According to J.B. Williams with CanadaFreePress.com, the answer is yes. In fact, Williams goes so far as to claim that "a conspiracy to mislead and ultimately defraud voters took place at the top of the Democrat Party."

Williams provides documentation to back up his assertions and claims Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi "knew that she was signing a false statement on behalf of Obama."

    Williams argues:

"A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.... They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power...."

    Such a story, to put it mildly, is a bombshell. Williams, to be fair, makes a credible argument that officials in the highest level in our government may actually believe that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States.

     So why does the Mainstream Media refuse to address this bombshell?

     No answers are forthcoming on why they won't investigate allegations published in the Canadian press... even to refute them... no attempt to either verify or refute William's claims... not even an easily answered softball question directed at Nancy Pelosi asking her to respond to William's assertion that "she was signing a false statement on behalf of Obama."

    There can no longer be any doubt that what you and at least 100 million other Americans suspected all along is true.

    Simply put, the editors and publishers and reporters of the Mainstream Media may actually suspect that Obama is constitutionally ineligibility to hold the office of President of the United States and their stonewalling and ridicule is an egregious attempt to cover-up (rather than cover) the story.

    And such blatant political advocacy (even on the part of a biased media) cannot be allowed to go unanswered. With your help, we're going to demand answers right here and right now.

A Tale Of Two Documents.

     Williams reveals a disturbing and indisputable fact; namely that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) produced and notarized two separate documents certifying the candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama.

     The first reads: "This is to certify that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

     The second reads: "This is to certify that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:"

     The second document, which according to Williams was filed in 49 states with the exception of Hawaii, is clearly missing the phrase, "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

     Both documents were notarized on August 28, 2008 by Shalifa A. Williamson and signed by Nancy Pelosi (in her capacity as Chair of the DNC) and Alice Travis Germond (Secretary of the DNC).

     And the question that no one in the Mainstream Media is asking is: Why.... Why were two documents produced and why was the document that omits the phrase "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" the version that was filed in as many as 49 states?

     According to Williams "the fact that two DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and notarized by the same individuals on the same day, means that a very real conspiracy to commit election fraud was underway."

     Perhaps. Or then again, perhaps there is a perfectly logical and reasonable explanation as to why the two documents exist, but Pelosi's office won't comment other than to acknowledge that they are aware of the controversy.

     And the Mainstream Media isn't asking any questions? Why not?

     It's time for us to push the point.

What Does Nancy Pelosi Know ?

     Williams asks if the second document was produced because Pelosi and other officials at the DNC doubted Obama's eligibility and did not want to open themselves up to charges of perjury at a later date.

     In order to validate his contention, Williams consulted a handwriting expert.

     According to Williams, the conclusions of the handwriting expert's analysis are as follows:

"All three signers of the certification that included the constitutionally eligible clause were aware that it was not true at the time they signed it."

     And that revelation leads Williams to conclude that "some form of a conspiracy to mislead and ultimately defraud voters took place at the top of the Democrat Party." and that "Nancy Pelosi knew that she was signing a false statement on behalf of Obama."

     At the very least, it's an accusation that demands a response, but don't hold your breath expecting Obama and Pelosi to start leveling with the American people.

     That's why we need to demand that editors and producers, if they ever want our business again, start covering a major story about a president who apparently has deceived his way into the land's highest office.

Western Center for Journalism

P.S. Even if you can not join us in this effort right now, you can still help us expose Barack Hussein Obama by sending this e-mail to at least 10 of your friends.

• Go Back

Related in this Category