Custom Search

NIST's Role in 9/11 Cover-up (with videos)

Sterling D. Allan

Established to be a pillar of scientific accuracy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has prostituted itself in the case of its role in helping the dark elements of the U.S. Government to cover their tracks of culpability in the 9/11 tragedy.

Compiled by Sterling D. Allan,
Son of NIST atomic clock physicist
First posted Dec. 10, 2009

"In the case of WTC 7 [...], for 100 feet of free fall to take place, they had to completely remove 8 floors of structural support, uniformly across the entire width of the building, simultaneously, to within a fraction of a second. This cannot happen naturally. It is a clear smoking gun for controlled demolition. ...Conclusion: On the first round, NIST falsified measurements in order to deny free-fall. It then turned around and admitted free-fall but denied its significance. ...Free-fall requires that explosives had to be used. Planting explosives in WTC7 would require time and high-level access to this very secure building well before 9/11. Whoever rigged WTC7 was clearly complicit in the entire 9/11 operation. Given that NIST knows what they are doing, we can be justified in calling their methodology 'fraudulent'. Fraudulent behavior in this context constitutes participation in a criminal cover-up." -- David Chandler, high school Physics teacher, at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.

Overview

NIST has become party to the 9/11 cover-up, falsifying information, cooking the data, and otherwise acting in disregard to the ethics of science it is supposed to not only uphold but epitomize as the official body for the United States establishing standards of measurement. NIST is supposed to be the final word on measurement accuracy, but in the case of 9/11, they have prostituted themselves at the hands of their Federal masters who are likewise involved in the cover-up. They have thus become another tool in helping to establish a world socialist dictatorship under the control of a sinister, insider elite.

On Aug. 2008, NIST published their findings that the World Trade Center buildings came down "due to fire alone."

Contrary to the Federal Government official story supported by the NIST report, many facts point to controlled demolition being the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7:

Falling at near free-fall speed
Falling into their footprint
Symmetrical "collapse" through path of greatest resistance
Pulverization of the building into powder
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
Squibs (horizontal, outward explosions) seen in advance of the collapsing portion
Many explosions heard by emergency personnel on the scene
Thermite and nanothermite found in the dust
The occurrence of micro-spheres in the dust, which could only happen under super high temperatures (from thermitic reactions), not consistent with a building fire fire
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
Liquid iron in the wreckage a month after the collapse (from continued thermite reaction)
The fact that never before had a fire caused a steel structure building to fail
The fact that the buildings had recently undergone elevator upgrades, giving access to the support structure
The fact that the building had an emergency evacuation just a few days prior to 9/11 in which security cameras were disabled (providing access)
The owner of WTC building 7 (Larry Silverstein) videotaped saying that they "pulled" (demolished) the building
Cover-up galore by those who were capable of pulling this off

None of the characteristics of destruction by fire were present:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

Volumes of evidence and commentary on each of the above points are found throughout the web, but are presented concisely on the home page of http://ae911truth.org in the right hand column with links to supporting evidence.

Here's a brief TV snippet interview with a key spokesman of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

700 architects and engineers calling for new 911 building collapse investigation (video) - Richard Gage, who specializes in steel-frame, fireproof buildings, acts as spokesman for a body of Engineers who are questioning the official explanation for the collapse of the three towers in New York on 911, citing the controlled demolition behavior of the collapse as well as discovery of demolition-consistent materials in the dust. Dark insider ramifications. (KMPH, Fox 26; Fresno; posted on YouTube; May 28, 2009) (Want to Know)

Relevant Links

http://Journalof911Studies.com - (articles are peer reviewed)
- Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction - Steven E. Jones, et al.
  Abstract: In an effort to better understand the conditions that led to complete collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC 7, we apply scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (XEDS) methods to analyze the dust generated, with an emphasis on observed micro-spheres in the WTC dust. The formation of molten spheres with high iron contents along with other species in the WTC dust required extremely high temperatures. Our results are compared with those of other laboratories. The temperatures required for the molten sphere-formation and evaporation of materials as observed in the WTC dust are significantly higher than temperatures associated with the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings. (Jan. 2008)
- Controlled Demolition at the WTC: a Historical Examination of the Case - Frank Legge (PhD Chem) - "I got hold of some software, FrameShots, free on the internet, and examined the videos, frame by frame. ( There is better software available now.) I was able to confirm that the initial movement of all three buildings was suspiciously fast. In the case of WTC 7 the initial acceleration was so close to free fall that there could be no doubt that all the columns, or most of the columns, must have been severed simultaneously." Discredits the 2008 NIST report. (May, 2009)
- 9/11 and Probability Theory - Frank M Legge (BSc, PhD) gives a summary which compares the official theory with the alternative explosive demolition theory in terms of their relative probability. (10 June 2008)
- The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites (7-02-08) - Some argue that NIST failed to look for evidence of explosives simply because they were ignorant of such matters. This is clearly not the case as Kevin Ryan shows. “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.” -- NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction - Paper by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al., diplomatically questioning and rebutting the conclusions of the NIST report. (Reprinted with permission of Dr. Jones) (The Open Civil Engineering Journal; 2008, 2, 35-40)
Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-up of the Crime of the Century - Jim Huffman points out that the 10,000-page report by NIST is a "distraction," such as 1000 pages modeling the airplane, while only 1/2 page is spent on the core assumption of the "collapse initiation" and the following "global collapse."
http://www.AE911truth.org - Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. Sign the petition for a REAL investigation.
http://www.stj911.org - Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
http://firefightersfor911truth.org - Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.com - Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
http://rl911truth.org/index.php - Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
http://mp911truth.org - Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Videos Regarding NIST Cover-up

Lead Engineer for NIST Report Caught in Bold-Faced Lie about Molten Metal

Here's a video of John Gross, lead engineer of the NIST report, saying that there were no witnesses whatsoever of molten metal, compared to the evidence of a plethora of eyewitnesses, photos, and video of molten metal provided by Richard Gage to the contrary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo8nJHciHQ8#t=5m43s

John Gross says: "First of all, let's go back to your basic premise that there was a pool of molten steel. I know of absolutely nobody, no eyewitnesses who said so, nobody who's produced it."

Molten metal, more than a month after the attack, is probably the most obvious smoking gun of pre-planted explosives of demolition charges. Thermite or thermate continue to react with metal, and that is why there was molten metal so long afterward.

That John Gross would make such a blatant lie about something so well-proven, shows the degree to which NIST is going in covering up this crime.

NIST's lead investigator into the WTC attacks, John Gross, is caught lying, saying that he has not seen nor knows of anyone who has seen liquefied metal in the WTC rubble. This video shows the many contradictions to his assertion. (''YouTube''; July 09, 2009)

* * * *

WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall, But . . .

In this three-part series, physicist David Chandler, on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, documents the "dry labbing" done by NIST regarding World Trade Center building 7, in which measurements are falsified to support a pre-determined outcome.

Here's a synopsis of the data, followed by the video presentation by David Chandler.

David Chandler's data from video analysis		NIST's data from video analysis

		The above graph by NIST shows rounded beginnings and ends, before and after the free-fall Phase II, to save face from earlier pronouncements of a total fall time in excess of 5.6 seconds, in support of their theory of downward resistance by an in-tact building, as opposed to free-fall dropping which would imply pre-placement of demolition charges, and conspiracy, and cover-up. The analysis shown at the left, in contrast to the curves shown by NASA above, shows a sudden change from stationary to free-fall. As you visually inspect building 7 falling, does it not look like a classic case of planned demolition?

"I think the 2.25-second period of actual free-fall acceleration (over 100 feet) admitted to by NIST is indeed compelling evidence for explosives use: what else could have moved hundred of thousands of tons of steel support columns and concrete out of the way to permit fall with no resistance?" -- Dr. Steven E. Jones, Sept. 11, 2009, close friend of David W. Allan

(Part I)

(Part II)

(Part III)

See also the presentation by David Chandler at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology in a session entitled "Power Crimes." Posted Nov. 7, 2009.

* * * *

9/11: Blueprint for Truth

In the 2008 edition of this multimedia presentation, filmed professionally in a studio before a live audience, San Francisco Bay Area architect, Richard Gage, AIA, provides the myth-shattering scientific forensic evidence of the explosive controlled demolition of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings on September 11, 2001. Gage is the founder and key spokesman for the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which now has more than 800 distinguished members. Below is embedded his 13-part presentation.

* * * *

NASA Engineer, Duane Deets

In December, 2009, Duane Deets, former NASA engineering executive, was interviewed on Jackalope 105FM. Deets is also a distinguished member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Parts 2 and 3 of this 6-part YouTube video address the official story's obvious violations of the laws of physics and NIST's obfuscation of the facts regarding 911.

* * * *

WTC 7 -- Classic Controlled Demolition

Here are some resources contradicting the "official report" supported by the NIST report, that WTC7 came down by fire alone.

9/11 Coincidences (Part Seven) - [from the description:] WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein said to the fire department commander "the smartest thing to do is pull it." Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to "blow up". The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint. Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris. There can be only one conclusion as to what happened to WTC 7 - it was demolished. Silverstein Properties made billions from the insurance policies he set up on the WTC complex just a few weeks before 9/11. He specifically took out insurance policies to cover terrorist attacks, and got double his policy because of the two planes that hit the neighboring building.

NIST Whistleblowers

Dr. James Quintiere, Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division calls for an independent investigation: "Let's look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Towers." See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt6YOwZS4Zs#t=4m51s

(These YouTube urls point to the exact time stamp of relevance.)

Kevin Ryan of NIST was fired because he pointed out that NIST fudged in their usage of the Underwriter Lab tests of the modeling, which had concluded that "the buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by..burning jet fuel [and office materials]." See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt6YOwZS4Zs#t=5m08s

Balanced, Independent Coverage

Explosive Theory - Balanced coverage by Silicon Valley's #1 weekly newspaper points out that a growing organization of building trades professionals suspect that there was more to the 9/11 event than the government will admit. Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, says the World Trade Center couldn't possibly have been brought down by planes. Correction: there is protest from within NIST. (MetroActive; 09/09/09)

Four Winds 10 - News