d States a major power in the Middle East; to provide a democratic alternative to the typical Arab autocracy; to give the United States control of major oil fields; to take pressure off Israel, and to establish that the United States was a superpower that could go anywhere in the world and do anything it wanted. The "war on terror" was only a pretext to implement this plan, as accounts of the early White House reaction to the Sept. 11 attack seem to indicate."

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.

But it cannot survive treason from within."

­ Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator, 106-43 B.C.

23 April 2004

There's a sign on the horizon, no bigger than a man's hand, that there's a military draft in the works. The Defense Department has announced that Selective Service is making preparations for another draft, "in case one is needed." The New York Times in an inane editorial pleads with the president to articulate a goal for the war that if it "was clear and comprehensive and people understood how to reach it, then Mr. Bush could . . . even bolster the desperately straitened military with a draft if Americans understood the need to sacrifice."

If the editorial writers of the New York Times are talking about a new draft that would send young men and women to die in the deserts of Iraq fighting crazy religious fanatics, then the idea is certainly being whispered about in the upper echelons of American society. A draft would not be proposed before the election -- if it were, Bush would be wiped out in a landslide. But a wise person would not bet against the draft being proposed next January.

What in the world is the Times talking about? Why should Americans sacrifice for the Iraq War? Not by the wildest stretch of the imagination can one seriously argue that the war in Iraq is to defend vital American interests. We found that there were no weapons of mass destruction there and no connection with al-Qaida or the Sept. 11 attack. The only issue seems to be whether we can impose democracy on Iraqis who don't seem seriously to want it or to prevent a civil war that will happen anyway as soon as our army leaves. Americans are supposed to accept the need to sacrifice their unwilling sons and daughters to fight for such absurd goals?

There are many authoritarian liberals who have a kind of illicit romance with the draft. Young people owe their a country a part of their lives, even their lives itself (not their own sons and daughters' lives, of course). Military service is good for you, some veterans insist. It will make a man out of a drifting late adolescent. What it will do for a young woman remains to be seen -- probably teach her how to live in a world where rape is commonplace.

Building up the army with a draft will serve only the needs of the Bush administration to "win" a war. Gen. Eric Shinseki, then-chief of staff of the Army, said that 200,000 would be needed to pacify Iraq. Donald Rumsfeld made fun of him in public. Now the Defense Department seems to be engaged in remote planning for a draft army that will be much larger.

How many men and women, it must be asked, will be required to pacify Iraq and to turn it into a freedom-loving democracy? How long will it take, how many lives must be sacrificed to protect the honor and the legacy of Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld and their crowd of imperialists?

Doubtless it will be argued in favor of a draft that we all must make sacrifices for a war on terrorism. It might be better if one sent men and women in their 40s to fight in a foolish, unjust, immoral, criminal war. It would be good for them. They'd have to lose weight and get back in physical condition.

Bush has made "the war on terrorism" a mantra to cover everything his administration has done. But the Iraq war has nothing to do with the war on terrorism, as we now know. It was a plan of Cheney and Rumsfeld and their coterie of "neo-conservative" intellectuals (like Paul Wolfowitz) long before they came to power. It was supposed to make the United States a major power in the Middle East; to provide a democratic alternative to the typical Arab autocracy; to give the United States control of major oil fields; to take pressure off Israel, and to establish that the United States was a superpower that could go anywhere in the world and do anything it wanted.

The "war on terror" was only a pretext to implement this plan, as accounts of the early White House reaction to the Sept. 11 attack seem to indicate.

Does one have to say that none of these goals have been achieved or can be achieved?

I wonder why Sen. John Kerry sounds so much like Hubert Humphrey in his support of the continuation of the war. I hope at least he makes opposition to a new draft a major issue in the election.

###

"The World Wide Web is where the genuine information is today. The mass media have deteriorated into a deceptive and delusional miasma of propaganda pitches designed not to tell the truth about current events, but to spin them in ways that will be profitable to the patricians who own the media outlets and pay for the deceptive advertising that ruin the health and the fortunes of ordinary citizens who are just trying to live their lives in a peaceful and orderly manner." - John Kaminski -- Kaminski's list of best sites is at http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=28296

LET'S STOP KIDDING OURSELVES! 9-11 was an Israeli-backed spanking on

our collective American bottom! A Boeing 757 DIDN'T pierce through six walls of the

Pentagon (impossible + no aircraft debris), a late model cruise missile did the job;

the Twin Towers DIDN'T collapse due to heat (impossible), demolition charges

did the job; there were NO Arab hijackers (the jets were guided electronically);

and the Zionists/Judeo-Christians now in control of the United States are traitors

to the U.S. Constitution... as well as being mass murderers.This has been a Zionist

WAG THE DOG operation from the start, deadly serious for our elected leaders

WHO KNOW WHO'S GUILTY, and an Arabian Nights charade for Mom and Pop

in Littletown, U.S.A.! It's an info war! Forward this to the world! henri@alaska.net

"When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS." - Mohandas Gandhi

Courage is the fearless faith

in a greater good of, by & for a

Higher Power

that is willing to do

what the poor in spirit are not

able or willing to do;

"feed my sheep".

subscribe at geonotes@mcn.net and network freely

~~~~~~~~~

CopyRound 2003, HEARTcom Services all rights well-rounded

High Touch HEART of High Tech

With a Higher Understanding of LOVE

Defining, Refining, Combining and Shining

Our God-given Gift and Talents via Net Standards

For a New Economy based on LOVE-centric Net Worth.

- Positioning E-Valuation Criteria -- HEARTware(tm) -- along more Enlightened Lines

- Networking the Vision of Ultimate Virtues for the Victory of Global and Local Civility

- Framing Personalized Gateways from Cyberspace to Innerspace with HEARTware

- Centering and Connecting Higher Wholistic E-Valuation Cyberethics for Net Worth

- Involving & Evolving Spherical~Spiritual "High Touch" TeLeComputing with a Heart

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------