- Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

SHOCKING Global Control System Exposed - What is Going On With SERCO

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0


Watch Video Here:

More notes on this massive deception !

1. Political forums are separate and superior jurisdictions than law or commerce.

That's why treaties are the highest form of law recognized in the Constitution along with the Treaty between the People beginning with the Declaration and the perpetuity the Confederation between the States directly representing the People. Article 6 Constitution.

2. America is unique in that the People are Sovereign and from that position created the law forum from which to control commerce.

3. The main source of commercial value in Britain is HUMAN CAPITAL, subjects. This is true for all other forms of government in 1776.

4. 1783 Treaty of Peace at Article 1 in particular exposes the Peoples Sovereignty.

Article 1: His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states, that he treats with them as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety, and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof.

5. The key is to understand the word "propriety", which as defined means, all forms of private chattel, movable, property or SUBJECTS !

6. "The take over of our law, commerce, and operations by British subjects -- corporations being subjects as well -- is not only a Breach of Treaty, but an act of War." The term "commercia  beli" defines the Queens operations as 'Commercial Warfare'.

7. "No King can enter a Treaty with those of lesser standing." His own subjects were required to be recognized as equals or superior in order for the 1783 Treaty to be considered valid under the Law Of Nations at that time. Furthermore, the King could not Treaty with subjects of other crowns, as doing such would be viewed as an act of war.

9. The Breach of Treaty by taking profit from the acts of British subjects while failing to honor the Treaty makes the Queen and Crown fully liable for all harm, injury and damages.

10. There is a single agent that is empowered to settle charges or claims against British subjects, and that is The Plenipotentiary Ambassador from Great Britain. Understanding of the definition of  'plenipotentiary' is KEY !

Treaty Article 5;   And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights. (while this section was set in 1783 it is still binding today because British subjects under control of the Queen are bound by the same terms as their master or owner. This is English Common Law and Law of Nations. )

Treaty Preamble 

In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse , between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the tenor thereof, have constituted and appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his part, David Hartley, Esqr., member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their part, John Adams, Esqr., late a commissioner of the United States of America at the court of Versailles, late delegate in Congress from the state of Massachusetts, and chief justice of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary of the said United States to their high mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands; Benjamin Franklin, Esqr., late delegate in Congress from the state of Pennsylvania, president of the convention of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the court of Versailles; John Jay, Esqr., late president of Congress and chief justice of the state of New York, and minister plenipotentiary from the said United States at the court of Madrid; to be plenipotentiaries for the concluding and signing the present definitive treaty; who after having reciprocally communicated their respective full powers have agreed upon and confirmed the following articles.

So, my question is "Why is no one focusing on the superior political forum where American liberty resides?"

"Everyone is lost on the results and looses sight of the cause."

Loosing sight of the cause means we have a private money and private foreign law and commerce system controlling our political forums. This is an act of WAR, an invasion on our soil, on our law, on our People.

So, in the context of a foreclosure, when the Queen/Crown benefits from the trespass and theft of homes, does the ultimate liability lay on the Queen for the respondent superior, owner, of the agents and agencies committing the acts?????

What agenda is driving this crap??? How does anyone or more to the point, why do these characters 'forget' 200 years of operations and then draw the conclusion the current operations go back to the beginning?

What happened in the interim? That's the key.

Perhaps the marriage of the Prince and the sales job has something to do with the British hostile take over of the corporate government structure.

Look at the time lines of the creation and bolstering of these foreign actors operations in the context of PC speech, women's movement, new age movement, LBGT movement, control and censoring of WEB speech, and the endless attacks on the principles of liberty through self government.

Reactive behavior kills critical thinking and simple review of the facts in and on public records world wide.

The simple way to state this whole agenda is very direct and exposes the intent.

What better way to benefit from management of human capital is there than to have the Slaves create their own chains through belief they have no options?

If you are subject to control by something with out your informed consent are you a Slave???

Is self imposed slavery or voluntary servitude a crime????

When you enslave your self who is responsible???


Charles Miller