), and the founding ECO of the Environmental Conservation Organization (1988). He is publisher of eco-logic Powerhouse, a widely read on-line, and print magazine. His columns are frequently translated into Spanish and published throughout Central and South America, Spain, Portugal, and Italy. He has attended United Nations meetings around the world, is a frequent speaker at conferences and workshops across the country, and is a regular guest on dozens of talk radio programs. He has provided testimony for the U.S. Congress, as well as State Legislatures, and has served as a consultant to FOX News on U.N. affairs.

For eight years, he was CEO of a national trade association for contractors, headquartered in Chicago, coming to that position from CEO of a private construction company specializing in erosion control and water management structures. His background includes teaching at the secondary school level, and serving four years as a legislative analyst for a county government in Florida. E-Mail: