FourWinds10.com - Delivering Truth Around the World
Custom Search

9-11 Pentagon simulator Mike J Wilson guity of scale-change deception with his graphics presentation --

From Dick Eastman

Smaller Font Larger Font RSS 2.0

July 19, 2012

-11 Pentagon simulator Mike J Wilson guity of scale-change deception with his graphics presentation -- "911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77" simulation cheating - twice they alter plane scale while graphics "eye" us off the plane
 

9-11 Pentagon simjulator Mike J Wilson guity of scale-change deception -- "911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77" simulation cheating - twice they alter plane scale while graphics "eye" us off the plane  He needs to be questioned under oath immediately under suspicion of treason and participation in the 9-11 super crime, in its  cover-up phase.

 

Mike J. Wilson's dishonest video "911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77" was created for two reasons.

 

First, Wilson's simulation was made to counter evidence investators who show that the damage imprint on the Pentagon's outside west wall (pre-collapse) could not be explained by the crash of a Boeing 757 like Flight 77.  In fact, the simulation proves the opposite, viz., that a Boeing crash which was centered ("nose in") at column 14 in fact cannot have been responsible for the window and frame completely pushed in far to the south between columns 19 and twenty on the second floor. 

Second, Wilson's simulation was made to disprove the contention of evidence investigators that security camera video picture showing the killer object completely covered by the entry gate pass reader box in the foreground could not be a picture of the pass reader box obstructing the view of a Boeing 757, because at the distance the Boeing would have been from the pass reader box if the Boeing were on the path of downed roadside light poles moving towards the Pentagon the Boeing would have been too big to be concealed.  It's very long fuselage (in relation to tail fin height) would have had to be showing.   And here we catch Mike J Wilson cheating.  As he moves the viewer's eye, in his simulation, southward to take up position at the security camera, he takes our eye off the plane as the viewer's perspective (apparent location) is changed.  And when finally Wilson puts the plane back in view he has modified the scale of the plane and shortened its fuselage.  Go to Wilson's video  http://youtu.be/YVDdjLQkUV8 and verify that this has been done.  Start viewing at time 1:50.  Notice how the eye is taken from the plane at time 2:10, at a point far south of the security camera.

Mike J. Wilson has changed the scale of the plane -- when he puts the plane back in sight it is smaller with respect to the heliport tower and the building -- and thus, after this deception, after this alteration of scale in a video that Wilson is representing as "true to scale" the shrunk plane now exactly is hidden behind the pass reader box.  A deliberate deception.  Wilson changed the scale.

 

But the graphics artist cheats.  The simulation is a fraud.  It is false expert testimony.  As he moves the artists-eye (imaginary camera) north to reproduced the correct scale representation of the plane from the location of the security camera -- he for no reason takes the eye off the plane  -- the plane is not shown as the camera moves north to relocate the viewers eye behind the lens of the security camera  -- but if you simply look this section of Mike J Wilson's video you see that the plane has shrunk far more than mere receding in the distance accounts for.  Mike J. Wilson has changed the scale of the plane -- when he puts the plane back in sight it is smaller with respect to the heliport tower and the building -- and thus, after this deception, after this alteration of scale in a video that Wilson is representing as "true to scale" the shrunk plane now exactly is hidden behind the pass reader box.  A deliberate deception.  Wilson changed the scale.  He knowingly engaged in this deception, the cover up to hide the fact that the Boeing, if it were located where the first part of the simulation, which is corectly scaled,  put it  - then the fuselage would not have been covered.   Do you think it was just an accident that he got the eye off the plane at that critical moment.  But he does it twice.  When he backs the viewers eye in the simulation away from the security camera lense  he again takes the plane from the simulated view  for a while  and then when the comes back in view, its original (true) scale to the building is restored.

   These are the only two times the graphics artist takes the eye off the simulated Boeing.  And each time he changes the scale.  The first time he shrinks the scale fo the plane so the plane will indeed be concealed behind the pass reader box  and the second time is afterwards when he goes back to the lamp post area to continue the simulation of the crash viewing from that perspective.   This video has received 3,808,659 views, 3,808,659 people deceived by Mike J Wilson.  Mike Wilson is thus an accomplice in the 9-11 mass-murder perpetrated to destroy a building, the people and records in it, and to start wars against innocent Moslems for the benefit of Israel and China.

 

Wilson need to be put under oath and questioned about what he as done and why he did it.  While some infiltrated the truth movement and secured postions where they could function as gate keepers, and other infiltrated to present absurd theories that repel people and cause dissention and heated arguement between honest people and those attempting to frustrate and divide them  - others like Mike J Wilson create false evidence and spurious analysis to defend the great lie.

Wilson has gotten nearly 4 million people to view his lie.  I cannot get 40 to view of actual photos that prove that the Pentagon has been caught in a black-op deception.

 

 

I made my video reply and Wilson has removed it.  Although it is still available apart from Wilson's video here:

 

Dick Eastman - Pentagon

http://youtu.be/5-IXAe0UOYg

 

 I made my comment:

the simulation takes its eyes off the plane as it the point of reference pulls back from the lamp posts perspective and moves to the security camera lens. You couldn't make that continuous because the plane at the proper scale would simply be too big to be hidden behind the pass reader box. I have challenged you with my video - Dick Eastman Pentagon I have called you on this before - with no response. Once your deception is pointed out your simulation becomes more evidence of cover-up.