FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

STORY: DISCREDITED OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY FULFORD DISPENSES OUTRAGEOUS LIES ABOUT QUEEN ELIZABETH II (Updated Oct. 27, 2009)

Christopher Story

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

READ ARTICLE:

http://www.worldreports.org

/news/239_discredited_offensive

_against_the_british_monarchy

#1a   (Reply)

 
----- Original Message -----
From: D
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:26 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10
 

Message:

 OH MY!!!

 So \'m sure you are aware of Story's seemingly abject PANIC---the moorings are breaking loose! Are, maties, thar she blows, along with the entire mooring foundations of everything they've held as their illusory ship of power.

 And---you and Ben are NSA, disinfo sources---HA!!!

"Methinks he doth protest too much!" What and why is he so adamantly defending??? Just WHAT has spurred his excessively vituperative reaction???

 Isn't it amazing to watch the rats freak and scatter as they lose their grip upon their carefully crafted reality?

 They're now smashed upon the rocks,swimming blind, swirling in their own cesspool of deceit...

 And how do we tell? It's in their behavior and reactions!

 Story HAS used the extrapolatory benefit of his convincing word wizardry. But now, he reveals an even more powerful communication---his vehement reaction and defensive posturing.

 Keep rattling those cages, Patrick---there's more creepy crawlies ready to come slithering out!

 Love N Light, D

#1b  (Reply)

----- Original Message -----
From:"D
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:10 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10
 

 Message:

 Re: The Story

 Story knows EXACTLY what he's creating....and he expounds upon it here...

 "Its purpose is to generate preparatory confusion so that when the really devastating exposures surface, false 'alternative' versions of the events will have been swilling around in the undergrowth sufficient to generate a protective fog of lies and diversionary 'noise' to afford the perpetrators an added layer of sorely needed 'protection'. The technique being used is to redistribute old reports, on the pretext that we should all immediately drop everything and 'connect the (false) dots' amid a heightened cacophany of CIA/DVD redirection stories that are in fact designed to maximise the potential for confusion."

 Thanks for your self-admittance, Chris...

 D

#2  (Reply)

 
----- Original Message -----
From: PW
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:00 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10
 

Message:

 in regards to this post on fourwinds10.com

 STORY: DISCREDITED OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY FULFORD DISPENSES OUTRAGEOUS LIES ABOUT QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 i say, keep going patrick and anne including benjamin fulford. I\'m sorry but i do not trust tim barello or the examiner website.

"anti-christia\" ha-ha maybe he is right about that this is anti satanic cult christian website. I love ALL cult christians because they are me. but i myself are antichristian because of the babolynian crap they preach. this includes God him/herself. they really don\'t like religions at all.

 everything benjamin has said makes sense. the queen obviously does not want people to know her ties.

 love you patrick and anne for all the stuff you put on for these many years keep em comin.

 i sent story a messege to tell him of the disinfo he/she has sent.

 love and blessings,

 PW

#3  (Reply) 

 
----- Original Message -----
From:"D
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:20 PM
Subject: Siterun Contact Request from Fourwinds10
 

 Message:

 RE: Fulford on Princess Diana\'s second son

 Just so you know:

 The following has been obvious to me (and to many people) for quite some time now -- Fulford is clearly correct here:

 This source also had a bombshell of his own that he would like put out on the net for confirmation or denial on the part of other informed parties: "Look at Di's (Princess Diana's) children. The second one's father is Diana's horse trainer and lover. Look at his features, they are identical to those of the horse trainer"

 See for yourself: James Hewitt:

 .Prince Harry

 Well Elizabeth, what is your response to all this?