Saturday I went to a town hall in front of Patrick Murphy's Bristol office. 40-50 people were there-- at least 80% supporting the public option.

Murphy walked up to the group with a three inch binder with a lot of tabs in it. It was the house health insurance bill. He told us he'd read it and when anti-public option people brought up issues, like free health care for illegal immigrants, he was quick to point out the page where that is specifically not allowed.

Murphy's a bluedog Democrat, meaning he insists that legislation pay for itself, or be budget neutral and that's what he said he would require for any healthcare reform.

I was impressed by the way he handled the impassioned concerns of anti-health reform constituents. He usually had answers and when he didn't he offered them further access for discussion. I talked to a few afterwards and they were satisfied with his responses.

But during the town hall, Patrick pointed out to one reform opponent that he doesn't always go with the liberal point of view. He specifically pointed to ME and said, I don't agree with liberals like Rob, who supports single payer." Later he went on to say that he would oppose single payer which makes all doctors government employees, and which would make all health care run by the government. (I had mixed feelings on him pointing me out. It gave me street cred among other liberals there, but I have his bumper sticker on my car-- one he handed me personally at a house party I held for him, which over 60 people attended, before he was first elected. I felt a bit used, as an example of a liberal he doesn't agree with.)

Note the nurse with the pursed lips. She opposed health reform

That's perrennial Bucks County Nam Vet activist Bill Perry holding the sign

When he gave me my turn to talk, I accused him of using right wing talking points. I don't know of any single payer advocates who support making all doctors government employees or governmentalizing all health suppliers, like hospitals. All single payer means is that government pays the bills. There's no hiring doctors or taking over hospitals. It's all about the PAYMENT system, not about operating businesses.

Congressman Murphy is not alone. Recently, Joe Sestak and Arlen Specter have been guilty of the same kinds of mis-characterizations of single payer-- describing it in ways that right wing opponents to all health care reform use. Maybe it's an honest mistake or maybe they've talked to too many lobbyists. But this has to stop.

After I chastised Patrick on his using GOP talking points, I asked him a few questions. I didn't get to ask him all the questions I wanted. I'll ask them here.

1- If you really want the most cost effective health plan, why not tell the Congressional Budget office that has told us that it will cost a Trillion dollars over ten years for the Obama plan to do a study on what it will cost for single payer. Previous studies suggest that it could save a trillion or more. That would be a $2 trillion saving over ten years. Last week, at Netroots nation, Howard Dean told me that congressmen have the right to ask for such studies.

2-Why don't you factor in the cost of lost jobs? America's failure to provide single payer, putting the weight of health care on businesses, makes them less competitive with manufacturers in nations where health care is government covered. That's one big reason our automotive industry has been hurt so badly.

Those were the questions I asked. He replied that he didn't think single payer would save money, but didn't say what he based his opinion. He agreed about the lost jobs factor and brought up the cash-for-clunkers program, which he helped sponsor as a way he's helped the auto industry.

I praised his backing this "wildly successful" program and pointed out it was the only one so far implemented which actually used a true bottom up approach. I suggested that we should switch to only using a bottom-up approach with the banks and finance companies-- putting up loan subsidies that banks could use only when consumers and businesses took loans.

Here are a few more questions I wanted to ask.

3-You mentioned that 20,000 people died nationwide due to lack of healthcare. Do you know how many died in Bucks County? And how many people go without prescription drugs because they have to choose between medication and putting a roof over their children's heads and food on the table?

4-Over a million people, nationwide, went bankrupt and over 60% of them did it because of medical bills, a majority of them WITH health insurance. How many of those bankruptcy victims are in Bucks county? How will a public option system that keeps private insurers in place protect the rest of us?

5- Under George Bush, Karl Rove was highly involved in directing Department of Justice federal attorneys to engage in partisan prosecutions that destroyed hundreds of people's lives. These prosecutions were 85% against Democrats and the other 15% were against moderate republicans or more visible republicans in presumed to be safe Republican seats.

In PA, prosecutor Mary Buchanan pursued a blatantly partisan, attack on Pittsburgh Democrat Cyril Wecht. This was clearly a case of prosecutorial misconduct. She "randomly" drew a Bush appointee judge who violated the most basic principles and who was ultimately overturned by another Republican. She has not been replaced by Eric Holder or President Obama. There are dozens of these Bush appointed, Rove-vetted and directed attorneys. Normally, the president has the Attorney General replace them early in his term. This has not happened yet and those toxic attorneys who have a known history of prosecutorial abuse are still at work. This should not stand. There are victims whose lives have been ruined, even victims who have been imprisoned. Thomas Jefferson faced a similar situation. He fired the attorneys, impeached some judges and released and pardoned the prisoners. What can you do about it? At least, tell John Conyers to investigate this further and tell President Obama he should act already.

I was impressed with Rep. Murphy's answers-- his knowledge of the bill and his earnest desire to work on the issue.. I was happy he independently stood his ground against his bluedog fellows in supporting the congressional public option health bill. But he has a job that is unforgiving in that as soon as something is accomplished there are more issues on the table. I've listed some reasonable ones. I hope he addresses them.

Author's Bio:

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Publisher of PositiveExperience.com a site where people share their positive experiences and where you can find tips on how to have more and better positive experiences.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out this article.

and there are Rob's quotes, here. To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived on www.whiterosesociety.org Or listen to it streaming, live at either www.wnjc1360.com or here.

Or check the archived interviews at: whiterosesociety.org

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations. -While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans. -My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

www.opednews.com/articles/Questions-for-My-Dem-Congr-by-Rob-Kall-090823-86.html