The Truth About September 11
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001 http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002 http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,they just " arrived late " http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001 http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine proceedure. Here's an example of how routine it is. 1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane. Netscape news. May 15 2003. http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-APO-1110&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T
The proceedures were already in place before Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002. http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a cover up story been concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behavoir of G.W.Bush It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash. This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel. http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that morning. See how many times he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey. http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange press conference. By Jared israel and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002. http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2: White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002] http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002 http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about where he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continueto listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason at the top level.
2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the " innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)
3.4a STILL No Arabs On Flight 77 By Thomas R. Olmsted, MD http://www.rense.com/general38/77.htm
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ? ), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in this article 3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not being on the passenger lists? What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched,and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9 http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/still_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm
3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html
3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml
3.15 http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm
3.18 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?coll=chi-news-hed
According to this article 3:11 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves - unless they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the airport security cameras, and were not on the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside the airport ( last minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly the things! ) and then crashed the planes in breath taking displays of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times! ), where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse doping scandals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: The pentagon frame up and the WTC plane switch
It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing 757 ) crashed into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 has a wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make a hole less than 40 ft wide, not high enough to fit the tail, collapsing less than a 50 ft depth of the outer ring of the building - and not leave any wreckage outside ? This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
4:1 http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self - inflicted frame up.
For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story 4:2 http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002 4.3 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WTCDEMO/wot/holmgren/index.html 4:3a http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php
Eyewitness evidence does not confirm a large passenger jet hitting the Pentagon.
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002
4:4 http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast
4:5 The Pentagon crash hoax http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/
What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes we've been told ? ( AA 11 and UAL 175)
4.6 http://thewebfairy.com/911
4.7 The amazing Pentalawn. http://www.cryptogon.com/docs/Introducing%20the%20amazing%20Penta-Lawn%202000!%20(9-11).htm
Section 5: The suspicious collapse of the World trade centre Towers and the WTC 7 building.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held?
5:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001 http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
5:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J.McMichael http://serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm
"Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
5:3 http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html
5:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm
5:5 http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-BurningQuestionsNeedAnswers.pdf
5:6 A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building"http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html
5:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty and Jared Israel
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm
5:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks,and eyewitness accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious flaws in the official accounts. http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm
For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC collapse, see
5:9 http://home.comcast.net/~jeffrey.king2/wsb/html/view.cgi-home.html-.html
5:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php
5:11 The World Trade Centre demolition http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm
5:12 Capter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment) http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm
5:13 Capter 2 (with comment) http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm
5.14 The jet fuel. How hot did it heat the World trade Center? http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
5.15 Proof of controlled demolition at the WTC by Jerry Russell, Ph.D. http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
5.16 Where's the inferno? http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm
WTC-7: The Improbable Collapse by Scott Loughrey 10 August 2003 5.17 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LOU308A.html
Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene towards the top of the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow caused both towers to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled demolition ? And what about the similarly neat collpase of B7, which was not hit by a plane?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban housefires. Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled implosion completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting steel?
Section 6: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident enough of it's case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding" convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably because new video technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video confession and a fake.
When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999 6:1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm
Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002 6:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey. 2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast (Read the section called "Evidence please !")
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
Bin laden denies terror attacks and points finger at jews. Annanova news.6:3http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war. ABC news online Sept 17 2001. 6:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm
Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline Milwaukee Jornal Sentinal Sept 16 2001 6;5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp
Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA were committed by some American terrorist group. Pravda Sept 12 2001 6:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html
Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News 6:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm
Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN sept 17 2001 6:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html
Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001 6:9
http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story
Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13 2001. 6:10
http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sectrion 7: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been planned months before ?
BBC News report by George Arney. 7:1 http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm
U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two days before Sept 11.NBC news. May 16 2002 7:2 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:A5WwRGMKgTYC:www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/msnbc051602.html+U.S.+
Planned+for+attack+on+Al+-Qaeda.+White+house+given+strategy+two+days+before+Sept+11.&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in Washington 7:3 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/walq05.xml
US Tells of covert Afghan plans before 9/11 By Bob Drogin LA Times May 18 2002 7.5 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-051802strike.story
Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not planned prior to sept 11, and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise " attack, and the story then changed after proof of the preplanned attack came to light ?
Section 8: Best of enemies. The USA + Islamic extremism = Good business.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that they wanted to get him first. So why didn't they arrest him when they had the chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
8:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
8:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
8:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus,San Francisco Chronicle 2 Dec 2001 8:4 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne,NY Times 5 Mar 2001 8:5 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm
The George W. Bush Money Tree 8:6 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm
Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman, LA Times. 10 Jan 2002 8:7 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-011002carlyle.story
8:8 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm
Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel 8:9 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm
BushLaden by Jared Israel 8:10 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm
Addition to the above article 8:11 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm
Judicial Watch:Bush/Bin Laden connection " has now turned into a scandal " Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel 8:12 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm
8:13 Bin laden. Terrorist monster:Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm
8:14 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's Brother in Law by Michel Chossudovsky 27 december 2002 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html
Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC Newsnight Report on "the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001 8:15 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html
8:16 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm (added comments by Jared Israel)
Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001 8:17 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html
US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001 8:18 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html
8:19 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were Told, 'Let Sleeping Dogs Lie' By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002
8:20 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html
After capuring one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed intelligence."
8:21 Taliban general 'freed by mistake' Sunday Times Dec 19 2002 http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,5704967%255E15574,00.html
8:22 US accidentally set wanted taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CDI.html
8:23 FBI agent Robert Wright says FBI assigned to intelligence operations continue to protect terrorists from criminal investigations and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002. http://www.judicialwatch.org/2469.shtml
A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror -- The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet · 8.24 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html
Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles. Compiled by Jared Israel 8.25
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam 8.26 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm
"Articles documenting US creation of taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist network" Series of links to different articles 8.27
http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm
"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel 8.28 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm
"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel 8.29 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm
U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001 8.30 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel 8.31 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001] Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington 8.32 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm
Section 9: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba.
Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001 9:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001 9:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel. 9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm
Scanned images of the actual document.
9.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
9.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
9:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
9.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
9.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
9.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
9.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
9.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
9.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
9.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
9.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
9.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
9:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
9.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
9.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
US military schemes- ominously like 9/11. 9:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm
If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?
Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy in 1992 9:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 10:Why has the govt resisted and obstructed inquiries into Sept 11?
Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002. 10:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/
Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002 10:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators/
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002 10:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm 10:4 http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002 11:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
10.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
10:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush. White House retreats on independent probe. Dana Priest and Dana Milbank. Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A46446-2002Sep20¬Found=true
10.7 White House refuses to release Sept 11 info. by Frank Davies Miami Herald May 5 2003 http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/5792329.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp
Four 9/11 Moms Battle Bush by Gail Sheehy Aug 22 2003 10.8 http://www.newyorkobserver.com/pages/frontpage3.asp
Section 11: Miscellaneous items.
Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
11:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined By David L. Graham http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before theattacks? 11:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
11:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
11.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody had ever concieved of planes being used in this manner, their statements in this article,
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002 11:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential problem had been recognized for decades. And there are other examples of this possibility having been widely recognized prior to sept 11. 11:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001 http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm
In article 11:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas. The statement she made is in this press briefing. 11:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice The James S. Brady Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
11:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen.Washington Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A35744-2002May17¬Found=true
What did happen to Flight 93? by Richrad Wallace. The Daily Mirror sept 13, 2002
11:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html
11:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm
11.11 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143
Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible ? 11:12 http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.html
11.13 http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.html
11.13a http://www.shirky.com/writings/permanet.html
11.14 September 11 US Govt accused. The Portugal News. Front page 3/8/2002 http://the-news.net/cgi-bin/story.pl?title=September%2011%20-%20US%20Government%20accused&edition=663
Attorney General, John Ashcroft was warned in July 2001 not to fly commercial anymore. Ashcroft flying high. CBS News July 26 2001. 11.15 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml
San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown received a travel warning on Sept 10. Willie Brown got low-key early warning about air travel. San francisco Chronicle Sept 12 2001 11.16 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/12/MN229389.DTL
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that investigators were already looking into huge volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Two years later, we see no sign of any inquiry. If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm which handled much of the trade, are we expected to believe that authorities can't find out who was responsible?
Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001 11:17 http://propagandamatrix.com/mystery_of_terror_insider_dealers.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------