Oct. 27, 2016

 

From a reliable source but if you would like check it out!

 

Subject: Letter to Comey from former FBI Agent

September 2, 2016

Mr. James Comey, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

 

Sir,

 

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing

the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was

being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the

Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her.

Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced

from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant

evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to

not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court. However, you personally

re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State

describing her actions as "extremely careless" in using a personal

email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of

State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

 

 

 

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this

letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a

Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and

experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions,

which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating

procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the

finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent

and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not

be silent.

 

 

 

Sorry, but NO SIR, Ms Clinton was not merely careless or extremely

careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the

statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her

decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control

and possession in order to control what information was available to

the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of

 State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications

into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly

and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could

never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character

against her.

 

 

 

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to

unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule

of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have

set a precedent that can never be rectified, and certainly not

justified. Shame on you, sir. You ought to resign right now in

disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the

finest law enforcement agency in the world, for entirely political

reasons.

 

 

 

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of

agents, with one being the case agent, or the lead investigator. When

the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be

presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It

would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution

for that investigation. NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton

investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the

investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S.

but instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even

provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to

take this upon yourself.

 

 

 

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence,

or 51%, is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even

that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling?

What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

 

 

 

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took

great pride in conducting each investigation in an  unbiased manner

regardless of the subjects' position or standing in  the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, sir, decided to allow

this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged

for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion)  which

threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short

of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering

Influenced and Corrupt Organization). This is a RICO case if there

ever was one. Even an untrained person can tell from the

communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more

time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than

on state business.  It may be argued that Hillary did not

do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefited. You

decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

 

 

 

I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I

volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law

Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject

matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that

year I operated "outside the wire" patrolling with the troops,

interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the

bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure

channels to the commanding officer.  All reports and communications

were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices.

Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made

transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air

Base in order to securely report to the commander of the battle space.

It would have been convenient if I could have just called the

commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my

personal laptop. But, had I done so, I would have been reporting

classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been

compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State

communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent

even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to

Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation

is considered.

 

 

 

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO

activities and is running for President of the United States , the

most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of

Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in

unbiased enforcement of the law.  How do you sleep at night? It is

time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

 

 

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI  Agent, Retired)

 

 

 

From: addintlusa @comcast.net