is to serve as an educational tool on several subjects, with the primary objective being to teach the reader the Common Law. The general ignorance of the Common Law, and its true source and meaning, has brought the citizens of Canada, the USA, and other former British controlled countries to a state of near despotic subjugation and slavery. Do not let the term "Common Law" lead you to a state of confusion and panic. It is as basic and as simple to the human psyche as the air we breathe and the food we need for sustenance. It is only the statutory law made by the devious minds of those who would enslave us which requires years of learning in a law school and a mind capable of understanding and interpreting that form of "so called" law. The bogus term, used by current law dictionaries, describing Common Law as “judge, or jury made law” is pure treason on the part of the law societies and their members.

The incentive of learning how to get oneself out from under the burden of the Income Tax should suffice to make, what is normally touted to be a dry, uninteresting and complicated subject [the Common Law] much more palatable.

You will also learn about Canada's status [or lack thereof] as a country, the very questionable legal status of the Federal and Provincial governments of Canada, the licensing fraud [auto, driver's, marriage, etc.], the sad state of affairs currently existing in what once was the great republican experiment, the USA and maybe some other things you really didn't want to hear or know. You may find that it was much easier and less complicated to remain an ignorant and obedient slave.

It takes "guts" to face the risks and problems resulting from the task of obtaining and maintaining freedom, independence and happiness.

The author has drawn from a wide variety of sources for the basic information contained in this narrative, some of which are mentioned within.

However, relative to the income tax, in the use of such information to find remedies and to present conclusions, the author claims originality.

Eldon Warman, Author

ACTUAL NOTICE

The Queen in [claimed] Right of Canada

Attn: Stan Keyes, Acting As MP

And, Minister of National Revenue

Room 121, East Block, House of Commons

Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6 Date:______________

Mail Registration # _________________

Sir:

I, ________________have recently learned that I, with a status of being a full liability free will man, and with no intention or knowledge of being any form or type of incorporated entity or of being a commercial “also known as”, or of my being a ward of the Crown, am not a "person" - a limited liability legal fiction. I am, therefore, not a legal entity called a “taxpayer” subject to the Income Tax Act of Canada.

I further learned that I have been defrauded by the Crown [the Federal Government of Canada] and deceptively induced by the propaganda of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, or its predecessor, Revenue Canada, into making a presumed contract of incorporation, or a presumed contract of status change to a limited liability legal fiction called a “person” with the Crown by my having filed a return of income, thus making the presumption that my status as a flesh and blood man was changed into a "person resident in Canada" and a "taxpayer"; and, therefore supposedly making me subject to the income tax by that assumed contract. This act by the Crown [Federal Government of Canada] is believed by me to be a violation of contract law and of the Statute of Frauds [Br.] of 1677 by way of fraud, and is a trespass upon my life and my property.

As the injured party, I hereby revoke and void any such supposed or assumed contract, past, present and future; and, hereby declare my sovereign status as a flesh and blood full liability free will man with absolute rights under Common Law.

I hereby revoke and forbid any usage of my Social Insurance number as a taxpayer number; and, void any contract such past usage of it as a taxpayer number may have implied. I further denounce any detrimental assumptions that the CPP Act, and my participation in it, may imply relative to my status as a full liability man under the Common Law.

I hereby claim all Idem Sonans names which have been attached to me as commercial legal entities, under the Maxim of Law "accessio cedit principali", as being my private property.

I hereby demand that you pay back to me forthwith any supposed withholding tax which has been withheld from my wages; and, all supposed income tax which I paid over to the Receiver General of Canada under Social Insurance Number ______________on the grounds that I was fraudulently induced to pay it and was thus deprived of that money, the fruits of my labor and skills - my private property, unlawfully.

I hereby demand that you order Canada Customs and Revenue Agency to cease and desist any harassment of me; and, that you prohibit CCRA agents from violating my common law property and privacy rights.

I, _________________a free will full liability man lawfully living at: c/o ________ Street, (city or town), (province) declare in the presence of the undersigned witness that the above statements made by myself are believed to be true, correct and according to the laws of (province) and Canada.

______________________________________ ____________________________________

Autograph Witness

ACTUAL NOTICE

The Queen acting as [claimed]Crown in Right of Canada

Attn: Stan Keyes, Acting As MP

And, Minister of National Revenue

Room 121, East Block, House of Commons

Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6 Date: __________________

Mail Registration # _________________

Sir:

I, (common law name), who is a full-liability and sovereign-man living at the (city/town) in the unity of the (province) hereby declare:

Whereas, I, (Common Law name) am of the right and the truth in the common-law.

And, whereas, I believe that the Goods and Services Tax collection contract under Goods and Services Tax number (GST number) is inequitable to me in that the benefits to me are considerably less than the obligations and requirements imposed by that contract which benefit the Federal Government of Canada, and thus constitutes a fraud upon myself;

And, whereas, I believe the Goods and Services Tax number represents an unlawful and fraudulent license issued by the Crown which supposedly allows the G.S.T. lisensee the privilege of committing extortion outside of contract against the free people of Canada, that being the charging of an extra amount beyond the contractually agreed to price of the goods or service before consumating that contract;

And, whereas, I believe that the Goods and Services Tax contract implicates me in a fraud upon the Canadian People perpetrated by the Crown in supposed right of Canada or Federal Government of Canada in the collection of a direct tax;

Therefore, I hereby rescind Goods and Services Tax number (GST number), and void any actual and/or implied contract, past, present and future which was imposed by my participation in the G.S.T. fraud.

And therefore, I refuse to collect Goods and Services Tax for the Crown in supposed right of Canada or for Federal Government of Canada.

I, (Common Law name), a full liability man of the status of the common who lawfully lives at:

the City/Town of the __________, in the Province of the unity of the (province) make the affirmation of the declaration of the truth.

__________________________________ __________________________________

Signed Witness

Provincial Court of ____________

Judicial District of __________

In Reference to Case No._________

Regina v. YOUR NAME, a legal fiction

EQUITABLE (OR OTHER APPLICABLE) ESTOPPEL

Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent

Page 2 of 2

And whereas, the Court has, or it has been the practise of the Court to extract a plea from the named accused using legal trickery in cases arising out of the Income Tax Act of Canada; and/or, failing to obtain such volunteered plea from the accused, is/has been the practise of the judge to enter a plea of not guilty;

And whereas, the Criminal Code of Canada states in Section 621, to wit:

Notice to corporation

621. (1) The clerk of the court or the prosecutor may, where an indictment is filed against a corporation, cause a notice of the indictment to be served on the corporation.

Contents of notice

(2) A notice of an indictment referred to in subsection (1) shall set out the nature and purport of the indictment and advise that, unless the corporation appears on the date set out in the notice or the date fixed pursuant to subsection 548(2.1), and enters a plea, a plea of no guilty will be entered for the accused by the court, and that the trial of the indictment will be preceded with as though the corporation had appeared and pleaded.

R.S. 1985, c, C-46, S. 621; 1997, c. 18, s.71

Therefore, it is believed by Your Name, a full liability man, that a judge who enters a plea for this full liability man under the fraudulent guise that this full liability man is a limited liability corporate entity called a “person”, will be committing an act of nuisance, mischief and treason prejudicing the rights of this full liability man, Your Name. Such an act would be the invoking or applying of a law or of an authority that is inapplicable to this full liability man, Your Name, who is not a corporation or a corporate body, and who is not subject to the Crown.

I, Your Name, in the name of my advocate and counsellor Jesus the Christ, do declare

my beliefs and statements of fact herein to be true and correct, and according to the law that is given to me in the Holy Bible, the only law under which I stand.

Notary Public for (Province)

_______________________

The Estoppel should be served upon the clerk of the court at the same time

as the Affidavit is served. If the affidavit is to be served upon a company, the estoppel is not required. The affidavit will have to be modified eliminating the references to court or a court case.

1. Actual Notice [Use to detax]

4. Actual Notice [For opting out of GST]

5. Affidavit establishing non-person /non corporate status

6. Equitable Estoppel to further convince the Crown that you are of a foreign jurisdiction (common law) to the

court, which is civil code dealing only with limited liability fictional entities.

Respondent: The full liability man or woman (or, their name - if known) acting as an officer of any of the following de facto bodies politic or incorporations in Canada or a Province of Canada, including, but not limited to (name of government branch or agency). (Delete all bracketed instructions)

Respondent: Stan Keyes, acting as Minister of National Revenue for the de facto

Federal Government of Canada, and as agent for the impostor Crown in right of Canada

Affiant: Your Name (in proper noun format - begin each name with cap and remainder lower case)

Affidavit - Denial of corporate existence and Claim of Right

1. Comes (Your Name), a free will full liability man living upon the land mass known as (Province), and declares in truth:

2. I, (Your Name), as a free will full liability man (or woman) do not participate in any commercial activity in de facto corporate Canada; but, remain as authorized representative and owner of the legal entity known as (your ALL CAPS name)©, or any variation thereof.

3. I, (Your Name) have made no voluntary contract with the de facto Crown in right of (Province), or with the de facto Crown in right of Canada to be a subject of, or a corporate member of such Crown, a limited liability corporation. Further, I have voided for fraud by actual notice to the full liability man, (whom you sent your Actual Notice to), acting as the Minister of National Revenue, dated _________, any assumed contract of servitude to the Crown based upon evidence obtained from my previous acts of obedience to Acts applicable only to subjects of the Crown performed through my ignorance and fear which resulted from propaganda and/or directives from CCRA, the de facto Federal Government of Canada or the Crown in right of Canada.

4. I, (Your Name) believe that any such assumed contracts of status change to that of a subject/servant to a corporate entity, specifically the Crown, and the attachment of a corporate name to my full liability body/person under the rule of Idem Sonans is an act of fraud by the full liability people acting as officers of the incorporated Crown for the sole purpose of prejudicing my God given rights.

5. I, (Your Name) claim under the maxim of law, accessio cedit principali, full ownership of any and all “also known as” commercial names, such as, but not limited to (your ALL CAPS name)©, or (your Family name, comma, given names)© attached to my body/person regardless who may have created such Idem Sonans name.

6. I, (Your Name) am the creditor and holder in due course, and the owner of the common law copyright on the corporate commercial name (your ALL CAPS name)©, or any variation thereof, the debtor.

7. And, therefore, as a full liability free will man/woman under Anglo-Saxon Common Law, I

am not subject to the jurisdiction of the corporate Courts of Canada or a Province in any

civil or contractual matter arising from a statute of the Federal or Provincial de facto

governments of Canada.

I hereby affirm by my autograph affixed to this affidavit that I believe the above statements are true, correct and complete.

_________________________________ __________________________________

Notary Public

INSTRUCTIONS

Find this affidavit at:http://www.detaxcanada.org/download2.htm File: genaffidavit.rtf

*****************************************************************

If you have a Canadian incorporated company, put these paragraphs after paragraph #5:

6. I, ________ believe that there is no evidence existent giving the de facto governments of Canada, federal or provincial, the right to incorporate Roman Persons. I believe that a de facto government has no basis in law, and is not a sovereign entity under international law, that being a basic requirement in the creation of Roman Persons, limited liability incorporated companies created for commercial purposes.

7. Therefore, my supposedly (province) incorporated company known as ______________ is, in fact my privately owned proprietorship, and not subject to statutory laws which only apply to the de facto and fraudulently incorporated limited liability companies created by the impostor Crown in right of (province).

8. And, therefore, I believe that I, ____________ and my company ___________________ are not subject to any cause of action or requirements under the de facto Income Tax Act of Canada or the Corporations Acts of Canada.

Re-number affidavit paragraph #6 to #9.

If you live in Quebec, add this paragraph after paragraph #5:

6. This Affiant believes that, as a freewill full liability man under common law, he has a right to his common law jurisdiction as proclaimed by the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in the Quebec Act 1774, Article 11, to wit:

''Xl. And whereas the Certainty and Lenity of the Criminal Law of England, and the Benefits and Advantages resulting from the Use of it, have been sensibly felt by the Inhabitants, from an Experience of more than nine Years, during which it has been uniformly administered:'' be it therefore further enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That the same shall continue to be administered, and shall be observed as Law in the Province of Quebec, as well in the Description and Quality of the Offence as in the Method of Prosecution and Trial; and the Punishments and Forfeitures thereby inflicted to the Exclusion of every other Rule of Criminal Law. or Mode of Proceeding thereon, which did or might prevail in the said Province before the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and seventy-four; any Thing in this Act to the contrary thereof in any respect notwithstanding; subject nevertheless to such Alterations and Amendments as the Governor, Lieutenant-governor, or Commander in Chief for the Time being, by and with the Advice and Consent of the legislative Council of the said Province, hereafter to be appointed, shall, from Time to Time, cause to be made therein, in Manner hereinafter directed. “

***************************************************************************

Space your document so that, if there is a blank space at the bottom, draw a diagonal line from upper left after the last word of your document to the bottom right hand corner, where you will autograph. If your words end near the bottom, print your name on the upper left of the blank reverse side, draw a diagonal line to the lower right corner and autograph below.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------