Adam Schiff Just Got Caught – New Evidence Shows He May Have Twisted Lev Parnas Text Messages
Adam Casalino
Surprise, surprise! It looks like Adam Schiff may have been leading America astray once again.
Before the Senate impeachment trial began, we got word about a man named Lev Parnas.
This man, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani, claimed that Trump spoke with him about pressuring Ukraine.
After Trump denied it, Parnas took it back and admitted had never spoken with Trump about pressuring Ukraine. Whoops.
But Adam Schiff released evidence of test messages that Parnas discussed with Giuliani “trying to get us mr Z.” Schiff apparently thought this was proof of a Trump conspiracy.
Now America is getting to see the full conversation, and it looks like Schiff may have been deliberately twisting the conversation for his benefit.
From Politico:
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga…
In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,”
But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.
It looks like the “Mr Z” discussed was a Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma.
We know that Giuliani has been trying to get to the bottom of the Biden-Burisma connection. He’s been working with Ukraine to discover what Joe and Hunter Biden were really up to.
So it makes sense that he would have reached out to the founder of the company Hunter had worked for.
Yet Schiff may have misled his colleagues by claiming the “Mr Z” discussed was, in fact, the President of Ukraine, Zelensky.
That would make it look like Parnas was trying to coordinate with the President of Ukraine.
Getting a bit desperate, are we Schiff?
Schiff’s impeachment has been built around the accusation that Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden.
(Even though Zelensky himself has denied any pressure again and again.)
It seems Schiff wanted America to believe that Giuliani was trying to get to Zelensky, a sign that Trump was indeed pressuring the president.
But it turns out to be totally wrong.
Was Schiff openly lying? He had access to the unredacted content, right? Why would he imply something that seems to be wrong according to the new evidence?
Is Schiff so driven to remove Trump from office, that he’d just lie through his teeth?