The Bilderbergs tagged him for President and so did Goldman-Sachs and the Council on Foreign Relations and so did the Speaker of the House who certified his qualification for the office at the Democratic Convention knowing he was born in in the British Protectorate of Kenya to a Kenyan father and that spent his childhood in Indonesia -- and of course later he won the Nobel Prize.

The American People have to start all over with a completely new ruling elite and they must sweep away all of the think tanks and media organs of the organized crime network that gives us these murderous and destructive misfits (Obama, the two Bush Presidents, the Clintons and on and on.)

No the republicans are no alternative  -- Obama and the Neo-cons are really the same team  - the team that is playing against us and until now has been winning every match.

Jim Stone: 9/11 The Conspiracy Holiday

Comment:  There are many many independent lines of evidence that establish that 9-11 was a false-flag frame-up event, that things happened that are incompatible with the account given by organized crime through the government and media they obviously control.  I know of many of these and have presented them again and again.  But here is one I missed -- photographic proof that the South Tower was hit by a different type of aircraft than Flight 175 -- and proof that Popular Mechanics knowingly participated in the cover-up when it substituted a counterfeit picture of a 767 for its magazine article "debunking" citizens who investigated the evidence, an article written by Chertoff, acousin of the director of Homeland Security.  I remember that article  -- it did not dare attempt to debunk my 9-11 evidence.  When Chertoff was discussing his article on coast to coast radio I phoned in and asked him why he did not address the Pentagon security camera evidence  -- he said he was going to do so but didn't have room and he said he might do a second article to deal with it.  I was going to itemize some of the facts he would be facing when Art Bell cut me off.  Most of the others calling in were "no-planers-hit-the-WTC disinfo operatives"  doubtless working in tandem with Chertoff providing him with a good straw man to look good answering.  Most of the debates in the "Truther" movement are operatives serving the cover-up taking to each other -- the real ones are usally kept out at the gate.

Anyway here is Jim Stone's article - which is very effective because it makes the case by pointing up discrepancies that are easily confirmed.  That is the test of a good 9-11 investigator  -- he presents evidence ample to convince any impartial grand jury or impeachment committee, if such existed.  (All of the grand juries have been run by gatekeepers as far as I can tell.)

this article from rebel org

9/11 Conspiracy Holiday

by Jim Stone

Since 911 has become somewhat of a conspiracy holiday, I will post a few obligatory comments. I was thinking about doing a lot of 9/11 stuff early on, but I am going to skip it. Here are my main points about 9/11.

1. The planes were real but were not the ones used in the story line. Flight 93 landed in Cleveland and though Liz Foreman, the journalist who posted that story tried to white wash it later, it's a really thin white wash. First of all it was not a local Cleveland/Cincinatti story, it came across AP and she was just parrot reporting. I have a little hint for you - AP DID NOT mysteriously accidentally ooooopsidaisically post a story about an aircraft landing somewhere when it did not, THAT IS TOO RANDOM, FLIGHT 93 DID INDEED LAND IN CLEVELAND. An error would have been flight 234 from Biafran airlines landed in Cleveland, it would have been something stupid. It's a mistake that could not possibly be made, text did not erupt out of nowhere spontaneously and the simple randomness of this story means it has to be true. It means it was a landing that was unexpected enough to make news, and it also explains why there was NOTHING IN THAT STUPID CRATER

MSM image of remains of 300,000 pound plane with 40 passengers, 50 suitcases, and 21,000 express mails (which get loaded onto mostly empty planes). No fire either. Grass and trees are perfect.

I suggest you try to find the story "flight of the bumble planes", it totally explains how flight 93 "crashed" AFTER landing in Cleveland.

2. The plane that hit the second tower was a prototype from the Boeing 737-800 project, and not a 757/67 as reported. The plane that hit the tower WAS NOT ANY MAKE AND MODEL IN PRODUCTION. In ONE WAY OR ANOTHER there is a mismatch from every other plane in production, it had things that were removed in the final version of the 737-800, yet is most comparable to that plane. This allowed the people fronting the conspiracy to use a plane that was not accounted for anywhere to do their dirty deed. It most likely sat out near Mojave for three years after being used for test flights and ditched as a useless oddball aircraft that could not be sold yet was perfectly functional. Perfect for a bunch of cheap bastards to use in a war against the people.

A point not made in the photo - look at the wings on the Popular Mechanics lying rag plane, and the wings on the actual plane. I never read Popular Mechanics since, I KNOW WHO OWNS THEM

3. The FBI itself said the phone calls, where the entire Arab story was hatched, DID NOT HAPPEN. Their final report said ONE call was made, with a total duration of ZERO MINUTES AND ZERO SECONDS. So they said a call was made, and then said it had no duration. This is political mind playing where they can say they never said there were no calls, all the while saying there were no calls. The FBI said there were no calls because they know the truth about the cell phone system - IT CANNOT CONNECT AT ALL above speeds of 200 mph because the towers have to agree upon which one will take the call and if you are going above the speed where they can accomplish this you pass by too many towers for them to make that decision. On top of this, they look horizontally, not upward so an aircraft is in a super weak signal zone, and the aircraft will be distant because it's altitude is miles, and it's aluminum skin impedes calls on top of it. This was the situation in 2001, and even today, when things are improved, it still does not work at that speed OUT IN THE OPEN, AT AN IDEAL ELEVATION. And after the entire cell phone scenario was proven fraudulent, a story was hatched that they called from a seat back phones that used satellite uplink that was also a lie, because none of the planes had phones, they had been disabled and removed from all of them prior to 9/11.

And I don't need to waste space here with the obvious stuff, like building 7, thermate, the impossible collapse pattern if it was as stated, the fact that the firemen said they had the fire out in the first tower only to have it immediately collapse after they radioed out that it was under control, and the fact that every shilling info scammer has started a new story line both debunking and diverting from the cold hard truth - 9/11 was IMPOSSIBLE, a Las Vegas style stage show where the laws of physics were not obeyed, a massive surveillance state seeking only patriots was born, and the Israelis danced. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY DANCE?

• Go Back

Related in this Category