South Australian Government Wants Forced Vaccination and Medical Treatment
Please pass this to everyone you can.. this insures that every child would be immunised at birth if you want it or not.. our rights are being taken from us under the guise of what they think is best for us.. what is the difference from this to communism, total control of the people. We have no way of stopping them experimenting on us if this is passed, and with labor in government in every state but one and in federally, it will go right throughout Australia.
Home birthing illegal & the SA Government wants mandatory vaccination.
There must be something in the water (actually there is, its fluoride, arsenic, lead and cadmium). It seems like many world governments are bent more and more on legislation to keep us so safe. Yet so safe we can no longer exercise any freedom of choice! And their idea of safety comes with side affects more dangerous than the disease or problem at hand.
Here are some of the latest government initiatives that stand to infringe upon our freedoms of choice.
Home Birthing Illegal?
Some of you may know about recent moves by the Australian federal Government to make homebirth midwifery illegal. If this legislation passes after committee then a midwife could face up to $30,000 fines for assisting in a homebirth. This effectively plays into the hands of the medical associations and medical industry.
Please send your letter to the Federal Government Committee that is reviewing the details of this Bill as they are asking for submissions from the public.
We have until the 11th of December to submit our views.
You can read more here:
This SMH article is also a good summary: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/roxon-joins-mother-of-birthing-battles-20090816-elwo.html
You can send your petition/letter here:
http://www.healthpetitions.com.au/please-do-not-make-homebirth-illegal
South Australian Government wants right to detain sick people
Another issue that will become a problem in the new year, the South Australian Labour Government is moving towards making medical intervention mandatory with regards to vaccination....and even cancer treatments and other such diseases.
The South Australian State election will be held on March 20th 2010. As this week (Dec1st-3rd) is the last sitting week of South Australian Parliament and the Bill has not been introduced to the South Australian Parliament, nor has consultation on the Bill been finalised; therefore this issue is unlikely to be debated before the new State Parliament sits in May 2010. We will keep you informed.
_______________________-
| SA Government wants right to detain sick people |
| Written by Jill Pengelly |
| Sunday, 29 November 2009 00:04 |
|
Under draft legislation proposed by the State Government, someone with swine flu, measles or meningococcal disease could be forcibly held, examined and treated.
It is one of several wide-ranging powers sought to protect the public. (or under the guise of protecting us).. The Public Health Bill also would, for the first time, give authorities the power to override parents who refused treatment for their children with infectious conditions.
Other diseases that could be controlled include AIDS, polio, rabies, salmonella and cholera.
The tougher enforcement powers would come with a substantial increase in fines - up from $60,000 to $1 million and 10 years' jail - and relate to any serious risk caused to public health. SA Health public health director Kevin Buckett said the new legislation would give authorities wider powers to act more quickly.
"There's nowhere on Earth that is more than 36 hours from anywhere else and where people go, bugs can go," he said yesterday.
"We have to have legislation that can respond in that sort of time.
"The idea would be that we get them out of circulation, where they can't infect other people." Dr Buckett said there were many reasons people refused treatment, including mental health issues, language barriers and even malicious behaviour.
Non-communicable diseases, such as cancer and diabetes, could also be declared, allowing the Government to introduce codes of practice for certain industries or the community. Opposition health spokesman Duncan McFetridge said he supported powers to protect the public from infectious diseases but feared parts of the Bill - to be debated next year - would allow the Government to control people with chronic conditions.
"It's bordering on nanny-state legislation," he said. "It's understandable but how far do we go?"
Australian Medical Associat- ion state president Andrew Lavender said he welcomed most of the changes. as important to protect the public.
SA Government wants right to detain sick people JILL PENGELLEY November 20, 2009 |
You can read more here: