Is US ‘Occupying’ Pakistan? 38 Pakistanis Killed By CIA Drones Every Day Since 2006
eremy Scahill
Not only killing Pakistanis, but the U.S. is quietly increasing the number of its soldiers based in Balochistan and NWFP, and is building a massive military fortress right behind the Presidency and PM House in Islamabad that will cost one billion dollars. The arrival of the Americans comes with increased separatist chatter inside Sindh, Balochistan, NWFP, and the Northern Areas. The silence of the Zardari government has been bought for US $ 1.5 billion. Gradually, America will turn Pakistan to a mess like Iraq, with sectarian killings and proxy wars. The Pakistani people and the military need to wake up.
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Three days after his inauguration, on January 23, 2009, President Barack Obama ordered U.S. predator drones to attack sites inside of Pakistan, reportedly killing 15 people. It was the first documented attack ordered by the new U.S. Commander in Chief inside of Pakistan.
Since that first Obama-authorized attack, the U.S. has regularly bombed Pakistan, killing scores of civilians. The New York Times reported that the attacks were clear evidence Obama “is continuing, and in some cases extending, Bush administration policy.”
In the first 99 days of 2009, more than 150 people were reportedly killed in these drone attacks. The most recent documented attack was reportedly last Thursday in Waziristan. Since 2006, the U.S. drone strikes have killed 687 people (as of April). That amounts to about 38 deaths a month just from drone attacks.
The use of these attack drones by Obama should not come as a surprise to anyone who followed his presidential campaign closely. As a candidate, Obama made clear that Pakistan’s sovereignty was subservient to U.S. interests, saying he would attack with or without the approval of the Pakistani government. Obama said if the U.S. had “actionable intelligence” that “high value” targets were in Pakistan, the U.S. would attack. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, echoed those sentiments on the campaign trail and “did not rule out U.S. attacks inside Pakistan, citing the missile attacks her husband, then-President Bill Clinton, ordered against Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in 1998. ‘If we had actionable intelligence that Osama bin Laden or other high-value targets were in Pakistan I would ensure that they were targeted and killed or captured,’ she said.”
Last weekend, Obama granted his first extended interview with a Pakistani media outlet, the newspaper Dawn :
Responding to a question about drone attacks inside Pakistan’s tribal zone, Mr. Obama said he did not comment on specific operations.
‘But I will tell you that we have no intention of sending U.S. troops into Pakistan. Pakistan and its military are dealing with their security issues.’
There are a number of issues raised by this brief response offered by Obama. First, the only difference between using these attack drones and using actual U.S. soldiers on the ground is that the soldiers are living beings. These drones sanitize war and reduce the U.S. death toll while still unleashing military hell disproportionately on civilians. The bottom line is that the use of drones inside the borders of Pakistan amounts to the same violation of sovereignty that would result from sending U.S. soldiers inside the country.
Obama defended the attacks in the Dawn interview, saying:
“Our primary goal is to be a partner and a friend to Pakistan and to allow Pakistan to thrive on its own terms, respecting its own traditions, respecting its own culture. We simply want to make sure that our common enemies, which are extremists who would kill innocent civilians, that that kind of activity is stopped, and we believe that it has to be stopped whether it’s in the United States or in Pakistan or anywhere in the world.”
Despite Obama’s comments about respecting Pakistan “on its own terms,” this is how Reuters recently described the arrangement between Pakistan and the U.S. regarding drone attacks:
“U.S. ally Pakistan objects to the U.S. missile strikes, saying they violate its sovereignty and undermine efforts to deal with militancy because they inflame public anger and bolster support for the militants. Washington says the missile strikes are carried out under an agreement with Islamabad that allows Pakistani leaders to publicly criticize the attacks. Pakistan denies any such agreement.”
Pakistan is now the biggest recipient of U.S. aid with the House of Representatives recently approving a tripling of money to Pakistan to about $1.5 billion a year for five years. Moreover, U.S. special forces are already operating inside of Pakistan, along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Baluchistan.
According to the Wall Street Journal , U.S. Special Forces are:
“… training Pakistan’s Frontier Corps, a paramilitary force responsible for battling the Taliban and al Qaeda fighters, who cross freely between Afghanistan and Pakistan, the officials said. The U.S. trainers aren’t meant to fight alongside the Pakistanis or accompany them into battle, in part because there will be so few Special Forces personnel in the two training camps. A senior American military officer said he hoped Islamabad would gradually allow the U.S. to expand its training footprint inside Pakistan’s borders.”
In February, The New York Times reported that U.S. forces are also engaged in other activities inside of Pakistan:
“American Special Operations troops based in Afghanistan have also carried out a number of operations into Pakistan’s tribal areas since early September, when a commando raid that killed a number of militants was publicly condemned by Pakistani officials. According to a senior American military official, the commando missions since September have been primarily to gather intelligence.”
It is clear — and has been for a long time — that the Obama administration is radically expanding the U.S. war in Afghanistan deeply into Pakistan. Whether it is through U.S. military trainers (that’s what they were called in Vietnam too), drone attacks or commando raids inside the country, the U.S. is militarily entrenched in Pakistan. It makes Obama’s comment that “[W]e have no intention of sending U.S. troops into Pakistan” simply unbelievable.
For a sense of how significant U.S. operations are and will continue to be for years and years to come, just look at the U.S. plan to build an almost $1 billion massive U.S. “embassy” in Islamabad, which is reportedly modeled after the imperial city they call a U.S. embassy in Baghdad. As we know very clearly from Iraq, such a complex will result in an immediate surge in the deployment of U.S. soldiers, mercenaries and other contractors.
Jeremy Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He blogs at RebelReports.com .
Also See:
US, Israel and India backing Baitullah Mehsud: reveals close aide
Confirmed: Pakistani Taliban Using Indian/US Weapons
Video: Why Baitullah Mehsud Is CIA-Indian Asset?
End of Fake Taliban: Pakistan offensive to target Baitullah Mehsud
Is U.S. Trying To Save Agent Mehsud?
Zionist Agenda From Kabul to Islamabad
Indian RAW funded Swat terrorists:$650 million to destabilize Pakistan
India is supporting Taliban against Pakistan says US intelligence official
Report:India is trying to separate Balochistan from Pakistan
Pakistan Tells America To Stop Supporting Insurgents Inside Pakistan
Who is behind TTP’s Terrorists?
Thoughts On The War Between The USA And Pakistan
Report:India is trying to separate Balochistan from Pakistan
Pakistan: Malik blames Brahmdagh, India for Balochistan conditions
The Destabilization of Pakistan: Finding Clarity in the Baluchistan Conundrum
RAW Facts on South Asia- India Fails to Occupy Countries
RAW Network In Afghanistan Destabilizing Pakistan
Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) Terrorism- Global Security Intel Report
India: Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) Terrorism
Sri Lanka Defeated Indian RAW Game Plan
RAW On The Mission Of Obliterating Regional Peace
US Report: Direct RAW Involvement In East Pakistan Secession
India: Exporting Terrorism In The Name Of Largest Democracy
RAW: An Instrument of Indian Imperialism
Pakistan and China versus Mossad, CIA, RAW and MI6
Video: Obama targets Pakistan – Who’s behind it?
Israeli Terrorism = U.S Invasion Of Pakistan
Video: The Project for New American Century Exposed!Updated
The Destabilization of Pakistan: Finding Clarity in the Baluchistan Conundrum
US planning to partition Pakistan: Poll
After Iraq and Afghanistan, Is it Pakistan?
US-NATO Military Agenda: The Destabilization of Pakistan
US-Indian Plans Exposed: NAS RUN MIN ALLAH HAI WA FATAH UN QAREEB!
Cut CIA’s Footprint In Pakistan
Cornering the Nuclear-Pawed Cat
A Simple Guide To Pakistan’s Enemies
What About America’s Responsibility For The ‘AfPak’ Mess?
SPECIAL REPORT: US Grand Designs on Pakistan
Media Disinformation: Reframing the War in Afghanistan and Pakistan as a “Class War”