FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

Israeli Role in Destroying Iraq

Hussein Anwar

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

 
This is a speech by Former Israeli Security Minister Avi Dechter on 4th, September 2008 at the Research Institute of the Israeli national Security.
 
I ask the reader to reflect upon the Iraqi Arena in general after reading this post, I ask the reader to brainstorm about why Israel's major goal in the Middle-East is to destroy Iraq and keep it weak, I ask the reader to use the information to think of all the strategic and political ramifications of this speech, and the Israeli project in the region, the malicious, and vicious project... and WHY? WHY neutralizing Iraq is important to Israel more than neutralizing any other Arab country.
 
After reading this post it is very important to read this post which I posted some time ago...it will help you get the big picture.
 
This is a very important post, I ask all decent bloggers whether Iraqi or not to publish this post on their blogs because some very few bloggers included little quotes of this lecture but not all of it. This is the first time this lecture appears in English language. I translated it from Arabic to English...Please publish it on your blogs.
 
I will follow this post with 2 other posts (Perhaps combine them both in one post) about the Kurdish relationship with Israel and I will also cover what exactly happened in Halabja and Anfal battle from the experience of former Iraqi Intelligence Director and high ranking Iraqi Army Generals which they witnessed and participated in both.
 
Lecture from the former Israeli Minister of Security, September 4, 2008
 
Avi Dechter on the Israeli role in Iraq:
 
"We achieved in Iraq much more than we planned and expected."
 
 
Iraq has faded away as a military power and a united country, and our strategic goals are to keep this country segregated not allowing this country to to restore its Arab and regional role because we will be the first to be affected. One of the main objectives of Israel is to support the Kurds with weapons, training and security partnership in order to establish an independent Kurdish state in the North of Iraq, controlling the oil industry in Kirkuk and Kurdistan in general.. Our final analysis and strategic goal is that Iraq must be kept segregated and isolated far away from the territorial environment. The text of the lecture regarding Iraq:
 
______________________________
 
No one can deny that we have achieved many goals more than we expected and planned for in this field. We must remember our vital role in Iraq since the 70’s of the last century, and the main objective of our role in Iraq is to support the Kurds because they are an oppressed ethnic group that has the right to decide its destiny, enjoying freedom like any other nation.

In the beginning, the planners in Israel and on top of the list Uri Lubrani the former advisor of the Prime Minister then our Ambassador in Turkey, Ethiopia and Iran has planned the frame and the content of the Israeli support to the Kurds. In the beginning the support was modest, it was political support and flagging the Kurdish cause in the media. The Kurds were not able to flag their cause in the United States and Europe and even inside some of the European countries. The support was also financial but limited. The important change started in 1972. This support took greater strategic and security dimensions, giving the Kurds weapons through Turkey and Iran, receiving Kurdish groups for training in Israel and even in Turkey and Iran.

This active support was to mark an important strategic evolution in the relationship between Israel and the Kurds.

We expected this strategic alliance with the Kurds and our continuous support to them to achieve important goals and results... if it weren’t for the Shah of Iran and Iraq to reach and agreement in 1975 in Algeria.

This deal between Iraq and Iran in Algeria gave a severe blow to the Kurdish aspiration but according to the testimonies of high ranking Israeli generals…this relationship continued with the Kurdish leader Mustafa Barazani. The Kurds never lost hope, on the contrary they insisted to continue their struggle against the leadership in Baghdad. After the collapse of the Kurdish resistance as a result of the deal between Iraq and Iran; the Kurdish leadership was distributed to Syria, Turkey and Israel. On the basis of moral obligation and moral duty Israel stayed on the side of the Kurds and support them in reaching their national goal of achieving self-government and independence at some later stage.. I will not take much time lecturing about the past, I must lecture about our achievements in Iraq which were beyond our imagination and beyond what we had hoped for.

 
In Iraq today, there is truly a Kurdish nation, this nation has all the elements of a state ; land , people, the State authority, the army, the economy of a promising oil yield.. This nation-state heads for a border beyond the borders of Kurdistan to include the entire North of Iraq ; Kirkuk city in the first place, then Mosul, then perhaps Tikrit, Jalawla to Khanaqeen.

What we felt from the Kurds during their meetings with Israeli officers, they never failed to mention the support of Israel to them, and they could not imagine the achievements to be so great and they couldn't do it on their own without our support.

As for us, our goals were achieved and that is in the support for the project of a Kurdish state. We never imagined that all our goals would be achieved during one time as a result of the war the United States declared on Iraq which resulted in it’s occupation.

The Iraq which we imagined in our strategic vision to be and stay the biggest and most dangerous threat to Israel after it became a military power, suddenly it faded away as Iraq as a country and a military power and even as a united country faded away. Dividing Iraq into geographical territories, the segregation of it’s society, witnessing a fierce and destructive civil war resulting in the death of thousands of people. If we observe the Iraqi situation since 2003, we will be facing more than one scenario :

 
1- Iraq segregated and divided into 3 communities and territories although there is a central government.
2- More internal wars and killing among the Shiites and the Sunnis and between Arabs and Kurds too.
3- Iraq with all its security, political and economical conditions will never be restored to its pre-2003 status.
 
We are not far away from our strategic changes in Iraq since 2003, our strategic goal still remains the same -- not to allow this country to restore its active Arab role, its regional role because we were and would be again the first to be damaged.

Our active struggle will be kept the same in this field, as long as US forces stay in Iraq, which will provide us with an umbrella and a chance so as to forestall any chance for the return of Iraq to its pre-2003 status -- united and strong.

We use all invisible means in politics and security to keep this country weak. We want to create safeguards and ballasts not in northern Iraq, but in the capital Baghdad too. We are trying to weave relationships with some of the political and economic elites so they can act and remain a guarantee for us to keep Iraq outside the circle of the Arab States, which are in a state of war with Israel.

Iraq until 2003 was in a state of war with Israel…and considered the war with Israel as the top of its priorities. Israel was facing a real strategic challenge in Iraq, although Iraq went to war with Iran which lasted 8 years…Iraq developed and strengthened itself strategically and militarily, including its quest to acquire nuclear weapons. This situation must not be repeated. We are negotiating with the Americans on this topic, for the sake of cutting the road and blocking it in front of Iraq once and for all and assuring that Iraq will never return to its past status as a belligerent country in a state of war with Israel. The U.S. administration is keen to ensure our interests and to provide these guarantees through various means, and they are:

 
1- To keep the US forces in Iraq for a period between 10 to 20 years even if Barak Obama is in favor of withdrawing US forces from Iraq by the end of 2009.
2- to make sure the security pact between the United States and the Iraqi government include more than one item that ensure the neutralization of Iraq in the conflict with Israel and not allow Iraq to join any alliances or systems or comply with codes founded on hatred against Israel for example like in a treaty in some joint Arab defense nor participate in any hostile action against Israel in case of a war in the region with Syria, Lebanon or Iran.

In addition to these safeguards, there are also efforts and steps we take individually to ensure that these strong safeguards block the way in the face of Iraq to return to its past position of adversary. The continuation of the current situation in Iraq and support of the Kurds in Northern Iraq as a distinct political entity, gives us strong and important guarantees for Israeli national security in the foreseeable future, at least. We are also working to develop a security partnership and strategic relationship with the Kurdish leadership, although this might anger Turkey as a friendly country. We have spared no effort to convince the Turkish leadership, and in particular, Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Abdullah Gul, and even military leaders that our support for the Kurds in Iraq does not affect the situation of the Kurds in Turkey.

 
We also made it clear to the Kurdish leadership and have warned of the consequences of any friction with Turkey and supporting the Kurds of Turkey in any way. We told them that their partnership with Israel should not harm our relationship with Turkey and that the field of this partnership is Iraq at the moment, and that this breadth must widen in the future to include Syria and Iran. Tackling the strategic challenges in the regional environment requires us to not turn a blind eye on the developments in the Iraqi arena and we must strengthen our efforts and activities there and not stand idly and watch, but also play a contributing balanced role, thus avoiding exacerbating harmful interactions.
 
The neutralization of Iraq by devoting to uphold its current conditions is not less important and vital than devoting efforts to sustain the neutralization of the other Arab countries. The neutralization of Egypt was achieved through diplomacy, but the neutralization of Iraq required the use of all means available and not available for it to be a comprehensive and complete neutralization. We can not talk about the use of the force option, because this condition does not exist in the case of Iraq. Because this option is exercised by the greatest power in the world, the United States, and has achieved results beyond all limits, it was impossible for Israel to achieve it all alone without using the elements of power, including the use of nuclear weapons.
 
Our final analysis is that Iraq must remain fragmented, internally divided and isolated away from the regional environment, this is our strategic goal. In order to keep achieving this; we will persevere in the use of the options best fitted for that situation; a Kurdish state in Iraq that is dominant over the sources of oil production in Kirkuk and Kurdistan. There is commitment from the Kurdish leadership to restart the oil pipeline from Kirkuk to the line of the former IBC via Jordan. There have been preliminary negotiations with Jordan and we reached an agreement with the Kurdish leadership too. If the Jordanians decline, there is the Turkish alternative to extend the pipeline of Kirkuk and other areas of production in Kurdistan to Turkey then to Israel. We conducted studies of the scheme of pipes for water and oil with Turkey and from Turkey to Israel. The equation governing the movement of our strategy in Iraq is based on the package that we must undermine the capabilities of the Arab countries inside and outside their borders in order to ensure the national security of Israel.
 
The most important stated in a lecture to the Israeli security minister, "Avi Dechter," which he delivered on September 4, 2008, at the Research Institute of the Israeli National Security

www.uruknet.info/index.php