
Warrant for arrest issued against Ghislaine Lanctôt for failure to produce income tax reports for Revenue Canada

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/12150/48/
...........................................................................................................
Her pages:
http://www.personocratia.com/
http://www.personocratia.com/en/index.php english
http://www.personocratia.com/en/qui_est_ghislaine.php who-is/ with pictures.
http://www.personocratia.com/en/enseignement.php teachings
http://www.personocratia.com/en/personocratia.php
http://www.personocratia.com/en/cent_millieme.php journal
I REMEMBER WHO I AM:
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/home.htm
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/ in french
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/qui_est_ghislaine.php
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/enseignement.php
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/cent_millieme.php journal
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/personocratia.php
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/boutique.php her books and more
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/contact.php
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/dernieres_nouvelles.php
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/dernieres_nouvelles.php?module=Nouvelles&class=Affichage&event=supplement&id_nouvelle=24&langue=fr
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/dernieres_nouvelles.php?module=Nouvelles&class=Affichage&langue=fr autres nouvelles
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(...)
On July 16th, 2007, Judge Marie-Josée Ménard ordered a trial at the same court, to be held on September 6th, 2007.
On September 6th, 2007, the legal entity LANCTOT, Ghislaine, was sentenced on all charges, by Judge Menard, and asked to pay a 1000$ fine for each charge, for a total of 7000$. An order was also issued to produce seven income tax statements within 30 days.
On January 30th, 2008, new charges were laid against the legal entity LANCOT, Ghislaine, for not having produced the income tax statements within 30 days. The appearance was set for March 3rd, 2008, at the Granby Court of Justice (Summons No. 460 73-000190-085). Me Serge Champoux, attorney, was still acting for Canada Revenue Agency.
On March 3rd, 2008, given the absence of the former representative for the Ghislaine LANCTOT Corporation, a warrant for arrest was ordered against this corporation for failure to appear.
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/proceedings.htm

in french:
http://www.personocratia.com/fr/i/qui_est_ghislaine/plaque-je-me-souviens-de-qui-je-suis.gif
in english, below with Jean Dury legal notes.
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/plate.htm#fable
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CANADA REVENUE AGENCY AGAINST GHISLAINE LANCTOT
HOWEVER, NO RELATIONSHIP PRESENTLY EXISTS BETWEEN THE LANCTOT, GHISLAINE CORPORATION AND THE HUMAN BEING, WITH A BODY, A SOUL AND A SPIRIT.
-
Income taxes do not serve the public interest. They go directly in the pockets of international bankers, the true owners of the Bank of Canada, who use them to finance weapons, wars and similar ventures.
-
The Bank of Canada does not belong to Canada, but to a cartel of international private bankers who created the Canadian currency we presently use. Beforehand, the power to create money was exclusively held by the Canadian government. It was given away to the Bank of Canada in 1913. Since then, the government has been borrowing – with compound interest – money that it could create for itself at not additional cost. That is why our huge national debt keeps increasing. Meanwhile, Canadian taxpayers are used as a security and bleed themselves white to pay the interests of this fraudulent debt.
-
The services provided by the government are not paid with taxes. They are funded through new loans incurred on a regular basis, bringing about a steady growth of inflation and increasing the public debt – capital and interest.
-
This public debt is fictitious, fraudulent, and virtual. It is a false debt. No money has been loaned by the bankers who own the Bank of Canada. They register and use written numbers that are not backed by any reserve (gold or other). This money is fictional; it has been created out of thin air. There is no real debt!
-
For individuals, income taxes are voluntary contributions. There is no law that forces human beings in flesh and bone to pay tax on their income. Only corporations – fictitious entities – are required to pay tax on their profits – revenues minus expenses.
-
I become an accomplice of public deception and fraud.
-
I participate in financing world-wide wars and genocides. Don’t the Nuremberg Principles condemn any form of collaboration, direct or indirect, to “crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity”?
-
I support “big ones” as they dispossess “small ones”; I create social injustice. When this becomes clear, my soul adamantly forbids me to pay income tax. Indeed, there is much ambivalence in the message offered by the authorities concerning the behaviour they wish me to adopt. They demand that I blindly obey their orders at all times. However, occasionally, I must obey my soul and conscience rather than their orders.
-
Condemn Nazi leaders in Nuremberg, and Papon in France, because they had obeyed orders rather than their conscience;
-
Reward General Romeo Dallaire, after he had obeyed his conscience and not the orders issued by the United Nations. There exists “a higher law, the law of God, which orders us to obey our soul and conscience”, claimed the authorities during the Nuremberg trial.

your life.
And what the state gives, it can take back if you are not a docile taxpayer.”
unlimited creatrix of the whole universe,
incarnated in a physical body, my creature.
*IDESSA: The name of the Supreme Being inherent to all that exists. She is both the creative spirit and the created matter. Each human being is Idessa, whether she is aware of it or not.
FROM:
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/Ghis.htm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
![]() I met Ghis in 1995, when she was known under the name of Ghislaine Lanctôt, during her trial with the CMQ (“Collège des médecins du Québec” – Quebec College of Physicians). We connected strongly as soon as we met. At that time, I had been presenting several associations in the field of alternative medicine. Ghis did not need a lawyer since she was presenting herself in court, but she was looking for a legal counsellor. Through personal experience, I knew that a person subject to trial could very well present himself in a court of law if he had access to legal counselling. Such an approach seemed revolutionary at the time but, nowadays, it has become a common thing. The person can express himself without a middleman and has access to justice at a lesser cost. Since that time, Ghis and I have developed a close relationship.
I have been practicing criminal law in Montreal since 1980. I have also been giving conferences on many subjects that are close to my heart, such as:
I will keep you informed regularly about the date and location of these conferences on the site: www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com.
On this same site, I will also publish legal notes based on related issues.
|
![]() NOBODY IS SUPPOSED TO IGNORE THE LAW
As I perused the current file for Revenue Canada Agency against LANCTÔT, Ghislaine, I was left perplexed. I recently defended a motion in the Court of Quebec concerning the unconstitutionality of the Canadian Income Tax Law, on the motive that it was totally incomprehensible. Nobody is supposed to ignore the law. Ignorance is not an excuse, but this celebrated principle of common law is not applicable to the Income Tax Law, since nobody can fully understand it, including judges, lawyers, civil servants, bookkeepers, ministers…. Some people may have a partial knowledge on specific articles, but nobody in Canada has full knowledge of this law. Nevertheless, this same law stipulates that all must know it thoroughly.
I lost my motion on the following reason: even if the Income Tax Law is complex, the Court guarantees its explanation. Even if I tend to respect other people’s opinions, I am fully convinced that nobody can apply a law that remains incomprehensible, even with the best of intentions and the highest competency in the world.
In Ghis’ current file, I was amazed to find out that on September 6th, 2007, the attorney for Revenue Canada Agency, Me Serge Champoux, omitted to establish one of the essential elements of the evidence: the fact that LANCTÔT Ghislaine had a taxable income for the years concerned. Indeed, no Canadian citizen needs to file a tax report if he did not generate a taxable income during the current year. Is an 18+ year old student ever forced to file an income tax report? No. The reason is simple. To accuse a Canadian citizen of not producing an income tax report, Revenue Canada Agency needs to prove that the taxpayer has indeed made a taxable income.
Secondly, Judge Marie-Josée Ménard imposed a fine of $1 000 for each of the 7charges, one per year of non production, for a total of $7 000. Thirdly, she ordered LANCTÔT, Ghislaine to produce, within 30 days, 7 tax reports for the years concerned.
As a consequence of non production for the period prescribed, LANCTÔT Ghislaine was again summoned to appear in court on March 3rd, 2008, since she contravened Judge Ménard’s orders.
Why did the attorney for Revenue Canada Agency, Me Champoux, omit to prove the existence of a taxable income, an essential and fundamental element of the charge? And why did the judge for the Court of Quebec condemn her in spite of this absence of evidence?
This is essentially the problem that people keep encountering with the tax law. If the Agency’s attorney and the judge for the Court of Quebec made such a blatant error, how can taxpayers be expected to understand the tax law?
Today, Ghis, the human being, is under an arrest warrant, the most precarious legal situation under the Common Law since the 13th century Magna Carta. Since my training as a specialist in criminal law in the early 80’s, I have learned how important it is for Justice to make sure that no Canadian citizen is deprived of his freedom without due process of law.
For those who believe that the accused person should have appealed against the judgment, I shall reply that she does not need to know all the details of the tax law. This task belongs to judges, along with Revenue Canada Agency and its attorney.
In the USA, such situation would inevitably bring about a 10 million dollar prosecution against Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
THE ONLY WAY OUT IN THIS CASE IS A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS.
This example clearly proves the incoherence of the Canadian fiscal system. Realize here that we have not yet examined the unconstitutionality of this law. In 1867, the legislator never gave the federal government permission to collect direct and indirect taxes from Quebecers citizens.
In 1867, the Canadian Constitution never stipulated that the federal government could transfer its power to create money to a private corporation, the Bank of Canada. This group of bankers stem from a cartel that was already well established before 1913, the foundation date of the aforementioned bank. These bankers privately organized the biggest crime against humanity in history, the creation of currency from absolutely nothing. In the Criminal Code, a fraud is defined as being a scam, a lie or any other delusive means that cause or may cause others to suffer prejudice. The lie is to persuade us that the paper money issued is backed with precious metals. The prejudice is that the Central Bank has never put in circulation the money needed to pay the interests on the capital.
Furthermore, the world banking cartel has been, for a long time and is still today, the essential cause for all the wars on our unfortunate planet. The so-called money that citizens are asked to give as taxes serves one purpose, which is to maintain this obvious fraud with the complicity of the federal government. What happened to the responsibility of the same federal government, which was to ensure the establishment and maintenance of peace, order, and good governance, as stipulated in Section 91 of the 1867 Constitutional Act?
It's about time for the public to become aware of what is going on backstage, so that they can finally regain their own power, as Ghis says so well.
Serenely yours,
Jean Dury
P.S. The present document is not meant to be a moral judgment, but a personal observation concerning the political reality of this world.
Source: www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com
|
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/notes.htm
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/billetsB.htm in french
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comments from Public
We keep receiving emails, most of which express an enthusiastic support. Some are very moving, others are encouraging, all of them are sincere. We are very touched and thank you from the bottom of our heart for your support. Here are a few messages that we wish to share with you. Some are presented integrally and others, in part only. We have decided to keep them anonymous. You may recognize your own comments. (( will be posted soon))
http://www.jemesouviensdequijesuis.com/english/testimonies.htm
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
from nenki, conspiration.cc :
Sur Google: L'homme qui ne paie pas d'impôt au Canada. Si vous desirez le télécharger - cliquer ici - 120 megs). Un cours sur la constitution, la loi, la banque et les impôts au Canada qui n'est pas piqué des vers. Faut entendre et faire circuler. Le Québec est indépendant du Canada depuis 1976. Pour comprendre également le combat de Guylaine Lanctôt et bien d'autres. Jamais, en 1867, il n'a été prévu dans la Constitution canadienne que le gouvernement fédéral pouvait transférer son pouvoir de frapper la monnaie à une corporation privée, la Banque du Canada. Ce regroupement de banquiers issu d’un cartel déjà établi bien avant 1913, date de la fondation de ladite banque, a fomenté en privé le plus grand crime contre l’humanité de l’histoire terrestre, soit la création de la monnaie à partir d’absolument rien. La fraude est définie au Code criminel comme étant une supercherie, un mensonge ou autres moyens dolosifs qui cause ou qui risque de causer un préjudice à autrui. Le mensonge est de nous faire croire que ce papier mis sur le marché vaut de l’argent (métal précieux), et le préjudice est que la Banque centrale n’a jamais mis en circulation l’argent pour payer les intérêts du capital.
Guylaine Lanctôt en entrevue à l'émission de Denis Lévesque avec le montage d'Orion 1999, partie 1.Elle résiste au ministère du revenu et risque la prison: elle refuse de payer ses impôts depuis plus d'une décennie. Vous connaissez ? Elle a bien exposé la souveraineté individuelle et une des fraudes des banques: que tous les impôts des citoyens vont au peiment des intérêts de la dette nationale. Pas les routes, les écoles, les hôpitaux, l'agroalimentaire. Non, des intérêts inconstitutionels et illégaux. Les grandes entreprises devraient payer des impôts. Pas des individus qui n'ont que leurs salaires pour subsiter. Et le prolétariat soutien les pauvres et engraissent les riches. Pas pour longtemps au train où ça va en ce moment. D'où l'arme non-léthale 'Active Denial System'. Partie 2
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++