AUSTRALIA TO BECOME AN ENERGY SUPERPOWER BY 2017
The Unhived Mind [UHM]
Australia ‘to be an energy superpower’ by mid 2017
Morgan Stanley report predicts that gas exports will help country eliminate its current account deficit for the first time in four decades
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard8:30PM GMT 15 Dec 2013 CommentsComments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10519371/Australia-to-be-an-energy-superpower-by-mid-2017.html
Australia is to become a global gas superpower by the middle of the decade and eliminate its current account deficit for the first time in almost 40 years, according to Morgan Stanley.
“Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from Australia could be the next big thing,” said the bank in a new report.
It predicted a “huge ramp-up” in LNG output that could transform the country’s economy, claiming that Australia could overtake Qatar by to become the world’s biggest exporter of LNG as soon as 2017 rather that 2030 as widely assumed.
By then Australia would be a major force in global energy production, with LNG and coal exports together matching the country’s vast iron ore shipments.
Two-thirds of the world’s entire increase in traded LNG capacity is currently from Australia. While the US has a glut of natural gas from shale sources, it will be five to 10 years before it has the export terminals and infrastructure to sell large amounts on the global market.
This gives Australia a window of opportunity. It can benefit from the shortage of LNG supplies in Asia, especially in Japan where closure of nuclear reactors after the Fukushima disaster has left the country heavily dependent on gas imports. Gas is selling in Japan at almost $19 per British thermal units (BTU), compared to just $4.3 in the US.
Once dismissed as a pipe-dream, LNG has come of age with new technology since the 1990s. The breakthrough came with gas turbine technology and advances making it cheaper and safer to transport the fuel in refrigerated hulls made of molybdenum alloy at minus 116 degrees.
“The ramp-up would be enough to see Australia record a current account surplus in 2015, the first since the second quarter of 1975. It is difficult to overestimate the long-term structural importance of this industry to Australia,” said the bank’s East Asia expert Geoffrey Kendrick.
Whether it will be that easy for Australia to boost output is a disputed subject. Chevron says the cost of its Gorgon LNG project on Barrow Island with Shell and ExxonMobil off Western Australia has jumped $37bn to $54bn. It is the latest in a string of setbacks for the LNG sector.
If Morgan Stanley is right, the export share of Australia’s economy will rise from 20pc to 22pc of GDP by 2016. Energy would jump from 10pc to 18pc of total shipments. The return to surplus would be a remarkable shift for a country that has run a current account deficit averaging 4pc of GDP for the last three decades, and is currently near 5pc.
Australia is one of the world’s last surviving AAA states, yet its position is precarious. It has built up external liabilities of $855bn US dollars and has a net international investment position (NIIP) of minus 64pc of GDP, the world’s most-stretched after Europe’s Club Med bloc. The International Monetary Fund usually regards minus 30pc as a warning signal.
The LNG bonanza may give Australia a chance to stabilise its external balances and perhaps start to reverse the slide by beefing up its sovereign wealth fund, or Future Fund. The fund is a crucial means of recycling commodity wealth out of the economy and preventing the Australian dollar from rising too high.
The country is exhibiting clear signs of the “resource curse” as other sectors of industry whither on the vine, literally in the case of struggling vineyards. The beautiful wine-growing region of Hunter Valley is being “ripped apart” by coal mines, according to local activists.
General Motors has announced that it will shut down its car plant in a blue-collar district of Adelaide, blaming the “sustained strength of the Australian dollar and high cost of production”.
http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress3/2013/12/17/australia-to-become-an-energy-superpower-by-2017/
sasquatch says:
Harold Holt attempted to make Australia a resource superpower back in the 60′s before he was assassinated by intelligence. A man by the name of Gary Simmons has one hell of a story to tell about his assassination. We know this situation would be null and void if Nikola Tesla’s technology was not suppressed a hundred years ago.
- theunhivedmind says:
Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/harold_holt.htm
Gary D. Simmons’ website
I, Gary Simmons have invoked this web site under the Second Law of the Universe
because I have withdrawn my consent to their deliberate intent where I was used
for evil purposes.
Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered late Saturday night on the 16th of
December 1967, as shown in a Brisbane Supreme Court Affidavit in file No. BS
1127/04. He was then reported missing while swimming around midday on Sunday the
17th of December 1967. There is no evidence to support the “official” report of
Harold Holt drowning, nor is there any evidence of a Chinese submarine abducting
him.
Read on and judge for yourself what is “Truth”.
The Commonwealth Government’s web site at
http://www.naa.gov.au/Publications/fact_sheets/FS144.html reads:
Harold Holt disappeared while swimming at Cheviot Beach near Portsea, Victoria
on 17 December, 1967. His body was never recovered. Without determining the
cause of Holt’s death, a joint report by Commonwealth and Victoria Police,
submitted in January 1968, concluded that, ‘… there has been no indication that
the disappearance of the late Mr Holt was anything other than accidental’.
The report (see copy on file A1209, 1968/8063) found that his last movements
followed a routine domestic pattern, his demeanour had been normal and despite
his knowledge of the beach, the turbulent conditions (high winds, rough seas and
rip tides) overcame him. The explanations put forward for a failure to find the
body included an attack by marine life, the body being carried out to sea by
tides or becoming wedged in rock crevices.
While a variety of theories have been expounded about Holt’s disappearance, the
Commonwealth Government did not deem a formal inquiry necessary, accepting the
conclusions of the Police report.
Contrary to the above, Holt was murdered, because he was opposed to American
bases such as Pine Gap being built on Australian soil.
Gary Simmons, has had X-rays taken of his neck which reveal something peculiar.
An operation has been performed on his neck during the time he was a Navy diver
(30 years ago) without his knowledge or permission. This operation involved
damage to his throat and a wire being placed inside his neck. [ See website for
x-rays ]
“The fact is, if I were never involved in the disappearance of Harold Holt,
there would never have been objects placed in my throat during a surgical
operation when I was a Navy Clearance Diver. The enclosed Ct-Scan flyer’s visual
evidence is indisputable and together with the enclosed Supreme Court Affidavit,
detailing the indifferent treatment I am subjected to, validates my involvement.
— (Harold Holt’s disappearance is stated in paragraph 12 of this Affidavit)”
–G.D. Simmons
Disappearance of Harold Holt – a new inquiry!
By Carl Thompson
http://www.harold-holt.net/its_time.htm
“I saw Holt murdered” – Simmons
The disappearance of Harold Holt, Prime Minister of Australia, has mystified
everyone for years. The official story was that he drowned while swimming at
Cheviot Beach on 17 December 1967. Mr Holt was a very strong swimmer and the
official story has always been held to be dubious.
Mr Gary D. Simmons, 55, once a Navy clearance diver with a high security rating,
in an affidavit (file No. BS 1127/04) to the Brisbane Supreme Court, claims he
was involved in the “disappearance”.
Evidence ignored!
He also claims that he has submitted evidence on two previous occasions which
was ignored. The evidence he submitted in Affidavits, files BS9`66/03 and
BS1127/04, stated that as part of his duties he was engaged in clandestine
operations, one of which was the removal of the body of the then Prime Minister
of Australia, Harold Holt, from his home to a fishing boat the night before it
was reported he disappeared.
Manchurian candidate!
He further claims that he was surgically operated on during his navy service,
without his knowledge and objects placed in his neck which left him unable to
write, spell or converse with clarity for almost 30 years. To further enhance
his evidence he has tendered a Cat-Scan which clearly shows the strange objects
lodged in his throat. Gary feels the implanted objects made him like a
“Manchurian candidate” complete with trigger words which left him with memory
gaps, but in the past 12 months his mind has become clear and lucid and that he
must use this time to bring out all that he remembers. He has massed a great
deal of evidence and wishes to place it at the disposal of the authorities.
A coronal inquiry into Mr Holt’s disappearance is being scheduled soon in
Victoria and it would be criminal of them to ignore Mr Simmons’ evidence which
has been forwarded to them. Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered in an
intelligence service black operation, a former Royal Australian Navy diver has
alleged.
Brisbane man Gary Simmons claims to have towed the body of Harold Holt out to a
fishing boat and then anchored the body to the sea floor, the day before the
Prime Minister was reported missing on 17 December, 1967. Mr Simmons served in
the Royal Australian Navy between 9 July 1965 and 5 November 1971, most of which
time he spent as a clearance diver. He was discharged after medical problems
rendered him unfit to serve as a diver.
Inquest announced
Mr Simmons has presented his evidence to the Victorian State Coroner, who on 15
November began an inquest into sevral unsolved disappearances off the Victorian
coast. A spokesman for the coroner’s office said that the inquest was not
specifically into the disappearance of Mr Holt. Rather, it was an administrative
move to clear up a large number of open files.
Duty to tell the truth
Mr Simmons told this paper that he had decided to speak openly about his role in
the murder of Harold Holt because he believed that he had a duty to God to tell
the truth before he died. He said of the five people who were on the fishing
boat that day only himself and one other man were still alive.
Mind control
Simmons described drug and mind control techniques similar to those depicted in
the movie ‘The Manchurian Candidate’ and a surgical operation which placed
mysterious objects in his neck. An operation of which he has no memory but
x-rays show the objects clearly inside him.
He recollected being on the deck of a fishing boat, then going over the side
about three kilometres off shore and swimming to the shore near the then Prime
Minister’s beach house. He said that he was met at the shore and given a body
bag, which he towed back out to the fishing boat. The marathon swim with the
body bag was made possible by favourable tide and currents. Simmons said that he
was an exceptional swimmer, probably the best among the Navy’s divers at that
time, which would have been why he was chosen for the mission.
Still alive?
When he got back to the fishing boat, the body bag was opened and he saw Harold
Holt inside it.
“I think that they’d drugged him, because I think that he was still alive when I
picked him up,” Mr Simmons said.
“I remember his hair. I remember thinking how strange it was that a man in a
body bag would have such neatly combed hair.”
Mr Simmons said that he then put on SCUBA gear and took Harold Holt down to a
point on the sea floor, where he anchored the Prime Minister’s body to a weight.
Too deep
The body was attached by a tether that was supposed to come apart after a couple
of days, so that Mr Holt’s body could float to the surface and be found.
“That part of the plan failed, for some reason,” he said. “I think that I took
him too deep. Its been my experience that bodies down 70 feet or more don’t come
back up.”
Cover-ups in high places?
There have been a few people who have questioned our story about the murder of
Harold Holt and the veracity of Gary Simmons’ charges. If people doubt the story
maybe they could explain to me how the devices placed in Mr Simmons’ throat got
there and what they are for. Mr Simmons himself does not know, neither can he
remember ever having undergone any operation to place them there. He is, even
now, ignorant of their purpose, but suspects that they have a nefarious origin.
It seems incongruous that allegations of such import can be ignored by the
powers that be, but that appears to be the case, so far. The charges are clear
and concise and published widely for everyone to read. The websites:
http://www.harold-holt.net and http://www.shootersnews.addr.com being just two of the websites
dealing with Prime Minister Holt’s murder.
Murder is not affected by the statues of limitations, so you would think that
police would be happy to have such a raft of evidence to prosecute an
investigation, but sadly, and not surprisingly, they don’t manifest any great
enthusiasm.
The police are very active fining Mum, Dad and the kids for travelling a little
too fast on their way home from the beach, on behalf of Tenix Australia Pty Ltd,
but are very reticent to pursue matters of much greater interest to the
Australian pubic. Once we had a police force skilled in the law, administered
locally, and an asset to any community. Now we are burdened by a force, ignorant
of law but skilled in forcing regulations on us, administered by a power no
longer part of the community, but remote and answering to no one but their
political masters. Someone once said, “Power corrupts and absolute power
corrupts absolutely”. We should remember that quotation when they are handing
out extra powers to police.
It is now obvious to everyone who cares to read that Lee Harvey Oswald was not a
lone assassin but part of a much greater plot. Those facts were known at the
time by various authority figures, but a cover-up ensued.
Harold Holt falls into the same category and Gary Simmons is ready to tell all
he knows if anyone will listen. The Australian public must ask loudly why no one
in authority is taking notice. Their reticence can only be construed as
complicity, much as the evidence regarding the Port Arthur evidence regarding
the massacre being locked up for 50 years, a move unprecedented in Australian
criminal history, manifests the complicity of the Tasmanian authorities and also
the federal authorities. It is time that the public began to demand answers to
these questions. That is, providing we really do want to maintain our freedom!
Sacrifice is the price of freedom and sadly Australia has lost the ability to
see the benefit in sacrifice. Let us hope that the national character ha snot
been permanently damaged. –Ray Smyth
Extracts from The Nation newspaper
Copies of ‘The Nation’ newspaper can be ordered by contacting:
PO Box 1199 Beenleigh Qld 4207
Ph 07 3287 4440
Vol.4, edition 11
Murder – Former navy diver reveals role in Harold Holt mystery
By Carl D. Thompson
http://www.harold-holt.net/Extracts_Nation_News.htm
“Mr Simmons said that he could recall being involved in 14 black operations, for
which he was drugged and subjected to mind control.”
* Next month in The Nation, a retired Brisbane engineer reveals why Harold Holt
was murdered and who was behind the conspiracy.
Oil big money murdered Holt
Atomic plan engineer reveals conspiracy
By Carl D. Thompson
Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered to prevent the establishment of an
Australian atomic energy industry, said a retired engineer who was deeply
involved in the still-born project.
Brisbane man Colin Law, who was involved in the purchase and importation of
equipment that was vital to the project, said Harold Holt was murdered on the
orders international capital, in particular the Rockefeller Foundation.
In last month’s edition of The Nation, former Royal Australian Navy diver Gary
Simmons confessed to taking Harold Holt’s body down to the sea floor and
anchoring it to a weight, on 16 December 1967 as part of an intelligence service
black operation. The then Prime Minister was reported missing the following day.
Mr Law said that on 18 December 1967 Harold Holt had been due to announce the
establishment of a major Australian nuclear energy industry, which would have
made Australia the Saudi Arabia of atomic energy. He said that Australia would
have gained dominance of the world’s atomic energy industry quickly and that the
entire nation would have boomed.
This was something that could not be allowed to happen because it threatened
Rockefeller control of the world’s governments and economies through control of
the energy supply, as well as the international banking system. Mr Law said that
he was briefed on the matter by the late Sir Philip Baxter, who was the head of
the Australian Atomic Energy Commission.
“I was warned that we were being opposed by extremely dangerous people,” Mr Law
said.
“Sir Philip warned me that there were no limits to what they would do to achieve
their goals … and that included murdering a Prime Minister of Australia. The
disappearance of Prime Minister Harold Holt was no accident. Sir Philip Baxter
was well brief on this.”
Mr Law said that Harold Holt had been due to announce the construction of a
nuclear power station at Jervis Bay. This power station would have provided
cheap energy to a planned steel mill, which would have broken BHP’s monopoly of
the Australian steel industry.
It would also have allowed Australia to produce some of the cheapest steel in
the world.
“The project had the full backing of the Holt Government and was due to
proceed,” Mr Law said. According to Sir Philip, drastic action had to be taken
to stop the project. Sir Philip Baxter knew all the details and all those who
were involved.
Holt murdered by oil barons
“Naturally, with all the turmoil that followed the disappearance of Harold Holt
and the change to a Prime Minister who could be bought, the project was
shelved.”
Mr Law said that the plan to establish an Australian atomic energy industry
lingered in the background until the Hawke Labor Government was elected. That
government sold off all the equipment that had been bought and dismantled the
infrastructure that had been created since the 1960s.
Mr Law said atomic energy was safe, cheap, clean and the Holt plan would have
placed Australian in a position of global economic dominance.
The Holt plan would have created an economic boom for Australia, the likes of
which had not been seen since the industrial revolution, or the discovery of oil
in the Middle East.
He said that the so-called environmentalist movement had been telling lies about
atomic energy since the 1960s, funded by the same international capitalists who
controlled the fossil fuel energy supply. The same people who murdered Harold
Holt.
“The headquarters is the Transnational Institute in Amsterdam, with funding
coming from the tax-exempt Rockefeller Rubin Ford Foundation in the United
States,” Mr Law said.
“The list of recipients of this funding includes organisations such as
Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, The World Council of Churches, the Uniting
Church, the Communist Party of Australia and the Teachers’ Federation. They have
also created and funded the Aboriginal industry, which they use as a means to
lock away Australia’s resources and prevent the development of an atomic energy
industry.”
Mr Law said the Rockefeller agenda was about political and economic control.
“Rockefeller controls the world’s major energy resources, especially oil,” Mr
Law said.
“In the Northern Hemisphere, especially North America, the average working man
spends one third of his income on energy, mainly on oil to keep warm during the
winters. The Rockefeller wealth and power comes from controlling the price of
world energy and money.
“The philosophy is to keep the working man poor, by controlling his income
through the price of energy. When cheap alternatives occur the panic button is
pressed. Setting up the Rockefeller foundation and the investment of billions of
dollars a year to fund all the anti groups may seem a lot, but it is peanuts to
them compared with what is at stake.”
http://www.harold-holt.net/JHoward_2003.htm
Excerpted from
Letter to John Howard, dated 15 Sept. ’03
advising of denial of Civil and Human Rights.
Also you will find some information in this letter about ASIS (Australian Secret
Intelligence Service).
“… Here is some added information for your Holt inquiry: Why was everyone sent
on leave from the Navy Diving Team One except for myself before Holt’s
disappearance? Why weren’t the 12 divers from Team One recalled for the Holt
search? Why did Team One, before being sent on leave got all the search and
diving gear together for this search? (I spent 14 months on this team and was
there three months before the Holts event, which demonstrates that I have
knowledge of how this Diving Team operates and works.)
For the past 32 years, a top few at ASIS have been allowed to act like GODS
where “they” answer to no one and have stop people from inquiring about me. The
abuse of “their authority” where in the past, it has interfered in the Due
Process of law was done to conceal my issues and to stop any disclosure or
acknowledgement of me. This was done to conceal “their” own criminal act of
fraud, where for years “they” have fraudulently withheld payments and
entitlements that belong to others and me. These entitlements were to compensate
and reward us for the losses; we will suffer through our High Security.
It should be noted that “their” inference in the due process of law, is against
the High Court ruling of 1984 of A versus Hayden 56 ALR 82. This ruling was
against “them” and the Federal Government, where it stated no one can break the
laws of the land and no one can interfere in the due process of law. The High
Court ruling also states any contract or engagement having a tendency, however
slight, to affect the administration of justice is illegal and void.
The way you, your Government and the media have ignored my issues in the past is
nothing but contemptible where you choose silence over law or fair play. You
can’t have it both ways with my High Security where: you deny me law yet you
apply law against me, and where you deny me of my rights, and then you ignore me
of my entitlements. It should also be remembered that for nearly 30 years I was
unable to write, spell or speak with clarity after the operation to my throat
and these are years I can never get back.
Letter to John Howard, dated 29 Jan ’05
requesting an ex-gratia payment, or face legal action. — The purpose of these
letters is to show how these elected members of Parliament would fail in their
elected duty by ignoring the seriousness of the evidence placed before them.
http://www.harold-holt.net/JHoward29Jan05.htm
The following letter, is Gary’s explanation why this web site exists and without
interference. — It was faxed to the Prime Minister, the Federal Attorney
General and the American Consulate (Sydney) on the morning of the 28th February
2005.
26 February 2005
G. D. Simmons
15 Ludgate Street
BANYO QLD 4014
Ph:
Mr John Winston Howard
Prime Minister of Australia
3-5 National Circuit
Canberra ACT 2600
Attention: Mr John Howard Prime Minister
You are aware by all my previous correspondence, that I have always stated that
the operation to my throat was illegal and because I gave no consent for it nor
did I ever give consent to having foreign objects placed in my throat, as shown
in my CT-Scan.
I now inform you that I have involved my website http://www.harold-holt.net under the
Second Law of the Universe because I have withdrawn my consent to their
deliberate intent, where I was used for evil purposes.
The Laws of the Universe are immutable and cannot be changed or distorted. They
work without question as to whom is applying them and dire consequences for
those who interfere with them.
Note; This means there can be no interference with my website or any person
involved with it or involved with me.
If you are unable to comprehend the above, I suggest you get in touch with your
“CONTROLLER” who knows precisely what I am saying, and who is held accountable
for any interference with the position I have taken under the Second Law of the
Universe.
Gary David Simmons
The Creator is the only one, and will show us how to save our Planet. Remember
their GOD, your GOD, will be answerable to the Creator.”
http://www.libertarian.org.au/
The Australian Libertarian Society (ALS) is an organisation dedicated to the
principles of individual liberty, free markets and small government.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=203475
PM me if you want a free copy of The Nation
The Nation, is on a circulation drive. If you have not seen The Nation recently
and would like a complimentary copy, PM me with a snail mail address and I will
mail one to you immediately.
If you want something faster than snail mail, PM me your email address and I
will send a copy to you as an Adobe PDF. I need your ISP email address, not one
of the free web-based email services (such as Yahoo, Hotmail and Nightmail)
because they do not accept attachments.
The Nation is published every month and is the official voice of the One Nation
political party.
It is a tabloid and is currently four pages. Soon it will go up to eight pages.
An annual subscription costs $18.
http://www.stormfront.org/archive/t-173471What_are_you_making_for_Yule/
t-203475PM_me_if_you_want_a_free_copy_of_The_Nation.html
The Nation is published every month and is the official voice of the One Nation
political party.
Doesn’t seem to quite correct. This is the email I got.
Hello ……,
The Nation Newspaper is not the “Official newsletter” as it claims to be, but is
put out be the Beenleigh Branch of the Queensland Division. Contacts are:
Ph. (07) 3287 4440
Fax: (07) 3287 4448
Email: onenation @ gil.com.au
Website: http://www.onenation.com.au
Regards,
Jim Casidy
President One Nation NSW.
National Archives of Australia
http://www.aa.gov.au/publications/fact_sheets/FS144.html
Other conspiracy theories regarding Holt’s disappearance
By Ross Coulthart
http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/investigative/
case5.asp?MSID=a3cfd0fb2adf4feba4e30e01cb95491d
http://www.smh.com.au/cgi-bin/common/printArticle.pl?path=/articles/
2002/08/16/1029114012911.html
How a scared little country became a nuclear wannabe
By Tony Stephens
August 17 2002
As the Howard Government revs up the rhetoric about a war against Iraq and
weapons of mass destruction, a new documentary reveals how Australian
governments pushed for two decades to have their own nuclear weapons.
The documentary claims the proposed nuclear power station at Jervis Bay was not
designed primarily to produce energy for domestic consumption, but as the
centrepiece in a secret plan to fortress Australia with a nuclear arsenal.
A co-producer of the documentary, Peter Butt, said yesterday that Fortress
Australia was a “story of a country fearful of its enemies and mistrustful of
its allies that set out to buy, and ultimately construct, its own nuclear
weapons”.
He said: “With war against Iraq now likely, it’s timely to confront our own
sordid past, when we were once a frightened little country heading down exactly
the same path, without considering the consequences.”
Andrew Ross, a military analyst with the Australian Defence Studies Centre at
the University of NSW, said that the notion of Fortress Australia should be put
in the context of the Cold War, instability in Asia and Australia acting as part
of the old British Empire. But it was true that “Australian military strategists
were planning to be able to fight a nuclear war in South-East Asia in the
1960s”.
The former United Nations weapons inspector Richard Butler drew another
parallel: “Prime Minister Menzies had lied to Australia about the Vietnam War,
but we had asked to be invited to join, just as the Howard Government is asking
to be in a war against Iraq. Then Sir John Gorton, pushed by Sir Philip Baxter,
Australia’s Dr Strangelove, sought a nuclear option. Now the Howard Government
wants to spend billions on new strike aircraft.”
Sir Philip, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, predicted 30 years ago that
Australia would be a lifeboat after a nuclear war around the turn of the
century. Most of the northern hemisphere would be uninhabitable and Australians
would have to fight off an invasion by armed refugees. He urged that “the most
sophisticated and effective weapons that man could devise” be adopted.
Fortress Australia, to be screened on ABC on Thursday, draws on previously
secret documents and rare film, including some bizarre footage taken in 1963 of
a simulated nuclear test in North Queensland.
Wayne Reynolds, of Newcastle University, wrote last year in Australia’s Bid for
the Atom Bomb that Australia had hoped to secure nuclear weapons through the
United States or Britain, but the big powers agreed to limit their
proliferation. Dr Reynolds said “Australia’s Manhattan Program” would have
resulted in an Australian reactor producing weapons-grade plutonium.
The documentary reveals Baxter wanted Britain to fund a nuclear reactor close to
the Mary Kathleen uranium mine, in north-west Queensland. In 1965, Menzies asked
the Atomic Energy Commission to advise on the cost of producing
nuclear weapons. Baxter thought 30 could be produced in a year.
In 1966, the prime minister, Harold Holt, thought Australia should be as nuclear
self-sufficient as possible. In 1967, Baxter sought to restrict uranium sales to
Britain so that Australia could produce its own bombs.
Gorton was sworn in as Britain was withdrawing from Asia. He refused to sign the
Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1968 and pushed for the power station at
Jervis Bay.
Dr Ross, an assistant to cabinet secretary Sir John Bunting in 1971, said: “We
couldn’t work out why the government wanted a power station in Jervis Bay. It
didn’t make sense as an energy source.”
After succeeding Gorton as prime minister, Billy McMahon scrapped the station.
Australia signed the treaty. By the mid-1980s, it was a leader in the nuclear
disarmament campaign.
“Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300″,
by Dr. John Coleman,
Let us talk about actual case histories, the attempt to communize and
de-industrialize Italy. The Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall
be a smaller – much smaller – and better world, that is, their idea of what
constitutes a better world. The myriad’s of useless eaters consuming scarce
natural-resources were to be culled (killed). Industrial progress supports
population-growth. Therefore the command to multiply and subdue the earth found
in Genesis had to be subverted.
This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration of
industrial nation states; the destruction of hundreds of millions of people,
referred to by the Committee of 300 as “surplus population,” and the removal of
any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee’s global planning to
reach the foregoing objectives.
Two of the Committee’s earliest targets were Italy and Pakistan. The late Aldo
Moro, Prime Minister of Italy, was one leader who opposed “zero growth” and
population-reductions planned for his country, thereby incurring the wrath of
the Club of Rome commissioned by the “Olympians” to carry-out its policies in
this regard. In a Rome courtroom on November 10th, 1982, a close friend of
Moro’s testified that the former prime-minister was threatened by an agent of
the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), who is also a Committee of
300 member, while he was still the U.S. Secretary of State. The meteoric rise of
the man the witness named as Kissinger will be dealt with later.
It will be recalled that Prime Minister Moro was kidnapped by the Red Brigades
in 1978 and subsequently brutally shot to death. It was at the trial of members
of the Red Brigades that several of them testified to the fact that they knew of
high-level U.S. involvement in the plot to kill Moro. When threatening Moro,
Kissinger was obviously not carrying out U.S. foreign-policy, but rather acting
according to instructions received from the Club of Rome, the foreign-policy arm
of the Committee of 300. The witness who delivered the bombshell in open court
was a close associate of Moro’s, Gorrado Guerzoni.
His explosive testimony was broadcast over Italian television and radio on
November l0th, 1982, and printed in several Italian newspapers yet this vital
information was suppressed in the U.S. Those famous bastions of freedom with a
compelling right-to-know, the Washington Post and the New York Times, did not
think it important to even print a single line of Guerzoni’s testimony.
Nor was the news carried by any of the wire-services or television-stations. The
fact that Italy’s Aldo Moro had been a leading politician for decades, and who
was kidnapped in broad daylight in the Spring of 1978, all of his bodyguards
butchered in cold blood, was not deemed newsworthy, even though Kissinger stood
accused as an accomplice to these crimes? Or was the silence BECAUSE of
Kissinger’s involvement?
In my 1982 exposé of this heinous crime, I demonstrated that Aldo Moro, a loyal
member of the Christian Democrat Party, was murdered by assassins controlled by
P2 Masonry with the object of bringing Italy into line with Club of Rome orders
to de-industrialize the country and considerably reduce its population. Moro’s
plans to stabilize Italy through full employment and industrial and political
peace would have strengthened Catholic opposition to Communism and made the
destabilization of the Middle East – a prime goal – that much harder.
From the foregoing it becomes clear just how far ahead the conspirators plan.
They do not think in terms of a Five Year Plan. One needs to go back to
Weishaupt’s statements about the early Catholic Church to understand what was
involved in the murder of Aldo Moro. Moro’s death removed the roadblocks to the
plans to destabilize Italy, and as we now know, enabled conspiracy-plans for the
Middle East to be carried out in the Gulf War 14 years later.
……
IMF AND THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES.
Revealing the real motive behind the so-called foreign aid Dr Coleman tells us:
“One needs to have a clear understanding of just why the fake ‘environmentalist
movement’, established and financially supported by the Club of Rome’, was
called upon to wage a war against nuclear energy—with nuclear energy generating
electricity at cheap rates and in abundant supplies, third world countries would
gradually become independent of US and IMF aid and begin to assert their
sovereignty. Dependence on foreign aid actually keeps other countries in
servitude of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR)”.
Oil from natural gas
The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Adelaide University in 1976 financed by Mobil Oil (Rockefeller) invented a
process to convert natural gas to synthetic fuels. As they did not patent it,
Mobil used the process to build the Motunui Synthetic fuel plant. Opened in 1986
this plant takes natural gas from both the offshore Maui and offshore Kapuni gas
fields and converts the combined gas feed first to methanol and then to
synthetic gasoline via the Mobile Methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) process.
Located 20km north of New Plymouth, New Zealand, the plant produces a premium
unleaded gasoline blendstock suitable for use directly in the transport fuel
market. The total annual production from the plant is equivalent to about one
third of the New Zealand gasline market. When combined with the production of
condensates associated with the off-take of Maui and Kapuni gas, plus the use of
CNG and LPG as a fuel, this has enabled New Zealand to achieve almost 50% self
sufficiency in petroleum products, a significant shift from the situation in the
early 1980s when the country was 85% dependent on foreign oil.
Australia also has vast natural gas fields and gas from the is sold as ‘Autogas’
(LPG) which is either refined from natural gas or blended with the propane, the
by-product of oil refining which is normally burnt off into the atmosphere.
Rather than using the MTG process, it is converted to a liquid by pressuring it
to 150 psi and stored in a separate tank. A converter returns it to a gas, which
is injected into the engine.
This way it costs only about three cents per litre, however this must be
compared with the cost of producing oil which provides about 280 litres of fuel
per barrel, Bass Strait oil costs less than $3 a barrel to produce.
Fuel reprocessing
The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Monday 15th August 05: The ABC ‘Four Corners’ programme on the electricity
generation industry was the usual well-orchestrated litany of lies and
half-truths which the CFR’s influenced Peter Garret circulates on this topic.
The programme was in fact a beat up to promote the Kyoto scam, and the lie about
harmless carbon dioxide that is essential for plant life. The real deadly
by-product is sulphur dioxide, which kills plant life (forests) and does not
decay.
The ABC showed only the older side of the industry, highlighting the by-product
storage from it, maybe this was intentional or maybe its because the industry no
longer makes it latest technology public. The truth is, with new reactor
technology and re-processing, what little is left is encapsulated in the small
slug shown above with final decay life now being reduced to a minimum.
What is not clearly understood is that the CFR through their foundations, fund
Greenpeace and other anti-nuclear power as the biggest threat to their control
over the price of energy (oil),. Over 40% of household income in North America
is spent on oil just to keep warm in the winter. Their control of the media is
used to promote the lie of shortages to justify their greed for price increases,
this is apparent when you go to fill up at the fuel pump.
Through their control of the IMF it has now been revealed that a 10% slush fund
is available to control our two party system of government. This has resulted in
the dismantling of the National Energy Research Development Corporation and the
sell out of the control of our vast energy resources to foreign control. OPEC
pricing, excise taxes and GST give us the highest domestic fuel prices of all of
the fuel exporting countries.
Unlike he Arab OPEC countries where fuel is only a few cents a litre, our
government exploits us to further CFR globalist greed.
Lets examine the lies about the prospect of a nuclear waste dump in Australia.
To start with there is o such thing as waste in the nuclear industry, spent fuel
is in storage waiting reprocessing. With the older reactors it was not possible
to fully recycle all the fuel, tis resulted in this minute amount needing to be
disposed.
To this end the Australian National University developed the Synroc process that
encapsulates this material into a small disc that can be held in your hand. For
safety it is normally buried in an area of safe stable earth structure where it
can be left to decay back to a harmless state.
here has been many lies circulated about decay life, however from confidential
information I had before retiring, this decay life had been reduced from years
down to weeks and maybe now hours.
The latest reactors coming into service are far more efficient than the older
ones, especially those operating in the old eastern block communist countries.
The Fast Breeder types recycle spent fuel and are the closest thing to a
complete renewable energy cycle.
The reprocessing of nuclear fuel is worth $ billions, however control over the
complete fuel cycle is worth $ trillions. Australia has over 40% of the world’s
known supplies of uranium. By mining and enriching it then producing fuel rods
for lease to the world’s nuclear power stations on condition the spent fuel is
returned to us for reprocessing, not only gives us control over the complete
nuclear cycle, it is also worth more than all the Arab oil combined. There are
now over 441 nuclear power stations operating around the world in about 37
countries with another 72 on the way. Nuclear power drives most modern navies
and space vehicles. It will eventually power most shipping and supply water via
desalination plants.
Australia has the resources, the knowledge and even the equipment to undertake
such a project, this I can assure you of as I did play a part in obtaining it.
Australia should export more uranium according to the resources Minister Ian
MacFarlane in responding to news that the Labor Party backed the idea of
increasing sales to Communist China.
However what he failed to mention was that uranium should not be exported as
yellow cake, it should be processed here to fuel rods and then leased on
condition that the spent rods are returned for reprocessing.
This then provides us with complete control. Currently there is only the useless
non-proliferation agreement that was drawn up by the Rockefellers to protect
their oil interest from competition.
The choice is simple, we can go forward and become one of the wealthy countries
and at the same time play our part in defusing explosive world situation which
are all caused by perceived shortages of energy. The other alternative is to
believe all the lies and propaganda of the CFR and keep giving away our
resources and jobs, increasing our debt until we eventually lose control of our
country. Remember, it is all about the struggle for power, organisations that
are powerful enough to dispose of a prime minister and use their slush funds to
buy others, will do all in their power to retain control of Australia.
Write to your local Federal and State Member of Parliament. Ask them to bring
back ‘Energy and Oil Cost price regulation’.
Recently the editor wrote to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
asking for an explanation of how pricing for petrol and other fuel products was
determined, given that it seemed logical that some Australian agency should be
overseeing the maximum retail amount that could be charged to customers.
The answer I received pointed out that (quote) “Prior to 1 August 1998 the ACCC
endorsed the maximum wholesale prices for petrol and diesel of the major and
established freight differentials. On that day petrol and diesel prices were
deregulated and wholesalers are now free to set their own prices based on market
conditions.” (end quote)
The reply went on to say that – Petrol and diesel are internationally traded
commodities. As such, if prices in Australia were lower than international
prices, domestic producers would have an incentive to export them overseas,
which could lead to shortages in Australia. Australia currently imports around
15% of total petrol consumed in Australia, for which refiners would have to pay
the international price.
Therefore, I believe we should ask, how much do refiners pay for locally sources
oil? And it becomes obvious that we are being ripped off by petrol companies who
gain the extra profit by buying cheaper local product and selling at
international retail prices. Of course, the federal government also benefits
from the higher taxes gained from artificially inflated retail prices.
The letter closed with (quote), “The issue of regulation of prices is one for
the Australian Government to determine. You should address your question to the
Australian Treasury.” (end)
One Nation asks all readers to do just that, write to the Treasury and ask them
to set a local retail maximum price for petrol and diesel based on actual local
wholesale prices paid by refiners, and legislate to control the price of
exported product at international prices to avoid chicanery from the industry.
I suggest the answer you get will confirm who controls the Australian Government
and its ministers.
The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Synfuel
Synfuel or synthetic fuel is a process of converting hydrocarbons into petrol.
Feedstock to efficiently do this is either coal or natural gas. Of the many
other various processes of producing synthetic fuels, most fail as the cost of
the feedstock is greater than the output and thus require $ billions in
government subsidies.
First we take a look at ‘Oil from coal’, as Australia has huge resources of
coal. The question is, can it be converted to a liquid fuel at an economical
price?
Oil from coal
One of the prime causes of Germany’s defeat in WWI was its lack of petroleum.
German leaders resolved never again to be dependent upon outside world for
gasoline. Germany may not have had oil deposits within its territory, but it did
have abundant reserves of coal. One of the first goals of the German chemists
after the war therefore, was to find a way to convert coal into gasoline.
By 1920 Dr Bergius had discovered ways to make large quantities of hydrogen and
force it, under great pressure, high temperatures and in the presence of
specific catalysts, into liquid coal products. The final steps into refined
gasoline were then assured. It was only a matter of perfecting the hydrogenation
process – IG suddenly was in the oil business.
Farben used its vitally important new discovery to open doors that led to the
creation of a worldwide cartel, “Frank Howard of Standard Oil was invited to
visit the great Baldische plant at Ludwigshafen in March of 19266. What he saw
was astounding – gasoline from coal! In a near state of shock, he wrote to
Walter Teagle, president of Standard Oil:
“Based upon my observations and discussions today, I think that this matter is
the most important which has ever faced the company. “The Baldische can make
high-grade motor oil fuel from lignite and other low quality coals, in amounts
up to half the weight of the coal. This means absolutely the independence of
Europe on the matter of gasoline supply. Straight price competition is all that
is left …” I shall not attempt to cover any details, but I think this will be
evidence of my state of mind.”
During the three years that followed, intense negotiations took place between
Farben and Standard Oil. These resulted in the ‘marriage’ of the two industrial
giants on November 9, 1929. Under the agreement, Standard Oil was given a
one-half share of all rights to the hydrogenation process in all countries
except Germany. Standard gave Farben 546,000 shares of its stock valued t more
than $30,000,000. Both parties agreed never to compete with each other in the
fields of chemistry and petroleum production. The goal was to remove competition
and to guarantee a surge in profits.
The Nation newspaper (8 pages) – PO Box 1199, Beenleigh 4207,
email onenation @ gil.com.au, Ph. (07) 3287 4440